if OAN accepts a penny for an NDA they are absolute dogshit
these trials are his campaign trail, paid for by the democrat retards
He probably said it in front of the mirror a dozen times and still didn’t realize how tonedeaf it sounds
Does this mean no more mosquitos ripping dogs faces off so sick fuck Fauci can get a chubby?
They probably couldn’t get approval from Kubricks estate
It’s gonna be framed so silly that anyone who makes the claim it was faked will be ridiculed
Speaker Johnson is a RINO
I remember a time when Snowden said he would be hesitant to endorse Trump if Trump Pardoned him.
How much they gonna sue Fauci for??
hope the juice was worth the squeeze
Break it down for normies. “If the deep state is willing to leverage the federal fucking reserve to get Trump, you don’t think they would self release a virus and blow it out of proportion to rob an election from him??”
I'd like to see the Agency dissapear
I can't agree. He is a professional talker, and he sounds VERY convincing.
We already have a democrat Speaker of the house.
I'm not a smart man but that's a fucking man.
Pointing out the obvious shouldn’t be taken as an insult unless you have some deep rooted insecurity
and you deleted all your replies, how very insecure of you.
Not for nothing but it would have never gotten to this point if you didn’t tell me to just go fuck myself right off a whim. We’re on the same team here.
Just the part where you said “ I DISAGREE WITH YOUR (OVER)ANALYSIS. PERIOD.” Says all I need to know about your stance here. If you think I over analyzed this film, you have clearly under analyzed it, and it is painfully obvious.
Of course he left the film up to viewer interpretation? But the fact that it was thru the lens of a fucking journalist is not up for discussion.
Oh and telling people to “go fuck themselves” over a disagreement of a movie. Real classy. Maybe you need somebody to talk to? I’m here buddy.
Don't get mad at me you didn't get it. It's worth a rewatch. Kubrick's films went over alot of people's heads on their first viewings.
I have also noticed a lot of downvotes on comments I am replying to while having an actual discussion with, obviously an attempt to cause infighting. I'm certain I'm not alone in this too.
I see you, glowboys!
That was just Kubrick's style, he wasn't hitting the audience over the head with the message of his films, which is why he was so great.
He didn't just "happen to be a journalist", That was the story that was written for a reason. The Born to Kill on his helmet, the peace pin on his fatigues, running into his old mates from bootcamp who have now become savages and documenting them, and eventually getting his first kill making the transition from being a spectator into a killer (one of them), played a larger part of the film than you picked up on.
I'd argue that not only is it similar, but I doubt Civil war can come close to accomplishing what FMJ did.
Also not sure if Civil War was shot in a 'fake' documentary style (think spinal tap - fuck Rob Reiner), looks like its just following Journalists making a documentary.
I mean it isn't that clever. Wasn't Full Metal Jacket Vietnam from the perspective of a Combat Journalist? That film was how old?
If journalists are being hunted down then yeah, they are being portrayed as the good guys, I bet they never even touch on the fact that the only reason there even is a civil war is because of their meddling and fake news in the first place.
Anyway, I'll probably give it a watch, but if they make the Sniper with a hello kitty manicure the biggest bad ass I won't be happy about it. lol
PS. Im not the dude who downvoted you for whatever reason they did
From the trailer, I get the vibe that this is the general story:
"Hi We're with the Press and we are the good guys! Trust us!"
If that's the case, not fucking interested.
You just activated my trap card! All my people die!
Did trump run into a bodega for a chopped cheese?