I've been doing a good job of ignoring him for the last couple years. I truly doubt that the USPS is tracking ballots for this election. If anything I suspect they're in on the cheat. I hope he's right, but I'd give it some large handfuls of salt. A pinch of salt won't be enough. imo.
You can read the USPS proposal yourself, it does NOT check citizenship. https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2026-10968
adding: However, this is about an EO that Trump is signing about elections. So this post on X is mostly clickbait, imo. I'll take a look at the EO later.
If they're talking about the proposal they published for ballot mail, it doesn't check citizenship and afaik it also doesn't do address verification. But, it does mention some other postal procedures that may involve the address portion. But, it only takes information of who is to receive ballots from the state. It doesn't check whether they're eligible, that's still the state's job. So, whoever posted this on X didn't do any research.
I just looked on Rumble and found it there, put on my watch later. https://rumble.com/v7a8dga-joe-rogan-experience-2503-eric-weinstein.html
The only good thing I see with this, after I finished reading the 20 page proposal, was that the fedgov (Harmeet Dhillon) can probably get the list of people that were mailed ballots from the USPS rather than having to ask the states and be turned down. But most mail ballot states have drop boxes where ballots can be returned and there's essentially no chain of custody with that. So it might be a small step in the right direction, but that's about it, imo.
I think insurance companies are a huge part of the problem. You would think they'd want to pay out less and keep more of the premiums by having healthy customers, but apparently it doesn't work that way. This is one area where I definitely think we need more regulation.
He used to be the chair of the ACIP committee. He resigned after a court ruling basically disbanded the committee and HHS wasn't going to fight the ruling. And yes, it does matter what he thinks. He's well-regarded in those (MAHA) circles.
You can make a comment on the regulations dot gov website. Here’s a substack link of a recent article and video Mellow Kat posted about it with a link. https://open.substack.com/pub/mellowkat/p/before-june-5th-tell-epa-no-to-the?utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=web
There weren't many details in the story, but there was a PDF of the ruling. It looks like they consolidated 3 cases from 3 plaintiffs. (DSCC, NAACP and League of Latin American Citizens, et al). It was from the District Court for the District of Columbia.
Here's an archive link, since it appears to be behind a paywall: https://archive.is/wi6cb
So glad someone with a big following put that out. They like to play word games.