1
branded 1 point ago +1 / -0

Katie Hobbs think the constitution is a joke.

0
branded 0 points ago +1 / -1

How does self representing to the SC make you money ? You sound like a paid shill to me.

0
branded 0 points ago +1 / -1

You claimed that SCOTUS cannot unseat elected members. It can be done. As to whether failing to do their job merits unseating, that is a gray area. You don't get to decide for them, however.

0
branded 0 points ago +2 / -2

Seems like he wants to make everyone pay through the nose by hiring expensive attorneys for everything. The Brunson brothers know what they are doing. We all have standing when elections are fraudulent.

0
branded 0 points ago +1 / -1

If the Supreme Court can't unseat members elected by fraud, you might as well throw away the constitution.

0
branded 0 points ago +1 / -1

If the Supreme Court can't unseat members elected by fraud, you might as well throw away the constitution.

3
branded 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think the cabal is trying to make sure they dominate this land mass after the next disaster cycle.

0
branded 0 points ago +1 / -1

Not everyone is a grifter like you.

0
branded 0 points ago +4 / -4

No legal theory ? So I guess the constitution should be used for lining bird cages, and the corrupt politicians have all the answers.

0
branded 0 points ago +5 / -5

The Bruson bros will appeal. But it won't change the fact that some Justices are deep state tools.

5
branded 5 points ago +5 / -0

CERTIORARI DENIED for Brunson v Adams

https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/010923zor_p860.pdf

Back to the drawing board.

1
branded 1 point ago +1 / -0

Q is not biblical prophecy. I think they have put off the military option as long as possible hoping that there will be a less violent way. This may be it. If not, then it is the military.

1
branded 1 point ago +2 / -1

I did a search, and the discussion was pretty meager with all the recent info coming from Loy Brunson.

https://rumble.com/v1xi6vh-juan-o-savin-112722-video-b.html

This could be the big enchilada. Or not, depending on the whether the SC just wants to threaten Congress rather than go on the offensive.

1
branded 1 point ago +2 / -1

This case is also an insurance policy against Biden packing the court or Supreme Court term limits enacted in a lame duck session.

0
branded 0 points ago +1 / -1

Loy Brunson said that the Clerk of the Supreme Court contacted them and gave them pointers on how to amend the case to make it more likely to succeed and asked them to speed up the process.
He explains it in this video; https://rumble.com/v1xi6vh-juan-o-savin-112722-video-b.html

1
branded 1 point ago +1 / -0

But if the SC was not going to accept it, why did they push it ? They are treating this case like no other. They wield the sword of Damocles over Congress. I think it will come to a head during this lame duck Congress. They can hear it at any time they want, and they are waiting for something to happen. Probably Trump's arrest.

-1
branded -1 points ago +1 / -2

I think they are waiting until Trump gets arrested. Then suddenly the deep state players get arrested and Trump will be elected speaker of the house by the remaining congress members. Since Biden, Harris and Pelosi are gone he will become President again. It will be biblical and a nice Christmas surprise. Not my idea by any means; https://rumble.com/v1xi6vh-juan-o-savin-112722-video-b.html

-1
branded -1 points ago +1 / -2

What is going on with this forum ? Why is nobody talking about the Brunson case before the Supreme Court ?

7
branded 7 points ago +7 / -0

Call the FBI and they will raid your house at 2am and find child porn on your computer.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›