4
merf 4 points ago +4 / -0

Maybe an attempt to alert the cabal that something is askew in the Austin office?


https://www.crowdstrike.com/blog/falcon-update-for-windows-hosts-technical-details/

https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2024/07/crowdstrike-fixes-start-at-reboot-up-to-15-times-and-get-more-complex-from-there/?comments=1&comments-page=1

The file in question is a CrowdStrike driver located at Windows/System32/Drivers/CrowdStrike/C-00000291*.sys. Once it's gone, the machine should boot normally and grab a non-broken version of the driver.

u/#q291

I can't tell if the star is part of the filename or an indication that multiple files have to be removed.

Could be a coincidence but the posts around 291 are very Hillary related.. C-291, Clinton 291?

See drops 2912 and up..

2
merf 2 points ago +2 / -0

Is this something they do periodically? This seems to be a similar announcement at the beginning of 2024.

https://mondovisione.com/media-and-resources/news/china-securities-regulatory-commission-csrc-bans-securities-lending-during-res/

Maybe it's something they do after any market fall?

Here's another:

https://www.asiafinancial.com/china-imposes-fresh-curbs-on-share-lending-amid-market-slide

I'd say this is something to worth monitoring but not a unique event.

4
merf 4 points ago +4 / -0

Credit to u/LongGame and thx for the heads up u/queue-anon.

Any new takes on the meaning of PG-13 in this context?

2
merf 2 points ago +2 / -0

Very nice find there! I'm gonna go ahead and post it unless u/LongGame gets it out so it gets more eyes.

9
merf 9 points ago +9 / -0

There's a followup tweet but it's so hilarious to imagine Joe temporarily taking over his account for a minute just to convey this...

-1
merf -1 points ago +1 / -2

I'm suggesting that armed with the Q proofs of the day, it's not illogical to conclude that the entirety of it was staged. Which would mean the following:

White hats seeded the SS w/DEI actors, including the tiny female that would uselessly hug his waist for the photo.

White hats arranged for the shot to occur where the press would not see the impact of the bullet or the popping of a blood packet if they were moved to the front of the podium, where they were moved by SS just before the shooting.

White hats arranged for the bullets to land in a spot where cameras were unlikely to be pointed, and where people likely to have deep associations to the White House & security clearance were sitting (friends & family section). i.e The section where you have plausible volunteers willing to assist with the scene.

Absent some sort of interference, all deaths & injuries would be crisis actors.


Liberals are uniquely primed to exert maximal non-sympathetic skepticism about this event because they don't believe Trump is human and that he is selfish & destined to create a fascist dictatorship. Overnight this has placed them in Alex Jones shoes and they are having to defend a conspiracy theory for the first time in their lives.

The only way liberals learn is by experiencing the consequences of their policy.

They are now walking in Alex Jones' shoes.

This is part of the Great Awakening.

0
merf 0 points ago +1 / -1

You think the Jones lawsuit was not white-hat orchestrated?

A suit that should have been scuttled for obvious 1st amendment reasons makes it all the way to sentencing on Mossad's top controlled-opposition press entity, on the very narrative that undermines their entire gun control agenda if exposed (Sandy Hook shooting)?

1
merf 1 point ago +1 / -0

But is it wrong? And is it really?

From what I can observe it's falling into the same zone as Biden's cognitive health; the liberal establishment is not promoting a "staged" narrative, but the liberal base fervently believes it.

Rather hilariously, the liberal establishment narrative seems to encompass the least probable interpretation of the facts imaginable: that a far-right Trump supporter shot Trump due to his violent rhetoric, and that the Secret Service did their job effectively.

2
merf 2 points ago +2 / -0

Now that's a frosty snausage!

1
merf 1 point ago +2 / -1

Down-votes = emotive thinking or programmed reactions.

2
merf 2 points ago +2 / -0

Maybe, but teams that operate at an elite level leave divine intervention for the matters they can't control, and make plans for the stuff they can.

-1
merf -1 points ago +1 / -2

What about Charlotte Bacon? Daniel Barden? Ashley Babbitt?

When one considers these possibilities, one enters the zone of questioning something that would be hurtful to the victims families and the broader population's emotive understanding of the situation.

It's not a socially-rewarding territory to enter, hence why Q chose the vaccine-damaged autists.

Having a "victim" or two around creates the perfect cover for a hoax--nearly impenetrable emotive protection from analysis of the facts.

-2
merf -2 points ago +6 / -8

It's one possibility. I think Trump is the most likely to have not been shot at all.

I'm seeing some secondary angles which seem to indicate a possible second shooter.

https://x.com/ImMeme0/status/1813363426292367417

https://x.com/Crazynews4real/status/1813269053617893712

And to be clear: I'm not claiming 100% certainty on this matter. Just running the probabilities of the facts:

  • Solid Q proofs lining up with the event showing predictive qualities (Emmys, red carpet, 6:11, fight/fight/fight, shot heard round the world).

  • SS shuffling the camera crew to an angle where they would be unable to view the grazing shot.

  • Improbability of Trump's security spectacularly failing in so many respects on one day after such a long history of high performance.

  • That this event perfectly reverses the roles we normally play (liberals become conspiracy theorists, conservatives & conspiracy theorists trust the official story). This will lead to some fantastic and unifying discussions in the coming months.

  • Q post indicating this event would be the justification to clean out the three letter agencies, followed by swift congressional action in just that form. #1829 if you're curious.

  • The way the event let all the air out of the Hitler rhetoric that the left was engaging in, which happened to be their entire electoral argument.

So yeah, just a theory. But most seem to be inclined to go with divine bullet intervention, and I don't blame them because it certainly makes for a great story so why not? I just can't help being my frosty, probabilistic self about the whole thing.

-8
merf -8 points ago +4 / -12

This other link also indicates camera crew being moved from behind Trump.

https://x.com/washingtonpost/status/1812325808683331801

Agree that it was staged. They moved the camera crew so they wouldn't see the blood packet being applied.

Trump has had probably hundreds of events now. They didn't magically get sloppy and line up a bunch of top tier Q proofs for no reason (6:11, red carpet, Emmys, shot heard round the world). They're letting us know it was staged and part of the Awakening.

This event has created millions of unwitting liberal conspiracy theorists. It'll make their minds vastly more pliable to have to challenge a narrative. It'll also make them more receptive to the fakery of other news events.

3
merf 3 points ago +3 / -0

Agree.

I was more surprised how many in attendance weren't doing what this lady was..

1
merf 1 point ago +1 / -0

I kept this link handy because it at least gives you a glimpse off to the right after the incident, but I can't see anybody acting as though it landed near them.

https://x.com/washingtonpost/status/1812325808683331801

See around 42s in. This is the cleanest shot I've seen of the trajectory where the bullet would seem likely to land.

Very astute comment here:

If you notice, there was a ss who made the press to move to the other side, claiming that they will have a better view

2
merf 2 points ago +2 / -0

There a higher risk of rain not falling off that roof than a human doing the same...

9
merf 9 points ago +9 / -0

Different child separation policy = the coyote aren't being allowed to carry the "cargo" to the pedos.

Notice CNN uses the term "legal guardian" rather than parents, because the fucking coyote can't prove paternity/maternity.

2
merf 2 points ago +2 / -0

Two years younger than Obama and assigned to "mentor" him??

I didn't even realize Mike was older...

7
merf 7 points ago +7 / -0

I think we can rest assured that Trump has sprinkled a bit of MAGA dust on Vance and he'll not only hold the line, but be useful in many amusing ways we haven't foreseen.

5
merf 5 points ago +5 / -0

Very astute fren. The roles have flipped:

The far-right & conspiracy theorists are mostly going with the media/FBI/SS narrative: that there was an assassination attempt.

The left are highly suspicious that it was real because they have been primed with so much "orange man bad" programming. A huge number are putting on tinfoil hats with respect to this event.

By putting on those tinfoil hats, they are entering what should have been the constitutionally-protected Alex Jones zone: expressing skepticism as to the truth of a shooting event.

But wait a moment, now we're in a dysphoria pocket. Shooting events can't be faked, but orange man bad and must have faked his shooting event. Questioning shoot events illegal, but if believe this shooting event then agreeing shooting orange man was wrong?! How shooting Hitler wrong?!

DOES NOT COMPUTE -- FATAL ERROR

1
merf 1 point ago +1 / -0

TBH was my first thought when I saw the defensive sniper team as they were wearing all black and didn't look like they had put anything down over the metal...

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-rally-shooting-secret-service-identified-rooftop-security-flaw-rcna161783

1
merf 1 point ago +2 / -1

You've lost me on most of that but I think Corey Comperatore as a name is definitely worth playing out the anagrams.

Even the simple etymology seems like a clue:

Corey/Kori: chosen, selected

Comperatore-com imperator: with the commander/leader

I'm getting ready to settle in for a rough ride with the minority of folks who think the shooting was staged.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›