"No vaccine, no care" is one of the worst policies I think there could be. It runs contrary to the oath, it shits on the legacy left by Hippocrates and it is repugnant to every doctor alive and dead who were actually putting themselves into personal harm's way to do what they could to help people.
And this is with the retarded assumption that these vaccines could even be perceived as helping!
More than there should be, fewer than projected by the doomers who said everyone who took it was going to die.
This continues to reinforce that there were hot batches, so let's hope enough vials are/have been looked into by independent labs to bring the house down.
Even if that ended up being the case they don't acknowledge that as being real.
I guess if we move a step forward and they try to claim that, then that's a red pill moment.
Well, that's the problem. If the there is no verification process, then there is no process.
Ah, shit. Here we go again.
She is not, but she is second in line. She should be involved and educated, and she definitely is -- she's just lying, as she always does.
I don't know that actors are quite as beloved as they used to be.
One only needs to point at the concept of the death of the movie star.
Few actors, nearly all of them aging out, can pull an audience by name.
Instead, most movies have become recycled slop -- worse, recycled slop that relies on the characters that were built beforehand.
I'm sure I'd miss a few, but the list is short anyway.
Ryan Reynolds, Hugh Jackman and Tom Cruise are three of the short list that can draw an audience based on name alone, and they are of course the names involved with recent smash hits.
But the latter two are aging out, and Ryan Reynolds is about two wrongthink jokes from being cancelled.
Gone are the days when you'd see a movie because it has Stallone or Schwarzenegger on billing.
Is there credit for the footage?
Oh I was just joking around, I agree with you.
Considering Blackrock's near total ownership of Ukraine at this point, I guess it's not totally false.
Like claiming you work for the CIA when you actually work for YouTube. It's just a few rungs lower on the ladder!
Ah but then they can't play good cop bad cop to get him to flip. No need to build resentment before the routine after all.
For this hyperbole to work, they would need to acknowledge the likes of Azov Batallion as neo Nazis. They do not. They used to though.
Well, I won't speak to religious motivations but that is not mutually exclusive with communism, which they were and now aren't.
I wouldn't see him as an ally, but I do see it as entirely fucked up that he is able to so easily criticize our country based on what we are supposed to be and aren't.
That he seems more in tune with what our Constitutional rights are, for example, than DC creatures in charge of legislating and making rulings from an elevated position (judges) is beyond fucked up actually.
u/winn really showing legacy media propagandists what journalism really is. High effort.
Only if there are results.
If the conclusion is similar to "no reasonable prosecutor would take such a case" or "what difference, at this point, does it make?" then there is no reason to change opinions.
You should have fucks to give about this.
Fuuuuck no. They keep trying to frame these attempts as white people disillusioned by Trump / Republicans / one offs.
When we get to see what the shooter said and did, we expose a lot more about him and this is starting to blow up a plot to kill POTUS and we NEED to have eyes on that.
Here's a hint: Worrying about "copycat killers" is irrelevant. It doesn't matter. It keeps being proven not to matter. There is something more rotten going on in society that needs to be rooted out, not shoved under the rug away from public scrutiny.
The platform makes more sense to misidentify at a glance than all those times every gun was called an AR-15 at least.
I would like a statement from Elon for why these shooters have their Twitter accounts scrubbed.
I would like to know if Twitter is doing it on government behalf, if they're taking it upon themselves, or if the government gains or has access to do so themselves.
Education vs intelligence, after all. You can be well-read and learned, but that doesn't make you intelligent. Being intelligent also does not make you educated, although if you apply yourself you do have an advantage in acquiring knowledge.
But it's also not as fast as cable, which is why I included the cable latency numbers too. It's not even as fast as DSL.
It IS like than 10x better than the next best satellite services (clocking between like 680-700ms?)
Again I think it's really cool tech and as a nerd I'm fully willing to nerd out about how much better it is than the competition and the potential benefits to resolving a lot of issues though!
People said "who needs faster internet" in the 90s, too. And the early 2000s. They'll keep saying it for years.
But data only gets bigger.
It is not as fast as fiber in either bandwidth or latency, and you would be delusional to think it would be. FttP (fiber to the premises) is much faster than anything Starlink puts out.
Starlink max throughput is 40-220 Mbps down / 8-25 Mbps up with 25-60ms latency per their documentation
Fiber has a higher maximum throughput (100 Gbps options, which is not the ceiling) and best case latency in the low micro-seconds. Starlink simply cannot compete on that front -- and nor is it trying to.
These are also numbers on their fixed options; they list latency at <99ms for mobile, which is much slower than cable.
You can see according to the FCC's 2021 Fixed Broadband report that latency is notably lower even for services like Frontier's DSL, which is ~11ms.
Expected latency of cable is 13-27ms, substantially lower than Starlink's range. Expected latency of fiber is 10-12ms.
Additionally, I had ~50 down and ~12 up in around 2012, and it was costing around $30/mo. Residential is $120/mo.
It's really cool tech, but bold claims are not even supported by their actual documentation.
Imagine thinking that a place like Palestine has legit elections when we can't even have them in the United States.