17
HelloDolly 17 points ago +17 / -0

I always wondered why Tom Hanks and other cabal types made such patriotic movies about war heroes. Now when I see the sacrifice so many have made it makes me sad of course as it always has, but also beyond sick to my stomach. Even watching It's a Wonderful Life. "On V Day they wept and prayed, on VJ Day they wept and prayed." To think that so many have died for the interests of so few.

They want us to buy into the idea that it is a noble sacrifice. From the perspective of the men and women that fight, it is. But they are being duped, as are their loved ones, as at some point we all were. I really have come to believe that all wars are bankers' wars. We are nothing but pawns to them. Not even. We are like bugs or ants under their magnifying glass. Here for their amusement. Sheep no more.

2
HelloDolly 2 points ago +2 / -0

Biden was always pretty stupid actually.

2
HelloDolly 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's not really based on a quick review of this article. You can't get injunctive relief when someone stops doing what you wanted them to stop doing. Based on my cursory review of this article, it looks like Biden Administration stopped the mandate before the court could rule on whether the mandate should be stopped.

A different example would be someone going to court to stop people from blocking traffic in protest of animal cruelty or climate change. If by the time you get to court the protestors are gone, the court has no power to issue an injunction. It's kind of the same thing. The issue isn't "ripe" for adjudication.

2
HelloDolly 2 points ago +2 / -0

Came here to say this. Injunctive relief is extraordinary relief. Once the mandate was removed there is nothing for the courts to hear. That's why Biden Admin vacated the mandate before there could be a ruling.

4
HelloDolly 4 points ago +4 / -0

I have always marveled at the fact that these White Collar Criminal Defense guys are laundered in and out of DOJ so they can then cut deals with their former colleagues for their criminal clients.

Has anyone ever also noticed that the most "criminally" fined banks and Big Pharma companies (Pfizer) never seem to have an actual person that serves time? What does it even mean to "criminally" fine a corporation? They always do the math and the answer to the "was it worth it?" question, is usually "yes, we're still in the green." Add to that the bankers and their "mortgage servicing arms" that swindled millions out of their homes by conducting illegal foreclosures. As soon as Price Waterhouse Coopers outlined the audit that was going to take place, banks like Citi "settled" for $350,000,000, a pittance compared to what they took.

4
HelloDolly 4 points ago +4 / -0

"Poison Ivy League" LOL:

"Four justices who graduated from Poison Ivy League law schools (Harvard, Yale, Penn, and Virginia) declared, over the objections of three justices who graduated from the University of Colorado, Denver law school, that:

Section 3 of the 14th Amendment is “self-enforcing, Donald Trump committed insurrection, and The president is an officer under the United States who is subject to Section 3."

5
HelloDolly 5 points ago +5 / -0

The post is about Biden and the document case, but I thought the slam against Stephanapoulous with the word "Liddle" in it was interesting to say the least. That's usually his code for pedophile, no? Here's the full text:

"Crooked Joe Biden didn’t cooperate on the Documents Case, just the opposite. It is the pitch that Liddle’ George StepaDOPEalis just made on ABC FAKE NEWS. “Crooked” sent Classified Documents all over the place, including to Chinatown, in D.C. What’s that all about? Remember, China paid him $Millions, and Joe didn’t come under the Presidential Records Act, but I did, as President. The Fake News and their partners in crime, the Radical Left Democrats, are looking for a way to explain how they can let Biden off the hook, when he’s guilty as hell, but hold “TRUMP” accountable, when he’s totally innocent. This is their new formula, BUT IT WON’T WORK. The people of our Country are too smart for this!!!"

by MAGULQ
6
HelloDolly 6 points ago +6 / -0

I think they troll so that it can be debunked when someone tries to check it out.

9
HelloDolly 9 points ago +9 / -0

Oh wow I remember the KinderCare rabbit hole from the Voat days. Does anyone remember what I am talking about? Vaguely remember seeing pictures of a tall skinny guy in some third world place and for some reason he was connected to this organization. I am going to have to search old Voat now LOL.

EDIT: Here is one of the posts from the olden days https://archive.searchvoat.co/v/theawakening/3344174

2
HelloDolly 2 points ago +2 / -0

I am probably older than you and don't smoke weed at all, drink only occasionally. It really bothers me that my kids' generation thinks you can smoke pot day after day without consequence.

20
HelloDolly 20 points ago +20 / -0

Rewriting history is their specialty.

1
HelloDolly 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't test but I don't control who does is the problem.

3
HelloDolly 3 points ago +3 / -0

But let's talk about that a little bit later...

2
HelloDolly 2 points ago +2 / -0

I understand your point and the distinction is noted. Ivermectin has a decades long history. But both are anti-parasitic, which is the common denominator of many "debunked" treatments for not just viral replication, but certain kinds of cancer. This includes Hydroxychloriquine, Ivermectin, Fenbenzadole, etc.

I have never been anti-vax or anti-medical community. My kids were fully vaccinated and even took the Meningitis vax before college.

Until COVID, I used to believe that certain therapeutics were not suppressed, they just weren't funded for research because there was no profit motive.

After the COVID vax tyranny and "C'mon Y'all, yer not a horse" campaign bullshit, I started looking at things in a totally different light. They lied, lied lied, and then tried to run reputable physicians who were asking totally normal questions out of their livelihood.

You are correct that in effect, two wrongs don't make a right. But thousands of people have taken MMS without incident. I am not a doctor, I am just a skeptic. I took Ivermectin for COVID after they told me not too, and it worked. My BIL took it for a TERRIBLE case of COVID, and it worked.

Out of curiosity I then started really slow with MMS - I mean really slow. And it worked for me too. Numerous times without incident. Not an endorsement, just my personal experience. And my husband's. I haven't had a sinus infection in 3 years. And before I started doing my own research, I was being prescribed antibiotics for terrible sinus infections at least once and usually twice annually.

7
HelloDolly 7 points ago +7 / -0

I'd love to see the administrative state dismantled at all levels. It is totally unconstitutional for the federal and state legislatures to be delegating rule making to unelected bureaucrats.

Article II of the Constitution clearly states that Congress and only Congress shall make law. It is fundamental to the separation of powers, which is the KEYSTONE of our republic.

So to get around this duty to make law, Congress passes "laws" that delegate the "rule making" to bureaucrats. But calling laws rules is just sleight of hand bullshit. If you are wondering, it is where the "we have to pass it to find out what's in it" came from. This has become standard operating procedure.

For example, Obamacare delegated the "rule making" to "The Secretary" of HHS, at the time Kathleen Sebelius. That's why Sarah Palin, like her or not, was warning about unelected officials turning into death panels. It's a real concern. It happens with every acronym agency. Congress passes a green law and then the EPA passes a rule about how much rainwater can collect on your driveway or whatever. The end result is that every minute of every day each and every one of us is in violation of some rule, somewhere. So the powers that be can literally pick any target they want. Find me the man and I'll find you the rule. Total tyranny.

Like I said, calling laws "rules" is just sleight of hand bullshit. We need to take our power back.

1
HelloDolly 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's the stuff you wish you didn't know. But there it is. No un-ringing the bell.

2
HelloDolly 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's just mind boggling. I just found out my one BIL is in the hospital with pneumonia so I called my SIL to see how they were doing. Turns out they both had the flu first. She actually said to me, "And we had the FLU shots! But of course it would have been much worse." They are 80 and she's a retired nurse. At this point there's no reason to even bother, the cognitive dissonance is too strong. Especially since he is generally weakened now with kidney failure that he didn't have before the clot shot. They simply cannot be deprogrammed.

3
HelloDolly 3 points ago +3 / -0

My Dad used to say that so matter of factly. When I was young I thought he was being too cynical. If he was alive today he'd probably try to have me committed for my conspiracy theories LOL.

1
HelloDolly 1 point ago +1 / -0

Someone once said "when I see McFuckFace I know I am going to agree with the comment." I updooted but should have said "Me Too!" Although in my mind I usually think of you as Boozy. ;)

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›