7
Wayshuba 7 points ago +7 / -0

Funny you say that because Q has posted "These People are Stupid" 28 times.

Among those is this gem from post 2446:

The Senate was the target.

Corker + Flake removed.

How do you catch a fish?

Mission forward.

These people are stupid.

Q

2
Wayshuba 2 points ago +2 / -0

Interesting.... following you example:

Feb. 19, 2021 is when the Supreme Court hears all the evidence for multiple states regarding vote fraud.

2+1+9+2+0+2+1=17

Where have I seen that number before?

3
Wayshuba 3 points ago +3 / -0

What people need to wake up to is this has nothing to do with impeachment.

Notice they keep comparing it to 9/11 - which is asinine in itself.

Remember what came from 9/11? The Patriot Act.

They are setting this up to once again pass legislation that will further destroy the Constitution. Just watch.

4
Wayshuba 4 points ago +4 / -0

Cates points out that they are trying to get out in front of the "stolen" election.

I would argue that, with the evidence of direct foreign interference and collaboration in the election shown in the Lindell video, more importantly they are trying to get out in front of TREASON.

I sometimes believe that [they] believe the conspiracy on the November election is so massive that no one is going to bring them to task for this.

3
Wayshuba 3 points ago +3 / -0

The traitors who conspired on this crime are the easy part when the time comes - and it will.

The hard part is the other nations committed an outright act of war against the US. This is what I believe they are most preparing for.

Bear in mind, the people in the US involved with this are acting on behalf of foreign nations. Yes, it is treason. Yes, most Americans are fed up and want to see justice for the largest crime ever committed in US history. But, outside of the traitors, we also have to remember that these foreign nations did this for a reason and that also has to be dealt with as well.

4
Wayshuba 4 points ago +4 / -0

Because of what they have gotten away with, particularly in 2020....

Mask mandates are illegal.

Forcing businesses closed without due process of law is unconstitutional.

Forcing people to stay home is unconstitutional.

Governors have ignored law and even the courts and become a law on to themselves. Under the 14th Amendment, Clause 3 this makes them ineligible to hold office.

Now they committed the greatest crime and literal treason against the US in the last election.

So, the big answer to your question is, BECAUSE WHO IS GOING TO STOP THEM?

3
Wayshuba 3 points ago +3 / -0

On more than one occasion Q said to forgive typos because they were on the move. Q also mentioned Wizards and Warlocks as a small group of people who commanded the whole thing.

Also, Flynn mentioning there is not a plan may just be spreading disinformation. He still seems very confident that Trump is going to be President again soon for another 4 years. That kind of confidence comes from knowing something - meaning there has got to be some sort of plan.

2
Wayshuba 2 points ago +2 / -0

This debate has gone back and forth and, I will admit, I am not sold on whether it is the White House or the studio lot. Personally, I am leaning towards the White House.

That being said, there are still some unexplained anomalies with the Oval Office that I have noticed and yet have not seen a good explanation for.

1.) There are many shots where the reflection of studio lights is clear as day in the windows behind Xiden on the desk. Past photos of the Oval Office with Trump or others show they simply turn up the cove lighting in the room for media shots. You will also notice that the lighting is much whiter than when videos of Trump or Obama in the Oval Office are signing things.

2.) Look at photos of the last days in office of a predecessor President and the first day of a new President. The Oval Office in those photos is ALWAYS the decor of the outgoing President. Trump was still in the Oval Office the morning of inauguration day, yet we are supposed to believe that an interior decorating team refurbished the Oval Office in less than six hours? Photo evidence from the past has shown this has never happened before, yet it did specifically for Xiden. Something here doesn't add up.

2
Wayshuba 2 points ago +2 / -0

You last line says it all, "It's not perfect," and that was my point. In other words, you can still spot a deep fake even with today's tech.

In addition, like I said, it will also depend on the content. If there emerge videos of crimes with children, no one is going to believe someone would put something with that content together just to add a deep fake face.

10
Wayshuba 10 points ago +10 / -0

The problem with their Deep Fake narrative is what the content of the videos themselves contain.

If their are videos of some very disturbing actions, no one is going to see them as deep fakes.

Furthermore, these deep fakes are limited in that they handle straight one facial features and are still not perfect. Refer to the recent finale of the Mandalorian with the Luke Skywalker facial reveal to understand.

2
Wayshuba 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's what I thought as well when I first viewed this. My signature originally was in perfect angled cursive. Now, I sign so many documents in the course of a week, that it has a much more hurried appearance today.

At least that's what I believed until the end of last week when my wife and I had dinner with two friends, one of which is a detective with 21 years experience and also a handwriting expert (which she developed as part of her job).

She had me write out four or five ways I have signed my name over the past. So I did my various signatures as they have evolved over forty years. Then she proceeded to point out how there are certain forms within all my signatures that haven't changed at all over forty years - maybe in look but not in the form I wrote those letters.

So I then asked her to look at the image of the two Biden signatures and give me her opinion and she said, very matter-of-factly, those are not signatures from the same person and the two dead give aways were the "B" in Biden and it's connection to the "i" next. She then went into a bit of explanation how she knew they were from different people, which is too much to recall here, but suffice it to say my opinion has changed after someone I respect who is an expert in the matter convinced me otherwise.

3
Wayshuba 3 points ago +3 / -0

I meant the implication, or assumption, because she has a Q pendant on. I am not saying she is a white hat at all.

12
Wayshuba 12 points ago +12 / -0

There is NO WAY she is a deep cover white hat.

I could understand that with most of what she did, but the intentional murder of thousands of Michigan citizens is NOT something a white hat would do.

Not to mention she is one of four governors Q called out for murder (the other being Cuomo, Wolf and Murphy)

9
Wayshuba 9 points ago +9 / -0

You really believe Trump would sign a carefully crafted EO in 2018 and not know what it implicated and how it could be used?

If anyone hasn't figured it out yet:

1.) Trump not only knew they were going to commit election fraud, he knew the actual plan and basically told us BEFORE they did things what they were going to do and they did them anyway.

2.) At any point, knowing the plan in advance for the fraud he could have taken steps at any point to have stopped it - like Q said was done in 2016. Yet he didn't. This would have been the obvious way to stop the fraud if the intent was a second term in office.

3.) Trump also KNEW the courts would find every reason NOT to hear the cases. Throughout the process he was sending tweets to remind people at various steps (certification, etc.) of the law. This was done on purpose because it implicates them as KNOWINGLY certifying fraud (and catches them all in the treason). He needed to expose to the American People that the system was so corrupt that this kind of massive conspiratorial crime could be pulled off and lead the country into Communism.

4.) Trump is well aware of the steps he could have taken as President to expose the fraud. People that have worked with him in the past and did interviews all attest to how extremely intelligent he is. You think he forgot his own EO? But, he also knows the government has become corrupt across all three branches. The ONLY way forward for the US is a wholesale REPLACEMENT of all government - federal, state and local. As Q said, there are traitors everywhere.

5.) Speaking of replacement, remember Trump's most infamous campaign promise, "Our movement is about REPLACING a failed and corrupt political establishment and replacing it with one run by you, the American People."

6.) Trump still left office with a lot of confidence and a note to the American People that the best is yet to come.

7.) Q has said many times that the military was the ONLY way. However, for the military to be legally used on US soil against the government only one thing allows that to happen under 11.3 of the Military War Code - an illegitimate (belligerent) government must take power.

Anyone wondering why Biden is issuing orders so fast, many of which are illegal? Simple, he knows they have an illegitimate government and he is trying to get as much done as possible before the lid is blown off. There is no other reason for him to be moving at the breakneck pace he is. Let's not forget to mention the unconstitutional actions of Congress through all of this (certifying a fraudulent election, impeaching a private citizen, coming up with national voting laws, proposing making DC a state, among many others).

And before anyone says "but nothing is happening", realize that the US Military is very skilled at clandestine operations - it is how most of our special forces operate. I know so many people want it to happen publicly, and some will need to, but most will be dealt with BEFORE it becomes public. The military's primary purpose is the defense of innocent US citizens. Be aware, that the DS will do ANYTHING to keep from being exposed - and they don't care how many Americans have to die for that to happen.

Trust we are in good hands. Trust that the majority of the military are still patriots. In general, trust the plan. It has been planned and in the works LONG before Trump became President. He was just another part of the plan.

1
Wayshuba 1 point ago +1 / -0

If I heard Washington, U.S., I would think it a reference to Washington State.

7
Wayshuba 7 points ago +7 / -0

Considering the impeachment details that part of the reason behind the "insurrection" was Trump's repeated comments that the election was fraudulent... I believe that is probably going to be a yes.

4
Wayshuba 4 points ago +4 / -0

Once again, a completely unconstitutional order.

They are allowed, per the Constitution, to spend on general welfare and defense ONLY.

Please tell me which of these categories funding overseas abortions falls into?

Once again, they continue to illegally spend money.

2
Wayshuba 2 points ago +2 / -0

Apologize for the late comment here but had dinner with some friends last night, one of which is a police detective. This subject happened to come up and here is what her thoughts were on the situation:

She believes Nancy is most likely under indictment yet currently free (on bail or awaiting trail) and under watch.

She also believes they are US Marshals. I told her I thought they were Capitol Police detectives. She replied that it would only be Capital Police if she was indicted for a local (DC Area) crime, as that is their jurisdiction where US Marshals would be enforcing Federal Law.

She also noted the strange coincidence that when Nancy Pelosi was salivating to get at her mortal enemy (DJT) with another illegal impeachment, she passed of her duties to other House members. While not proof, she said, she did say this was indicative of her most likely being under indictment since law forbids her to lead the House floor while under indictment.

So, being devil's advocate, I brought up she could also be under protective detail. She then said it is obvious she is not. Standard protective detail would have both male and females in the group.

She said there are two reasons protective detail would be mixed genders. One is if some guy gave her trouble and needed to be arrested, and patted down, they would make sure the males in the group did that so their wouldn't be legal jeopardy with a female officer doing this with a male. Secondly, she also said if some large male decided to be a serious threat to the Speaker, they would want an equally large male to deal with the threat.

Then she explained to me that this is the dead give away she is most likely under indictment and under escort - five female officers escorting her. This is done so they can go EVERYWHERE with her including the bathroom.

So, take this for what is is worth. I am just giving you the perspective of a friend who has been a police detective for 21 years.

5
Wayshuba 5 points ago +5 / -0

Right, something plainly written in US Law is a theory......

5
Wayshuba 5 points ago +6 / -1

Now you are grasping at straws and trying to seed misdirection.

(15)“United States” means— (A) a Federal corporation; (B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or (C) an instrumentality of the United States.

The OR does not preclude the earlier definition, in the context it means ALL of the above fit within the context of the law. It means the definition applies to all three things defined.

The only thing that is a dead end is your claim that it is a dead end.

8
Wayshuba 8 points ago +8 / -0

The theory is anything but a dead end.

Begin by looking to the Corporation Act of 1870 (https://www.loc.gov/law/help/statutes-at-large/41st-congress/session-2/c41s2ch80.pdf) this is what set the groundwork for USA Inc.

Then the Organic Act of 1871 made DC a municipal corporation and the states as part of that corporation.

It is a simple as that and why it is called USA Inc. Ever wonder how a company that is really headquartered in Billings, Montana can be a Delaware Corporation? Ever wonder why a Burger King franchise cannot sue the parent corporation? The same relationships were established between the states and DC. That was the magical change that happened that turned us to USA Inc.

Furthermore, one have only look here in US Law (https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/3002) in Part 15 where it CLEARLY spells out that the United States is a Corporation. That is NOT what the Founding Fathers laid out at all when forming the Republic.

What they did to form US Inc. was through clever abuse of the Corporation Act of 1870 and the Organic Act of 1871 was to make DC the parent corporation and municipal corporations out of the States. This completely changed the dynamic of states rights to the federal government and completely flipped the intended structure of the states being sovereign and the federal government simply being a shared services entity for the states.

USA Inc. is very real. The big thing everyone misses when researching the theory is the Corporation Act of 1870. The Organic Act of 1871 just sealed the deal.

4
Wayshuba 4 points ago +4 / -0

The General in Biden's photo is NOT an actor.

The General is wearing and overcoat and scarf where they do not wear their medals or ranks on. We have already had a few Vet Anons point this out several times on these very boards.

Notice, however, he still is wearing a legit General's cap and has two stripes on his coat sleeves - indicating a rank of a two-star general.

The big difference to notice though is in Trump's inauguration the General purposefully kept step with the President, even briefly pausing on one step to not step ahead of the CiC. In Biden's inauguration, the General purposefully keeps one step in front of Biden and Harris.

The military is a stickler for details and that is the one that should be focused on.

8
Wayshuba 8 points ago +8 / -0

Read the notes at the bottom. This site is "doomium".

It basically is saying that it's forecast for the US is because Russia is going to launch a nuclear strike on the US with S-500 missiles and that Russia and China are allied. Yet at same time there is a forecast of Russia only dropping 4 million in pop if they launch nukes at the US.

It also praises Soviet-style authority and tactics saying the western world needs more of that.

So the whole premise is a nuclear WW3 is going to happen in the first half of the 2020s and it is a strike on the US and the US isn't going to be firing back?

I really like to know how much weed this guy smoked when he plugged this forecast in, because even his notes at the bottom of the forecast read like and end-of-the-world idiot.

2
Wayshuba 2 points ago +2 / -0

Right... because indictments this critical to Trump's strategy were only kept in one location.

Imagine if they only knew about a copy machine.

This article is complete BS. Anything that critical is going to have backups of backups of backups.

2
Wayshuba 2 points ago +2 / -0

Again, I stated to read up and study Operation Bodyguard.

In WWII they actually had troops plan for an invasion of Calais, the city closest to England opposite the English Channel. For all intents and purposes they LET certain troops believe this invasion was going to go as discussed and planned.

What the troops didn't know, is they also had passed off information to the Germans how to intercept that units communications. The Germans believed they had the upper hand on the allies because they were intercepting communications of the planned invasion of Calais.

Except that was never the plan, as we know today from history. The real plan for that unit was mis-direction for the Axis. The only thing that was true was that the allies were indeed going to invade Europe, but the details of that plan were purposefully misconstrued to the enemy.

So, tell me again how it is such a stretch to believe that Anons have been told there is a plan, we have given proofs that this is real, we have the reason WHY the plan exists, but that we haven't purposefully been given information of the details of the plan to through the DS off?

The military used the same exact strategy in WWII, but somehow I am being dumb pointing out that we have probably been fed some false details of the plan the same as they are feeding the DS? I am not, in any way, shape, or form estimating the enemy at all. I am trying to point out to Anons that misdirection is an intentional strategy used by the military - as Q has told us many times "Misdirection is essential."

That being said, I hold to what I said. Do you really believe Q has not used Anons to purposefully piece mis-directions together as well knowing we are being watched by the enemy? If you do, then you are the one who is sorely mistaken. We are being told as much as we are being used as part of the strategy. Thus to my earlier point that for some reason you have outright attacked me for, Q has also used our abilities to purposefully go in directions that also send the DS players in directions but we will never know the real plan until after it done.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›