An old but gold Q post for our new Anons #2137
🐸 FROG QUESTIONS 🐸
Anons were asking for a proof with 0 delta tweets (Q post and Trump tweet at exact same time)
An hour later, Trump tweeted and Q posted at exactly same timestamp!
Q further explains this - both messages were sent out at exact same moment from 2 devices. There was a 10 second lag due to different carriers, thats all!
Reading back old Q posts is amazing. You remember so many incredible things like this.
I like the Q posts with PRAY in them.
https://qalerts.app/?q=PRAY
Q is righteous.
Yes 🙏
Me, too!!
Hi Phish!! Great to see you fren!
Thank you fren.
There are many of those, for sure!!
Do you remember that guy that did a graphic of them all? Cannot remember if it was on Reddit or Voat, but it was cool.
I think so. I must have seen it, but I was not on Reddit, just Voat, so maybe not.
It always gives me hope
I haven’t seen it mentioned in a while, but I always thought the “amazing “ tweet was the big one. Where Q+ is asked to prove he’s the President by tweeting out the word amazing and a few minutes later Trump talks about an amazing view from AF1 with a picture. That’s the one that turned me into a believer.
But I didn’t know about this one. Thank you!
Tippy top!
That's my fave🐸👌
Mine, too! POTUS was adorable the way he worked that into his speech from the Truman Balcony at Easter! I was watching on TV and screamed when he said it! Scared hubby and had to explain. 😹 The boards exploded! 💥
Your reply about Tippy Top is the same as mine. I scared my husband so much by my shrieking, I think he jumped 4 feet off the couch. That day was a great day. I received perfect confirmation.
😁❤🐰
Ah lol, this is what I was trying to remember - yep.
There was another one. A much more obscure word. Trump incorporated that word in his SOTU speech a few weeks later while talking about Melania and a walk-in wardrobe or something like that. Just can't remember the word
interesting - i dont remember that?
Tippy Top, as another Anon mentioned here in another comment.
u/?q#991
yes i know that, but that wasnt to do with the wardrobe was it?
I hope you can or someone here can remember that because I don't recall what it was...
Tippy Top
Yes indeed. I remember gretting the little droplet sound from the Q app on my phone each time Q posted. Good ole days
I was driving once and Q started dropping like crazy, my phone sounding off DRIP... DRIP... I check and each one was Snow White 4 down... Snow White 7 down... 3... 8...
I was like oh shit is habbening! Had to pull over and scour the boards to see what was up lol
I know right, I would get a siren alarm from qagg.news after someone set that up. It would all of a sudden come across my tablet when I was doing something else. I would get a grin on my face and go check for the new post. It was such a rush to know we were that close to the presidency.
Great memories! When Q would drop my Q App would have a British woman's voice saying, "Q Alert!"...what an adrenaline rush and then the digging would commence. I remember that Snow White drop clearly.
Feel sad that the newbies missed those thrilling early days. I found Q one month after his first drop.
Love DJT's comm filled 0 Delta.. that must have been a shit in your pants moment
I'm reading through all the Q posts for the first time. I'm a recent convert (since around January), and more recently have more faith in Q. Rereading through these is insane.
I would love to hear stories of you all who had been on the ride AS q was posting... Must have been such a thrill ride. Maybe we should create a separate post? Either way, looking back and seeing the timing of events unfold at the exact same time of posts is spooky, and spiritual. These guys are truly combatting evil.
I started in February of 2018, four months after the first Q post. I would look for new posts multiple times a day. I downloaded everything I came across in my research.
It was three years of amazing.
It was awesome piecing it together in real time.
I love, love, LOVE when this board reposts things like this! I’ve been around since the beginning so it’s a great refresher for myself and like you said, it’s great for the newcomers to the Q group! Keep them coming! They never get old!
WWG1WGA !
If I'm not wrong, Qpost 2131 indicates a delta=0. Trump twitter is now gone but the tweet was about storms in the atlantic...
u/#q2131
No spaces in between...
1.) Lower-case “u”
2.) /
3.) #
4.) Lower-case “q”
5.) Post number
u/#q807
Awesome! Thank you!
u/#q3827
u/#q3497
u/#q2140
u/#q2137
that's what i was talking about ! Nice to see this old trump tweet, nice to see that anons saved everything offline ! WWG1WGA
Must have been a hell of a time, watching Q those first couple years. I have much respect (and some envy) for OG Anons.
I love me some deltas
One of the best was 2/17/19, when Trump posted to social media within 60 seconds or less after Q did, on THREE separate occasions.
Three times. In one day.
No matter how hard they try, the Qphobes cannot explain this away. Can't be coincidence; that's stupid. Can't be Trump doing it himself, playing the roles of both Q and himself; that's stupid. Can't be "special software" (love that one, even though it's stupid).
Anyone have that meme of anons when Q wasn't posting and then when Q posted. It was two pics side-by-side, partying vs standing at attention, saluting. Pretty funny and probably more true than not.
Whoa. Never seen the "delta" post before.
Thanks for posting this -- this is the "booster shot" I needed today. Those were wild times. I blundered into Q on 4 chan, a week or so after the first post and spent countless hours over there (through all the platform upheavals) during the years when Q was active. It tickles me no end to be able to say I was there to see this one happen in real time.
These are some of my favorite Q proofs.
I mean, c'mon guys, this isn't going to enlighten anyone. It's easy enough to wait until you see a trump post and then put something out 10 seconds after that you had already prepared.
I'm not trying to be a dick but I see these kind of things all the time that can easily be dismissed by the normies. It's not helpful.
If you ever wanted to actually send out two messages at the same time, you could easily make them refer to each other. This is silly. Put yourselves in the shoes of a skeptic - if it's easy to dismiss, then it's not worthwhile.
You are not wanting to succeed in that department. If you had, you would have studied previous discussions over at searchvoat, before opening up your late to the party smarty pants mouth in this way.
Did somebody call me??
Dudddde. Catch up