1
txbred 1 point ago +1 / -0

rumble has the full speech on their homepage

2
txbred 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh man, she'll have to sign her name to the back of the insurance claim check and everything. Tough life.

0
txbred 0 points ago +9 / -9

Yeah, someone farts too loud and these guys will call it a dumb explosion

1
txbred 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol, 72 year old man thinks he can take on the secret service agents that will follow trump around the rest of his life?

3
txbred 3 points ago +3 / -0

yeah, that's the short version for sure, I just cant remember all the details at the moment and didnt want to spread any false information on the subject. It definitely didn't help that most people of the time weren't educated, or simply just didn't know how to read and write.

3
txbred 3 points ago +3 / -0

I've never heard of the 1700 figure, although I have heard about the lost 1000 years due to changing the way they wrote years on maps and such , so for example 1650 ad should have been i650 ("in the year of out lord, 650") but they changed the i to a 1 without correcting the difference and essentially added 1000 years to our history, (and then they made up the dark ages to fill the gap) . https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L_nYW3DyeIs somewhat good explanation since I can't find the one I learned the information from

4
txbred 4 points ago +4 / -0

One of my favorite rabbit holes. Some of my favorite sources is jonlevi on YouTube, and Michelle Gibson both do some serious digging on mudflood and the resulting reset

5
txbred 5 points ago +5 / -0

So have we finally gone full circle? This In reference to chinas fake seizure/dropping like flies videos at the start of all this nonsense.

5
txbred 5 points ago +12 / -7

Support the vax: let the less-smart of my fan base inject themselves with a gene editing "vaccine" to save my own skin.. ignorance or not, the baseline atrocities are that he is promoting a vaccine that was, FROM THE BEGINNING-MRNA, it was NEVER safe. He is clueless.

-2
txbred -2 points ago +1 / -3

Thats a little backwards, no? To have plausible deniability he would need to prove he never promoted the clot shot, yet...."you were supposed to 'read between the lines' to know what I was really saying " scenario to justify it seems very flawed.

12
txbred 12 points ago +12 / -0

and thats what they want. No more delays to get their private jets in the air if the lowly sheep aren't crowding up the airways.

4
txbred 4 points ago +4 / -0

yeah that was vague lol, I was leaning on my username being the clue, Texas, but I get it for sure-I rarely look at usernames.

7
txbred 7 points ago +7 / -0

I'm actually surprised my state didn't come in 1st. This is such a depressing image.

1
txbred 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not that Guage steel and not in the time it took before the towers fell. Yes the jet fuel can "weaken" steel in a sustained fire that is being fed jet fuel continuously to the point of heating the steel all the way through , no it can't weaken every beam to skip the stage of sagging metal, to just straight up catastrophic failure. It also can't cause molten metal streams to be found MONTHS after the towers fell, the planes, or the fuel is not the cause of the buildings failing.

11
txbred 11 points ago +12 / -1

...and people still think those thick-ass beams were melted by jet fuel lol

2
txbred 2 points ago +2 / -0

If Futurama taught me anything, all we need is some string, cats, and a basement lava pit to the core, and a turn wheel and we can just speed up the earth slightly to gain some back.

2
txbred 2 points ago +2 / -0

The sun has thrown a few somewhat big CME's in earth's direction a few days ago, and more incoming. And with earth's electromagnetic field in a weakened state the last few months, the CME's are going to affect earth weather even more.

1
txbred 1 point ago +1 / -0

agreed, that's why I searched for the formal case document to clarify, but at the same time I also first read it as just someone's personal interpretation of the case.

4
txbred 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah hate being "that guy" but I also don't want our side using their tactics.

5
txbred 5 points ago +5 / -0

Unless they did a recent edit to that case, it doesn't say anything about this image. The entire case revolves around a prisoner of war . Unless I'm missing something when reading it. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/71/2/

1
txbred 1 point ago +1 / -0

somewhat misleading. its a link in the header(here ), it doesn't apply to any specific document, rather more of a blanket warning for the snowflakes. dont get me wrong, I don't like it either way, just don't like the tactics.

6
txbred 6 points ago +6 / -0

Why is this such a big freaking deal? It just stops abortions after 6 weeks. Close your legs, demand the use of protection from your partner, use birth control, choose your partners for more than a "one night stand" basis. Its sad that people are so upset about having to be responsible about having sex.

2
txbred 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because they've already roped their populations into obedience. If we would just accept social credit, and all the other control mechanisms, they wouldn't have to burn us alive to keep their death-goal/land acquisition sustainable

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›