Chances are very good that he issues a stay on Tuesday. Let's not meltdown when that happens. It'll just be appealed. This is going to become a separation of powers question and we will win.
Yea, this is going to be hard for a judge to halt. This should be blocked many different ways. I'm no legal fag at all, but I believe that this falls under the plenary power of the legislature. I believe that the contractors are operating under the authority of the legislature and they should be immune to these types of lawsuits while the legislature is in session. I also do not believe that the plaintiffs have standing.
That being said, I could easily see the judge go rogue as a delay tactic, and then it will go to the full state supreme court and perhaps even SCOTUS.
It could easily be temporarily halted tomorrow, because tyranny.
You ask a legit question. Remember, they hid behind questions of standing, ripeness, etc, to shoot down our litigation. In this case, they are now the plaintiffs, reversing the roles.
It's in the full panel of the AZ Supreme Court where I expect sanity to return. I just don't see how they stop the audit without trampling on the separation of powers.
Yea, if the first judge had to recuse himself because a lawyer interned with him in the past, how can the new judge even be considered if he has a connection to the law firm for the plaintiffs???
Or maybe the better option instead of stopping the count when this deep state shit bag says so.... the auditors give the big fuck you and defy the order... i mean... the dems would do that
Is this like a techie having worked in Microsoft earlier in their career? Does that automatically make someone [DS] ? I think we should hang on to our pants and sit tight
Remember, when you share this with people that will say, "judges are fair, what's the difference," that they had a much different attitude when ACB was appointed and if in their mind, she is controlled by the right at the highest level of judgeship, this turd is easily controlled. Throw their own arguments back in their own faces.
Chances are very good that he issues a stay on Tuesday. Let's not meltdown when that happens. It'll just be appealed. This is going to become a separation of powers question and we will win.
What authority does some black-robed tyrant have to halt it?
Yea, this is going to be hard for a judge to halt. This should be blocked many different ways. I'm no legal fag at all, but I believe that this falls under the plenary power of the legislature. I believe that the contractors are operating under the authority of the legislature and they should be immune to these types of lawsuits while the legislature is in session. I also do not believe that the plaintiffs have standing.
That being said, I could easily see the judge go rogue as a delay tactic, and then it will go to the full state supreme court and perhaps even SCOTUS.
It could easily be temporarily halted tomorrow, because tyranny.
It hasn’t been hard for them to do any of what has happened so far. Why is this different? Honest question.
You ask a legit question. Remember, they hid behind questions of standing, ripeness, etc, to shoot down our litigation. In this case, they are now the plaintiffs, reversing the roles.
It's in the full panel of the AZ Supreme Court where I expect sanity to return. I just don't see how they stop the audit without trampling on the separation of powers.
holy schiff. The Deep State Law firm!
Dan Martin signed Equality Act Petition 13 days ago
https://www.grassfire.com/73135
Nothing surprises me anymore.
And thats where the digital army comes in handy lol nice work pede
So what will the response be, and do you guys think that Trump and the Patriots' side foresaw this?
I can't imagine they didn't. I mean, they knew all of this has been coming...
White hats need to step it up a bit...or maybe...
Do you think they let this criminal shite slide to buy more time to clean up the rest of the world?
If they can't prove they have the power to "fix" something soon, there sadly won't be a world to clean up.
The fraud must be cleaned up first.
Not also a conflict of interest??
Sounds like another conflict argument to me.
Yea, if the first judge had to recuse himself because a lawyer interned with him in the past, how can the new judge even be considered if he has a connection to the law firm for the plaintiffs???
Or maybe the better option instead of stopping the count when this deep state shit bag says so.... the auditors give the big fuck you and defy the order... i mean... the dems would do that
Maybe we should lay the lefts tactics back on them. You know threats and intimidation lol
Is this like a techie having worked in Microsoft earlier in their career? Does that automatically make someone [DS] ? I think we should hang on to our pants and sit tight
Remember, when you share this with people that will say, "judges are fair, what's the difference," that they had a much different attitude when ACB was appointed and if in their mind, she is controlled by the right at the highest level of judgeship, this turd is easily controlled. Throw their own arguments back in their own faces.
Does this judge fuck kids too?
Can a monkey wrench be melted ? Why yes it can ??
They’ve got everything figured out.