Does mRNA vaccine permanently alter DNA?
(childrenshealthdefense.org)
Comments (27)
sorted by:
Yes it does thats why almost all who get the vaccine will be dead within a couple years.
There is no established biological pathway that allows for the mRNA strands of the type being injected to permanently alter the DNA of the subject. If someone has led you to believe otherwise, they are misinformed.
However, and I posted this several days ago, there is some interesting research coming out that seems to indicate it may be possible for certain types of RNA INSIDE the nucleus to alter DNA during transcription:
https://phys.org/news/2020-01-rna-effect-dna.html
We are continuously told this is impossible by this "vaccine". We are told that they are merely coding for spike proteins in the cytoplasm and then being flushed. And indeed, based on known medical science, that should be true. There shouldn't be any way for the mRNA to migrate back to the nucleus from the cell cytoplasm, and in any case it isn't the right kind of RNA to cause the effect above. So if our understanding of the human body is correct, then this can not permanently alter DNA.
But how can we really be certain that none of the mRNA strands are not somehow migrating back into the cell nucleus and possibly participating in some kind of dance with other RNA strands that can affect DNA? Nobody knows the human body well enough to guarantee that.
Just way too much is still unknown about this experimental gene therapy. I really worry for the people who are blindly trusting these demonic psychopaths pushing this technology. Until I know more I will never ingest this substance into my body. Lock me up if you want, but I am not taking this.
Biggest issue is how do we really know what's in the vaccines. If it really is just mRNA than no, it shouldn't permanently alter DNA, but we have only what they tell us in them.
THIS
Thanks. I will research it. Do you have a link to the paper?
Thanks. We actually discussed that paper in another thread on this site. Hasn't been peer reviewed yet, but I agree is definitely some intriguing research. Worth keeping a close eye on. I think it is clear that there is enough uncertainty in this technology that caution is in order.
Who gave this person negative downvotes?
Stop spreading this garbage, this isn't even remotely true.
Provide sauce.
My sauce is having a brain. If everyone who takes the vaccine dies, all society will collapse. You really think Trump would tell us to get that? The negative reactions to the vaccine happen something like 1/10000. Stop being a bunch of fear mongering pussies.
I will screen future girl friends of my 2 sons, first question...Have you been vaccinated? If not I will instruct them to get married and have 20 children.
Just have them walk through a scanner that'd highlight the "glow"
This is the first reputable data I've seen that cuts across the CDC narrative, and it passes the first-read sniff test! Though RFK Jr. sometimes pushes the meaning of a study a bit past its intent, in this case he seems to have a well-placed correspondent who has a right to raise concerns. This suggests the question is now officially open as to whether modRNA, being much more stable than human mRNA, has potential for reverse transcription into DNA at large. The secondary sources should be reviewed and understood and similar findings should be compiled for comparison. Autists need to get this together!
You really need to go to the full text.
This paper has not yet been peer reviewed, and as such there are some questions that remain unanswered and methods that may be flawed. I think overall it does lend support to other papers I have read on the subject though, which imply that our understanding of how the whole mechanism works is still incomplete. Again, I don't trust the certainty with which these medical specialists are claiming it is definitely safe. I think there are too many anomalies which suggest there may be other things happening that we don't yet understand.
However, the most interesting section in my opinion is the comments section.
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.12.12.422516v1.full#disqus_thread
There are some good discussions about what they are reporting, and what they are not reporting, and the dangers of people misrepresenting the findings. Of course, there is the usual call of people claiming the entire paper should be censored because it is too "dangerous" to allow anti-vaxers to see this and misrepresent the results.
But there are at least as many people who are espousing the view that this cancel culture of genuine science is just as dangerous.
I'm in the control group.
So the flow of consequences seem to go like this:
Normal person:
DNA - sends out RNA to do stuff. RNA does stuff.
'vaccine' person:
Fake RNA as part of the vaccine does stuff, in addition to or in conflict with what the DNA in the cell is ordering its RNA to do.
What if DNA demands one thing, and the vaccine RNA demands something contrary? Sounds like a great way to have cancers, cell deaths, high rates of other abnormal mutations and all sort of nasty side effects.
It also appears identical to how viruses work - by injecting their viral payload into cells, hijacking the regular ordering of the cell, and ordering the cell to generate new copies of virus. Or messing around with protein spikes if its the fake RNA stuff.
No tests or long term consequences are known for this entirely experimental process. Even if it worked perfectly as expected.. and there is every indication that this is NOT happening.
When your own expectations of outcomes are wrong, that means you dont understand what the fuck you are doing and its consequences. And that lack of understanding and its associated dangers means this the product is not fit for use.
While I concur with most of this, you CANNOT go by PCR tests at all- they only find damaged cell bits, not Covid or any other specific virus, and are artificially magnified to force high positive ratios.
I dont disagree with you on this one, I'm just quoting a section from the article.
As far as I know, there is no record of a genuine isolated organism that someone can point to and say 'this is covid', only protein sequences that are supposedly bits of covid. And probably bits of other things too, like the guy that used the PCR test against samples from a goat, a pheasant, and a papaya - all of which were positive to covid according to the PCR test.
Who just recently died incidentally.. nothing sus.
Great article! I had heard the vaccine could do this and I’m never taking it but struggled with responding to the argument “Well you took other vaccines, hows this different?” No more struggling now, I’m ready to debate!
Yes, I now have a small penis growing of my ear lobe
I believe you until the "growing of my ear lobe" part.