Where else would you get material for history books?
a) what if perceivable (inspiration) exists before suggested (information)?
b) what if suggested (fiction) tempts one to ignore perceivable (reality)?
c) what if matter (life) exists within immaterial (inception towards death)? Notice that while alive...one cannot perceive ones inception and death, hence existing in-between.
They’re going to use the main stream media
a) what if inception towards death represents the "mainstream" for each life within?
b) as perceiving (senses) within perceivable (inspiration)...could the suggestions (information) by others become the MEDIA (Latin medius; middle) if one consents to it?
to write false history
a) consider if..."he-brew his-story and jew fell for it" ?
b) suggested words (spell-craft) tempt one to ignore perceivable sound; while suggested letters (symbolism) tempt one to ignore perceivable symmetry.
c) nature doesn't write...those within choose to write.
their own understanding
To understand implies ones consent to "stand under" another's suggestion.
to deny...their own understanding
Ignoring perceivable for suggested puts one into a conflict of reason aka affirm versus denial.
obliterate
a) OB (against) LITTERA (letter)
b) consenting to suggested words (spell-craft) and letters (symbolism), while ignoring perceivable sound and symmetry, keeps one within a conflict of reason "against letters".
- SEX, noun [Latin seco, to divide.] - "the distinction between male and female"
Constant change (inception towards death) divides itself (life)...suggested "sex change" tempts one to ignore that.
remains coded
REMAIN (continue; ongoing) CODE (collection of)...ongoing whole (inception towards death) divides into temporary partials (life). Others suggest one to "collect" while ignoring the "ongoing".
I dont feel free
a) "I" was suggested by others to tempt "one" to claim self among other "ones", hence shaping the "I vs YOU" conflict.
b) "don't" aka "doing nothing" represents the suggested inversion of being (life) done by everything (inception towards death), hence being within a moving system.
c) feelings aka EMO'TION, noun [Latin emotio; emoveo, to move from.] tempts one to ignore being (life) moved by (inception towards death), hence ones need to resist wanted temptations like emotions.
d) self discernment can only be grown by one-self; like for example about being "free" will of choice within the "dom"inance of a balance based system aka free-dom....FREE (living) within DOM (process of dying).
e) what if your consent to use suggested words enslaves you to those suggesting them, while you ignore perceivable sound? Does nature use words to communicate itself or do those within nature shape suggestible words to describe perceivable nature?
I still have my life
a) does life; while being moved from inception towards death represent STILL; noun - "motionless" ?
b) can one within motion HAVE, verb - "to hold in possession or power" life or does the ongoing process of dying holds each temporary life within?
c) "my" represents once again a suggested claim by perceiving one (partial) within perceivable oneness (whole)...
life...and the pursuit of
Life, while being moved from inception towards death, demands ones resistance within perceivable origin...not the pursuit of suggested outcomes.
liberty
Choice can only exists within balance, hence as "free" will of choice within the "dom"-inance of balance aka free-dom aka free (living) within dom (process of dying).
Others suggest "liberty" and if choice consents to the suggestions by the choice of another, then "free-dom" is being ignored for willingly putting oneself at liberty to another one. That's the origin of slavery; folks....
self-evident
Consider if temporary self (perceiving) exists within ongoing evidence (perceivable), then ask yourself if the suggestions of others, sold as "evidence" could tempt one to ignore perceivable (reality) for suggested (fiction)?
all men are created equal
a) ...and by "all men" you refer to each different ONE of them?
b) being able to perceive (partial) perceivable (whole) implies temporary differences (living) within ongoing sameness (process of dying).
c) suggested creationism (implies out of nothing) tempts one to ignore perceivable transmutation (implies out of; within and in response to everything).
As form (life) within flow (inception towards death)...flow to form (inception); form within flow (life) and form to flow (death) represents the transmutation of temporary ingredient (growth) out of ongoing base (loss)...alchemy.
Governments are instituted
- IN (within) STATUO (setting)...GOVERN (to control) MENT (mind; memory)
If mind/memory exists within setting, then input controls outcome. Input implies ones choice in-between need (perceivable inspiration) or want (suggested information). Consenting to suggested, while ignoring perceivable, gives others the power of ones consent to "govern ones mind".
Declaration of Independence
IN (being within) DEPEND (sustained by) requires self discernment from each one within to DECLARE (to make clear).
Comprehension represents a clear mind/memory, while ignorance represents an obscured mind/memory.
not to vote
Can one react to this world without using free will of choice? Submitting ones choice by consenting to the suggested choices of others doesn't give free will of choice away...it just ignores having it and needing to adapt to this perceivable world.
trying to get people
Aka using suggestion to tempt others to consent to ones free will of choice...
not gonna work here
If EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power" represents work, then what exists outside of energy and what does it imply to be inside?
a way to secure
SECU'RE, adjective. [Latin securus.] - "free from danger"...what if one represents free (life) within danger (inception towards death)?
It is progress
Being (life) within progress (inception towards death) implies resistance (living) within temptation (process of dying)...others suggested progressivism to tempt one to ignore resisting.
It is progress...hopefully this starts
Your hope towards the start of something tempts you to ignore that everything is processing you.
DEMOS (people) KRATOS (strength)...voting represents shirking of response-ability (free will of choice) onto others, hence ignoring strength. Suggested democracy weakens consenting strength.
Another cannot represent ones free will of choice...voting represents the suggested smokescreen to tempt one to ignore that. If each one of the many ignores free will of choice by consenting to the suggestions of the few, then the few become the "chosen ones"...
Pirates of the Carribean
Aka sephardic jews pretending to be Portuguese like Moses Cohen Henriques ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moses_Cohen_Henriques )
Lord of the Rings
Who represents the Lord of the KIKE; noun - "circle; ring; a visible sign of an invisible bond; no beginning; no end; ouroboros"? Lord Rothschild maybe?
orlando bloom
Rebuilding of the khazarian empire aka OUR LAND (orlando) BLOSSOMS (bloom)...
For those with eyes to see...RED CHILD (rothschild)
mobile phones
a) consenting to suggested "mobile phones" represents a risk to life.
b) "mobile phone" aka "movable sound" represents a sleight of hand for being resonance (need) or dissonance (want) within ongoing sound...suggested words tempt one to ignore perceivable sound.
emergency alert
Being in-between inception (emerge) and death (recede) implies alert (vigilance; attention of the mind in discovering and guarding against danger, or providing for safety).
to be sent
To be (life) implies being sent from (inception towards death).
sent to all
All (perceivable) sends to each one (perceiving)...the suggestions of other ones tempt one to ignore all perceivable.
UK
a) United Kingdom aka United States aka United Nations aka European Union aka Uniformity aka equality (same) through diversity (difference) aka tikkun olam (healing the world by bringing together) aka e pluribus unum (out of many; one)....represents the suggested inversion of perceivable reality....
Nature sets itself apart, hence from whole (perceivable) into each partial (perceiving). To be implies ones struggle for apartheid (living) within wholeness (process of dying). The few suggest the many to come together, while ignoring to sustain apartheid, hence mixing together (miscegenation); shape masses (mass migration); melt resistance away (the melting pot); accumulate compound interest etc.
b) kingdom aka King (living) within Dom (process of dying) aka each ones sovereign "free" will of choice within "dom" inance of balance (need/want).
Nobody talks like this.
a) if nature talks, then what would one hear?
b) who suggested those within nature to talk about perceivable nature?
c) a BODY represents the frame of animation...what does NO represent?
d) "this" implies that someone talked like "this"...
Words have plain meaning
a) what if one represents odds (life) within even (inception towards death)? What if odds needs to resist even to sustain self?
b) what came first...suggested words or perceivable sound? Branding something implies that there was something to brand before branding it.
c) if you can't describe with words, would that which you can't describe cease to exist?
d) what if the few suggest labels (words) for a system that doesn't label (sound) to trick the many to consent to the label (suggested fiction) over the system (perceivable reality)?
e) words imply letters...can one shape a letter (symbol) without using symmetry to shape? What if suggested symbolism over perceivable symmetry represents idolatry? And what if suggested words over perceivable sound represents spell-craft? And what if just like letters shaped into words can be "bind" within books, so can those who consent to suggested be bind anew aka RELIGION (Latin religio; to bind anew)?
the message is clear
MES'SAGE, noun [Latin missus, mitto, to send.]...perceivable nature sends those within (life) on a journey (inception towards death) to grow comprehension of perceivable. One represents the choice to clear (comprehension) or obfuscate (ignorance) ones mind/memory.
What if consenting to suggested information tempts one to fill up ones mind/memory with fictitious garbage, which in return corrupts ones comprehension of perceivable inspiration?
Don't go full obfuscation
Nature offers everything (perceivable) to everyone (perceiving)...what if one obfuscates self by ignoring it for the suggestions of others?
like a philosopher
PHILO (love, want) vs MISO (hate; not want) over suggested SOPHISM tempts one to ignore the need to adapt to perceivable. Nature doesn't require those within to love or hate...it demands adaptation through free will of choice.
it depends on what the meaning of IS is
Everything perceivable "was" before anyone within can shape a suggestion about what it "is". Those who consent to suggested "is" are being tempted to ignore perceivable "was".
Now compare this to the few suggesting what "is", while the many are lacking to comprehend what "was"? Does that describe the world you live in?
it was never meant to convince
Yet, you already were convinced that "This is Bill Clinton's"...hence giving your consent for suggested Bill Clinton to have.
by digging into each and every individual word
a) what if destroying (by resisting the temptation to mentally hold onto) every individual word would allow one to comprehend more about the whole of perceivable sound?
b) what if I sledgehammer at the justification (word based definitions) for mass ignorance aka the spell-craft of the few who trick the many to willingly use their suggested tools of miscommunication (words over sound)?
c) what if every suggested word based definition one consents to layers more ignorance upon ones conscious mind/memory? How many definitions; redefinitions and contradictions of words do you store within your memory?
d) why do the definitions of words change so that the few have to keep printing dictionaries? Totally unrelated to that...why are the many keep getting less and less sure about the words they used to define the world around them?
opponents' arguments
What if only ones consent to want or not want suggested puts one into an argument (want versus not want) among consenting opponents? What if these arguments are suggested by the few as "reasoning"?
Sleight of hand from the Georgia Guidstones: "let this be guide stones to an age of reason"...
What if resisting suggested (want or not want) for perceivable (need) keeps choice within balance (need/want)?
Take that for deaf phoneticians.
a) "take that" implies a suggestion... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Take_That
b) "for" aka forward implies perceivable (inception towards death) for those perceiving it from within (life).
c) being (life) moved forwards (inception towards death) implies the need to resist while being tempted to want to ignore.
d) perceivable sound communicates implication (if/then), suggested words tempt one into the conflicts of reason.
a play on words
Suggested words represent a play within perceivable sound...
disinformation
Nature doesn't inform...it inspires temporary form (life) through ongoing flow (inception towards death).
the deeper you go
What if being implies center (perceiving) of surrounding (perceivable)?
Religion
Latin RELIGIO - "to bind anew" representing binding oneself by consent to the suggestions of others, whilr willingly ignoring perceivable.
history
He brew his story...jew fell for it.
diet
Suggested diet (want vs not want) tempts one to ignore perceivable hunger (need).
health
Regeneration (living) within generator (process of dying)...suggested "healthcare" tempts one to ignore taking care of health.
where, who and what we are.
a) partial (who) within whole (where) of EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power" (what).
b) suggested "we" (plural) tempts perceiving one (partial) to ignore perceivable oneness (whole).
c) self discernment cannot be gained by consenting to suggested information by others, it has to be grown (comprehension) as perceiving (partial) within perceivable (whole).
d) other partials represent the inspiration (moving differences) to sustain oneself (need) or the temptation (want) to lose oneself within whole...
Zuby and Elon are telling you...
a) they are conspiring to get ones consent to their suggestion, while tempting one to ignore perceivable (reality) for suggested (fiction), which in return would give them the power to define, redefine and contradict the suggested at will.
b) how many has Elon conspired against so far? https://files.catbox.moe/l18pe3.mp3
Prosecute "George" Soros
a) using the scapegoat to distract from his five children, including Jonathan Soros (Investment fund manager and ex- co-deputy chairman of the Soros Fund Management) and Alexander Soros (Deputy Chair of the Open Society Foundations and one of the World Economic Forum's Young Global Leaders of 2018).
b) mocking the ignorant many while doing it...PROS'ECUTE, verb (to follow, to seed)... https://webstersdictionary1828.com/Dictionary/prosecute, hence going after the old branch, while protecting the young seeds.
knows more than others
KNOWL'EDGE, noun - "perception of that which exists"...everything (perceivable) is available to everyone (perceiving), yet it's on oneself to grow comprehension within perceivable, while resisting suggested.
lonely
Growth of comprehension starts with self discernment about being one (living) within all (process of dying)...afterwards one can further grow comprehension about being "alone" aka "ALL(in)ONE", for all represents one in EN'ERGY, noun [Gr. work.] - "internal or inherent power".
become
Becoming implies coming into being (living), hence out of origin (process of dying)....others tempt one to ignore perceivable origin for suggested outcomes. Once again...only oneself can grow self discernment in-between perceivable (need) and suggested (want) by free will of choice.
a) to elect (choose) implies to abdicate (bestow upon others) ones choice.
b) if the each one of the many abdicates free will of choice by consenting to elect, then only the few suggesting elections represent the "chosen ones" aka the ELITE (French élite) - " selection, choice".
concealing his whereabouts
Not from those with eyes to see... https://img.gvid.tv/i/2q9W7tjG.png
a) PEST, noun [Latin pestis; Heb. to be fetid.] - "plague; pestilence; a fatal epidemic disease"
b) 150th anniversary of the Hungarian Jewish Congress held in PEST (today part of Budapest)... https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1462169X.2020.1796371
c) The Pursuit of the Sanhedrin: The Hungarian Jewish Congress in the Tradition of Nineteenth-Century Synods... file:///D:/2.%20Downloads/The_Pursuit_of_the_Sanhedrin_The_Hungarian_Jewish_.pdf
Liev Schreiber on the days off from abusing his children?
Each one within perceivable sound perceives differently, hence being able to express resonant (need) or dissonant (want) reactions.
Therefore; if one perceives sound as dissonant, then one chose to ignore to resonate with it, which happens when one consents to the suggested words by others.
How about this? Does one shape words out of sound; or sound out of words? If it's the former, then why use temporary words to label ongoing sound?