2
sillysausage 2 points ago +2 / -0

And this is why you don't withhold cricket from India.

1
sillysausage 1 point ago +1 / -0

And that exploited labor did not create a revenue engine without which we never could have gotten out from under the massive debts we accrued fighting the British? Slaves were involved in zero famous construction projects?

Free labor made America great, which is why we fought so hard to hang on to it. Losing free labor would mean losing the original American way of life. And it was lost, as the victims of Reconstruction well know.

1
sillysausage 1 point ago +1 / -0

They got massive cities dude

We still have people living in deep poverty in the Appalachians

2
sillysausage 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's not for kids. It's rated TV-MA. You know Disney+ has Rated R films on there, right? Like every other streaming service? You know Buena Vista Pictures IS Disney, right? Over the past three decades, they have amassed a massive warchest of IP for kids, adults, and everything in between. It's practically a monopoly at this point.

-6
deleted -6 points ago +3 / -9
-10
deleted -10 points ago +3 / -13
0
sillysausage 0 points ago +1 / -1

I will never understand this board's bizarre relationship with human traffickers, the board in aggregate seems to simultaneously love and loathe human traffickers in equal measure

Very odd

Didn't know about the bunny thing, that's awful. I personally believe being a human trafficker is a bad thing that eternally marks you and your soul.

1
sillysausage 1 point ago +1 / -0

I dunno, thought I was pretty succinct and straightforward. What part are you having trouble with? You need me to define "acre" for you, or "laws"? What about "Article VI"? Do you need the concept of a treaty explained to you? What?

"Treaties shall be the Supreme Law of the Land" - our Constitution (that means "cannot legally be broken")

Broken - well over a hundred different treaties regarding land currently operated by America and not the native nations the treaties say the lands belong to

Hypocrisy - using border laws your own country doesn't follow internally to justify keeping people whose ancestry is tied to the Americas from living in America, a state founded by people from a completely different set of continents on the other side of the world

Y'all desperately need a new bogeyman, because building a wall to try and stop people from overstaying their visas is just silly

2
sillysausage 2 points ago +2 / -0

I wasn't shouting, I was typing in all caps, which made very little noise as I did it.

1
sillysausage 1 point ago +1 / -0

Great, now tumblr teens are going to interpret that as an attack and use "Latinx" extra hard, thus eventually cementing it in the vernacular. Great job, SHS.

Also, absolutely chortling at her using a conservative (in terms of prescriptive vs proscriptive, not in terms of politics) language institute in Madrid to back up her argument. About Latin American Spanish vernacular, specifically regarding a word used to refer to people from Latin America, as opposed to "Hispanic", which refers to anyone from a Spanish-speaking country.

The Spanish spoken in Spain is different from the Spanish spoken in The Americas! Every high school Spanish student learns this!

-1
deleted -1 points ago +2 / -3
0
sillysausage 0 points ago +6 / -6

Why are you acting like it's a big deal that when a federal database goes down, it affects all of the country? Generally, federal things affect the whole country.

5
sillysausage 5 points ago +5 / -0

The 25th isn't gonna "haunt" Biden, that's the escape hatch for him and the DNC.

2
sillysausage 2 points ago +4 / -2

this is the truest and most accurate theory post on this board

-2
sillysausage -2 points ago +1 / -3

*borders

But entering a private space and existing there is completely different from practicing medicine.

And that whole "but muh laws" argument doesn't fly when we are literally presiding over acre after acre of land that should not belong to us, according to Article VI. Wake me up when our oh-so-sacred "boarders" are no longer around a hundred broken treaties, and then you can cry about people containing a longer genetic history of the Americas than you or I illegally entering a place called "America".

1
sillysausage 1 point ago +1 / -0

You sent it to multiple people but never saved to a disconnected device like a DVD or a thumb drive? And not one of those people did the same, and all of them reported the file going missing? That sucks, because no one who doesn't already agree with you will believe you.

You should get all the contacts you sent that to to record a short testimony and compile them

3
sillysausage 3 points ago +3 / -0

They don't trump federal laws. What are you talking about? Every time an Oregonian or anyone else in a state with medical or recreational marijuana lights up a smooth doobie, that is breaking federal law. It's just not breaking local law, so local law enforcement can't get involved. Any American stoner could conceivably be arrested by the FBI for breaking federal law.

But Drugs handily won the War on Drugs and Reagan's in the ground, so that's not gonna happen.

-3
deleted -3 points ago +1 / -4
-4
sillysausage -4 points ago +1 / -5

Except that pharmacist is a job. And there are very good reasons for the job of pharmacist to require documentation. Migrant is just a description of how much of your life has been spent in one general location. Requiring documentation to live your life is not the same thing as requiring documentation to prescribe medicine.

What a terrible analogy. Please don't tell me anyone actually thought this was smart.

1
sillysausage 1 point ago +1 / -0

So then, not a term that no one knows the definition of used by emotionally unstable liars?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›