BREAKING: JUDGE Says Trump WASN'T RESPONSIBLE For Capitol Riot In New Decision
(www.thedailyfodder.com)
Comments (51)
sorted by:
Obvious thing is obvious. The "riot" started before he was even done speaking.
And it was started, not by Trump supporters, but by agents provocateurs.
There's even talking points in the MSM about it being pre-planned and yet trump was attempted to be impeached due to "inciting a riot" that day.
Their talking points are contradictory. Not to mention, a very simple analysis of his words proves he continually called for peace.
But in 2021, that's inciting violence... Because Democrats.
Yep . . just what I was saying . . . "where's the beef??" All the yammering around the staged "attack" makes me want to killary all over the place.
The headline here is completely inaccurate, no doubt because the folks who run the site believe they can get links and clicks from Trump supporters if they make up something that sounds like good news for Trump.
What the Judge actually says is that a defendant can’t escape punishment for crimes he committed by pleading “Trump told me to do it,” because that’s not an excuse even if it’s true. She then uses the analogy of Trump ordering someone to commit a murder—a situation where, obviously, both people would be guilty.
I know folks are starved for a little positive news, but automatically trusting a pro-Trump headline is not really any better than automatically trusting the MSM. There isn’t even any original reporting or research here: They took a bunch of information from an MSM newspaper article, and then slapped a bogus headline on it for clicks.
https://www.politico.com/news/2021/02/23/capitol-rioters-judge-proud-boys-trump-471199
Well, the president can order members of the military to do things as CIC, not random civillians.
Anyway, yes: The person who carries out the order, if its obviously wrong, is responsible for their actions, which was the judge’s point. But that doesn’t mean the person who gave the order can’t also be guilty, assuming they intended for the person to really do it and believed that they would (as opposed to a joke about “go rob a bank” that someone bizarrely acted on). It doesn’t necessarily depend on having formal authority to order someone (mob bosses who order hits have no LEGAL authority to do so) but on whether the person intended & expected their directions to be acted on.
This isn’t some totally new situation; courts handle cases all the time where one person actually commits the crime, but did so at the direction of another, whether it’s Tony Soprano asking Paulie to “take care of a witness” or a spouse who encourages her lover to get rid of her husband. Paulie is guilty, but Tony can be charged too, though the prosecution has to convince the jury that when Tony said “take care of” he really did mean “kill” and not “give him a foot massage.” Guilt isn’t like a pie that gets divided up, so that if Paulie is fully responsible for his actions, there’s no guilt left over for Tony.
You kinda just made a play on words. just because the headline is sensational doesnt mean it isnt based in fact which is that trump didnt incite violence. Its nit like the judge ruled on it. They just made comments which support that fact that he didnt incite the riot
But the judge DIDN’T make comments suggesting Trump didn’t incite the riot. The judge said it doesn’t matter (to the case) if Trump incited the riot, because if you rioted you’re still responsible for your actions. I promise, if you run through the quotations, you will not find a single sentence where the (Obama appointed) judge denies Trump incited violence.
Hope people read this after posting their initial reactions.
Is there a quote for the judge saying that? I only see this, which doesn't really say the same thing.
That ain’t quite what the judge said....
He just pointed out that in law if a person claims he or she was told to carry out an illegal act by someone else, that person cannot use being told to do something illegal as a mitigation or defense to any criminal proceedings.....
The judge did not say Trump was not responsible, he stated that in those circumstances no one would be responsible....
WWG1WGA
Yes, I agree with you. The article says nothing about Trump's innocence or guilt.
Patriots NEVER riot. All rioting is done 100% exclusively by left-wing extremists.
The only violence at the Capitol on Jan. 6 during the peaceful patriot protest was committed by antifa terrorists in MAGA disguise.
It was a PEACEFUL PATRIOT PROTEST except for the violent haters of the extreme left. Communism always relies on mob violence because their policies are so abhorrent and repulsive to normal people that they always reject leftist garbage, unless forced into subjugation by mob violence, intimidation, and bullying.
Good, the next media person or politician who says otherwise should be used for defamation.
The left will pay dearly
u/#pepedance
The judge didn't say that.
He said if a person commits a crime because someone else told them to do it, it doesn't immunize the person who did the crime.
The judge could have agreed that Trump told the man to do it, but said the man is still culpable.
Well, duh. It was Antifa. We had quite a few of them identified while it was happening.
Now the judge needs to spank Nancy......
Score one for individual responsibility and accountability.
Story link to BusinessInsider.com (they quote Politico for the judge quotes that take the argument to its logical conclusion)
A judge dismissed claims by a Capitol riot suspect that he shouldn't be held responsible because Trump put him up to it
Now, if we could just get Mike Tyson to settle down TWATTER.
How?
By punching every LibTurd there in the face who word processes something their mothers should have put ‘em on time out for saying when they were chronological children.
They might have learned from it then.
Oh right, nowadays, they think The State should be everyone's mother.
And only those who oppose The State should get socked.
Note to The State: Live by the fist, die by the fist.
Wish he replaced ACB or Roberts on the SCOTUS. Trump should have appointed a man instead of ACB. ACB doesn’t have the courage to do what needs to be done.
This article is the CBD of hopium. Not gonna get you high.
Oh my goodness . . we are wasting SO MUCH damned time and energy dealing with total bullshit, while the truth drains even more resources due to contant attacks by lying morons. We are in desperate NEED of a Trmp-Style restart. Cut ALL of the bullshit, wipe the table, drain the swamp and shut these assholes up. Then let their libidiot strongholds secede, and REQUIRE all other globo-leftist morons to relocate.
I know, I know -- this sounds heavy-handed. Are we not at WAR with heavy-handedness??? YES -- we are.
Just sayin' . . .
Don't get me wrong -- HATS OFF to the judge -- but the judge merely stated the blatantly obvious truth. The fact that this is even newsworthy shows us how very far into the hole we have sunk. There had better be a solid bottom, not much further down. Time for some BEDROCK.
No, that is not what the Judge said. He said: the man has to bear responsibility for his actions IRRESPECTIVE of whether or not is was done on instigation, and has left that issue out of the consideration.
GREAT NEWS, NOW WHEN DO THE MILITARY TRIBUNALS BEGIN??
Well, how do you like that frens? A judge who can actually mak na decent ruling? Whoa!!!
The whole idea of this thing is contrary stupidity. If the good guys had "rioted" it would stop the vote and inhibit our own goals. Bam.
A point that I do not hear being made. The tifatard stuff happened before the robots inside had done their thing. We still needed them to vote in our favor and until that point there was no (real) reason to "riot." It was still early in the day. There was work to do. Maybe they vote in our favor, maybe they don't. But until...
So why? Why shoot early..? Just because they're dumbasses? No.
Somebody pulled the trigger at a specific time. They needed it to delay proceedings and claim it changed their minds or gave them an excuse to vote contrary to the evidence.
And as a bonus they get big mileage out of it after the fact in plenty of other ways too. Thank you for reading. ~{°¡°}~
Truth wins u/#emopepeok
Duh, the dumbing down of America.
Wow, a judge that knows and cares about truth.
Even in America, that's rare AF.
All the other judges know the truth. They just don't do the right thing with it
He's obviously not part of the MAGA movement, too stupid to be.
The team who made "A Thousand Pieces" Documentary (https://athousandpieces.com) is working with Patrick Byrne, Sidney Powell, Lin Wood & Mike Lindell on a documentary about election fraud right now. The Truth Will Out!
u/#emopepescroll u/#emopepescroll u/#emopepescroll u/#emopepescroll u/#emopepescroll u/#emopepescroll u/#emopepescroll u/#emopepescroll u/#emopepescroll
I thought the judicial system was comp'ed
Finally! A voice of reason rooted in the law SPEAKS!!
Judge - DJT not responsible
US - DERP
This came at the right time. Having a heated debate over this bullshit
But guyzz, it was like, totally worse than the 9/11 attacks. 9/11 didn't have literal supernazis trying to murderize AOC
If the buildings collapsed within velvet rope lines, 9/11 would have been just like January 6, and of course 1/6 is part of 9/11 upside down!
bingo!
IKR????
I see you watch salty crackers videos
I do