It feels weird to me too, especially the explosion of awareness of people with disabilities over the last 7-8 years. My theory is that, in general, and not just sign language, it’s a combo of three things:
- Good old fashion virtue signaling
- Trying to turn leftism into a religion
- To justify invasive tech
The first is obvious but if you think about it, a huge component of Christianity is caring for the sick and less fortunate. There’s something in human nature where people want to help those in need. This tries to fill that void for lefties, and recruit from the ranks of well meaning normies. As for the tech part, features that are invasive towards your privacy mesh well with disability features. Is it a feature that scans YouTube videos to auto-generate subtitles for deaf people? Or is it a backdoor method for scanning content for subjects they want to ban from their platform?
Slightly off topic, I know, but those are my thoughts on this whole disabilities movement.
Now that’s a Lamda variant I can root for! Haha, the Lamda Lamda Lamda variant. 😆
The Tri-Lams of the Revenge of the Nerds kind (and the Black chapter of their fraternity). Upvote for the reference.
It’s safe. I misread the advice here, clicked out 200 lb. doses, and took it 5 days in a row. Not the recommended schedule (which is doing that same dose once every 3-4 days?) but I had zero negative side effects. I weigh about 180 lbs. if that helps. I don’t think it’s anything to be overly cautious about. Kids, maybe, but adults shouldn’t be worried. Heck, the first time I tried it, I blew out the tube and probably ended up absorbing a second dose’s worth through my skin, haha.
For me it was an allusion to shootings in the news cycles designed to distract from Russia and fisagate.
Can’t remember which drop it was but Q said something to the effect that we all know what happens when the patriots chalk up a win / we all know the kind of things they do to change the news cycle...
...and the next day Parkland happened.
Can’t remember if it timed out with a big Nunes win back then but it hit me like a ton of bricks. And even more so when all the anomalies associated with Parkland started to trickle out. Q called it, and it was totally obvious that they had orchestrated the Parkland shootings to change the news cycle, or in retaliation for what the white hats were doing.
I’m in agreement with you. None of this passes muster. I just meant “they” in the Reddit hive mind sense. If they think it’s been debunked, you have to come up with another vector of getting the point across. Kind of like how we all know that both parties are the same (in the Uniparty sense) but if you say that to someone on social media, they get triggered and comeback with the predictable “both parties are not the same” + copypasta. I would expect Koch’s postulates to turn on the lightbulb for more people but sadly that just isn’t the case.
I’m only about a third of the way through it so not sure I can answer the question. Author’s name is Sally Fallon but at the moment, I’m having a hard time finding a link to the full pdf. Here’s a link to a summary I found though: link
That’s how I took it too. It’s a well cited book by an expert in her field and that’s the thesis of the book - that we’ve been totally misled about the true nature of viruses and germs. Almost nothing ever passes any form of these postulates and thus we need to rethink things like germ theory. She contends that illness comes from mineral deficiencies and the break down of our own cells en masse, not from dirty toilet seats. The Contagion Myth is the book.
They think they’ve debunked the Koch’s postulates thing so in case it comes up, here’s River’s postulates (which supposedly are more useful and current:
This is from a book called The Contagion Myth.
I never thought of that - he does use the same techniques he criticizes the magicians for using. Good point.
I wish I remembered which episodes he tipped his hand by ridiculing Q, but for me it revealed his true intention. How someone you mostly agree with can still be working for the enemy. It also, like you said, felt forced and phony.
Regardless, it reminds me of the propaganda they pushed in the 60’s - if you don’t agree with society, drop out and move to the middle of nowhere. Instead of trying to fix the system where you live, and trying to truly challenge the establishment. Don’t get me wrong, I still dream of having my own homestead someday but now is not the time to tuck tail and run.
He’s part of the deception.
I used to like his podcast/show but during one of the purges a couple years ago, he went on several anti-Q rants. And there were several others who out of the blue, started using QAnon as pejorative. It was like they were all given the same script at the same time. Never trusted him after that.
If he really believed what he was saying, he should’ve been supportive of what Q was trying to do. He says a lot of things you’d agree with, but he’s an actor at the end of the day. He’s a different kind of limited hangout. Plus, he never shuts up about the Jews which should be a red flag in and of itself.
He also has his own fan club which is kind of gay.
My uncle’s lips puffed up, he got a rash, and has looked gaunt ever since he got the Pfizer(?) shot.
38 year old girl at work died of a heart attack. Can’t say for a fact that she got the shot, still waiting to find out more.
That’s all I’ve seen personally.
To take that a step further, you could apply that to the flu.
They’ve been bullshitting us on the dangers to sell us on their yearly vaccine schedule.
When there WAS an actual flu strain that was more deadly, I’m now inclined to believe they cooked it up in a lab and released it. To push their vaccines and play their eugenics games.
Not defending the man (didn’t follow his case that closely so don’t know) but he was very outspoken on the problems in the black community. He didn’t blame their problems on a systemic boogeyman, he had a get an education, stay out of trouble, and stay married approach to trying to fix problems in the black community. If it wasn’t for the rapist thing, I think most of what he would give lectures on would resonate with the anti-woke. I’d put him in the same category as Charles Barkley, but more academic.
Knowing what we know now, I wouldn’t be surprised if the left targeted him for takeout. Most of what he said didn’t fit with the leftist narrative of systemic racism.
The Cyto-Toxic Avenger, the first Superhero from Wuhan
Posts like this miss the point.
If it’s a shooting war, be ready for pencil neck leftists PLUS the UN, the cartels, Muslim terrorist cells, and the Chinese. At the very least.
But the left/cabal isn’t that stupid. They know we’ve been preparing for this fight since the 90’s. They know that if someone pulled a gun on us, we’d know exactly what to do. They’re never gonna give you that opportunity.
Instead it will be more of the same. They know they can’t outgun us, so they will rely on other weapons - they will continue to confuse, poison, indoctrinate, and demoralize us until we have no idea who to point our guns at.
I love my guns as much as the next guy but I don’t know how useful they are in our current predicament.
I don’t think that’s from one of his books.
He’s more subtle. He hides his pop reduction plan behind jargon and euphemisms. This seems like it would be from a diff book.
Right. No way some establishment guy is gonna mention the Kalergi Plan or Serco. Those feel like Easter eggs designed to trigger conspiratorial minded individuals.
I haven’t read it in a long time but I remembered it due to the hometown connection. There are lots of these old anecdotal conspiracies but this one always rang true to me. Too many things he described came to pass. Especially how they transitioned us from a system that was built upon the doctor-patient relationship on the individual scale to one of bureaucrats, hospitals, medical groups, and insurance groups. I wish we could get back to an era of home-visit doctors who remained your family doctor for decades.
I think this is the one you’re referring to?
Couldn’t agree more. That’s why I thought it was so silly. The one Asian dude I know, who I consider a best friend, comes from a Chinese AMERICAN family who has won at every aspect of the American dream. Most likely because they worked their asses off. I don’t begrudge them that at all. His dad has saved 100’s of lives I’m sure. That wouldn’t have happened if they stayed in China, and never became US citizens.
Yeah, I don’t know what to make of him. This redeems him a little in my eyes but even after the Evergreen incident, he wouldn’t support what Trump was trying to accomplish. I was like, duh, Trump is calling out the same people that ruined your career but you won’t give him any support? And go so far as to promote people to run against him? I’m glad someone of his visibility has taken a stance on Ivermectin, but i still don’t entirely trust him.
Wasn’t she shown to be part of the deep state a while back? Can’t remember if she was cia, fbi, or just had a weird criminal record, but I’d approach what she says with caution. Maybe someone else remembers the details. Maybe like she claims to be a cia insider and has a weird criminal record. Something like that.
I just look at them as different heads on the same beast system. They have their agents in organizations across the board. And at different points in history, have gone by various names. They all stem from evil, you will know a tree by its fruit, so to recognize evil, is to recognize them. Whatever name and masks they choose to hide behind.
I dunno dude. It’s not like your gonna find the deed to the US, signed by the Queen of England, just sitting around. That’s kinda the point. These people have spent decades, if not centuries, covering their tracks in archaic legal proceedings and corporate transfers. There are hundreds of other sources and videos on this. I just gave you a link. If that’s not up to your standard of excellence, I guess you can head on down to the National Archives and start going through the stacks for yourself. Report back to us after 20 years of research like she did. But remember, don’t speculate and be concise, because random dudes on the internet won’t settle for anything shy of serious textual analysis.
For the sake of argument, let’s say Trump is working with Milley. It’s a for-the-cameras, fake fight, like when Trump pretended to bewildered with Sessions (even though he was rounding up pedos at the highest rate ever).
Trump stepped aside for the optics - he can’t forcibly retake the White House or you get a civil war. Almost everyone here believes there’s a faction in the military that’s still loyal to President Trump. What if this is for similar optics? The Milley spat would provide similar optics, and put some distance between himself and the military (as they do exactly what we’ve expected all along and remove the bad actors). New elections could be run by the military and maybe 1 in 1000 people would suspect that it was coordinated by the Q contingent. Trump gets back in office despite having been out of power, and at odds with the military.
Makes it seem legitimate in the eyes of normies.
Added: Milley would also have to play his part, and make himself seem as far from MAGA as possible. Hence acting like an over the top cartoon caricature of wokeness.