NBC reporting
Federal investigators have tentatively identified the man who shot at former president Donald Trump today in Pennsylvania and he is a male, approximately 20, and from Pennsylvania, according to five senior U.S. law enforcement officials briefed on the matter. W
I would wait on any ID for a while
Apparently people posted pic of a soccer fan in Italy and claimed it was the shooter.
Remember when people identified the wrong Boston Bomber?
I wait since then.
President Reagan was President in 1981 when he was shot.
Such an easy thing to check
Why are people so addicted to pushing this nonsense.
Being outside the event may not mean being outside the security perimeter.
So far, from what I have seen, he seems to be the closest eyewitness.
If Trump were shot anywhere near his jacket it would be caught on the original video.
What do you mean?
There's no bullet hole in Trump's jacket.
I don't even half to investigate to know this not true.
What do you mean?
Has any one argued America was deep blue?
NY is obviously way more blue than the country.
Oddly enough that exact site in Bayonne is an example I use when I tell people I don't think it could have been a demolition.
That area used to be a military facility that they are now opening up for civilian use and they demolished buildings In the same complex where that memorial is.
https://youtu.be/Bq_qZMBJYiE?si=61KXrZJtjN653IfU
Listen to how loud the demolition charges are.
I live miles away from that spot and I heard a rumble when the demolition occurred. Just checked I live 4 miles away.
What exactly would you expect to hear about it? When's the last time you heard about anything from Bayonne, NJ?
And what do you mean directly across?
It's directly across Brooklyn, not Manhattan.
Jersey City is directly across the WTC site. They turned this memorial down. And that's how it wound up in Bayonne.
It was covered when it was first put in, but why should the media be telling us about it now. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2007/06/25/monument-3
This is a source claiming years after it happened that Matthew Perry did this.
What I am asking for is actual news stories that Matthew Perry did this BEFORE he died.
That is, where are contemporaneous news sources for this. It It would have made a big splash. Where are the people on social who were talking about what Matthew Perry posted last year. There's no sources like that.
I'm saying this new source is lying.
Matthew Perry's Instagram account is still active with like 10 million followers. So what I'm saying is if had he done this before he died it would have made a big big splash and it wouldn't be something we didn't remember.
Why did he leave DC with the football?
He was still president. Until Noon.
You do know that there are multiple versions of the football. And that the football was then simply flown back the DC. They changed the codes immediately at noon. None of the codes in the football that was in Florida were active at 12:01 p.m. January 20th.
The football is a communication device worth several hundred thousand dollars. Nobody is suggesting Trump stole the football and kept it.
Both the football and the plane designated as Air Force. One just flew back to DC when he was done.
I've read the devolution stuff and I don't buy into it and as far I can tell this stuff is outside Q
So why didn't he do something while he was DNI?
He was not.
It's a lie.
No he didn't.
Otherwise you could point me to that post or a screenshot or all the many news stories about that post
He was about to write a tell all book and snitch on all the pedos. Damn.
No he wasn't. And he wasn't murdered either
That is BS people have added to a real news story to get folks to pass around their posts to get more clicks.
The real story is Perry was an addict and he ODed and now the people who supplied Perry with drugs are being investigated in might be charged with crimes. Among those crimes might be an involuntary manslaughter charge.
How exactly does a civilian get to Gitmo?
And why would this change the timing?
This was an argument raised by Trump's lawyers.
Former President Trump’s legal team suggested Tuesday that even a president directing SEAL Team Six to kill a political opponent would be an action barred from prosecution given a former executive’s broad immunity to criminal prosecution.
The hypothetical was presented to Trump attorney John Sauer who answered with a “qualified yes” that a former president would be immune from prosecution on that matter or even on selling pardons.
Sauer argued that presidents can only be criminally prosecuted if they have already been tried and convicted by the Senate.
“He would have to be impeached and convicted,” Sauer replied
I don't mind people going slow on investigations like this.
I'd rather get the facts than get bombarded with fake rabbit holes to go down.
Or having to unlearn fake facts.
Press briefing coming up.