3
yldngo 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's the one with the guy on the one seater craft with a small BBQ grill and American flag.

0
yldngo 0 points ago +1 / -1

Of coarse it was a plane... in a day or two they'll find the pilot's driver's license...

4
yldngo 4 points ago +4 / -0

Maybe a bad idea to go to the Super Bowl...

17
yldngo 17 points ago +17 / -0

John 14:6
6 Jesus said to him, “I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.

3
yldngo 3 points ago +4 / -1

This pilot doesn't at all mention the obvious ascension of the helo. It's in his video PAT at 002 (200') changes to PAT 003 (300') just before impact. Even in the video of the collision it is observable the the helo is rising.
It does seem clear that the helo pilot accepts responsibility for separation and claims to see the plane... is it to far of a stretch to ask if it was intentional?

4
yldngo 4 points ago +4 / -0

He assumes the helo pilot visually spots the wrong plan on a very clear night. He may be right. He also doesn't discuss the helo ascending from 002 (200 feet of elevation) to 003 (300 feet) in the last moments before the crash. The established flight path of the helo is 200 feet max. This can be visually observed in the videos he shows. The helo rises to intersect the plane. It's a near miss if the helo stays below 200 feet. I don't suspect he's trying to steer us wrong but he's missing two obvious critical aspects of this incident.

by grtdayn
4
yldngo 4 points ago +4 / -0

Is the tranny craze an MKultra product?

5
yldngo 5 points ago +5 / -0

I saw a couple stating 200 feet for the route. 100 is low but seems reasonable right beside the airport. I don't have a definitive sauce. Either way, the helo can be observed ascending in the video while the plane is approaching. My tin foil hat is telling me the helo had some kind of hostile take over that utilized a SOP until it was in striking distance.

5
yldngo 5 points ago +5 / -0

Thanks for your input UF!

3
yldngo 3 points ago +3 / -0

The helo had an authorized route that had an elevation limit of 200 feet. It seems like it wouldn't be uncommon for this route to be used during busy times when planes where coming across that route at 400 feet. What seems to really make this crash suspicious is the helo diverting and ascending nearly 200 feet at the right time to collide with the plane.
The ATC wouldn't have been worried to much about the helo if it would have stayed at the expected 200 feet of elevation as would have been normal and expected.

4
yldngo 4 points ago +4 / -0

The helicopter was on an approved route for a maximum of 200 feet. In the last moments before impact it climbed almost 200 feet to collide with the aeroplane. The plane was 100% doing what it should have been doing and so was the ATC. No one expected the helicopter to ascend and collide, perhaps not even the helicopter crew.

5
yldngo 5 points ago +5 / -0

At what age may a young person exist and defend the country with a gun... and at what age may the same person buy a hand gun?

2
yldngo 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you watch all of Trump's brief he heavily leans toward this being the helicopter pilot's error but never specifically says who he blames.

3
yldngo 3 points ago +3 / -0

When does the bernie in mittens at the 2020 inauguration meme get changed to have him in a onesie...

4
yldngo 4 points ago +4 / -0

Why does this guy not discuss the flight path of the helo. The abx shows it did not take off from that base as he claims?

4
yldngo 4 points ago +4 / -0

If 5 is too few just get two of them. Most things small enough don't hold many more. A Ruget LCP only holds 6 +1 chambered... a G19 or G26 would use your mags but really isn't that much smaller... but is still going to be familiar and reliable.

8
yldngo 8 points ago +8 / -0

Psalm 18:27-31
27 For you save a humble people, but the haughty eyes you bring down. 28 For it is you who light my lamp; the Lord my God lightens my darkness. 29 For by you I can run against a troop, and by my God I can leap over a wall. 30 This God—his way is perfect; the word of the Lord proves true; he is a shield for all those who take refuge in him. 31 For who is God, but the Lord? And who is a rock, except our God?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›