A disk assumes space, which neither you or anyone you know has ever been close to, is a real thing.
Remove the outer space programming and look at the world. You're on a textured surface of land where up is up and down is down. The luminaries in the sky are not a product of theoretical nuclear fusion. Actually go outside and look at the stars one night.
Next, take the various movements the Earth is allegedly performing day after day and rectify that with the fact that ancient structures, pyramids and whatnot, where built with constellations in mind - also the stars were already mapped thousands of years ago.
Thousands of years of continuous alignment with the celestial bodies despite going tens of thousands of miles an hour around the sun, while the sun and us go hundreds of thousands of miles an hour around the galactic core and on and on?
Then sit back and realize that basically all of what you know about all this was given to you by completely untestable, unrepeatable means from figures of authority that you are never to question. You should see the same pattern emerging as you've seen across many other areas of waking up.
One model proposes a smaller local sun, the other proposes a 93 million mile distant sun that just happens to be the same size from Earth as the 240,000 thousand mile distant moon.
Firstly, "flat earth," doesn't propose a disk. Secondly, night and day on a flat earth are easily explained in several ways - much more easily than night and day on a ball that continuously arcs and speeds in a variety of directions simultaneously without any ascertainable sensation of motion.
These are all among the first things you'll learn in even a badic 40 minute presentation by even a clown like Eric Dubay - if you haven't gotten past these things, you haven't even looked into the idea yet, m8.
Foucalt's pendulum is a joke, friend! It may work by calculation, sure, but were the Earth's spin the cause of any movement you would be able to recreate the experiment with no motor or push to start on literally any fixture of propper height. In reality, that doesn't work. The suspended string would just hang there, unmoving, forever.
The second phenomenon is a result of the angular resolution of your eyes. In a flat building of great enough width you will see the ceiling decline and the ground rise to your eye line over a distance. It's not disappearing over a curve - eyes just don't see forever.
Earth is a created realm - not necessarily flat (plenty of altitude changes), but definitely not a meaningless ball spiraling millions of miles an hour in a billions of years old void of creation and destruction.
The spinning ball has two primary characteristics:
- You're spinning
- There's ultimately a curving downward and away from any position you're at, given enough distance
Both of these are obviously untrue and any meaningful declaration otherwise is based out of misunderstanding of either the theory around the ball or the opposing viewpoint.
That said, I don't spend much time worrying about this stuff anymore, but it is life changing, for sure.
Seems sketchy tbh.
They performed an air to surface rouse on another location so that they could then attack people who were not in that location or preparing to fight their forces.
Either you believe their intel and assume all those underground were actually terrorists, or you question it and reason that they killed a bunch of people underground who may/may not have anything to do with the conflict.
It's crazy to me anyone ever believed that tbh.
Supposedly the CEO of like 6 companies at the same time and makes the majority of his money from govt contracts? Dates a literal witch, pushes merging with computers, climate change, etc.
Sure, his interests align with ours once every blue moon, but that's about it.
It's funny to me that people somehow still believe that crypto is some kind of revolutionary force of good.
It's a fiat that's 100% virtual.
And bitcoin was supposedly developed by some unidentified guy who never claimed millions of dollars worth of the coin.
Have we not learned anything, people!?
Also, Elon is not on our side.
I do understand the desire to speculate cryptos, though, as that could definitely be profitable - just understand the risks and don't gamble anything you aren't willing to lose!!!
The serpant being a freer of mankind is repackaged luciferianism for the uninitiated. You're watching too much gaia. All of new age philosophy stems from those same luciferians responsible for this mess - look at it for a while and you'll see the parrelels.
It can be read that there are two creation narratives in Genesis - that of Adam and the sixth day mankind creation. They are seemingly separate. That said, the bible is specifically addressing a bloodline through which salvation would eventually come to mankind (the offspring of Seth.) There are so many interesting details left out of this, but texts like the book of Enoch are definitely great supplements.
Are you taught a more true version of earth or the nonsense that leads people into thinking there are "billions of spinning planets teeming with life?"
I would assume you all are given some teachings that cut through the deceit given to commoners, and this is one area rife with it.
The downside is Alex Jones talks over him a bunch and interrupts a couple of what would be interesting discussions with diversions.
The info Steve does give makes it sound like he might be working with a compartmentalized piece of the Q team.
It's odd how all these conservatives decide to play the game the left sets for them, with rules established by leftists that only apply to conservatives, yet conservatives just go along with it and lose gracefully with a few zingers here and there.
I feel the same, unfortunately.
Probably, at least, a mixture of different groups with different agendas. It's very doubtful it's just a single straight up army of 60,000 righteous individuals secretly working to bring good to the world (though I hope it is.)