I addressed that: some disinfo is necessary.
It’s not to the point where we can call it a demonic entity. Right now, it’s just software.
Continue in your ignorance and see where it gets you.
Of course we are in the middle of a war.
I’m not saying AI can’t be possessed or that there are no aspects that align it well with the binary of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil.
But it’s not there yet.
This is dumb. Lots of stuff taken out of context, first of all. One context being that many clips are from when he was younger, before his ideas evolved to what they are today.
And he addressed his brief role doing research with a group that reported for the UN.
The natural state of things was man left alone. This book documents it: https://a.co/d/9SU7QsK
No, LaoTzu now is necessary for getting to the future we want. You become the change you want to see in the world. Clean the inside of the cup before the outside.
SunTzu is necessary now too, because that’s the reality of today’s challenges.
There will be those who use violence, but it doesn’t take a government to thwart them. Violence is not the cure for violence (violence being the violation of others by force). Defensive force is not the same as violence.
Many Democrats have repeatedly spoke up for this.
https://www.naturalnews.com/039749_Planned_Parenthood_post-birth_abortions_choice.html
https://slate.com/technology/2012/03/after-birth-abortion-the-pro-choice-case-for-infanticide.html
You aren’t describing anarchy, you are describing chaos.
The Muslim Brotherhood is just the equivalent of more government, as they are violent legalists like the rest of them.
Lennon was singing about collectivism, not stateless society.
Lao Tzu wrote about an order that arises naturally when men are left alone in a state of liberty. It emerges over time through a series of progressive steps toward greater goodness, where government is no longer needed and no longer tolerated.
To Quote Q on a topic is seen as an absolute joke, as well. So clearly, that’s not the litmus test.
He speaks out against Israel, as well. So I guess the Deep State CIA and Mossad both fund Alex to inform the people of their evils…???
Nanotech in InfoWars supplements? Good lord. No there isn’t.
You’ve strong together a conspiracy but lack the facts to back it up. Speculative storytelling.
I’m sure you are suspicious as fuck about just about everyone on our side. Lol
He’s not a communist. He advocates for decentralization and believes in communal anarchism — which can operate side-by-side with anarcho-capitalism.
Yet Alex never gets angry at patriots who repeat his talking stance on things. He literally tells his audience to rip his ideas off.
Maybe Bill was a tad sensitive and prideful.
Literally, the only thing anyone here can find against Alex is what Q said.
Otherwise, we would all admire and respect Alex.
He’s woke up so many and fired up the Patriots. There’s no reason for the Deep State to take the lead in that — if Alex hadn’t been here the best and most influential would’ve been Rush Limbaugh. But Rush wasn’t exactly a Red Pill.
We need more than assertion from Q or else everyone is falling for dogma (a declaration by an authority).
Personally, I think Q expects better of us. Some disinfo was necessary — and creating division between the Q movement and the InfoWars movement was necessary for optics.
We used to call it being on the “front line” of battle.
Where does a bogus $1 billion judgement fit into this?
If there is really a Q operation (and I believe there is) then wouldn’t you also think that many of the actors in that operation will be tasked with denying the existence of the operation?
No screenshots?
I don’t buy that Alex is working for the event. Not at all. He oozes patriotism and God when he does his thing. It’s genuine.
What have you heard?
Alex helped Trump get elected the first time. BIGLY.
Why would the Deep State do such a thing?
I don’t see a mask malfunction.
At the end, Alex called the guy crazy, said “Q is back like herpes,” and that Q said Biden would be rounded up during his inauguration.
What does it take to get SCOTUS to take vote fraud seriously?
But is she off the hook? SCOTUS recently denied to hear her appeal.
I added the question, “right??” because I’m not saying it with certainty. Just asking our forum for feedback and insight.