2
marvinthehaggler 2 points ago +2 / -0

The fashion industry is global and captures high net worth individuals, as well as people who are highly beautiful. High net worth and/or highly beautiful opens doors. The industry is perfect for the CIA, etc. to gain access to spaces they might not otherwise access. And, there is a lot of money moving around, as well as physical goods. So it's a perfect industry for money laundering, child trafficking, etc.

2
marvinthehaggler 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think that just like anything there is a Light and a Dark version.

A "Light" version of eugenics could be what we would call "epigenics" today. Meaning we feed you food and exercise designed to produce the best possible expressions of the genes you have. I think this is very consistent with RFK Jr's approach.

The "Dark" version would be more along the lines of Sanger, or Himmler's Lebensborn program. However, if the participants know what they're getting into, they are making an informed choice. The "know what they're getting into" part is often hard to secure.

2
marvinthehaggler 2 points ago +2 / -0

Pretty much every prominent person of the second half of the 1800s and the first half of the 1900s was a eugenicist.

Lindberg, Ford, George Bernard Shaw, Teddy Roosevelt, The Huxleys, Hitler, etc.. We still have a lot of them but they know now to keep their views quiet (folks like Gates).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:American_eugenicists

7
marvinthehaggler 7 points ago +7 / -0

In the case of major cereal companies like Kellogg's, their products are far worse than this. Their "vitamins" are essentially industrial waste, their grains are GMO, their sugar is GMO, etc.

Straight poison.

1
marvinthehaggler 1 point ago +1 / -0

And the Lord said to me: Say not: I am a child: for thou shalt go to all that I shall send thee: and whatsoever I shall command thee, thou shalt speak.

Be not afraid at their presence: for I am with thee to deliver thee, saith the Lord.

2
marvinthehaggler 2 points ago +2 / -0

My expectation is that they are:

  1. Expecting that the vote for Trump will be high.

  2. Expecting that the vote on voting day will be hindered by "Oh noes! Voting machine no workie!!!! So sorries." bullshit like they pulled in Maricopa, AZ to suppress the conservative vote.

The old thinking was to not vote early, to not enable the Ds to know how many fake ballots to create (or real ballots to "harvest").

I think the current thinking is probably to avoid the bullshit that the Ds pulled with the voting machines "mysteriously going down, but only in conservative counties" on election day.

I also think that if there is high Trump turnout (there will be) on early voting, that will cause the Ds to ramp up their fraud up-up-up, and (I hope) the non-Ds will catch them. The counterpoint to this is, of course, that more votes were counted for Biden + Trump in 2020 than we have registered voters, but somehow that never triggered a WTF assessment of the vote last time.

Hope and pray. And vote. And get your friends to the ballot box.

3
marvinthehaggler 3 points ago +3 / -0

P.S. I thought of another one. The redneck-lookin' dude who would eat chips and point out stuff on videos playing behind him. That guy made me laff. Have no idea how to find him.

P.P.S. I like rednecks, so this was not a slur.

2
marvinthehaggler 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't think he does anything without at least a reason, and ideally a plan.

5
marvinthehaggler 5 points ago +5 / -0

My only exception to our shared hate is Ian Carroll. Who is excellent.

6
marvinthehaggler 6 points ago +6 / -0

"Send in the clowns."

They're already on stage.

1
marvinthehaggler 1 point ago +1 / -0

I will accept a rain of frogs as well.

1
marvinthehaggler 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lolo Soetero was, as the story goes, the CIA Station Chief for Indonesia.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›