2
randomnumbers 2 points ago +2 / -0

If they make it streamable and available in Canada, I would definitely sign up!

(I don't have cable)

2
randomnumbers 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, but we should use any form of media to get the People's message out.

The beauty with hiring people that are already streaming to the internet is - they don't have to do anything different. You just need to stream their show directly from Youtube/Rumble/whatever, and just pick time slots.

For example, Tucker weekend special interviews, Crowder has the morning show, Tim has the evening show... Alex Jones gets all the time between shows to make sure breaking news is covered.

Before long, it'll just be Fox News versus the People's Network.

Edit: Joe Rogan wants a job too, so fit him in there with some comedy or something.

3
randomnumbers 3 points ago +5 / -2

Then hire Alex Jones, Tucker, Bannon, Crowder, Tim Pool, etc etc, to host their shows on there and we win.

6
randomnumbers 6 points ago +6 / -0

Trump/business folk call it the Big Ask. They do it all the time.

Not surprised but I really would have liked to see Gaetz wreck their shit.

1
randomnumbers 1 point ago +1 / -0

Welp, time to send that info to Senators and hope they won't confirm her. There should be enough friendlies to stop it.

Edit: Actually, they need to draw the sting. Bring it up during confirmation. Maybe Trump knows about it and thinks it won't be a problem? Her background seems to match the mission.

2
randomnumbers 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thank you very much. I appreciate being able to understand more of the story here.

What absolutely pisses me off is the fact that they've done this to Matt, who seems like he just genuinely wants to make life better for people. I also respect that he's one of a handful that's willing to tell the truth.

Like, what the hell does the Gaetz family have to do with your dumb spy that got captured by Iran. Here's a thought - stop fucking doing that!

1
randomnumbers 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sure, they could do that if they want to be "legit".

But they could also just appoint him like "Jack", and let the otherside try to take it up to the Supreme Court.

I could see this plan being related to stopping the lawfare we saw with Trump.

Sometimes you gotta fight fire with fire.

9
randomnumbers 9 points ago +9 / -0

Can confirm. I've been watching the weather carefully since 2017. Same shit, different year.

1
randomnumbers 1 point ago +1 / -0

That is the problem with this, so it's not a total win - he didn't dismiss the verdicts outright.

They will try to hold this over Trump's head like the Sword of Damocles. Once he's out of office (at the end of term or otherwise), they can still send him to Rikers.

However, I do believe that particular judge is in an "Acting" capacity. If they can replace him with someone smarter, they might dismiss it.

10
randomnumbers 10 points ago +10 / -0

Bring back the ones that were fired for not taking the vax.

That was an easy way to identify the smarter group.

6
randomnumbers 6 points ago +6 / -0

Miss Lindsay kept letting himself be cucked by the Turtle.

Additionally, Miss Lindsay has been harping on going to war with Iran.

He might have some good slams every once in a while, but I don't trust him.

6
randomnumbers 6 points ago +6 / -0

That was my first thought too -- There's definitely something on Miss Lindsay.

And I bet you anything, MTG has been saying she wants to put everything out behind closed doors - long before she made that tweet.

Miss Lindsay knows she's serious.

I still say release it all. The world deserves to know, considering how many millions of people they have killed in various countries.

7
randomnumbers 7 points ago +7 / -0

LOL the climate scam.

How many failed predictions will it take before these people figure it out?

2
randomnumbers 2 points ago +2 / -0

They mention something else in that interview -- Trump can force the recess (I wasn't sure).

So now I think it's likely he does that at some point, because he needs them out of the protection of the chamber to arrest them. (I distantly recall some discussion around when are we able to arrest them)

He doesn't need them to create any new laws, everything's on the books already.

Also related Q posts? This is the storm we're waiting for?

u/#q3353

u/#q3354

u/#q2261

3
randomnumbers 3 points ago +3 / -0

You motherfuckers better build a wall between us.

We don't want them up here either.

MAKE NUT HOUSES GREAT AGAIN!

8
randomnumbers 8 points ago +8 / -0

I think the defendants' lawyers would short circuit if that happens.

They literally are just trying to shut him up without getting rid of him. That's why they do stupid things like sell the InfoWars domain... without understanding it's the internet... AJ could literally start another website.

Strange people.

4
randomnumbers 4 points ago +4 / -0

My thought too. We know their last act is to just crash the econ.

4
randomnumbers 4 points ago +5 / -1

Missing a huge opportunity not having Alex Jones there, tbh. Even for a day.

Actually, it should be a rotation of different influencers. Really rub the MSM's stupid face in it.

5
randomnumbers 5 points ago +5 / -0

Turtle at least stepped back from leader. I appreciate that. His term wasn't up this time, but he'll probably not run again. Better get someone set up in Kentucky before 2026.

Miss Lindsay, you'll have to primary him in 2026. But thankfully, he seems malleable and probably has a lot of skeletons.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›