1
bluewhiteandred 1 point ago +1 / -0

it can exacerbate mental health issues but in fairness it's probably in a minority of cases and if the person is otherwise mentally healthy it may not cause such issues

the moral problem is it seems to induce a state of intoxication so would be contrary to the virtue of sobriety

1
bluewhiteandred 1 point ago +1 / -0

didn't watch but is he suspicious of "Francis" too?

2
bluewhiteandred 2 points ago +2 / -0

didnt watch vid but on topic of energy, I'm kind of against or a little for both sides here

use "fossil" fuels while we have them (whatever they are) but also reduce harmful air emissions if you can (filters?)

renewables exist like biogas, wood, etc. and make use of those too

be prepared for the possibility of running out of "non-renewable" energy sources and to be able to rely more on renewables

personally not a nuke fan

2
bluewhiteandred 2 points ago +2 / -0

fetterman still bad on the issues: pro abortion, pro illegal immigration, pro middle east wars

1
bluewhiteandred 1 point ago +1 / -0

"J6" sounds like a distraction from the Epiphany observance (in the West)

1
bluewhiteandred 1 point ago +1 / -0

that was an intense moment in the protests

also "J6" sounds like a distraction from the Epiphany observance (in the West)

1
bluewhiteandred 1 point ago +1 / -0

Francis seems to be neither Catholic nor pope, therefore Vigano ought to not follow him as such; instead he seems to promote the error of the SSPX or Lefebvre where Francis seemingly is both a modernist heretic and the pope of the Catholic Church.

Sure, here, Francis states the "official" policy of the Catholic Church is opposition to such unions, however then ambiguously whispers doubts about this policy and expresses vague statements that maybe a contrary opinion might be tenable... which instead raises doubts about if he is a pope at all, for a "doubtful pope is no pope".

3
bluewhiteandred 3 points ago +3 / -0

✔️pay✔️in✔️cash✔️everywhere

1
bluewhiteandred 1 point ago +1 / -0

no disrespect but should women even be judges

1
bluewhiteandred 1 point ago +1 / -0

aren't there natural antibiotics (like honey)

and also isn't the over-use of artificial anti-biotics causing anti-biotic resistant strains which are an issue

0
bluewhiteandred 0 points ago +1 / -1

I don't really know if ivermectin is useful or not (I have my doubts) but

vitamin D can be free

and other natural supplements are available for various ills

2
bluewhiteandred 2 points ago +2 / -0

it will destroy every monarchy

> implying monarchy isn't a superior form of government

2
bluewhiteandred 2 points ago +2 / -0

makes sense to have kids when you can keep up with them

Yeah, I think there's a whole conversation that just isn't happening... some people are "too young", but then when you're a little older it can become different (or impossible to have kids at some point too, you can get too old)

There are a lot of declining fertility rates and I think this is part of that culture ("too young to have kids" ... to the point where people just don't have kids)

Even if there were a compromise - maybe not 16 but how about 20?

yeah, but I just expect people to keep moving the ages to older and older

3
bluewhiteandred 3 points ago +3 / -0

that's one possible problem, the other problem we are now seeing is more "never marrieds" as a lot of people were told they were "too young for relationships" and then they had a short "accepted" window which passed and now are too old to marry / have kids

4
bluewhiteandred 4 points ago +4 / -0

as the other comment touched on, at some points in history their ages were acceptable for marriage up until like only very recently

I sometimes wonder what people were like as adolescents because I felt very attracted to the opposite gender from like age 10 onward...

biologically in an alternative timeline I could see myself having married as a minor, although it's a good social rule of thumb to delay marriages for non-biological reasons

I only expect this conversation to become more dysgenic, with "conservatives" being against people marrying until 21+ or older ages, playing in to the "extended adolescence" meme

2
bluewhiteandred 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think some people said huxley was one of "them" just saying what "they" were doing

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›