Whatever this board is, it's no Voat. Moderators acting like big tech, deciding what you can and cannot discuss...wake up before you turn into the libtards you despise.
Comments (126)
sorted by:
Funny, the downvoats this post is drawing.
Pretty telling, isn't it?
I’d say you’re a huge faggot. Mods here have done a fan-fucking-tastic job at keeping this place clean of garbage. This is forum sliding and literally a low tier shit post. Go back to George News to sell your bullshit.
Hey kids, who wants an unhappy meal!!! In all seriousness, I’m in your boat as usual.
Based good sir. Carry on holding the line!
Confirmation bias much?
Just because people disagree with your broad-strokes assessment without you providing any facts to back it up?
Voat may have been the only sanctioned; but does it really matter? If we can discuss Q here, using our own words, and our own discernment, surely that is all we need?
Think you missed the point. You are only free to discuss what moderators feel is acceptable. If that's what you think Q is about, you're mistaken. In a country built upon the notion of "free speech", moderators, by definition, are meaningless.
I think you missed the point of the bill of rights if you think that the intention was that all speech of all kinds would be allowed under all circumstances in, around, and on all forums.
The moderators aren't stopping you from going anywhere else to discuss what you want. They're trying to stop a continuous onslaught of people here to disrupt and prevent capacity for communication about Q. by propagating George news further, people are doing exactly that.
If you are claiming to know what Q is about, and then promoting George news, you're being hypocritical. "No outside comms".
Says the same guy bitching about FB censoring. You're a clown.
Can you not see the difference?
Facebook doesn't just remove posts or remove you from their platform. They collude to remove you from ALL platforms, and from your job, and even LIFE.
The mods have public logs. Nothing but transparent.
WOW, what a rock solid argument - I'm a clown?! Holy shit I'll never be able to argue out of that one.
Grow the fuck up.
Peeps who whine and bitch about freedom of speech as if it means there need be no definition of purpose are always super obvious.
Free speech means that in a public setting (aka where the only authority is the government, who is the Servant of the people) where no specific purpose is defined, you're free to say what you want.
It doesn't mean you can try to redefine purpose of a forum or venue where the govt is NOT the authority and get away with it.
Notice the extreme mis-logic of equating Gwin with a "country built upon the notion of free speech"?
The fact is, Fluffbuk is either a 320 public forum that does not edit content, or it is a private venue where they decide the rules. The real issue at fluffbuk is that a) their actions are completely inconsistent with the 'purported' purpose, they enjoy contradictory protection, they have misrepresented themselves constantly, and manipulate the data stream and narrative for the intent of controlling and undermining people's freedom.
"Blah blah blah free speech let me REDEFINE what YOUR forum is about" is an old and transparent tactic of evil intent and satanic infiltration. Always has been.
It IS a shill shit-post. We have standards and we don’t put up with shills. There’s an easy to read site-BOR. We have the BEST Mods at GAW. Deal with it & deal with us or go elsewhere.
You are discussing it right now you giant LARPing faggot. It is either you cannot read or are just a dumb lackey sent over from george news.
Free speech is great but manners are good too. This place seems to want Q related material but we still talk about lots of stuff. The main thing I gather from the mods here is that they don't want our time spent arguing with screaming heads. Sure, that cuts out lots of speech but Q is also about a certain perspective, God and goodness. We here in safety from negativity. I'm good with it. My free speech and exploratory theories can take place elsewhere.
I was a big voater, and downvoted this post, as you kay he correct that voat was the only sanctioned forum, but the mods here are doing great, banning known PAYtriots and other scammers that have no part of the great awakening...
Not as telling as your ratio.
Still trying to find out where the funding for this site comes from.
Do let us know what you find
For a site that's about researching Q and questioning everything around you, it sure feels like you can't disagree with a lot of things.
Maybe George isn't legit, or maybe they can find a way to prove that they are indeed credible. Whether they are legit or not I don't think the mob mentality against George is good for what GAW is supposed to be, which is a Q research board. This sort of mentality could be used against us by outside parties.
It paints a bad picture, tomorrow someone like Mike Lindell or hell, even Trump himself could be ousted by GAW because a mod said they're "paytriots."
That's my two cents at least.
Have you read the mountains of evidence compiled against George?
A lot of people have been skeptical since day 1. They were silenced by George dick suckers calling them shills or doomers.
Now that the dam has finally burst, people are coming out against it again to reinforce that it was bullshit, the same way they did with Simon Parks and all that other nonsense.
I have, they do seem guilty. What I'm saying is that we should maybe give them the benefit of the doubt and a chance to redeem themselves. Maybe they can show proof that they are legit instead of immediately attacking them.
If you look closer, they did give them the benefit of the doubt. The first concerns were raised last night. Since then, they've had multiple opportunities to address them. Instead, they respond by banning people and disabling communications.
Nobody is stopping you from posting a defense of George news. What I read indicates the mods won't ban that; what they're purging is links not related to the discussion of George's veracity (in other words, posts assuming it is valid, or promoting it as valid [as in spam] without providing proof).
And now GAW is banning people for talking about it. Ironic, isnt it.
Find me in the PUBLIC mod logs where they banned someone for discussing whether or not GN is legit.
You're just triggered I defeated your argument and called out your bullshit so you're posting on all of my posts that you can find. Not even worth my downvote; you're doing my work for me at this point.
Found a DM shill
I noticed some Gn posts here over the past weeks (months). Very quickly, all the "look! Posting from this location" crud had the distinct vibration of larpism and exploitation.
"you are not abandoned" etc, and then being treated as if some source of legit or inside info? No thanks.
Nothing wrong with posting encouragement and supporting each other, but the smell coming of George News hit my nostrils pretty quick, and for that reason, I quickly turned off and paid no attention aside from asking myself "Why are people giving this the attention they are???? Sheesh"
PS. Liking your comments in this thread, Jud.
tips hat
Thanks bud, doin' what I can with my two cents.
Express your concerns and your discoveries, let the people decide if they agree. if they don't find more proof. if they still disagree reevaluate your position and decide for yourself to avoid George. AMERICA
I know I miss it!
Just a reminder to all that https://searchvoat.co/search.php still exists for all voat archived posts. Lots of great information, research, and shitposts over there.
Also fun to look back at older accounts you may have had when you forgot your password (me) and since there was no email necessarily for verification it was lost forever and you had to create a new account.
I miss Voat. can appreciate the mods trying not to feed the MSM trolls and get destroyed like 8ch. another platform will emerge.
Voat was always high quality because it was never about the users only the content and posting reflected that it felt like people did everything for the passion and not trying to farm likes.
Pizzagate was legit I learned a lot there back around the time Alefantis had made his instagram private pizzagate was hot back then the autism was off the charts insane sometimes I get that vibe here but its getting more and more like tdwin as it gets more popular npcs and shills become one and the same and the board becomes too big and hive mentality posts take over
LOL< yeah. QRV was my least favorite voat Q-venue. And who said its was "sanctioned" by Q? Q pointed to it as a location for the r/GreatAwakening masses to go when RGA was Krystalnachted, but sanctioned?
Was a denizen of V/GA up until Christmas day, and appreciated the quality there, but QRV? No thanks.
"daily shitshow" Yep.
You can be safe or you can be free. Not both.
America is a country based on freedom.
Actually, you can definitely be safe and free. What the heck do you think a strong military is about? Or being able to defend yourself?
I think you're confusing the maxim that if you sacrifice freedom for safety, you end up losing both. Yes, and thank you Ben Franklin.
But seriously, Bob, aside from that, I cannot see how your comment is a reply to mine in any way. People at Voat were free to go to whatever forum(s) they wanted.
Have a great day.
v/PG and v/GA
It's up to the readers to suppress trolling spam. Not moderators. We can all down vote and slide that shit. Dont need people banning topics of discussion. That's libtard shit
exactly. I’m sick of it. It feels like every other sub that has been ruined by mods worrying about what “outsiders think.”
they finally took down the voat chat, it was a sad day
I hear ya.
After today's turn of events I miss it more than ever!
Exactly the reason Q sent us to Voat from Reddit. Lame-ass, spine-less bitch moderators thinking they run shit.
I was onboard with this site fully until today. Today was eye opening.
Same, as someone who left Reddit for Voat and then came here, I'm actually shocked to see what I am.
We shouldn't be, though.
It happened at The Donald.win = overrun with trolls and shills.
I just wonder, if this place goes to shit, where will we go next?
This is the last place I'm aware of.
I'm shocked today as well. I'm not a q follower, but I enjoy the news and hopeful outlook. Been slowly peeling back the curtain to see what it (Q) is all about, but if free thought will get you banned here, I'm in the wrong place.
As far as I knew until today, the book burners were the other guys.
I woke up to a targeted assault. I don’t care if it is true bc it’s wrong to censor and ban like that. I remember not too long ago, me posting about my sons vaccine damage got me banned at other supposed “free speech zones.” After yrs of abuse from fellow so called patriots about the topic, now they rage 24/7 about the Covid vaccine poison. It’s all so tiring. It’s evil and sick.
Yes it was.
What was eye-opening about today?
Moderators deciding what is Q related and what isn't, who is legitimate and who isn't, and banning whatever they have decided is false.
Completely antithetical to Q's entire notion of "Think for yourself"
I don't remember Q ever saying "Trust your moderator's decisions to censor"
The mod logs are public. Make up your mind from those.
If what you think is so dependent on what you read on a single internet forum that moderation of that forum prevents you from thinking for yourself, then you might need some serious mental support.
The moderators have been consistently transparent about what they do and do not allow. Their purported aim is to provide a curated environment for discussing Q, on topic and in an easily accessible way, in particular for those new to it all.
It's up to you to decide whether or not that is what they are doing.
I've seen everything I need to in order to be convinced that the Mods have been doing what they say. If that changes, it changes. Nothing has changed as of today with their policies regarding the posts here.
How much are the mods paying you to lick their shit for them?
lmfao you're triggered I defeated your argument and called out your bullshit so you're posting on all of my posts that you can find. Not even worth my downvote; you're doing my work for me at this point.
"If what you think is so dependent on what you read on a single internet forum that moderation of that forum prevents you from thinking for yourself, then you might need some serious mental support."
Wow gaslighting, cool.
Mod logs don't do shit for if I want to discuss something.
Sorry for wanting a forum with minimal moderation. Didn't think it warrants this kind of an attack on my character.
It feels like arguing with liberals more and more on this site.
I don't believe I have attacked your character whatsoever.
I was describing how there is zero good reason forum moderation should prevent someone from thinking for themselves. I never stated that you personally needed mental support, I am saying that a hypothetical someone that IS prevented from thinking freely by basic forum moderation does, because frankly, it's not that hard to "think for yourself" regardless of what you read. I went years with only hard left-wing media surrounding me and I still thought for myself; that's why I'm here.
I bring up the mod logs because it is there you can go to verify that the moderators have not been suppressing discussion of Q and current events. What they suppress is things that do not follow the rules, which are clearly stated on the right. They will not stop you from talking about whether or not George is valid, they're simply trying to cut down on the absolute flood of forum posts we've been getting for the past couple months every time they so much as blink, because said posts bury worthwhile content and, knowing what we know now, is promoting people who are, by virtually all evidence, thoroughly deceptive.
Moderation on this forum is fairly minimal in the sense that most discussion is allowed. There are multiple dimensions of enforcement going on here; you seem to be taking their actions as an indication that they will be heavily moderating in the sense that they will strictly control conversation; what the moderators' actions, statements, and logs would suggest is that they are firmly moderating the existing rules. Am I making myself understandable? It's kind of hard to express the distinction.
Here's another way of putting it; there are two kinds of "strict" or "strong" moderation: there is moderation that strictly controls conversations and content, and there is moderation which firmly enforces the established rules. A forum with a single rule can still be strongly moderated if the mods strictly enforce that rule. Does that make sense?
I apologize for offending your character; I did not intend to.
See you all on the other side. I don't expect to be here long enough to respond to commenters.
Same, it’s disappointing that we can’t speak freely anywhere in America nowadays. Godspeed fren. I’m about done too. They are losing some of the best anons behaving this way... including myself. I have so much research but I barely post it here bc I don’t feel like dealing with cocky jerks who think they know everything hence my username (intel background). Oh well...
I’m old enough to remember the CBTS forum on Reddit. All that PIzzagate stuff as well.
I miss VOAT.
Same. So many weak bitches can’t handle actual free speech. I’m black and sometimes people on voat said “offensive stuff” but so damn what. People need to get over themselves and read the message.
GAW says "WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q". LOL
Yea, no.
Damn I thought Q was the public face of Q. No wonder the media has a ham with "QAnon" if they are looking at us as the face of Q!
You can fuck off. Direct links were banned, discussion never was. He was banned for good reason, discuss whatu want on voat if that is what you wish.
And Paol.
8Kun is the primary.
I found out about the george site from 8kun , when it was redirecting to the george site for a few minutes one day. Does that mean 8kun can't be trusted now too?
Yeah ... fuck off
they are loading https://z.moatads.com/addthismoatframe568911941483/moatframe.js into to George news website. Searching for moatads on Google gives you the following result:.
Moatads Moatads.com is a browser hijacker that comes to your computer in the form of add-on for Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox and Internet Explorer. ... Moatads.com also can analyze your browsing and collect your personal data. Some data may be transferred to third parties without your consent.
I'll stay here on GAW.
ok george
Agree ?
Voat was taken down Christmas Day, 2020. RIP
Just to clarify, VOAT is still there. The Great Awakening sub is gone.
Voat.co is gone.
Wow, I thought it was just the sub.
I was there from day 01 of v/pizzagate. And v/greatawakening. Hell, I was a mod at v/GA for a brief period. So glad it didn't last. Q sent people to QRV as a filter, I believe. Those who paid attention and sought out the truth trickled down to v/GA and eventually v/PG. We "tuned" the database for the White Hats, IMO. All theoretical.
searchvoat.co is a great resource
Voat lost its funding. How is this site funded?
Your handle LOLOL.
I came from voat. The mods here keep is way cleaner from shills than voat near the end. We were getting hammered. I like coming on here and not having to filter through hundreds of racist and division posts. Im ok with their slightly itchy ban fingers here
You can be safe or you can be free. Not both.
You don't have to like what other people say.
Why did you need to argue with them? If you don't like it, change the channel. Go to another thread?
Oh they have an attitude, no doubt, but you know, a lot of the (((stuff))) they talk about is true.
White Americans are so conditioned to accept everyone and shun anyone who doesn't that we've become pretty weak and stupid. Meanwhile, other groups are taught to blame white people for everything, but white people still think "LA LA LA we're all the same....".
Are we all humans? Yes. Treat them all humanely. This includes transgender people and all that. They might be a bit weird to some of our eyes
The mistake is believing that these groups have the same mindset as you. Do certain individuals? Oh, probably, but are they taught differently in general? Certainly.
I'm not in America right now. The people in the country I'm in 100% put themselves above other groups, and expecting them not to is just an absurd notion.
White people are the only ones taught not to do this, and when everyone else is on a "team", it's dangerous and stupid not be on one yourself.
I'm not on one because I'd be crucified for trying to be even though everyone that doesn't look like me is.
Anyway, just like you can learn the antifa playbook like reading Saul Alinsky, most of these other groups have playbooks as well.
Notice how many people from these groups come out to denounce their team's playbook. Not many. Close to none. Maybe none.
You still need to treat everyone as an individual because just like Q followers not everyone decides to drink the cultural Kool aid, however.
People on Voat often took it a bit far but I think they're fed up with being attacked or ignored about such things. I'm sure you've been frustrated trying to get people to listen to you about Q or voter fraud or something along those lines.
Duh.
Were you under the impression it was, is or represented itself to be?
Your confusion is apparent. Moreover, your intent (and desire) to impose YOUR definition of purpose of GAW is not only unprincipled, its unreasonable and illogical.
I suggest you go create a forum and a venue and manifest your purpose there. Why don't you? Prolly because no one would show up?
Sigh.
Which Q post says that
While I think Mods could be a bit nicer with the perma bans.
I belive this board should stay confirmable, objective, Q intell, or at minimal, damn good reserch.
If you want to get a bit more conspiritol, go to conspiracy.
The mis info is a psyops too. If you dont think its effecting people. I have a few crazy people you can meet that have just absolutly lost it over the Q telegram accounts putting out bad info.
Also: Mods deal with a lot and I think they are doing a good job. If I were in their shoes. Id probably get fed up and start ban hammering too.
Napoleon Complex, Little Man Syndrome, Lord of The Flies.
Goat Company forever!
Im with the mods. We remove infowars posts, why not other cointelpro disinfo paytriots?
This is a Q forum. So tell us, what Q related topic do you wish to discuss that the mods are preventing you from talking about?
What are you even on about?
What happened today that was any different from any other day?
George news was exposed as almost certainly a fraud. The proofs were provided and exist to be disputed as people will; that said, the evidence they are frauds is colossal.
Moderators banning people from a forum they operate and effectively "rent" ownership of is not against the principles of free speech. It IS however FOR the principles of property ownership and control.
Are you incapable of critical comparison?
Before reading on, take this moment to compare the actions of the moderators of this forum with the folks on the other side. Find all of the differences you can, then read on.
Those forums don't just ban you. They communicate with each other to excommunicate you from EVERY forum. They doxx you and they get you fired from places of work. They steal your data, track you, and ruin your life if you deviate. That is illegal monopolistic collusion. These mods do NONE of that; they simply remove your posts, and if that doesn't prove enough, they ban you. The moderation logs are publicly available. Nothing but transparency occurring.
Social media is anything BUT transparent.
As far as the accusations of that forum: 1.) The concern isn't exclusively about their location or the business owner's leanings. That is a strawman argument. The real concern is their promotion from a left-leaning group, and the existence of tracking in the design of that host. If they're really concerned about security, they would not be operating a tracker.
Furthermore, do you trust the Swiss government? I sure as hell trust NO governments. Privacy laws mean virtually nothing when a government is immune to them.
2.) Once again, a strawman. George has used these videos in the past as a way of "proving" their legitimacy. "Here are videos that only we have" falls apart when other people have them. By being deceptive about this, not only are they flat out wrong, they are BEING deceptive.
3.) GAW is not claiming to have insider knowledge. They are claiming to promote Q to the public. GN acts mysterious, and plays games, dropping "coded messages" and pretending to have insider information. THAT violates "no outside comms". If someone in GAW were claiming to know Q, or have ties to Q, that would also violate it. They do not.
Nice try but two strawmans and a false equivalency isn't a "nice try" or a "checkmate".
Wow! What an argument!