20
WhoReallyRunsThis 20 points ago +20 / -0

That's a great point - this totally could've been an intel op in order to flush out who could be trusted; and obviously all of those calls are recorded...

21
WhoReallyRunsThis 21 points ago +21 / -0

I don't know how I feel about this one - Milley is a traitor in general.

In reading the article, it says that our intelligence was showing that China was prepping to be attacked by the USA - Trump is the least likely president to go to that extreme, so the report is a joke. Milley should've reassured his counterpart with the facts, instead of leveling with him in a treasonous way.

In other words, I get trying to reassure another superpower, but seems like it should've been handled completely differently. The fact that Milley is more concerned about his optics, and wokeness, he shouldn't be in any position of influence.

7
WhoReallyRunsThis 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yeah, unfortunately, he might not have seen a plane, but I did.

Literally watched live as the second plane hit. Like most that are old enough, I know exactly where I was, and how eery I felt before the event took place.

I still can't tell you how building 7 came down... LOL, but yeah, there was a plane.

2
WhoReallyRunsThis 2 points ago +2 / -0

The event didn't have Trump speaking much. It wasn't very well thought out... they cut to Trump, Jorge, and Jr just before the holyfield fight, and the commentary was kinda awkward, but to be expected. None of them are great commentators...

But eventually they just went to the fight and regular crew. No real off topic banter during the fight or anything, and there weren't any 2nd rounds at that point, so no breaks in between rounds.

6
WhoReallyRunsThis 6 points ago +6 / -0

Generally, I agree, but I think those with breakthrough infections will now have the antibodies... what gets interesting, however, is the expected severity of subsequent infections if you've been doped up with synthetic spike proteins leading to a larger cytokine storm.

1
WhoReallyRunsThis 1 point ago +1 / -0

To be fair, I clicked out of the constitution and into other categories... it looks like they put that disclaimer on all pages that contain archives:

Archives page for any "Act of Congress" documents

2
WhoReallyRunsThis 2 points ago +2 / -0

Again, not true.

Read the full paragraph. The EUA statement is a continuation for kids 12+. It's been authorized for people 16+.

Wish it wasn't the case.

3
WhoReallyRunsThis 3 points ago +3 / -0

No no no.

As much as I hate that the corrupt FDA approved it for political reasons, this is not accurate.

There is still supply of the EUA vaccine in markets. The new branding has the "same formulation". They were authorized for people 16 and older, EUA continues for kids 12+. Would love for someone to prove me wrong. Heck, would love for this whole movie to end at this point...

4
WhoReallyRunsThis 4 points ago +4 / -0

For being such a 1337 haxor, he certainly didn't look that knowledgeable at the symposium.

I don't consider myself an expert, by any means...in ANY system, but I can maneuver my way around and can google with the best of 'em. His inability to browse through an image of a windows machine was really awkward to sit through. And maybe worse, the fact that he had ZERO idea what a batch file is or how it works was also kinda awkward. Literally it's like a bash script with different syntax...

Equally, I felt really dumb sitting there watching him. He talked up a big game on Telegram before the showing, and you'd think he would've spent as much time as possible scouring, searching, documenting some findings instead of "Fuck it, We'll DO IT LIVE".

1
WhoReallyRunsThis 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think you're right, or at least that's what the paper suggests:

23 complete-genome sequences were obtained. They all belonged to the Delta variant, and were phylogenetically distinct from the contemporary Delta variant sequences obtained from community transmission cases, suggestive of ongoing transmission between the workers.

What's also interesting from this statement (if my dumb brain is interpreting correctly), is that they isolated the 23 genome sequences as all belonging to the same strain... which almost implies that they can detect even the most subtle differences INSIDE of the Delta variant family... I presume it's like figuring out that hunter is genetically in the same family as his gf... I mean niece.

1
WhoReallyRunsThis 1 point ago +1 / -0

Unfortunately, there are several variables that you can't take for granted... One is whether Delta just accumulates more in general (does 251x also appear in an unvaxxed person - which is what is being actively discussed)

The OTHER, and maybe more important variable is the cumulative buildup of Delta amongst healthcare workers. I recall early on in this debacle reading about how the cytokine storm can be dependent on viral load based on exposure timeframe. Thus - are these healthcare workers replicating and continually amping each other's viral loads up?

In other words, if they came in contact with an unvaxxed person without a previous infection, and the virus took hold - what would their viral load be after a set time of incubation?

I'd like to see that.

And for the record, I'm on your side, it's still a good and interesting study, but like @Grease said - we need to win the information war with solid data.

7
WhoReallyRunsThis 7 points ago +7 / -0

Thank you - this should be top comment; I came here to say that the abstract doesn't quite line up with the headline or article.

To elaborate, I think, it's very likely that an unvaccinated person could have 251x the viral load from previous versions of the virus also. You are correct that it simply states versus previous strains.

1
WhoReallyRunsThis 1 point ago +1 / -0

WTF is a "social safety net" when someone you love gets murdered? Is that just money for your sorrows??

Someone please explain that to me...

12
WhoReallyRunsThis 12 points ago +13 / -1

I'm following along as well - posting a lot of scans of a training doc, which bares the Dominion logo.

So far the info is basic bios and windows administration... so be a bit cynical until there's something earth-shattering. He keeps saying "Today we learn..." etc... so hopefully he'll be giving the actual dirt very soon and not just a let down.

2
WhoReallyRunsThis 2 points ago +3 / -1

Yes, I’m my opinion you’re missing something. If we say the vaxxed are THE superspreaders, that implies they spread more than normal. Op didn’t say ALSO superspreaders.

6
WhoReallyRunsThis 6 points ago +6 / -0

The problem is, everything I find, even this article, just says that the vaxxed carry or transmit at the same rate as unvaxxed.

It’s kind of a stretch to say that means they are superspreaders, unless you try to imply that because they feel safer, they are more lax and therefore spread more. I don’t find that to be the case - those folks seem to wear double masks, clear face shields, etc around here.

2
WhoReallyRunsThis 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah, I recall them saying this about Flynn, but I would also like a source on this... not saying it's wrong - could very well be true... just hadn't heard/read it.

42
WhoReallyRunsThis 42 points ago +43 / -1

Because ballot images got released to the public under a court order… so it’s been much more open…but will be interesting to see how that plays out.

Az has had pretty tight controls in place, they get to lay out the case…

13
WhoReallyRunsThis 13 points ago +13 / -0

This is from extensive research/memory from way back in Jan - so forgive me for any small details or errors.

Essentially, the guy who runs that site was connected/referenced/retweeted by kappy or something along the way. Dont' recall specifically, but there was a link to these individuals.

Kappy posted a hash for his dead man switch files.

No one connected the dots, AFAIK, until Lin Wood tweeted out the phrase "cultstate.comhasprotectionsoverthismatter", and it came back to the first letter of each of the lines you see in the image above. It was an obscure pw hidden in plain site.

When you hash that phrase, it precisely matches the hash tweeted out by Kappy... Which is statistically ... well, consider it impossible.

4
WhoReallyRunsThis 4 points ago +4 / -0

When you say no sauce, where did you at least hear or read this from?

Or just wild guess?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›