Thank you for a great post, especially after 9/11. For absolute 'ground zero' awareness of patriots, this should be stickied as a Notable. Also the link to Gerald Brown's free pdf - Cooperative Federalism explaining the meaning and difference between the Declaration of Independence's key term ... the united States of America and the UNITED STATES (Corp).
https://www.youhavetheright.com/tour1/Cooperative_Federalism.pdf
Watch and rewatch
Should be tagged as a NOTABLE. In summary... The fake & gay J6 crisis permitted House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to trigger an emergency session and avoid any of the 2020 election certification challenges.
Those congressional floor challenges, known and anticipated well in advance, would have formed a legal and constitutional basis for ‘standing’ in judicial challenges that would have eventually reached the Supreme Court.
The certification during “emergency session” eliminated the problem for Washington DC. In order to prevent those two motions, it required that speaker of the house, minority leaders, and the president of the congress (vice president of the United States: Pence), to NOT BE PRESENT IN THE CHAMBERS. At THIS NEW EMERGENCY SESSION VP Pence, President of Congress, then had no ability to even consider pausing the electoral certification, because there were now no motions of disagreements on the matter allowed due to emergency rules.
awesome list
Let's first ask Hillary :)
If you read the rehearing petition all you need to read is that is doesn't meet the criteria for re-hearing which is...intervening circumstances of substantial or controlling effect... rule 44.2. So all you need to ask yourself is has there been any substantial change of circumstances since the denial to hear on Jan 9 and this request dated Jan 18? If the answer is no, then you already know how the Supremes will rule on this.
Sorry guys... but this is a junk petition masquerading as a piece of legal proficiency. Its so bad, that I question how the hype continues to rage unabated.
Rookie numbers....you gotta bump those numbers up!
- Don't try so hard... let Life engineer circumstances
- Become God centered
- Look for ways to serve others
- Become Heart centered, not head centered; "for the heart knows things the head does not".
I love the free thinking on this forum, but sometimes you need to listen and weigh accordingly lawfags special expertise in such cases. Brunsen was bringing a Writ of Cert to overturn the Lower court's decision that they lacked standing to litigate such a matter in the first place. The remedy, even if the Supremes had taken the case would never have been the dismissal of the Congressional reps. The best result would have been for it to be sent back to the lower court. The 'trumpets' and 'jan 6' date for acceptance were merely the 'shiny objects' that allowed lay people to suspend their judgment of the actual facts of the case.
Thanks horseyPatriot for highlighting this important case. What do you think of the 2020 dueling electors implications if the Supremes find for the States legislatures? Anything to it in your opinion?
You are exactly right on all points, especially on the relief requested making no sense. If Juan O Savin has been pushing it as a plausible case, it tells everyone all you need to know about the veracity of following that particular line of mis-info. Btw, it took you 30 minutes.... slow reader lol :) Issues presented gave the game away.
Thank you for the correction, typed too fast
You obviously have no clue how the Supreme Court litigation process functions. These cases you show have now progressed to the argument stage, this is after they were distributed for conference in June and their petitions granted in June. Then briefing and replies were submitted. Brunson v Adams hasn't even been distributed for conference yet, let alone the petition granted for briefs to be accepted. You need to keep an eye on the docket number 22-308 in the docket search page for any updates. You will definitely not find any news on the front page of the supreme court site listing of oral arguments.
Sorry, Qanaut but this Petition of Cert 22-308 in the Supreme Court seems very weak in a legal sense and the chance of 4 Supremes accepting a case from a Pro-se litigant is next to nil. Just saying... Link to the pdf of the docket is here for those law fags who are interested... https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22-380.html
WTF catsfive! There's no Supreme Court decision!
This headline is misleading. The Supreme Court did not rule on this petition of certiorari. A decision to deny certiorari does not necessarily imply that the higher court agrees with the lower court's ruling; instead, it simply means that fewer than four justices determined that the circumstances of the decision of the lower court warrant a review by the Supreme Court.
It's been a long 2 weeks, but what a ride!
NO ! That is all!
"James Biden, known socially as Jimmy, is seven years younger than Joe and a dead ringer for his famous older brother. He worked as a salesman and served as the finance chairman of Joe’s first Senate campaign in 1972 before embarking on a career as a serial entrepreneur."
"James Biden, known socially as Jimmy, is seven years younger than Joe and a dead ringer for his famous older brother."
So 22 months from November 3 2020 is September 3, 2022 !!!
That settles it then... Quaaludes are the smoking gun... Bill Cosby built the Guidestones!
my sides !!! owned like a side'o'beef