10
dildoschwaggins 10 points ago +10 / -0

Seems plausible. We can only hope that public awareness prevents this from happening as Q suggests is often the case.

5
dildoschwaggins 5 points ago +5 / -0

Should be 3 times if you want to get technical.

4
dildoschwaggins 4 points ago +4 / -0

Or maybe they’re already been ended. If devolution is and has been in play, this would make sense.

5
dildoschwaggins 5 points ago +5 / -0

Should be zero % at this point. You're seriously thick if you think these are good in any way.

19
dildoschwaggins 19 points ago +22 / -3

Wow...the King James Version to boot! The winning is already strong, and I'll never get tired of it!

3
dildoschwaggins 3 points ago +3 / -0

Wait until he gets wrecked by Trump. He might think he's untouchable, but no institution, regardless of "charter", is above the authority of the POTUS.

4
dildoschwaggins 4 points ago +4 / -0

Fox called it for him.

3
dildoschwaggins 3 points ago +3 / -0

They're getting worse with these doubles...

2
dildoschwaggins 2 points ago +2 / -0

Never, but he doesn't always speak to the anons....sometimes it's for normies.

5
dildoschwaggins 5 points ago +5 / -0

I could see that; I may vote early, we'll see.

9
dildoschwaggins 9 points ago +9 / -0

I'm thinking about them knowing how many ballots to print.

15
dildoschwaggins 15 points ago +15 / -0

I'm having a hard time justifying voting early. Why would I show the enemy my cards ahead of time? Trump keeps saying it, but I'm wondering if we're not the intended audience. I'll vote early if that's what he wants us to do, but I'm not so sure.

view more: Next ›