No, he's 100% incorrect, most likely. HIs theory makes no sense, maligns what frankspeech is actually doing (allowing free speech and conveying important information), and has no apparent grounding in reality. Where is the evidence for the claim? Where is the logical argument? It is just like a random thought that falls apart under scrutiny.
OP is arguing that frankspeech, a very expensive web site that is very stable, constantly putting out excellent content, is absorbing people canceled from other platforms who earn their living providing such content, is nothing but a sting operation to catch black hat "hackers" DDOS'ing the site? Do you understand what DDOS is? It is basically a bunch of computers with malware that allows someone with proper credentials to send orders to the malware and cause the bots to act in unison. Usually the DDOS is little more than telling the bot net to send a lot of network packets all at once to create traffic jam on the network. The hacker, even if just a lowly script kiddy, is likely activating the bots through TOR or a VPN. All the logs will show is attacks from computers owned by innocent people. Heck, your own devices may be participating without your knowledge if they have been compromised and co-opted into a bot net! You maybe got compromised by visiting a tainted web site with an out of date OS/browser. So you really believe frankspeech is just to bust people likely you unwittingly running malware? And from you how do they trace back to the originator of the malware? Or the kid sending a single command to the bot swarm over TOR or VPN? The whole idea is frankly ridiculous!
We all need to do better here. Just because you have a cool idea or think someone else's idea looks cool on the surface, engage in a bit more critical thinking before jumping on stuff that may end up making us look silly and ill-informed. And, as I said elsewhere, frankspeech is a WONDERFUL service to the community. Everyone should be checking it regularly. When nonsense like this post gets promoted, many people may not bother checking frankspeech thinking that it is just a honey pot to pull in bad actors. So if you want some compelling ideas and facts to ponder deeply, ignore empty claims like OP made and actually go to frankspeech to watch some of the excellent content. Be sure to check out the pre-recorded sections so you can watch entire airings without just being stuck with the "livestream" on the main page which you may have already seen.
exactly, have an inlaw that makes snide comments about DJT's inheritance. the jealously and confusion is SO obvious. wonder if these people even have the potential to change...
Act weak by putting up a rock-solid web site that is non-stop pushing new, high-quality content every single day since its inception? I'm on there at least an hour every day, and some of my best intel is coming from there. Honestly, for quality, depth of content, frankspeech is regularly trumping this site, hands down. And, don't get me wrong, this site is a great asset, too! But don't jump on bandwagons to nowhere, achieving nothing but maligning a beneficial asset in our digital community! Support frankspeech.com! Go there regularly and LEARN!
I think you may be right, but it serves two purposes!
Truth to people
Weed out the hackers! They are most likely CIA and connected black hats! Perhaps even foreign actors/contractors for CIA black ops! This could be huge and more exposing and draining the global CIA-Cabal swamp!
and possibly a third purpose;
A warning signal to corrupt DS players; politicians, judges, agency officials, state/local officials of the up and coming legal ramifications. That they 'better get on board' with the law to their part in the election steal or else face the consequences!
It is really just #1 and #3. There is absolutely no reason to believe #2 has any serious merit whatsoever. The site was DDOS'd in the early days, maybe some after that (ineffective, btw). DDOS is not a sophisticated attack. It also wasn't effective. There is no reason to believe there is any "super secret content" stored at frankspeech.com to justify some super elite black hat hacker wasting his time. The DDOS could be launched be any idiot and works only to make Mike look incompetent. But, again, that failed. Support frankspeech and don't participate in falsely maligning its value and success.
If it is, the attacks are clearly a waste of time and having no notable impact on anything. If there is an attack against frankspeech.com, it is information warfare designed to make people think there is no reason to visit the site (because it is "nothing but a psy-op" or "a honeypot" or whatever other nonsense misleads people and causes them to miss out on the great content being disseminated from there daily).
They said they were under attack early on. I rarely have any difficulty accessing and using the site. If they are enduring ongoing attacks, they apparently are not very effective, and I haven't heard them mention them in a LONG time.
Think more along the lines of Operation Bodyguard.
Perhaps the platform was a simple red herring meant to be a false target that the white hats could closely monitor and track exactly where the attacks were coming from.
I'm afraid you're a bit off the mark with this one. "...just enough..."?! "...fell flat..."?! I'm there an hour or more every day and constantly getting great new information! The site is EXCELLENT and EXTREMELY successful so far. Furthermore, Brannon Howse has stated repeatedly and recently that they have very solid numbers all day every day with big spikes of activity whenever they go live. The site is 100% legit. If it is being used to trap script kiddies or something, that's a side project.
Furthermore, DDOS is an unsophisticated form of attack any idiot can pull off. You can buy bot nets on the dark web and launch a DDOS with almost no understanding of technology. It isn't top-tier blackhat hackers doing all the DDOS attacks.
Idk, I don't want to seem rude or paranoid, but this just seems so far off the mark as to make me suspicious efforts are underway to falsely paint frankspeech as a failed experiment to discourage patriots from going there. EVERYONE should be going there! The site is AWESOME, and I can virtually guarantee that ANYONE will learn something by spending time there. Suggesting it is "nothing more than a psy-op" is frankly ignorant and potentially damaging to a wonderful resource which Mike Lindell is heavily invested in to help us. There is no reason to make these claims about frankspeech and not about, say, this site. Would you find it reasonable if I said I thought this forum was "nothing more than a psy-op" just because the bad guys attack it occasionally? I hope not, because that would be equally absurd. Sites can serve more than one purpose, certainly, but if frankspeech serves only one purpose, that purpose is not what you suggest. The primary purpose of frankspeech is to provide a platform for freespeech and allow Mike Lindell and others a voice they otherwise would not have. People like Diamond and Silk are not setting up operations there to run a sting on a bunch of script kiddies. That's small potatoes compared to what frankspeech is really doing.
I tried to look at the site when it first debuted but I couldn't get on. I really don't want to join anymore social media platforms. Only going to join if President Trump is on it and is sending messages from it(any social media).
No, he's 100% incorrect, most likely. HIs theory makes no sense, maligns what frankspeech is actually doing (allowing free speech and conveying important information), and has no apparent grounding in reality. Where is the evidence for the claim? Where is the logical argument? It is just like a random thought that falls apart under scrutiny.
OP is arguing that frankspeech, a very expensive web site that is very stable, constantly putting out excellent content, is absorbing people canceled from other platforms who earn their living providing such content, is nothing but a sting operation to catch black hat "hackers" DDOS'ing the site? Do you understand what DDOS is? It is basically a bunch of computers with malware that allows someone with proper credentials to send orders to the malware and cause the bots to act in unison. Usually the DDOS is little more than telling the bot net to send a lot of network packets all at once to create traffic jam on the network. The hacker, even if just a lowly script kiddy, is likely activating the bots through TOR or a VPN. All the logs will show is attacks from computers owned by innocent people. Heck, your own devices may be participating without your knowledge if they have been compromised and co-opted into a bot net! You maybe got compromised by visiting a tainted web site with an out of date OS/browser. So you really believe frankspeech is just to bust people likely you unwittingly running malware? And from you how do they trace back to the originator of the malware? Or the kid sending a single command to the bot swarm over TOR or VPN? The whole idea is frankly ridiculous!
We all need to do better here. Just because you have a cool idea or think someone else's idea looks cool on the surface, engage in a bit more critical thinking before jumping on stuff that may end up making us look silly and ill-informed. And, as I said elsewhere, frankspeech is a WONDERFUL service to the community. Everyone should be checking it regularly. When nonsense like this post gets promoted, many people may not bother checking frankspeech thinking that it is just a honey pot to pull in bad actors. So if you want some compelling ideas and facts to ponder deeply, ignore empty claims like OP made and actually go to frankspeech to watch some of the excellent content. Be sure to check out the pre-recorded sections so you can watch entire airings without just being stuck with the "livestream" on the main page which you may have already seen.
“Act weak when strong”
this^ Mike Lindell does a great job of playing the bumbling billionaire, but underneath you can tell he's very shrewd.
exactly, have an inlaw that makes snide comments about DJT's inheritance. the jealously and confusion is SO obvious. wonder if these people even have the potential to change...
Act weak by putting up a rock-solid web site that is non-stop pushing new, high-quality content every single day since its inception? I'm on there at least an hour every day, and some of my best intel is coming from there. Honestly, for quality, depth of content, frankspeech is regularly trumping this site, hands down. And, don't get me wrong, this site is a great asset, too! But don't jump on bandwagons to nowhere, achieving nothing but maligning a beneficial asset in our digital community! Support frankspeech.com! Go there regularly and LEARN!
I think you may be right, but it serves two purposes!
Wouldn't it be so awesome if U.S. military stormed CIA headquarters and hauled off hundreds of them to be charged with treason!
'Gina Haspel enters chat room
"Where's Gina?"
The suicide of Gina Haspel is a tragic thing. How she shot herself three times in the back of her head is a mystery. Tragic.
It is really just #1 and #3. There is absolutely no reason to believe #2 has any serious merit whatsoever. The site was DDOS'd in the early days, maybe some after that (ineffective, btw). DDOS is not a sophisticated attack. It also wasn't effective. There is no reason to believe there is any "super secret content" stored at frankspeech.com to justify some super elite black hat hacker wasting his time. The DDOS could be launched be any idiot and works only to make Mike look incompetent. But, again, that failed. Support frankspeech and don't participate in falsely maligning its value and success.
Great insight on the angles he's working,... he's bait, and a distraction/noise.
But I'm gonna have to demand an audit of your "two purposes" total :)
I think you are on track fren
It was under constant attack launch day and probably more beyond that.
It's probably under constant attack
If it is, the attacks are clearly a waste of time and having no notable impact on anything. If there is an attack against frankspeech.com, it is information warfare designed to make people think there is no reason to visit the site (because it is "nothing but a psy-op" or "a honeypot" or whatever other nonsense misleads people and causes them to miss out on the great content being disseminated from there daily).
They said they were under attack early on. I rarely have any difficulty accessing and using the site. If they are enduring ongoing attacks, they apparently are not very effective, and I haven't heard them mention them in a LONG time.
I like how you think.
Ditto
Is it really "thinking" to have a random thought that doesn't hold up to scrutiny--scrutiny of which I have seen no evidence in this entire thread?
Why are you pushing this so hard? You've made your point, others have a different opinion. Move on.
Yup, you're right. This was my thought from the start too.
It is an unfounded, misguided thought that makes no sense on deeper scrutiny.
i think your on the money with that , many diversions to spread the deep state thin and extract out the players behind the scenes
Think more along the lines of Operation Bodyguard. Perhaps the platform was a simple red herring meant to be a false target that the white hats could closely monitor and track exactly where the attacks were coming from.
interesting take for sure
I agree exactly. He baited them with the whole, "Give me four of those and 5 of those". like he was a dumb rich guy.
I think they were matching up ip addresses to those from the fraudulent election(s)
Maybe it was just a fall out shelter in case of nuclear stike
I like your style, Patriot! SMART thinking!!
Youre on to something fren
I'm afraid you're a bit off the mark with this one. "...just enough..."?! "...fell flat..."?! I'm there an hour or more every day and constantly getting great new information! The site is EXCELLENT and EXTREMELY successful so far. Furthermore, Brannon Howse has stated repeatedly and recently that they have very solid numbers all day every day with big spikes of activity whenever they go live. The site is 100% legit. If it is being used to trap script kiddies or something, that's a side project.
Furthermore, DDOS is an unsophisticated form of attack any idiot can pull off. You can buy bot nets on the dark web and launch a DDOS with almost no understanding of technology. It isn't top-tier blackhat hackers doing all the DDOS attacks.
Idk, I don't want to seem rude or paranoid, but this just seems so far off the mark as to make me suspicious efforts are underway to falsely paint frankspeech as a failed experiment to discourage patriots from going there. EVERYONE should be going there! The site is AWESOME, and I can virtually guarantee that ANYONE will learn something by spending time there. Suggesting it is "nothing more than a psy-op" is frankly ignorant and potentially damaging to a wonderful resource which Mike Lindell is heavily invested in to help us. There is no reason to make these claims about frankspeech and not about, say, this site. Would you find it reasonable if I said I thought this forum was "nothing more than a psy-op" just because the bad guys attack it occasionally? I hope not, because that would be equally absurd. Sites can serve more than one purpose, certainly, but if frankspeech serves only one purpose, that purpose is not what you suggest. The primary purpose of frankspeech is to provide a platform for freespeech and allow Mike Lindell and others a voice they otherwise would not have. People like Diamond and Silk are not setting up operations there to run a sting on a bunch of script kiddies. That's small potatoes compared to what frankspeech is really doing.
Interesting hypothesis
Is the new platform going to be Decentralized social media? RVP? I heard rumors.
I tried to look at the site when it first debuted but I couldn't get on. I really don't want to join anymore social media platforms. Only going to join if President Trump is on it and is sending messages from it(any social media).
I love frankspeech.com, but I haven't joined and probably never will. I seldom join sites. Even here, 99% of the time, I browse without logging in.
I've thought the same thing myself and I believe I posted something to that affect a while ago.
Agreed...
You must be new given we were all saying this day one when his platform dropped.