1
dtxman75 1 point ago +1 / -0

So back to the point. The title is clickbait. The content of the video does not propose what is suggested by the article title. It's a typical GWP stretch on their articles. Thats it. The rest that you are putting here c9mes across as self affirmation. I understand many aspects of what you decided to outline but had nothing to do with the point of context of the video content and the click bait title GWP applied. The video comes across more as a rant and whine session rather than disclosure or bombshell. Although the subject covered is useful it doesn't really have the impact intended, imo. If you actually watched and listened to the interview.

1
dtxman75 1 point ago +5 / -4

Click bait title. This video is just another Giuliani video of him complaining about , we gave it to them and they did nothing. This isnt a Bombshell. This isnt about that "he HAS" a witness. Its a video of him saying we GAVE THEM the witness in 2020. Big difference there.

2
dtxman75 2 points ago +2 / -0

Similar in style, these were fondly referred to as birth control glasses.

1
dtxman75 1 point ago +1 / -0

You must have missed the one detail that would be very important if the testing is true as this says. 20 X 20 Faraday cage and they state there is no wireless radiation for their "experiment".

2
dtxman75 2 points ago +2 / -0

Looks like you still live a happy comfortable life and suffer from 1st world privilege and have not hit the personal precipice yet. The points used on how "bad" it is, are aspects comfortable people get upset about. It can and probably will get ALOT worse. Its interesting how so many are "awake" but still soo comfy. That is the reason we are all in this shit show. Because we are comfy and allow it. If that doesnt break and change then it never will and will be a repeating cycle. Buckle Up if im right it might get real bumpy and uncomfy.

0
dtxman75 0 points ago +1 / -1

lol OK. 1 is an event, the other is theoretical sequence event causal to the origination. Anyway I responded to your comment that if there was a detonation it would be contained and then that the damage would be limited, which wasnt accurate. Cheers.

1
dtxman75 1 point ago +2 / -1

The damage would be equivalent to size, type and source of fission or fusion. The detonation would be equivalent of the result of contributing mechanisms of the device. There is no containment of that. Nuclear fallout (winter) would be equivalent of the blast radius and atmospheric release coupled by the by product isotopes and isotope reaction of the radioactive material used for fission/fusion, causing the detonation. This would be devastating to localized area upward of 100 miles or more. Its not even a case to discuss or debate whether the damage would be limited. Essentially 1 to 5 miles of ground level within the radius of detonation would be vaporized and virtually uninhabitable of nearly any living organism. I would consider that far beyond damage and in the category of absolute. If you are within those parameters the only god that is in control at that point is the outcome of physics and the one you decided to pray to in your brain before it is wiped from existence.

2
dtxman75 2 points ago +2 / -0

"do some research" I would recommend you follow your advice. You can start with our National Laboratories and the DOE programs affiliated with these sites. Specifically LANL, LLNL and SNL. I can assure you, nuclear weapons are VERY real. This kind of logic and comments are outside the realm of reality and hardly worth responding to, but hey maybe one of you will actually learn something if you go do some actual research.

2
dtxman75 2 points ago +2 / -0

I understand the sentiment behind this comment, however in this scenario, IF a nuclear weapon or bomb is detonated, it would not be contained. It does not work that way, there is no known method, options, techniques or technology that exists to contain the fallout and after math of an actual nuclear detonation.

2
dtxman75 2 points ago +2 / -0

That hard situation for sure. I dont know what I would have done. All I can say is I stood where I work and would have lost everything I refused to comply. I was set to be fired on Jan 19, 2022. They pulled back on their policies a few weeks prior and I wasnt fired. But as far as I knew I was going to be fired so thats all I can say to that.

0
dtxman75 0 points ago +1 / -1

Your whiny and blame game comment compelled me to reply. Good luck with that injection

6
dtxman75 6 points ago +6 / -0

I know, thats why those kind of responses to justify personal choices as forced is so melodramatic. I have compassion for the outcome of these events but no sympathy for choices made. Or lack there of, and then defer responsibility to some long line of excuses or others for those choices.

I mean where I use to live or on travel, Ive seen single mothers with 6 kids driving a newer Escalade and buying an entire 2, overflowing loads of shopping carts worth of food, on their WIC card- OFTEN, and none of them were skinny. Yall arent going to starve because you refused a bio weapon injection, especially in this country

6
dtxman75 6 points ago +6 / -0

Proof in point right there. Free will, conviction and fortitude. Nice story shared there. Thanks

3
dtxman75 3 points ago +3 / -0

Exactly. For me words matter especially in context where such things are described as forced. I refuse to allow that narrative to persist unless that truly was the case and I am unaware of very few real "forced" situations, but have heard countless times of circumstances that clearly are not a forced to do something situation.

6
dtxman75 6 points ago +6 / -0

If that were really the case I would agree but in the US and accounts of events around the globe, generally speaking, this scenario is pure hyperbole. I cant speak for every situation but by and large losing your job does not equate to homelessness and starvation. Other countries and the tyranny that occurred I can agree without hesitation that is forced / force category or extreme coercion. I cant count how many times ive heard someone was forced because they wanted to go on their carnival cruise or take that vacation next month or whatever. If I didnt get injected I would lose my job. That isnt forced.

4
dtxman75 4 points ago +4 / -0

And out of that lengthy word salad the one immutable and stable fact that resonates immovable and always will be is....it was a choice. It was not forced. You want to see forced, what forced really means in real life. Go visit, integrate, live, experience the democratic republic of congo that should re calibrate a real world understanding of what that truly means.

0
dtxman75 0 points ago +2 / -2

Well put. No point in arguing with biased, loaded and presumptive extrapolations of personal regard into anothers plain and very simple statement. Cheers

3
dtxman75 3 points ago +3 / -0

But this here specifically identifies the root issue. Roll of the dice. Over something that is injected to someones body. Its a horrible situation. I certainly don't laugh, make fun, joy or hope someone is injured from anything, however when prefacing these stories with "forced" and the mental gymnastics that play out there after by the injected or the circle of influence of the injected is fundamentally at the singular point of construction that created the scenario of mass obedience and psychosis of compliance. Waking up to the facts that its a bioweapon is not enough, people need to wake up to personal responsibility of choice and consquences of those choices. No amount of explanations, caveats or circumstances give credence to applying a label like "forced" into receiving an injection; unless they were physically overwhelmed, restrained and injected, or equivalency of forcible.

My issue was specifically on "forced" its misleading and disingenuous. Not the horrific events and unfortunate fallout of these people and those affected by the outcome which are tragic events.

1
dtxman75 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is notable but not the beginning. Those have been occurring over the last 4 to 5 years. My opinion is done so with purpose so the loss of brick and mortar local banks is slowly reduced. Wells Fargo alone has closed at least 70 plus branches in last 2 years. Alot of the big banks have "quietly".

3
dtxman75 3 points ago +5 / -2

There is free expression. That door swings both ways. Also gos for the expression that alot of people have no sympathy especially with the wording used such as "forced". Which is untruthful and misleading. Just because you didnt get the expected sympathy comments doesnt mean anyone swarmed and is exactly what free expression is.

7
dtxman75 7 points ago +9 / -2

Wow blame everything but yourself. Everyone elses fault. HAD TO CAVE. This is why I have no sympathy you NPCS are the reason they got away with this shit for so long and so extensively. Ghee shucks oh well Im just going to go somewhere and let them JAM a needle into me with some completely unknown substance. What could go wrong.

4
dtxman75 4 points ago +4 / -0

The fact that anyone did or didnt know, should have been the very 1st clue for looking at, hmmmmm should I allow someone to INJECT this substance into my body? Would you rummage through a dumpster flailing your hands around and whatever you happened to grasp just eat it because the homeless next to the dumpster said they did too and feel fine?

6
dtxman75 6 points ago +9 / -3

Looks like it sucks to be the one who chose to let a bio weapon be injected into them and definitely not the person here that you claim has no compassion because they chose life over material society illusions

5
dtxman75 5 points ago +7 / -2

Probably more productive to wish for individuals to make better choices that involve their own personal health and safety. Those examples are like comparing a rocket launch to a paper air plane. Not even in the realm of close. Taking a untested, unknown substance that has now been proven, and took barely any research at all to see that it should be questionable, as a bio weapon injection and choosing to be the experiment for that. Yeah no compassion for people who care less about their own life than they do for the illusion of society that they choose toparticipate in with this 1st world priviledge society we enjoy.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›