1
summerstormAK 1 point ago +1 / -0

Me too - but I'm voting for her all across the board. I'm not leaving any blanks for election workers to fill in.

3
summerstormAK 3 points ago +3 / -0

We in Alaska need to get busy and get an initiative going to get rid of ranked choice voting. It's already a ****show and we haven't even voted yet.

1
summerstormAK 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ha! They can't even get my tax refund to me as it is.

2
summerstormAK 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's good news for Missouri. We're having to figure out how to overcome it in Alaska's next election. There are a lot of lies being spread about your vote being disqualified if you fill it out "incorrectly". It's safe to say when you fill out your ranked choice ballot: 1) Don't leave any blanks that would give the cheaters opportunity to change your vote, and 2) mark the same choice all the way across #1, 2, 3 and 4. Even if they throw out your vote because your choice didn't receive the most votes, at least you won't be voting for anyone else. After this election we need to go to work to repeal this cheater's paradise of an election process. If you don't have it yet, do everything you can to defeat it when the libs try to pass it in your state.

3
summerstormAK 3 points ago +3 / -0

No. Just no.

1
summerstormAK 1 point ago +1 / -0

Tell her not to worry. I was at one of the rallies and the security was incredible. In addition to every person entering the building being security screened, he had eight secret service agents directly around him while onstage as well as Trump team security all through the crowd both inside and outside. That was in addition to police, state troopers and event security. I never felt so secure before!

1
summerstormAK 1 point ago +1 / -0

It means history can be undone. For instance, he was impeached, but it is clear that it was a hack job and his reputation hasn't been damaged by it.

2
summerstormAK 2 points ago +2 / -0

Interesting that last sentence - it talks about choosing more than one person as your first choice; not at all what the earlier sentences were talking about. Sorta bait and switch in my opinion.

Myself, after studying it I've decided that even if they throw out ALL my choices of the same person for #1,2,3, and 4 when they eliminate my first choice, at least I'm not voting for someone I don't want. And I'm not leaving any spaces blank so to disqualify my ballot. It seems to be the best way to neuter the ranked choice nonsense.

5
summerstormAK 5 points ago +5 / -0

He may have - I could have missed that. I just know if the agents had found anything of importance, it would have leaked.

4
summerstormAK 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm more than ready to see the Fed destroyed and the IRS go away, but until that happens, I'm not willing to experiment by withholding tax funds. They've owed me several thousand dollars since March, and I'm just hoping they're still good for the funds. I've now filed twice, just to be sure they don't try to say I haven't filed. It's a mess, that's for sure.

9
summerstormAK 9 points ago +9 / -0

Wow. I'm so sorry. We definitely need the IRS to go bye-bye like the other 3-letter agencies when this is all over.

1
summerstormAK 1 point ago +1 / -0

Here's the explanation from the experts:

Nope; they're trying to deceive us. Notice in the last example two circles are not filled in: if you fill them in w the same person, your ballot DOES count. They're saying in other places that doing this "doesn't harness the power of ranked choice." But it's absolutely allowed. Here's the example from the folks who sponsored ranked choice in 2020: https://alaskansforbetterelections.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/ABE-How-to-use-your-ballot.pdf (Check out the very bottom example.)

(This is the website for the people who promoted Prop 2 back in 2020.)

Just have to fill out all the bubbles -- can't leave any blank, or it may be thrown out.

6
summerstormAK 6 points ago +6 / -0

You mean the Dianetics by L. Ron Hubbard, the scam artist of Scientology fame? No thanks

1
summerstormAK 1 point ago +1 / -0

Read Blink by Malcom Gladwell for a fascinating description of how this works.

8
summerstormAK 8 points ago +8 / -0

Chances are good that President Trump already had a complete inventory of what was in those boxes. Comparing it to the one he receives from the DOJ will reveal if anything has been added or taken out.

9
summerstormAK 9 points ago +9 / -0

It may have been a plant. The agents came with a safe-cracking expert, who opened the safe. But we have heard nothing about what they found, leading to speculation that they may not have found anything. That would be typical for President Trump playing 5D chess.

1
summerstormAK 1 point ago +1 / -0

Unfortunately, this merchandise is offered by WinRed, not by Trump or his campaign.

2
summerstormAK 2 points ago +2 / -0

We need poll watchers and video cameras. The ranked choice voting has to go. It's no accident that only Alaska and Maine "voted"/cheated it in.

3
summerstormAK 3 points ago +3 / -0

Just mark all four choices for your first choice. Ballot Measure 2 folks have publicly said that will invalidate your vote, but if you read the actual law, it is clear they are not telling the truth. This whole thing is rigged to try to get Murkowski back in office. And passing Ballot Measure 2 was rigged also.

3
summerstormAK 3 points ago +3 / -0

If they could have assassinated him, they would have long ago. POTUS is well protected.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›