8
cathole953 8 points ago +8 / -0

I'll be honest, I don't even really believe this anymore. Not only because I think the population numbers aren't true (I personally believe that there are less people in the population than is being officially reported for political and financial fraud reasons), but because the methodology used to achieve these "replacement values" is also inherently flawed for a nation like the US.

This is sort of a, personal obsession of mine. Going through all the bull crap involved in the population lies. While it's true in places like Europe, Southeast Asia, etc. The United States is unique when it comes to this topic.

Most nations will only count women under the age of 40-45 in their birth surveys since 45 is more or less considered the age when a woman is no longer fertile enough to have a child without some kind of medical/scientific assistence.

The US counts women all the way up to the age of 65. So you know, add in all the older women that are 20 years past child rearing age will obviously skew the results.

Combine this with the fact that we have the third largest population on the planet, and it's generally considered that roughly 5-15% of our "official" population (20-50 Million) consists of illegal immigrants who have no right to be here anyway and shouldn't be counted as part of the birth statistics. (Especially since they're going to be mass deported/self deporting post cabal).

Furthermore, they also include visitation visa holders in these reports (Students from abroad, seasonal workers with green cards, people on extended vacations: meaning 4-6 months, etc. etc.) Which adds another 5-15 Million people to that total.

In other words, in total, there's roughly 120 Million people included in the birth rate surveys and studies in the United States, that either have no right, or shouldn't be included in the studies/surveys.

Obviously that skews the "official numbers" heavily in favor of the narrative that we're below replacement rates and need to import more immigrants to save our country from population collapse.

It's not that hard to figure out, the birth rate fear mongering is just another fake news narrative designed to force us to accept mass immigration and importation of illegals. All you have to do is look into the actual methodology and data sets they use for all of this obviously biased and skewed bull crap.

13
cathole953 13 points ago +13 / -0

Hadn't thought about that, but inbreeding probably does happen quite a bit with this carp. So assuming that, could that be a large source of the homeless populations in these liberal crap holes? Just formerly kidnapped/bred children who outlived their usefulness, but we're too broken to be used as foot soldiers?

6
cathole953 6 points ago +6 / -0

Is it just me, or does the "republican protestor" look like Bobby Axelrod (Damian Louis) from Billions? Like, it literally looks like they just lifted the actors likeness for that picture?

2
cathole953 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well the few diabetics I know hate the taste of stevia, say it's too bitter, and when they try honey it makes their blood sugar skyrocket.

From my understanding, honey and maple syrup are the actual healthiest sweeteners, but they're also the highest in terms of carbs, calories, etc. So it's kind of a trade off for diabetics. On one hand, you get all the natural antibiotic and antioxidant benefits of honey and maple syrup. On the other, you have to be careful with how much you use since it can blow your sugar out of proportion.

2
cathole953 2 points ago +2 / -0

To be fair, not everyone has the option. Diabetics for example, are rather cost prohibitive in choices for sweeteners. They can't use regular sugar, and most "alternative natural sweeteners" like Monkfruit for example, are rather expensive. So that limits their choices.

Besides, if you listened to every single one of these "studies", you'd see that literally everything causes cancer. I remember a few years ago that several universities came out with multiple studies that said red meat caused cancer, then it was dairy causes cancer. Before that (in the early 2000's) there were literally "researchers" coming out with reports that "Fresh fruits and vegetables" cause cancer because they're fertilized.

Yeah not even joking. At one point, they tried to claim that fertilized crops and red meat caused cancer.

So I find myself often in the sceptic camp with "reports" like this. 9 times out of 10, it usually ends up being a nothing burger created with handpicked "observations" that support whatever agenda they're trying to push.

In this case, I'd say it's probably part of the agenda to force us all to eat bugs and completely artificial food. (Sucralose is artificial in name only since it's basically just processed natural white sugar that has zero calories/carbs, as opposed to regular sugar which has calories/carbs)

Just my two cents on the topic.

4
cathole953 4 points ago +4 / -0

Pretty much yeah. I'd love to live in Oregon or Washington. Two of the most beautiful states in the union. But I refuse to consider it until their crap is cleaned up. So maybe post cabal they'll be an option, but until then I'll stick to deep red states.

7
cathole953 7 points ago +7 / -0

OKC and Tulsa come to my mind. Granted they're more of an outlier than anything.

Regardless, the cities aren't as liberal as some seem to think they are. Take NYC, 21 Million people in the city proper. Assume 10% are actually liberal. That's 2.1 Million people. Which is a massive number, but when you consider there's 18.9 Million who ARE NOT liberal in that scenario....well that's kind of my point.

You can easily organize that 2.1 Million anywhere in the city to make it seem like there's "support" for whatever they're trying to push at any given time. You can even ship them out (which we know for a fact they do) to other states and areas of the country so that it appears like there's "support" for the liberal agenda all over the country.

This is a bit of a pet peeve of mine. People on our side want to claim that california, new york, illinois, etc. are actually red if you get rid of the corruption. But you can't do that and ALSO claim that every single major city if full of nothing but liberal extremists.

That's like having your cake and eating it too.

The truth is much closer to what I've described. You have a decent sized minority in most major cities that are actually liberal, that get's bolstered by out of state "professional activists/protesters" from uber large metros.

3
cathole953 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don't disagree with any of this. In fact I agree 100% with just about everything said. To be honest, this post is the "watered down version" of my original post.

I made basically this exact same post yesterday, but with different terminology and a few different points, and a mod deleted it (Big surprise there, every time the gay talk is brought up, one of the mods get's butthurt. Pun intended).

So rather than risk getting banned by putting it back up immediately, I waited a day, revised it a bit, and apparently it was deemed "sanitized" this time.

2
cathole953 2 points ago +2 / -0

A "secret investigation committee", in the Texas state house recently "concluded their investigation" and recommended that Paxton be Impeached. Just look it up, it's all over the MSM right now since they're foaming at the mouth over "republican infighting".

1
cathole953 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wouldn't worry about that, they'd have to lose 22+ seats for the state house to go blue. And in the past several years Texas has gotten redder on the state level (They've made gains in the house and senate on the state level.), DESPITE the cheating.

Besides, I doubt this crap is gonna last long enough for them to even get a chance for any part of Texas to go blue.

4
cathole953 4 points ago +4 / -0

Had me until you started saying nothing will happen. Tha's showing your ignorance. There's multiple examples (RECENT EXAMPLES AT THAT) of people standing up to the government with armed resistance when things actually go kinetic. ESPECIALLY when it comes to farms and ranches.

Remember the Bundy Ranch Standoff? That was in 2014. I can't imagine people wouldn't have an even more aggressive reaction nowadays.

1
cathole953 1 point ago +1 / -0

HK is the BMW of the gun world. They have a "reputation" that attracts only the snobbiest people who know nothing about their product (Cars for BMW, guns for HK), except it's expensive and "supposedly high quality". But when you actually compare their products to, well, literally anything else in the same price bracket, they always fall short.

Heck, here in the USA, you could literally piece together an AR-15/AR-10 from parts you buy online that would make an infinitely better combat firearm. Really and truly the only thing they have going for them, is they're one of the only "good" short stroker AR platforms, and even then there's STILL better options at both the same price point (LWRC for example), or a lower price point (POF).

Heck, the POF 415, is basically better in every way if you look at basic parameters. Battlefield Las Vegas has reports of multiple POF-415s and POF-Revolution PI (Basically their short stroke AR-10), lasting in upwards of 10K-20K rounds in rapid fire sessions before any failures or parts breakages.

There's no HK in existence that can do that. So it's just another example of a crappy company with an overhyped product, going woke because they're morons.

4
cathole953 4 points ago +5 / -1

Well, I will admit that the TQIA yadda yadda yadda freaks ARE much more mentally unstable than the standard queers, but I still maintain that even the standard LGB Queers aren't natural or normal.

Whether that's parasites, lesser mental illness, demonic possession, or something else I don't know with 100% certainty (I have my personal beliefs, but I don't know anything with 100% certainty since I have the same info everyone else has on the extremely suppressed topic of study and discussion). But I do know none of this is natural, and no one should be accepting of any of it.

Period, end of story.

"Acceptance" is how this crap has always been started. Here, Weimar Germany, Etc. etc. It always starts with "acceptance".

4
cathole953 4 points ago +4 / -0

As I said, I don't support it, and his career has probably been nuked over it. But the context has been left out completely in most cases that this wasn't his first choice, and he has personal motivation to do "Something" from his overly emotional wife who's friend was killed during the shooting.

I will NEVER support ANY form of gun control, but calling the man a RINO isn't accurate either. More just unfit for office if he allows himself to be influenced by personal connections to the extent he would go against his constituents wishes.

To be clear, he IS in the wrong here. But the context around this whole mess is incredibly misleading. Which is the point I'm trying to make.

6
cathole953 6 points ago +6 / -0

I've always said, that 90% of the time, if you get "big" and "famous" there's a price to pay. Don't get me wrong, God is more than capable of blessing people with immense wealth, prosperity, etc. and frequently does so. But if you're on a cabal platform, like youtube and instagram, or you're playing the cabal's game, stocks, tech startups, etc. then 90% of the time, if you "make it" then there's a price to paid.

Wealth, and especially fame, don't come free. There's always a price. If it comes from God, that price is obedience to God and doing his will with the blessings you've received from the Lord.

If it's not from God.....well, this right here is a prime example of that. This man probably was forced into this as some kind of sick illuminati ritual as payment for him and his friends "making it big".

2
cathole953 2 points ago +2 / -0

Here's the thing, China CAN'T become an economic superpower in the post cabal world. Their entire "economy" is a lie, built upon more lies, on top of a foundation of corruption and thievery.

You think the US FED is bad? China's GDP is inflated by at least a factor of 10 by most credible estimates. They're nowhere near as large as they would have you believe.

The literal only way that China can become an "economic superpower" is to force other nations into debt slavery, like what they've done in South America and Africa. And that's only possible with a central banking system. Take that away, and the Yuan is even more worthless than the USD.

Post cabal, China is going to be reduced to a third world status.

As for the Dollar being the world reserve currency, well that may change since the petrodollar system is more likely than not also going to die, but whatever replaces is is NOT going to be the Yuan.

In all honesty, we're probably just going to go back to the "old timey" system, that Russia has been pushing where every country has to do business in the native currency of whatever nation they're dealing with at the time. Which assuming that all major currencies are backed by gold, silver, and other resources at this point in time (as they should be), it would actually put the US in a VERY lucrative position on the international stage.

The USA is THE largest consumer on the planet of general products. We have the third largest population (Possibly second largest, since China lies about their population statistics), the most wealth of any nation, and on average out citizens have far more buying power than any other nation.

And that's all true CURRENTLY. Things are going to be A LOT more prosperous for us in the post cabal world. Meaning our import market is going to explode and we're going to be THE single most desirable market to do business in.

So while the USD may not be the world reserve currency anymore post-petro dollar, we'll still have an economic dominance over basically every other nation on the planet, since they'll all want to/have no choice, but to do business with the USA if they want their own economies to prosper/subsist.

In all honesty, this is basically what Trump did during his first 4 years. He more or less bullied every other nation on the planet into paying tariffs if they wanted to do business in the USA. Even IF, and that's a big if, China somehow does manage to maintain their economic status through some black magic, it's incredibly simple to maintain the USA's status as an economic superpower.

The rest of the world, literally can't afford to NOT do business with the USA. If they did, their GDP would tank, and they'd fall into a depression almost immediately.

4
cathole953 4 points ago +4 / -0

I know this is supposed to be funny, since the MSM is full of idiots who don't know what they're talking about, but Pump Action AR ARE a thing.

Case in point:

https://worldoftroy.com/products/rifles/pump-side-action.html

https://www.ctlegalars.com/pump-action-rifle

https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2020/06/23/hera-arms-vrb-pump-action-rifle/

The last one is a German rifle, built from the ground up to skirt the Euro-cuck gun laws and allow Europeans to have an AR platform-ish, firearm.

This is really more of a niche thing here in the states, basically people who just collect guns for the sake of collecting, and who like unusual stuff, along with those living in cucked states like CA, NY, NJ, etc.

It's really big in Australia though, since their laws allow them to own Pump actions with no restrictions on mag capacity or anything else, so pump action AR's are REALLY popular over there for target shooting (They'll mostly use Remington 7600 pattern pumps for hunting).

Here in the states, pump action AR's are basically a niche item, well outside of PA, because PA has weird hunting laws that forbid the use of semi autos, so they're moderately popular there for hunting. But most will still tend to stick with hand me down lever actions or Remington 7600 pattern pumps for the larger cartridges.

Gun nerd lecture over.

3
cathole953 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes, because Pew Research, a known woke "polling company" who has lied about literally everything in the past, posted countless fake polls, and was wrong about every major event in the past decade, is a "trustworthy" source for estimates on America's religious demographics.

For the record, if you actually look at the methods they use to get these "estimates" and discount their dishonest methodology (For example, counting the largest/fastest growing Christian demographic, the non denominational, as part of the "none" religious affiliation category, where they make up roughly 80-90% of the category.) then you can see the clear pattern that Christianity is GROWING, and growing rapidly in America.

And then of course there's the physical evidence, like more and more young people turning to God, and even older people as of late. Have we already forgotten about the Asbury University revival, that is STILL going on and has spread to pretty much every state in the union at this point, where they too, are STILL conducting a major revival?

The cabal WANTS the United states to be minority Christian, but it'll never happen. All the actual evidence points towards a massive religious revival in the US, just like with the other Great Awakenings. Ever since our nation was founded, it just seems like God will absolutely not allow the United States fall away from him.

Every time we start to do so, he responds with a massive religious revival that ends up becoming a "Great Awakening". Sound familiar?

1
cathole953 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ah yes, so Microsoft, Apple, Amazon and maybe a few others can come out unscathed since they all have $20-50 Billion in cash and cash equivalents. Or you know, just Berkshire Hathaway since Warren Buffet is sitting on a $100 Billion+ pile of liquid cash right now. Meaning literally every other company/Billionaire is screwed like the rest of us, while either Berkshire Hathaway or 3-4 Tech Companies come out unscathed. There's literally no way of making this mathematically work. Especially when most publicly traded companies assets are known.

MAYBE someone like the Koch Brothers (whichever one is still living) could get away with this by using not just US banks, but international banks as well since Koch industries is privately held and thus not subject to the same regulations as publicly traded companies. But even then, there's still not enough liquidity for all the cabal billionaire stooges and cabal companies to siphon off money from the Bank Insurance system and come out without a scratch.

It's mathematically impossible.

6
cathole953 6 points ago +6 / -0

It's one person, per bank. So all of your accounts combined at every bank you deal with is covered up to $250K (or $500K if you're married, but that's still $250K per person).

Meaning if you have a savings account, a checking account, a money market account, and a CD account at a single bank, all of them have a combined insurance of $250K ($500K for married couples).

There are ways to extend this by using services that split up your money between banks and credit unions across the country so that each bank has no more than $250K in it, while you can access the full amount from your designated home bank. But the insurance coverage doesn't change, and there's a limited number of banks in the US.

Quick search says that there are currently 4,746 commercial banks in the US. At $250K a piece the maximum conceivable coverage a person could achieve is $1,186,500,000, which is enough to cover 103 people using OP's numbers for how much cash the FDIC has on hand. And that's having it split evenly, which we all know would never happen.

People like Gates, and Bezos are gonna get a bigger chunk of the pie (assuming they get any), and that's not even getting into the shadowy overlords pulling the strings behind the scenes.

Besides this, most billionaires don't have this much cash lying on hand anyhow. The majority of ultrawealthy people have almost their entire fortune tied up in the stock market.

In the grand scheme of things, Real Estate, Precious metals, etc. are not the favored investment of the ultra wealthy. They don't deliver explosive returns over a short period of time and there's very few (if any) ways to manipulate their value or price by using elaborate schemes.

The complete opposite is true of stocks and equities, where it's so easy to manipulate values, that it's basically child's play.

There's a reason most cabal stooges are tech bros or stock market manipulators, while most "good billionaires" (Like Trump), are heavily invested in actual real asstes. There's also a reason why they're that people who earned their fortune honestly (again Trump), are generally 20-30 years older than cabal stooge billionaires. Because it takes longer to build things when you don't have the cabal backing you up.

EDIT: I feel I should also point out that "Maximum possible coverage" isn't really feasible either, since not all 4,746 banks in the united states participate in in these account splitting services, nor is it realistic sicne most ultra wealthy will have large accounts at private wealth banks and commerical banks due to their resources and investment programs. Take JP Morgan, they require a minimum investment of $10 Million to be a client in their private banking services. So that's at least $10 Million that can't be split between other banks for FDIC insurance. And most clients will have MUCH more than the minimum investment held in their accounts.

There's a reason that all these wallstreet banks have ridiculously high assets on their sheets. It's because all the cabal billionaire wealth is concentrated in like, 100 banks and investment firms in the country. They rarely, if ever, venture out into smaller banks, even for protection.

9
cathole953 9 points ago +10 / -1

See there's one VERY vital difference between what you're probably thinking of (Venezuela and the like) and the United States. Guns. We not only still have guns, but have more than any other point in history thanks to the past few years.

When people get desperate, they get violent before prostrating themselves. Look at every example of a complete disaster scenario in the past 100 years. The most recent would be all the Hurricanes in the Gulf where it's commonplace for people to rob each other at gun point, and rob the wealthy or people who weren't hit for basic necessities before they'll start prostrating themselves like peasants for a meager subsistence.

Going back even further, you have the Great Depression, which is the same era that bank robbers and bandits became commonplace. Again, because people get violent before anything else.

So no, people won't be "working for food" any time soon. They'll steal it and rob people before that happens.

Likewise, it does NOT cover all my arguments. I have YET to hear a single argument about how all of these cabal billionaire stooges will fund their own lifestyle and basic necessities if they lose their entire fortune.

"They buy real assets" isn't a valid argument. How will they buy food, water, etc. with ZERO cash? And it's not like Jeff Bezos or Mark Zuckerberg have any survival skills.

Besides, we all know the areas they live (affluent upper class gated communities) will be the first ones to get hit when the "food riots" happen. It already has. Look at when BLM was rioting and Hollywood "elite" suburbs were invaded and raided and they freaked out about it.

FUTHERMORE, I hate to break it to people, but the billionaires of the world DO NOT control the majority of real assets. That's the whole point of the great reset. They WANT TO but don't. If you look at pretty much "real asset" Class (Real Estate, Gold, Silver, Land, agricultural products/livestock, etc.), the overwhelming majority of them, percentage wise, is owned by private citizens.

The cabal's real wealth is held in the stock market. That's why it's so heavily manipulated. By manipulating stock prices behind closed doors, they can essentially "print money" for themselves with stupidly explosive returns. Ever wonder why tech companies have absurd growth levels (500%+ annually)?

It's because of all the string pulling behind the scenes to more or less generate capital for the cabal. So when the stock market falls, they fall too. That's why they've been desperately trying to cause a real estate crash before they stock market crash. So they could try and buy up as many real estate assets to replace their stock capital when it crashed and burned.

But things didn't work out like that. It's looking more and more like the stock market is going first, which means they'll all be screwed and have pretty much no capital to force their great reset to happen.

So no, not a single one of my points has been countered. They all still stand, but this is still good news, since it just means that the cabal and all their stooges are screwed. Normal people will probably be hit a bit, they're not going to lose everything like the billionaire cabal stooges.

12
cathole953 12 points ago +12 / -0

First of all, that still doesn't account for them losing 97.5% of their assets. You can't even buy a house in most places for $250K anymore.

Second of all, wonderful, assume they buy a few houses in the Ghetto, or some gold/silver. Now what? How do they LIVE while the financial system collapses?

How do they buy anything to live? Basic necessities? All of their capital is in illiquid real assts, so how do they fund their continued existence? And if they're going to try and keep massive amounts of physical cash on hand, then that's just painting a target on their back for everyone to rob so they can feed their families.

I'm not saying Silicon Valley isn't a house of cards, that much is obvious. I'm saying that there's no way to make a rug pull out of this where the cabal stooges and Billionaires/MIllionaires get all their money and the rest of us get left holding the empty bag.

Everyone involved will lose, that's the point. It's the "Great Reset" for a reason. Or at least they want it to be.

Honestly, I don't see this being as spectacular as everyone seems to think it will be. It probably won't be a full financial collapse, as there ARE moderately safe places to put money. Credit Unions, Savings and Loan Associations, etc.

Places that are far more localized and heavily regulated. Saving and Loans Associations in particular are probably the safest institutions at the moment since they more or less are forbidden from partaking in the fractional banking system.

They have to have their deposits on hand at all times unless loaned out, and they're only allowed to make loans to bank members, and even then 80% or their loans are required to be mortgaes while no more than 20% can be personal loans (Credit lines, regular loans, Auto loans, etc.) thus most of them usually just keep around 50%~ of their deposits on hand and loan out the other 50 split between 90-10 with mortgages and personal loans for their members.

Credit unions, likewise are pretty safe too since they're owned by their members and similarly aren't allowed to lend or invest the money outside of approved investments in Bonds, real estate, etc. And they also have similar requirements for liquid capital on hand since they typically aren't as involved in the fractional banking system as commercial banks.

If neither are available, a local bank that isn't part of a larger system will minimize losses. You MAY get hit if the whole system collapses, but you'll be safer than going with a big Wall Street bank.

Basically, it's not going to be a total collapse. The only people in real danger are the massive overleveraged commercial banks who have been cabal entities for decades anyway. If you stick with local/regional financial institutions, then the danger and risk is gradually reduced the more localized and client oriented you get.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›