6
americanjerky 6 points ago +6 / -0

Its creation was a deep state action based on lies that largely is responsible for the issues we have e today dating back all the way to Kennedy and before.

Fuck Israel.

5
americanjerky 5 points ago +5 / -0

I know we aren’t supporting Israel here, right??

1
americanjerky 1 point ago +1 / -0

It’s a great idea but I don’t see how any city has the infrastructure for that aside from ripping up all the streets and adding new piping

1
americanjerky 1 point ago +1 / -0

to be fair, Charlie was shot because stood up against Israel. Why are we supporting them again?

7
americanjerky 7 points ago +7 / -0

Big deal. This pales in comparison to the snake church they built. The pope has always been a figurehead for corruption.

4
americanjerky 4 points ago +4 / -0

Funny how someone is killed by Law Enforcement and suddenly no one wants to talk about race any more.

2
americanjerky 2 points ago +2 / -0

When you’re in love, you may overlook people’s flaws and red flags. Especially when you’re young.

1
americanjerky 1 point ago +1 / -0

Attacking my grammar doesn’t change the fact that you flip flop more than John Kerry

1
americanjerky 1 point ago +1 / -0

Moves and countermoves bro. I guess you forgot that whole bit. Or maybe you just cherry pick the drops you like to get the outcome you want.

1
americanjerky 1 point ago +1 / -0

You literally admitted in another comment “thanks so now I don’t have to listen to Candace” and now claim that you have listened to her. Get you’re story straight because you sound full of it buddy

1
americanjerky 1 point ago +1 / -0

I appreciate that you took the time to write this all up so I will respond.

First off, you’re off base with your claim that I can’t articulate what she’s done. I didn’t make any claim at all. Instead, I am criticizing the fact that she is attacking the only person trying to get to the bottom of the assassination of HER husband, and the fact that she isn’t questioning anything is very shady, because that official story is trash.

The explanation of it being a “sting operation” is junk, I don’t buy it even a little. You’re free to believe what you want.

I never said Erika is obligated to say anything, but that doesn’t mean the rest of us don’t want questions answered. We do.

2
americanjerky 2 points ago +2 / -0

Where did I insinuate that she had a role? I’ll wait. My issue is that a lot of things don’t add up that day, and she is attacking the one person asking questions - about the assassination of her husband and the father of her children. She herself isn’t asking any questions, it’s all fine and dandy for her. To me, that’s very suspect, and I’d like to know more about all of it.

Hope that clears something up for you.

view more: Next ›