They have been ignoring the Constitution for over 100 years. That's why we are in this mess and why a plan had to be created. Pointing to the law now is too little too late.
yep, speaking of, where the based sheriffs at? I don't see any making any arrests for those openly and blatantly violating the highest law in the land. Time to stop being bodyguards for corrupt politicians and start doing the actual job of enforcing the law, the highest law, our constitution.
Unless they did a recent edit to that case, it doesn't say anything about this image. The entire case revolves around a prisoner of war . Unless I'm missing something when reading it.
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/71/2/
Well fren, if none of us are "that guy", then these types of things will get posted. While this post wasn't necessarily nefarious, it wasn't checkable thus may not be factual. But that opens the door to nefarious things get posted, and maybe even stickied judging by the diligence of some mods. Not knocking mods as I know they must be up to their necks, but we need real checkable info to make intelligent, informed statements and arguments for off the forum talk.
Maybe this is my ignorance speaking, but the use of all-caps, phrasing like "earn a living", and the overall format/presentation, all points to this being yet another half-assed "meme" and not any kind of real legal document.
agreed, that's why I searched for the formal case document to clarify, but at the same time I also first read it as just someone's personal interpretation of the case.
A few weeks before the hanging and after the war had ended, Milligan’s attorney filed for a writ of habeas corpus at a federal court claiming that Milligan should not have been denied his right to a trial by a jury. The lawyer argued that the military courts were unconstitutional and that the president could not suspend the writ of habeas corpus. The Supreme Court agreed in a 9-0 decision and released him from custody.
The Supreme Court ruled 9-0 in favor of Milligan in all three issues raised during the case. Should Milligan be released from custody?
Yes, he should be released from custody.
Was it constitutional for the military tribunal to arrest and charge Milligan?
The military tribunal arrest and conviction was unconstitutional.
Should Milligan be granted the right for a writ of habeas corpus?
Yes he should be granted the right for a writ of habeas corpus.
The majority opinion stated that so long as civil courts were active at home, it was unconstitutional to try American citizens by military tribunal.
It’s in Section 98! Here is a summary of the court piece we are discussing if you please. Section pages included in the summary. Also here is a copy of the court case, and legislation. And I sticky’d it. Is there a problem?
This court case is also noted in 117th Congress HR 1808, and S. 736 under the Assault Weapons Ban. Though the functionality of these pieces of legislation are in Congressional limbo.
From a commenter from 2020, “ Look up Ex Parte Milligan, 71 U.S. 2 (1866) for yourselves. the case determined it was unconstitutional to try civilians by military tribunal when civilian courts are still in operation.. it was brought about because the Courts refused to give the President at the time (Abraham Lincoln) the power of military commission jurisdiction so his administration could try and Punish Union dissenters during the Civil War. basically stating that Martial Law can not exist within the United States so long as the Civilian courts are open… it was argued before the US supreme court March 13th, 1866. It had nothing to do with the powers of government under a state of emergency.
basically this ruling only means that as civilians you can not be tried in military courts for protesting against the current situation, and that no US president will ever be able to declare martial law within the United States for any reason short of an actuall military invasion by a foreign entity.”
Yes. It’s a court case we are discussing. And a piece people are looking at for answers or reason. I still don’t see the problem against sticky-ing it for discussion or research. It’s a court case, not sovereign law. But it brings up a past point in history we are actually at now. And a point that Xiden has brought upon himself against We The People.
Do you understand why this was deleted? We are discussing a court case, not a piece of law. I made that abundantly clear. So to jump my shit in your mind’s perfection and then being disrespectful in that process will get your comments removed. Please try to be kinder, instead of jumping shit when things aren’t as perfect as you’d like. Because I can easily admit, I’m not perfect. But I do like a good discussion about historical pieces without the perfection Rheeees.
Maybe I missed it, but I don't recall in the post title or image that this is a case, it seemed to insinuate it was law.
Apologies, I wasn't trying to jump your shit and may have been a bit harsh but it was in the interest of attempts to maintain a certain level of info here. To avoid MSMish tactics by presenting partial facts, opinion, and misinformation as truth. Or law in this case lol.
Any who, so much posted here that gets away from Q and TGA, I've done it, and enjoy some of it, but I don't mind being "that guy"(from another post in the topic) when I see something that is dubious.
Hey, so on a separate note, how do I add an "avatar" to my username? I've looked in the settings but didn't seem to find anything. Probably an oversight with all the users that have them lol
Every time I see a post or text in this format (like some shitty pic of a screen rather than the screenshot etc) I get skeptical...just a few minutes of research and it seems my skepticism is warranted- this wording doesn’t match the actual case referenced. Will continue looking but this appears to be more wishful thinking (and confirmation bias) stickied again.
The “section 98” garbage doesnt even need to be researched. In a ruling from 1866, there would not be mention of “50…States”. Further, while Milligan is important and an interesting read, the case has been bastardized here. Stop stickying garbage
You may find it garbage in your mind. Others are obviously excitedly discussing it for the past historical context it now brings today to our current times. How’s about spending less time bitching at what Mods think may be a good discussion piece, and more time doing research into how to save your country too. It’s a case discussion. In other words Get Over It and move on!
"Rule Forty-two."
Q = Alice
u/#q74
Q is Hillary?
Q is ALICE as is Hillary
I think it might be CERN access.
One has it, one had it.
I don't know why it says Q = Alice
Because elsewhere he identifies H Clinton as Alice
Not even close
Oh I'm thinking of what majestic 12 said, that Alice was a reference to Hillary. I got it mixed up thinking q said it.
What's the command to embed a q post?
Thanks!
Thoughts: Will Fed trials be separated or consolidated?
They have been ignoring the Constitution for over 100 years. That's why we are in this mess and why a plan had to be created. Pointing to the law now is too little too late.
True, but when extreme measures are taken, this can be shown to the masses as legitimate justification.
Good point. We have to wake people up.
Arrest them all! You know who, even the governor and President.
This means cops too, if they enforce it then fuck them they aren't cops anymore
yep, speaking of, where the based sheriffs at? I don't see any making any arrests for those openly and blatantly violating the highest law in the land. Time to stop being bodyguards for corrupt politicians and start doing the actual job of enforcing the law, the highest law, our constitution.
Unless they did a recent edit to that case, it doesn't say anything about this image. The entire case revolves around a prisoner of war . Unless I'm missing something when reading it. https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/71/2/
Ditto, I was just about to post the same, it's either been removed, which I'd tend to doubt, or it's malarkey.
Yeah hate being "that guy" but I also don't want our side using their tactics.
Ya but if more ppl were ‘that guy’ then more of these would be verified before they’re stickied...
Keep up the great work, Patriot!
Well fren, if none of us are "that guy", then these types of things will get posted. While this post wasn't necessarily nefarious, it wasn't checkable thus may not be factual. But that opens the door to nefarious things get posted, and maybe even stickied judging by the diligence of some mods. Not knocking mods as I know they must be up to their necks, but we need real checkable info to make intelligent, informed statements and arguments for off the forum talk.
Maybe this is my ignorance speaking, but the use of all-caps, phrasing like "earn a living", and the overall format/presentation, all points to this being yet another half-assed "meme" and not any kind of real legal document.
agreed, that's why I searched for the formal case document to clarify, but at the same time I also first read it as just someone's personal interpretation of the case.
Thank you!!!
King of the hill post right here! WWG1WGA! A clear act of war (per court case) by our own Administration on We The People!
Good find. Thank you!
http://sites.gsu.edu/us-constipedia/ex-parte-milligan-1866/
Thanks
"Hope."
"Hope?"
"Hope. It is the only thing stronger than fear."
https://youtu.be/mtuBqolFOVs?t=37 (1 min)
Watch for the "Contain It" moment.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h3xFAltAjDw ( 6 seconds)
https://greatawakening.win/p/12kFdoRpsk/x/c/
This is wrong and misinformation, if it isn't, than provide some sauce.
No where in the document is the above wording mentioned. Who stickies this garbage?!
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/71/2/
It’s in Section 98! Here is a summary of the court piece we are discussing if you please. Section pages included in the summary. Also here is a copy of the court case, and legislation. And I sticky’d it. Is there a problem?
https://www.johnnymelton.com/2020/04/23/ex-parte-milligan-71-u-s-2-1866/
https://constitution.org/1-Law/ussc/071-002a.htm
This court case is also noted in 117th Congress HR 1808, and S. 736 under the Assault Weapons Ban. Though the functionality of these pieces of legislation are in Congressional limbo.
From a commenter from 2020, “ Look up Ex Parte Milligan, 71 U.S. 2 (1866) for yourselves. the case determined it was unconstitutional to try civilians by military tribunal when civilian courts are still in operation.. it was brought about because the Courts refused to give the President at the time (Abraham Lincoln) the power of military commission jurisdiction so his administration could try and Punish Union dissenters during the Civil War. basically stating that Martial Law can not exist within the United States so long as the Civilian courts are open… it was argued before the US supreme court March 13th, 1866. It had nothing to do with the powers of government under a state of emergency.
basically this ruling only means that as civilians you can not be tried in military courts for protesting against the current situation, and that no US president will ever be able to declare martial law within the United States for any reason short of an actuall military invasion by a foreign entity.”
Yes. It’s a court case we are discussing. And a piece people are looking at for answers or reason. I still don’t see the problem against sticky-ing it for discussion or research. It’s a court case, not sovereign law. But it brings up a past point in history we are actually at now. And a point that Xiden has brought upon himself against We The People.
It’s a court case! Not a law! Re-read my last reply.
Do you understand why this was deleted? We are discussing a court case, not a piece of law. I made that abundantly clear. So to jump my shit in your mind’s perfection and then being disrespectful in that process will get your comments removed. Please try to be kinder, instead of jumping shit when things aren’t as perfect as you’d like. Because I can easily admit, I’m not perfect. But I do like a good discussion about historical pieces without the perfection Rheeees.
Maybe I missed it, but I don't recall in the post title or image that this is a case, it seemed to insinuate it was law.
Apologies, I wasn't trying to jump your shit and may have been a bit harsh but it was in the interest of attempts to maintain a certain level of info here. To avoid MSMish tactics by presenting partial facts, opinion, and misinformation as truth. Or law in this case lol.
Any who, so much posted here that gets away from Q and TGA, I've done it, and enjoy some of it, but I don't mind being "that guy"(from another post in the topic) when I see something that is dubious.
Peace out, God bless, and enjoy the weekend!
Thank you for the kind apologies. Have a good weekend too.
Hey, so on a separate note, how do I add an "avatar" to my username? I've looked in the settings but didn't seem to find anything. Probably an oversight with all the users that have them lol
In your settings for your account.
You have more than you know...
YOU DON'T SAY
What's the original source of this blurb, OP
Thanks
Every time I see a post or text in this format (like some shitty pic of a screen rather than the screenshot etc) I get skeptical...just a few minutes of research and it seems my skepticism is warranted- this wording doesn’t match the actual case referenced. Will continue looking but this appears to be more wishful thinking (and confirmation bias) stickied again.
Thanks
We have to find a way to enforce that. I don't think Nancy Pelosi is gonna rush this one through.
It's either been removed/amended, or the pic is malarkey. The wording is no where in the current document.
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/71/2/
The “section 98” garbage doesnt even need to be researched. In a ruling from 1866, there would not be mention of “50…States”. Further, while Milligan is important and an interesting read, the case has been bastardized here. Stop stickying garbage
You may find it garbage in your mind. Others are obviously excitedly discussing it for the past historical context it now brings today to our current times. How’s about spending less time bitching at what Mods think may be a good discussion piece, and more time doing research into how to save your country too. It’s a case discussion. In other words Get Over It and move on!
Thanks