No!!!!!, you should die now!
(twitter.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (81)
sorted by:
Porn should be wiped out. It decays society as a whole, and that is not just true with children.
When I was younger, I would've thought you a tyrant. Now I understand why this would be a good thing. Who decides what is and isn't porn though?
What is and isn't?
I'd say that is fairly simple to decide. If it is showing sex acts in any form or fashion it is porn be it film, printed, or live.
If the intent of the artist is to cause sexual arousal, it is porn. Thus, girls wearing bikinis and grinding on each other is porn. So are the frescos in Pompeii.
If the intent of the artist is to show off the amazing mechanics of beauty of the human form, it is not porn. Thus, the statue of David and things like medical photos are not.
There's a gray area for things like ancient fertility objects, grainy black and white artsy semi-nudes, and product sales like lingerie.
People can be sexually aroused by anything, because people are twisted. So you can't look at how it makes the person feel. You must look at the intent of the artist and the creator.
This is why Bill Barr goes full bag-piper when ever he passes a KFC.
Try explaining that to the little minor lefty demons. They don't get it.
Actually that doesn't support their effortst to undermine society and bring about the hell on earth they and their masters so desire so they are always going to try to subvert any attempt to ban one of their best tools.
fuck me bet you're fun at parties.
So things like playboy magazine would still be around then.
No that is print. Playboy is just a gateway drug. kek
You can't see the slippery slopen old CIA Heffner took this country down?
Penetration, or is dry humping with clothes on ok?
I see Heckles brought his troop to the rescue. I was wondering how long before the rest showed up. kek
Anybody with a brain and common sense. If people are naked or partially naked and engaged in sex, whether with someone or alone, then it's porn.
By that definition playboy doesn't qualify and is still legal. Also, there are many things people get off to that don't involve overt sexual acts, are those to be banned too?
Oh brother. I hope you live in a cave. And who said my list was comprehensive. Just trying to enlighten things for a dim bulb.
Or you could just not watch it and let people make their own choices.
I love seeing people piss and moan about censorship on this site, yet as soon as the opportunity to censor shit you don't like comes up, you jump all over it.
This is how it works - porn gets banned ...(slippery slope).... social media is banning the POTUS.
You're no different than the fucking progressives.
Why is porn free? Consider the effect.
Porn has been around forever - long before the internet. People like looking at naked people. It's human nature, not some crazy Jewish plot. I do question the whole "incest" thing they're pushing these days, but again, you can choose not to watch. If they're not fucking kids or raping people, I have no problem with it.
And honestly, everything on the internet is free - if you know where to look.
People here question why the ‘lifesaving’ vaccines are free and highly accessible. I wonder why, too. Many people suspect bad things.
Most people attest to feeling good in the moment of porn, and shame afterward. Yet we are told to feel pride. Which reaction is natural?
I think it’s an odd coincidence that the other definition of fetish concerns the use of an object for spiritual powers and shamanistic ritual. Not too disimmilar from how pharmacy comes from pharmakeia, which deals with magic, and feels good in the moment, but often hurts in the long run.
In purely these things, I’d enjoy more perspective. I won’t spend time arguing morality at the moment. I’m more interested in the language I mentioned as I believe coincidences are rare.
I sure could and so could you, but that was not what the thread is about it is about stopping it being pushed to children. Got and solutions for it being freely accessed and not have it available to children, or are you good with them accessing it too?
After all they could just 'make their own choices' about whether they want to watch it too.
What's your choice / agenda porn and a continued slow slide into hell? Or a change to the status quo?
You do know you can put parental controls on you computers and browsers, right?
My browser is default set at "moderate". You have the option to turn it off completely or set it to "strict". This should filter out the vast majority of porn sites.
https://bestparentalcontrolapps.com/how-to-block-porn-sites/
You do know that won't keep a smart kid out right?
I know but I don't want to give any govt that level of control over what people can view when it's all consenting adults involved and no violence being depicted or suggested, because violence against others is not protected by the Bill of Rights.
You give them that power, then they can say well you know what, I don't like how revved up that crowd gets at Trump rallies, so they're banned too. We just don't like people getting too excited, someone might get hurt. FOR THE GOOD OF SOCIETY it's banned. Etc.
I no longer consume any porn at all, and I don't miss it one bit. But I'm a huge 1st Amendment absolutist.
I am also a 1st Amendment absolutist, but I recogize that many of these platforms are not secured to just adults only. I also recognize that porn is used as one means of population control, and to dehumanize our personal life experiences to the point people become disconnected with what real personal interaction is supposed to be, and the role it plays in making us human.
You say consenting adults, but how do make sure those are the only ones with access? What makes you think is is not damaging to even adults and society at large?
I understand your concern with the slippery slope, but I see the slippery slope we have taken into the sewer with it available too.
All fair comments.
I don't know the answers. I was merely putting out the hypothetical that IF the adults were consenting, THEN there is no violence implicit in the material JUST because they're having sex of some kind.
I agree that it's nearly impossible to tell when women have been methodically raped from childhood into thinking acting in porn is what they need to be doing.
100% agree
Yep, why can't we let adults decide what they want to do with their own lives? I personally don't give a crap about what consenting adults do in the privacy of their own home. Why are some folks always trying to legislate morality? It is not for you to judge. I don't drink and i don't smoke, but I'm also not running around trying to ban it. Does it destroy lives? Yes, does it get you sick? Yes, but it is their choice. Children are different, they don't have the faculties, in general, to determine what might be the best for them. That is best left up to the parents and to some degree, law enforcement (if the parents are not doing what is best for the kids). I understand you don't like porn, good for you, you are free to choose. Be respectful and allow everyone else the same courtesy.
I agree with you in general, but in this one instance I might agree with some kind of intervention. I think people fail to realize just how much of our civilization is built on sexual energy. Men are very 'carrot on a stick' type creatures. We need that carrot to go out and expend the energy necessary to building a functioning society. Porn puts that carrot right in front of you and it's getting to the point where all of society is feeling the effect of weakened men.
So while you can say live and let live, and it's true in a way, it's also false in a way too because the effects of porn do eventually make their way through the entire society.