The OP was describing how the media created Kamala, claiming she was the first to be created from nothing. I. Suggested that Obama was the first,meaning an unskilled, absolute puppet created and controlled. You think that also describes JFK?
Ah... that should be interesting.
Thanks
I thought Obama was the first
So, I am confused. First, is the dude really a Hitler lover?
Second, those fact sheets... are those around somewhere and are they accurate?
How much of this was really his opinion, or was it for entertainment?
For those of us who are not involved in GME, can someone provide a short explanation of what is potentially about to happen?
Not gonna lie... 3 subs lurking in a line in the water is pretty badass.
Tell that to the Islamic neighborhoods in Great Britain and Minnesota where sharia law is now the lifestyle.
good tip. thanks.
This, to me, is what everything else is distracting from.
In fact, I am curious to know if there were any Q posts that talk about the Islamificaiton of the US? Unfortunately, I do not know how to search in a way that I am confident is a thorough search. Does that make sense? So... I am hoping/asking for help.
My hope is that the Q Plan that is global accounts for the spread of Islam.
That's possible. But it is more plausible that that was partofthe script, and made to seem out of the blue.
You or I could have done that. Keep an eye on the clock andinterrupt yourself at the planned time.
Sadly, yes. I am old
Garland and Wray come across as AA players... hardly pros, and not even AAA.
Movie.
I swear this is an SNL skit. It has to be. (Back when SNL was pretty good).
I understand the Q proof. But I have to ask, what is it really proving?
What's the chance Hannity (or his staff) found the Q post and decided to do the "16 minutes 30 seconds" thing so as to tie into Q? The motive could be to have people talking about it, more views, renewed interest, etc.
I have seen many proofs where something ties back to something else... but it would have been easy for the person to coordinate with the Q post.
So, to me this is a Q proof that demonstrates that there are people aware of the Q posts.
who is the second person? julia louise dreyfuss? or whoever that actress was from seinfeld?
and what were they doing? and someone inserted h-man? THAT is funny.
An Orc!
And I am Aragorn
Yeah, I'm not an insider, so my hunch or prediction is probably wrong. I mean, I haven't been right, yet. : )
As we near the end, I suspect that we will see further separating from Q, and I bet Trump will lessen his affiliation with it.
Why?
Think about it... if all that Q predicted comes true, then people will wonder how Q knew, and people will then wonder, "Why didn't you (Trump, military, anyone) step in and stop the shit.". They will not be satisfied with, "We had to show the people, so we let shit happen and scripted a lot of craziness.".
We won't see the credits. Maybe the grand children of our grandchildren born a decade from now will learn the truth.
There will be no " I told you so", because that will only get people to ask why it was allowed to go down this way.
Well, I for sure believe that they did that to create a false pandemic. However, sad to say but I am waiting for the tax to really kick in and wipe out a lot of people.
Maybe fear porn... and, maybe it's the next wave of death from vax injury (susceptibility to flu, etc.). Maybe this fall is the culling.
Now THAT's how you do fear porn ; )
Ah, thanks. I am not on X, so I don't have much knowledge of who's who.
I worship Flynn?
You're just a flat out idiot.
Oddly, there is a plausible explanation for every one of the statements.
So, this X post could, itself, be disinformation by WH's to further confuse BH's.
Who the hell knows? I've stopped guessing and am waiting for the moment where the wheat is separated from the chaff. Only then will we know.
Very cool. Thanks.
Can you add one more question?
"How many coincidences must occur in what you call critical investigations before they are mathematically impossible? "
: )