My kid (25) voted for Qidan. I respected his right to choose. Then he bought GME after following “DeepFuckingValue” on Reddit. He panicked when it dipped and sold 90 of his 100 shares and (only) doubled his investment in a month. He was bummed. He was angered when the powers that be stopped people from buying. First we talked about protecting your capital is the #1 rule. Then we talked about the forces at work and the battle for hearts and minds. He took a few red pills. I explained my red pill was 911. Who bought millions of dollars in puts on the airline stocks the week before? They made billions! Plus the free falling twin towers not to mention the 3rd building (hardened for a nuclear strike) going down several days later. I lost friends over that. They could not stomach the red pill. I asked him if he saw the irony in someone named DeepFuckingValue buying a junk company like GME. The only deep value is knowing a huge short squeeze is coming. Then, I really baked his noodle when I asked him, “who do you threw the billions at GME to force that short squeeze?” That was a killer whale taking out the apex predator sharks (hedge funds). Do the math. No way millions of little guys outgunned the hedge funds. He said wow Dad that’s a lot to think about. Then he said, do you always notice stuff like this? I said, my job is to leave the world a better place then I found it for you and all those I love. So yes, I do.
Comments (137)
sorted by:
The third building went down the same day around 5PM or a few minutes after.
It’s been 20 years but I thought it was a day or two later.
Nope, it was pulled same day. Well after BBC reporter went live saying it collapsed while still clearly up in the background, but I digress.
And Larry Silverstein was on camera saying "Pull it!"
At least he no longer had to worry about paying to have all that asbestos removed anymore.
I am so sick of all of this.
"Let it rip"
I remember that. I thought wait, I see it. How do you know it collapsed. A day to remember for sure.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=B7CLP7mbPqA
Found a clip.
I was there. First time I had ever heard the term 'pull the building', along with the industry slang definition of what it meant.
Na, but notably it was reported in UK 20 minutes before it actually happened.
Well, to be fair, the UK is ahead of us, time wise. So obviously they already saw what happened before we did. /s
For what it's worth, you could still see building 7 behind the reporter in a "live" shot while she was reporting it had collapsed.
LOL, that's illogical mate. Live is live, it does not matter what time zone one is reporting from. It's not like they are in a worm hole lol.
need more o's in that woosh for this madllad
You missed the /s sarc tag lad...
I know, it was meant to be sarcasm... /s
Figured as much, and that's what I give you the self righteous reply.
Larry "Pull It" Silverstein
Another free-fall. My recollection of the narrative was it “collapsed” from damages caused by debris from the Towers. A hardened steel superstructure. I was like, “yeah right you morons”.
I thought he meant hours
And remember the official explanation never mentioned demolition. They stick to the claim that office fires brought down building seven that same afternoon. Office fires DO NOT collapse steel structures and certainly NEVER at free fall speed.
I believe they left tower 7 out of the 9/11 report as well. Tried to memory hole that one. Idk how many people that I’ve tried to red pill about 9/11 and I always ask them to explain tower 7 and most don’t even know what I’m talking about and know nothing about it
It truly is the fly in the ointment
I think the official explanation was that a giant building fell on it in addition to fires.
Except building 7 was too far away....no building fell on it. Facts. All the other buildings.... absolutely crushed by towers....yet....none of them collapsed.
I'm just saying what the official explanation is. They claim it was struck by debris from the towers collapsing and that its internals looked like this.
https://www.nist.gov/sites/default/files/images/2017/02/09/building_research_buckling_of_wtc7_column_79.jpg
Bahhahahaahahahahahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahha. There was some damage to the face of the building but that's about it. NIST had a major conflict of interest. They should have never been allowed to investigate the collapse. They were paid to make the collapse seem possible using a computer model and that's exactly what they did.
yeah, but it wasn’t on fire, nothing hit it, yet it free fall anyway
It was on fire. A few floors had mysterious office fires for unknown reasons. And then the whole building fell into its own basement. Magic!
i remember that video of the police chick saying “move away! they’re gonna bring the building down!”
^This....Yes!
It's GME not GMX
Fixed. Thanks.
Your entire thesis makes no sense unfortunately but I like the free thinking attitude! Your assumptions have flaws, game spot was deep value, it was prematurely left for dead as being "another blockbuster" when actually it was still doing lots of business with new age consoles. Even Michael bury of Big Short fame was buying the stock and talking about its death being premature.
They did catch hedge funds shorting it to death, and the amount of eyeballs on this is insane. There isn't always a conspiracy behind the conspiracy, naked short selling is sinister on its face and makes these guys billions of dollars. They have destroyed countless companies doing this. What would be interesting to see is if good guys helped expose the naked short selling for what it is because now the game is exposed.
This event is a major positive, and the worst people are losing billions.
I see the hand of the White Hats all over this.
Just 'cause WSBets' mascot looks like lil' Don Trump? Naaaahhhh...
Any action that successfully squashes a big deep state player can be safely assumed to be White Hat operation at this moment.
I don’t pretend to be a valuation expert on GME. I do know that in the market, bulls make money, bears make money and pigs get slaughtered.
https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/so-you-just-raided-your-first-company-letter-non-professional-traders?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone
This was just stickied.
Bunch of BS and correctly called out in the comments. They like the stock!
The DeepValue guy is a Wii Fit trainer looking dude, probably a bit older than your son.
He was wearing a "Game Over" shirt for what it''s worth.
on the 9/11 stuff honestly I was just looking for an explanation of why the towers fell straight downward like a demolition implosion and not like they took an impact from the side and all i got was mocked... people assume you're taking a definitive stance on something just because you ask questions
We were trained to do that (ex leftist here) it’s being baked into the online and media culture.
I’ve realized my behavior and that of others emulates television to a disturbing degree.
The more I look into everything the more I realize what a dumb fucking animal I am.
I am not sure if its a coincidence but the leftists push the idea of Left Brain thinking (logic and facts), while completely suppressing Right Brain thinking (instincts)
youre not a dumb animal. youre a person who learns and evolves and changes their model of reality based on new information. all part of life my friend
The math would say that the plane wouldn't have even remotely enough force to hit the building over onto its side or something like that, if that's what your suggesting.
Demolition wouldn't be necessary. Structural integrity is a gritty game. With tall buildings like that, all of the materials are in constant and extensive tension. They're designed to maintain and strike equilibrium between the tensions, making them incredibly durable in the face of widespread forces (heavy winds, for example). A plane collision could easily have broken key nodes in the structure, destroying the equilibrium of tensions and causing the entire structure to slowly "unravel" if you will.
The whole "Jet fuel can't melt steel beams" thing is a meme for good reason. In a building like that there's a lot more going on in terms of forces than just the direct surroundings of the jet. A skyscraper has tremendous energy in it at all times, by necessity, due to the omnipresent force of gravity on a relatively localized point. In the right circumstances, energy converts to heat and extreme forces rather easily.
I think a lot of people have trouble recognizing how large structures like that behave. A lot of insight into that can be gleaned from watching the Japanese skyscrapers respond to earthquakes . They're designed to be flexible enough that said earthquakes bend them instead of shattering them.
Another example of what happens when structural tensions aren't sufficiently balanced can be seen in the footage of the Tacoma Narrows Bridge Collapse
It's for these reasons that I don't really buy the idea that there was demolition, etc. involved [at least, in the two main towers]. I do however entertain the idea that it was known about in advance and not prevented.
As far as all sorts of weird reports, I think that's just what happens when you have awful media, complete and utter chaos, and massive trauma all bundled in one. It's well documented that eye-witnesses to severely traumatic events (car accidents, for example) can all have different stories because people have trouble processing said events.
Sources: Family full of experienced engineers of all kinds.
My background is Chemical Engineering with four years practicing followed by a JD. So I’m not a statics and dynamics expert by any means but I’m also smart enough to know that a free fall requires just the right conditions and if not achieved, the building demolition will not be free fall and will likely topple to one side or the other. Not to debate 911 here - that’s not the point. The point is that what you see is not always the real reason for why things happen. Love, Dad
Agree with the last part, I'm not even trying to push a certain thing, I just like introducing other ways of looking at things.
That said, I can see what you're saying with toppling to the side, if it were more of an isolated structural failure (think removing the bottom-side Jenga block). In the instance where the tower received first structural failure from the top, if it were to collapse, it would likely be due to structure-wide complete systemic integrity failure. It may start to tip, but it wouldn't get far because it would effectively crumple under its own weight. Think sand castle, moreso.
If anything, I would argue that a more vertical collapse would LESS so imply explosives at the base, as that might not have sufficient time to damage structural integrity near the top, yielding greater room for tipping, potentially.
I really think there are just enough variables in play that you couldn't say with even remote certainty how it would or should behave without significant testing and computer modeling. My understanding is that people have done some of that and gotten mixed results. That tells me more detail and a wider spread of tests would be necessary.
Either way, I agree with the sentiment of challenging apparent answers and thinking, because in life, things tend to be overwhelmingly more complicated than people can even process.
So building 7 collapsed without a plane, rationalize that away.
Once you admit 7 was a controlled demolition, and the demolition crew was there that day to do the job, COINCIDENTALLY two other buildings beside it happened to also just implode vertically on the same day from airplanes without the demolition crew who was NEXT DOOR being involved. And this building 7 "pull it" demolition wasn't public knowledge, so they were attempting to keep it a secret. Why?
Chances that it is a coincidence 7 was demolished the same day the other two neatly implode in to perfect little insurance payout piles is what, one in infinity? One in a trillion? What if they didn't collapse and just stood there? 7 just implodes anyway?
The debris coming out of the other two towers would be significant in many instances - large steel chunks with concrete - and be propelled with significant force. It would be like a giant artillery slug hitting the buildings nearby with each chunk. Add onto that flaming debris (and incendiary materials) hitting them, igniting them as well, causing similar kinds of structural damages to them.
Excellent computer simulation demonstrating what I've been talking about across multiple posts in regards to horizontal and vertical tensions and forces in the structures. At risk of redundancy, go ahead and check those out as well.
Meanwhile building 7 demolition crews are on standby but definitely didn't guarentee those buildings went down. Got it.
So you believe the steel just metled because the fuel was on fire?
1.) steel doesn't need to melt to lose integrity; temperatures can alter it to make it brittle or more susceptible to weakness.
2.) The fire from the fuel ignited other things in the area, many of which could have had greater burning temperatures. Add on to that that some of this was in a relatively enclosed location; think oven.
So the question is, do you think that the instabilities due to temperature + other things burning along with the fuel would be enough to make the buildings collapse the way they did ?
I can easily understand if these instabilities started causing chunks of building to collapse and as a result they had to demolish it. But clearly (at least for the two towers) this was not the case. They organically collapsed and the steel was shipped out very quickly.
A building doesn't really collapse in chunks like that. One of the biggest problems if I remember right was rapid fire spread. The other reason it could very well happen like that gets back to what I was talkin' about before; a large, and in particular, tall, structure like that is under massive tension, by necessity.
You have steel beams acting as cross-sections which are holding the structure together by tension especially; beams in the floors are pulling horizontally due to the nature of the forces upon them. The tower would constantly have forces that, if not sufficiently counterbalanced, would tear it apart at the seams.
Do a little experiment, if you want. take some clay or putty or something, and make a tower out of it. then, gently push down on the top uniformly with your hand (like gravity). See how it bulges to the sides. A tower like that is constantly under forces to compel it to flatten/bulge, meaning not only does the structure have to be strong vertically, but it also must be strong horizontally.
Now, take out or severely damage the materials in that horizontal and vertical cross section. Fires will damage the integrity of the beams, and that isn't even to mention the materials like the concrete around those beams (which are actually in many ways just as crucial as the beams; they support each other because different materials have different kinds of strength (see here). With that kind of damage rapidly becoming widespread throughout each tower, top to bottom, it makes sense that it might literally collapse in on itself.
Also consider the possibility that some of the urge to cover parts up (hauling out steel rapidly) may be due to something entirely different; covering up corners that were cut in construction or maintenance. If it became known that the towers fell so rapidly and extremely due to corners cut in original construction (with the implication that they may not have fallen remotely as rapidly if they had been constructed up to spec), imagine the public outrage. Perhaps the steel was lower grade than it was supposed to be?
I think people need to get more creative and think outside the box when questioning common narratives. Sure, the mainstream one might be bullshit, but there are likely a thousand and one probable alternatives to the one that some people chose to believe. I tend to think that the inside job stuff jumps to far too many conclusions whilst ignoring much simpler and possibly more likely answers, especially when the justification really isn't there. Surely the towers didn't need to be taken down in order to impose the Patriot act and go to war? I think a lot less would have been more than sufficient, and I also think that risking exposure by performing such a visible and extreme false flag would be a really impractical move. I do of course think that it was taken advantage of, hence why I stated before that it's possible they knew about it in advance and just didn't stop it.
Lets say I buy your whole Clay analogy and that the beams are constantly under stress, and the fire damages the integrity of the beams and other supporting structures.
I still fail to imagine the synchronous way in which this damage become widespread from top to bottom. I rewatched the first tower falling. The building collapses starting from the top and going down extremely uniformly and extremely fast.
For what you are suggesting to be true, at the precise moment when the top of the building gets damaged enough to break, the damage should "spread" downward very quickly and uniformly, to see what we observe.
But if the damage is happening the way you suggest, the actual damage spread downwards would be significantly reduced as it reaches further down. And the time to spread would be longer than just fraction of a second. The only way the damage could propagate downwards so quickly and so uniformly is if the beams melted.
Now, let me explain why the Clay analogy might be a very misleading model. In your analogy you mention pressing it from the top uniformly (like gravity). But the damage we are seeing is nothing like that. There is no uniform downward acting force of the magnitude necessary to collapse the building, thats at hand.
As for the urge to coverup - I just cannot wrap my head around the idea of covering up for cutting corners. To be able to figure out that some corners were cut by looking at the debris is impossible, even if, say 10% of the materials were cut (and I am taking an absolutely crazy number. In reality it will be more like 1 or 2%, otherwise the building would have collapsed long ago). I mean, walk me through this logic. Were they afraid that someone would weigh the steel and the concrete and say "Aha, there is 10% less than what should have been there, and thats why the building collapsed!" ?
And, the people involved in constructing the tower came quickly and pulled the strings of the government, currently deep in dealing with the crisis of epic proportions and convinced them to get rid of the evidence so this cutting corner will not be exposed? And the relevant authorities all acquiesed ?
Far more simpler explanation would be to avoid exposing obvious signs such as explosives, radiation, or whatever other signatures that would easily make it clear that this was an inside job.
But I understand your effort. If you really want to believe that something happened a certain way, you can always keep finding evidence that confirms that belief. I used to be the same was as well, and its a very left brain thinking.
I have learnt to assimilate all information and let my right brain do the thinking and provide instinctual insights. More often than not, those instincts are more spot on since our subconscious brain is able to process vast amount of input to come up with what we call "instinct", but really a very large scale computation that our conscious brain cannot perform.
I'm not saying any which way is true, I'm just saying that there are a lot of possible explanations besides the common ones.
As far as cutting corners, if the metallurgy of the steel is off dramatically, something like that could likely be observed in the debris of said metal by someone with experience working on that kind of steel. That is to say, the way it fractures, bends, etc., would very possibly make a flaw in the steel very evident to those with experience.
Corner cutting doesn't have to mean less materials used. It just as easily may mean inferior materials used, or inferior construction techniques used in combining said materials. Such inferiorities, as I said before, tend to leave distinct patterns. This is due to the different atomic structural makeup of those materials; it's the same reason salt is a different crystal shape than sugar, for example.
What's more, if the metallurgy is off on the steel used, it's very possible that they may have a different melting point.
One of the biggest weaknesses of the clay analogy is that it ignores interior space. Perhaps a better comparison may be collapsing a cardboard box in the same way. Technically, it can fold in, it can fold out, or it can fold a mix. Either way, the problem in question structurally isn't the tower's ability to resist the force of gravity vertically, it's about it's horizontal strength. We do have the force necessary in this instance; that force is gravity. Don't forget that it isn't just acting on one part of the building; any part above the point of critical failure will be effectively added mass upon the remaining parts that haven't failed yet. That adds up quickly, and increases as the structure collapses.
Here is some excellent footage that demonstrates what I'm saying happening. You can, through the smoke, make out at 1:44 the sides collapse, just as they would with a squished pile of clay. Because the upper part still has it's mass, it proceeds to fall, effectively splitting the rest of the structure that is already weakened and compromised by losing critical structural keystones, much like a log splits vertically. Because the structure was designed to evenly disburse the force of gravity, not to take it on single points, when the debris of the top falls, it rather easily cuts those horizontal supports, allowing the tower to rapidly collapse under its own weight, and spreading plumes of debris out in all directions (which went on to damage neighboring structures. They are, in effect, massive chunks of debris with about the velocity of a falling artillery shell, which explains the severity of the damage to neighboring structures).
Here's a good video simulating the structure with different levels of force and strength. Primarily, I'm employing it to show what I'm talking about in terms of the physics and the folding and such.
Why would such a cover-up happen? Part of that is explained in the first half, but there's more. If the building had been built and maintained with corners cut, that would be evident in inspections. That means that the government would be complicit in the corner cutting, which may potentially put massive blood on their hands. Do you really think they'd want to risk the chance of such a thing getting out? The public uproar against them would be astonishing. It would also redirect from their ability to utilize the tragedy to their benefit; by keeping the blame solely on the terrorists, they were able to exercise the full extent of their agenda.
The kind of cover-up required for outright demolition would be astonishingly higher than just covering up some cut corners. Add on to that the likelihood that the plane strike alone would very likely be enough to bring down the towers (Either in the short run, or in the long run have them damaged enough to pose a giant risk), and it just doesn't seem like a pragmatic plan from the perspective of the deep state.
Bonus model here, as well. The National Geographic fluff is annoying, but the model itself, as well as the thermal-camera testing is rather fascinating. On top of that, there should be fairly accessible and reproducible procedures to finding these conclusions yourself. Given this is from 2009, the computer power to model that is probably fairly accessible to anyone today, if you so desired to model it yourself. The other part of this video that is good, is the part where the scientist explains very succinctly what I was trying to say about the steel beams being softened, not fully melted.
I'm not saying that there were corners cut. I'm not saying there wasn't demolition, or an inside job, or more going on. I'm saying that there are alternatives, that, in my eyes, better match with the available information. From the point of view of the deep state, such a move as using explosives at the base would have been far too dangerous in terms of potential for exposure. Even loading additional explosives on the aircraft would have been significantly easier (and much easier to explain, as well) and have just as good an effect.
He is dead wrong, and to assume they wired 7 but not the other two? They just happened to have the "pull it" demolition team there on the same day?
Insane and impossible
Also the fact that the BBC reporters talked about 7 falling makes me think that build 7 was supposed to be demolished earlier, but they probably delayed it .. and my wild guess is that they had forgotten some important stuff there and they want to retrieve it
Go revisit every assumption you have because you are dead wrong. The concrete cores down the middle wouldn't just implode evenly at the same time, you need to revisit the construction of those buildings. Insane structural strength. The outside of it was structural steal not curtain wall. Impossible for it to be brought down by the planes AND if they wired building 7 which is obvious you think they didn't wire the other two?
I heard about them falling while I was sitting on an airplane waiting to take off (spoiler: we didn’t). I imagined them tipping over where they were compromised, like a tree getting cut down. It just seemed weird they basically evaporated. Also crazy that no other steel tower has ever collapsed, so we have no reference point.
Empire State building got hit by a big plane, look it up. Nothing serious happened to the building.
Yup, it’s almost like these massive steel and concrete buildings are designed to remain standing even after a direct hit and massive fire.
I remember asking the exact same question and my friends screaming at me "Do you even know how hot it gets when a jetliner full of fuel burns up?" and I just accepted it. It never made sense though.
You sound like my Dad. He’s been red pulling me since I was 9. We joke about how I was born outside the matrix. Something went wrong with my brother though and he’s jaded and stubborn.
This post is awesome! Thanks
And it’s all true. I wondered often what I did wrong in raising him - turns out - nothing.
Beautiful! I’m awaiting the same with one of my girls. Your post meant a lot to me.
Your post meant a lot to me. I’m awaiting the same with one of my girls.
I hope that they have a few red pills soon. We do what we can while respecting them as the unique human beings that God made them.
We are not alone. Lin Wood’s kids don’t talk to him because he is fighting the good (but extremely unpopular) fight. Unpopular to leftards that is.
So Dad!
I feel Saudi Arabia is behind GME. What do you think the end game is with all this trying to kill the hedge funds?
https://stillnessinthestorm.com/2021/01/david-nino-rodriguez-explains-why-february-1-is-the-day-it-all-starts/
Wall Street has been laundering money. It all starts to implode tomorrow. Trump and his genius EOs. Thank God for real POTUS!!
BOOM
So “Son”, what makes you feel SA is the buyer? I’m no expert on SA but I do know there are many factions there and they all have a lot of money. There could be several whales there.
I generally think intuition can be very helpful (feelings), but facts can be more convincing, especially if you’re investing $$$.
It’s an interesting theory and one I had not considered. How would you research that? Consider deepcapture.com as your homework assignment. ?
Dad, dad, daaaad. I’m just forming my theory, I just started last night. I know. Too many theories floating around but just listen to me once. YOU NEVER LISTEN YO ME DAD!!!!
I feel there’s a trillionaire-whale behind the “little people of GME”. Millions of kids putting their life savings of $200 isn’t going to squeeze out Wall Street. And I bet all of Wall Street is about to fight us soon so who is capable of fighting them on equal qround?
China Israel Vatican Saudi Arabia And of course “those we do not know”
I also feel it has to be a Trump ally. I feel Trump et all in his camp are behind this. And Q told me so and I’m sticking with him with blind faith until the end. Seeing the Trump vista and SA’s posture over the last 5 yrs I feel they are the ones.
Promise Dad, I’ll start building my case BUT AT LEAST MOM BELIEVES ME!!!
When you browse wallstreetbets it has the same kind of energy as the_donald in 2015-2016. Wouldn't be surprised at all if the same type of psyop was used to manipulate the masses.
Don’t stop believing. Hold onto those dreaaaaams.... Journey circa 1980s
would be terrific last laugh if Trumps portfolio increased by a magnitude of ten after this is all over.
Yes! Considering how much he and his family have lost since he embarked on this mission.
It is not just "kids" with life savings of $200, there are many of us middle aged folk who said "fuck it" and dropped a couple thousand and then some.... just saying. I believe there are a couple whales in this (possibly Cuban, Musk, and AT LEAST one of the Trumps), but do not doubt a good chunk of boomers are playing the casino along side the millennials who realize the solid chance to get an ROI of up to and beyond 5x what we threw down. This is a once in a lifetime stock play (at least it should...) and there are more than enough people jumping on this that is messing up the hedge funds' play leading to increased valuation as they play their options to try to minimize their losses.
Follow the money. Future proves past! Unreal.
He’s saying an ally w a deep pocket was behind most of the capital that went into GME to trigger the shorts into a squeeze. This never occurred to me but I think he’s right. Probably a Trump ally.
Agreed. The statement made no sense to me.
Naked short selling is sinister enough, we don't need to invent new theories here.
This needs actual evidence or it's just BS talk
Do you believe that Keith Gill is DeepFuckingValue? The WSB interview came out allegedly identifying him as such, and it was just accepted uncritically by everyone on reddit it seems... although I cannot find any other association between KG who also goes by "Roaring Kitty" and the DeepFuckingValue account. KG does talk about GME a lot but I don't know if that is enough to connect them.
I haven’t actually investigated this but I am skeptical that he would have the right connections. People that are connected almost never brag about it.
A bit older than most, but my redpills were 11/22/1963 then it was Vietnam (4 year vet) though there wasn't an internet to go down the rabbit hole back then.
I’ll just throw in my 2cents on 911. The bedrock was melted. I have a picture but how do I show it here? What melts bedrock >nuke fission explosion.
AND THIS IS WHY:
Sound familiar?? TEXT TAKEN FROM JOHN D. ROCKEFELLER'S MASONIC CREED -WHAT THE ELITE THINK ABOUT US COMMON FOLKS, THE UNCLEAN MASSES! " We will keep their lives short and their minds weak while pretending to do the opposite. We will use our knowledge of science and technology in subtle ways so that they never see what is happening. We will use soft metals, aging accelerators and sedatives in food and water as well as in the air. They will be covered in poisons wherever they turn. The soft metals will make them lose their minds. We will promise to find a cure from our many funds, and yet we will give them more poison. Chemical poisons will be absorbed through the skin of idiots who believe that certain hygiene and beauty products presented by great actors and musicians, will bring eternal youth to their faces and bodies, and through their thirsty and hungry mouths, we will destroy their minds and systems of internal organs. reproduction. However, their children will be born as disabled and deformed and we will hide this information. The poisons will be hidden in everything around them, in what they drink, eat, breathe and wear. We have to be ingenious in distributing the poisons because they can see far. We'll teach them that poisons are good - with funny pictures and musical tones on TV. Those who are looking for them will be helpful. We'll enroll them to push our poisons. They will see that our products are used in film and they will get used to them and will never know their true effect. When they give birth, we will inject poisons into the blood of their children and convince them that we are helping them! We will start earlier, when their minds are young, we will target their children with what children love most, sweet things. When their teeth decay, we will fill them with metals that will kill their minds and steal their future. When their ability to learn has been affected, we have created drugs that will make them sicker and cause them other illnesses, for which we will create even more drugs. We will make them docile and weak before us, by our power. They will grow depressed, slow and obese, and when they come to us for help, we will give them more poison. We will focus our attention on money and material goods so that they never connect with their inner self. We will distract them with fornication, external pleasures and video games, so that they are never one with the unity of all. Their minds will belong to us, and they will do as we say. If they refuse, we will find ways to implement technology that alters the mind in their lives. We will use fear as our weapon. We will establish their governments and we will establish opposition within them. We will own both sides. We will always hide our goal, but we will continue our plan. They will do the work for us, and we will prosper from their toil. Our families will never mix with theirs. Our blood must be pure (because it is). We will make them kill each other when they oppose us. We will keep them separate from unity through dogma and religion. We will control all aspects of their lives and tell them what to think and how. We will guide them kindly and let them believe that they are guiding themselves. We will instigate animosity among them through our factions. When a light shines among them, we will extinguish it by mockery or death, which suits us best. We will make them tear their hearts apart and kill their own children. We will accomplish this using hatred as our ally, anger as our friend. Hatred will completely blind them and they will never see that in their conflicts we will be their leaders. They will be busy killing each other. They will bathe in their own blood and kill their neighbors, as long as we see that they are against us. We will benefit greatly from this, for they will not see us, for they cannot see us. We will continue to prosper from their wars and their deaths. We will repeat this until our ultimate goal is achieved. We will continue to make them live in fear and anger, we will give them images and sounds. We will use all the tools we have to achieve this. The tools will be provided by their work. We will make them hate themselves and their neighbors. We will always hide the divine truth from them, that we are all one. That he must never know! They must never know that color is an illusion, they must always believe that they are not equal. Drop by drop, drop by drop we will advance our goal. We will take over their lands, resources and wealth to exercise control over them. We will trick them into accepting laws that will steal the little freedom they have. We will set up a money system that will shut them down forever, keeping them and their children in debt. When we ban them together, we will accuse them of murder and present a different story to the world because we will own all the media. We will use the media to control the flow of information and their feelings in our favor. When they rise up against us, we will crush them like insects, because they are less than that. They will be helpless to do anything about it”.
You got that sauce?
They had video games in John D Rockefeller’s day?
Nice work!
Who is the killer whale? I assumed it was millions of retail investors the world over
Yeah, that's what I want to know.
I'm still not clear on whether this is really an organic revolution by the little guy, a white hat operation against the elite, or a deep state operation to crash the dollar and enact more censorship.
So far it seems like a good thing, but I'm just not sure what the end game is in this situation.
I don’t know who the killer whale is but it could be Trump led coalition of investors or even a US agency.
So how much do you actually know about the GME squeeze? Because DFV has been on top of this from a literal value perspective for at least a year now. It wasn't until September~October time-frame of 2020 that people started to see the writing on the wall with the shorts. If you go watch DFVs YouTube videos, he LITERALLY bought in because he believes that GME still has value since people still really like physical games. He bought in around 4.50 per share, expecting it to climb back up to 10-15 range, he never expected this short squeeze beyond saying "I mean the potential short squeeze is there, you have to acknowledge it, but im still looking at this from a fundamentals perspective."
I know next to nothing about the GME squeeze. I know A LOT about short squeezes, after having made and lost many thousands of dollars playing the market from 1999-2002. Go read deepcapture.com if you want an education. I was waaay long until March of 2000 then went waaay short. I’ve bought calls and puts and seen how the pricing varies based on time and volatility.
I made friends with a hedge fund manager who ran a “fund of funds”. When a fund wants to go long, they slowly build their positions over time. They do not buy all at once. The more they control the harder it becomes to out-perform because just getting the $$ deployed moves the market.
But, I know enough of the story from what I’ve seen here and from talking to my son to know the general story is not true. I also know a lot about financial analysis of a business to know that GME is absurdly overvalued. They would be lucky to do an IPO and raise capital but in reality the insiders will all dump their shares at the next opportunity for insiders to sell.
Cool, I'll give it a look. I recommend doing the same by actually going to reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets and do a little sleuthing around to fully understand this is not insider trading in the slightest. Some other funds, like Blackwater, have taken advantage of this situation, and I'm sure there are others, but seriously, do the research on this one to understand how this is WAYYYY different than any other squeeze in history. This is much more 99% vs 1% than a lot of media is putting on.
Is this just Patrick Byrnes personal blog or something?
It’s a little of everything from him but mostly his epic battle for company Overstock.com against naked short sellers. Probably a lot of naked shorts on GME
Yeah 140% float probably has a LOT of naked shorts. Someone did the math from January's Failed-to-delivers, and GME had 1.1 million, so make of that what you will.
EDIT: DECEMBER'S DATA, NOT JANUARY! we're still in January (duh!), so that was last months FTD
https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/comments/l97ykd/the_real_reason_wall_street_is_terrified_of_the
There is the post in particular if you wanna read it yourself. Obviously take all things reddit with your own discretion in mind, but still VERY informative nonetheless.
And everybody clapped... Lol sorry I couldn't help myself but thank you for being one to stay plugged in. I imagine it gets so overwhelming for some to keep up and remain vigilant. Your kid sounds like a lucky guy to have you around.
☺️ thank you
Next up is silver which will put pressure on the banking system.
Not sure, I saw some comments and posts saying that silver is just a diversion.
https://wearethene.ws/notable/199826
https://old.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/comments/l9ksh1/do_not_buy_silver/
Retail traders can't even make a dent into GME. They're only like 20% of GME's shares while the rest is institutions.
Should we buy silver? Are they trying to short silver?
Yeah, there's unprecedented demand and dealers are facing supply issues. The market just opened and it instantly shot up 6% in addition to an 8% gain on Friday.
I know this is beside the point, but I read DeepFuckingValue's reddit history and he was genuinely arguing for the value of GameStop back in 2019. That at the very least the company was undervalued. Also, DFV is not an active Reddit user, they only ever used the account to talk about their investment in GameStop. So I too am mildly interested in who is working behind the scenes in this scenario (I also don't believe DFV is Roaring Kitty, the guy being interviewed in the media, the assumption was made and DFV never corrected it).
All in all, whatever is going on right now it is red piling a lot of people and I'm really glad to see it.
My new Fren. OP is my new bestie. Thanks OP. Frens for life
You guys remember this #, 454 billion dollars.
That was beautiful, thank you for sharing.
It's funny I was reading about 9/11 earlier and the stocks. It did seem to be explained by someone sending out a newsletter and loads of investors jumped in. I think one of the main companies that bought puts also bought stocks in one of the other airlines and lost a lot too but I'll have to find the article again. I have thought for years that it was weird but this article did make a lot of sense. There are still weird things about 9/11 though.
Loose Change, I think was the name of the documentary that Followed The Money around 9/11- who bought insurance, shorted sticks, sold stocks, etc. around the buildings, airlines and all. Also followed the Pentagon story, the auditors and missing money, what was stored underneath the towers and never recovered (gold?).
A million people throwing in $1000 is a billion dollars. Some people were putting a lot more in. And I’m sure some whales were in on it too.
But GME worked because it was sparsely traded, over shorted, and the hedge fund was highly leveraged. If any of the 3 situations didn’t exist it would not have been as spectacular.
Deep destroyers Is what tbey are. Only story
Your whale:
It's Blackrock.
https://www.ft.com/content/f3ea07b0-6f5e-11ea-89df-41bea055720b
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-blackrock-investment-gamestop/blackrock-may-have-raked-in-2-4-billion-on-gamestops-retail-driven-stock-frenzy-idUSKBN29W22T
Trump did this:
https://pennswordtwo.com/article/meet-your-new-fed-chairman-president-donald-j-trump.html
https://qanon.pub/?q=shall%20we%20play%20a%20game#4951
"game" "stop"
Honestly, you have it all wrong.
It's one thing to say you don't want anything to do with this system, it's another to talk like you know ANYTHING about how it works or is working.
505 upvotes about some father pontificating, trying to shoehorn 911 into the current situation because it makes you feel good. Sigh...
This goes WAY DEEPER than a short squeeze. And has nothing to do with 911.
You think too small and that's what (((They)) have preyed upon.
Millions of people DID all move as one and ARE acting as one by holding their shares and not selling them.
The little guy HAS WON. The little guy has the cards to WIN EVEN MORE. The little guy has caught the ENTIRE SYTEM in a situation of UNLIMITED LIABILTY.
Don't misdirect your anger towards dudes like DeepFuckingValue, the Retail investor who is playing a rigged system. The guy has been sharing this information since March of 2019. He was laughed at by everyone but saw this coming.
HE JUST BANKED 12 MILLION, 34mil still in stock, from a 50,000k investment and TOLD people it was going to happen along the way.
But...do you understand what is happening? This isn't about DeepFuckingValue or his money. This is about the process Hedge Funds are following to make money.
Shares are being created out of thin air. Not legal.
They are being naked short sold. Not legal.
These Hedge Funds drive businesses to bankruptcy by using fake shares, shorting them and using the media to spread a negative narrative. Not legal.
They are forcing brokers to limit buys of the stock to decrease the gain in stock price from the demand, in order to reduce their liability. Not legal.
The are using low volume ladder shorts to buy each others contract to drive the prices down. They tried this 3 consecutive days last week. Not legal.
There are many, many legit people out there that KNOW first hand this is how the GAME is played. Look at Elon Musk and Tesla. That company was almost shorted to bankruptcy.
Retail Investors along with wealthy, legit businessmen are using a "once in a lifetime" opportunity to stick it to the "Bad Guys" and perhaps get the system changed to level the playing field. This may destroy the entire system, there really is no precedent for this as no one has ever been this cavalier about cheating the system.
Also......
GME is not a junk company either!
I'm not going to waste my time proving what others have but you have no idea what you're talking about. GME is legit and once you understand what these Hedge funds do, you'll see their game.
Now, obviously the stock price doesn't reflect the true value but a company's stock is not dictated by that. The share price is completely dependent on what someone else will pay for it. In this case, the Retail investors can basically name a price if they hold their shares long enough to take down the Hedge Funds and those who back them.
I understand. By George, so does someone else!
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-retail-trading-bubbles-analysis-idUSKBN29Z0HG
Great dad.
?
I tried to edit it and it wouldn’t let me. I apologize for any confusion.
GME, DIAMOND HANDS< SILVER=LARP