She says hospitals are getting legal indemnity from NIH (fed gov't) IF THEY USE NIH PROTOCOLS.
This, along with the money, explains why the hospital administrators are demanding NIH protocols, and the doctors are marching to their orders (without doing any research).
This is completely out of my realm, so sorry in advance if I butcher this question. But are there other protocols for handling PCR testing or Covid cases, etc., besides the NIH protocol? Like, could hospitals be handing this whole plandemic using another set of medical protocols?
I believe the Doc. I really do. But what then, is killing all of these people on ventilators? The symptoms are real. I don't believe it's the flu. It's something if not Covid.
Imagine if a genetic sequence was abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz. In other words, it was all 26 letters of the alphabet, in order. [Add: Dr. Merritt is saying that THIS sequence is part of the HUMAN GENOME, and NOT from any virus. I suspected this, but did not include it in the post.]
If we look ONLY for sequence ghijklmnop, then that is the ONLY thing we will find because we are not looking for anything else.
The next day (or year), maybe we ONLY look for sequence mnopqrst. In that case, we would ONLY find that and nothing else.
If you were driving around and specifically looking for blue cars, you would suddenly find a lot of blue cars, but ignore the rest.
If these genetic sequences are in everybody, then the lab tech will find it in every sample.
Are there any reports about how many lab techs did NOT find ANY of the Covid sequence? I have never seen anybody even talk about it.
What if all the lab techs found it in EVERY sample of EVERY person?
We know that a fruit and a goat came back positive, so the genetic sequence must have been in those samples.
Once the genetic sequence is found and extracted, then the PCR is used to increase the sample of the genetic sequence, by using an arbitrary number of cycles.
After that, a false positive or false negative is issued, and you have the scamdemic.
P.S.: This is the EXACT same scam they have been running on AIDS, for which Fauci has been the head of that scam. AIDS patients were prescribed AZT to "help with symptoms," but AZT is extremely toxic and is what ACTUALLY killed the AIDS patients.
So which is it. Ivermectin treats Covid or Covid isn't real? If it's a normal amount of people dying from a variety of normal reasons why is everyone taking Ivermectin? Taking one specific medication for any number of random illnesses seems pretty stupid to me. How did a study that shows Ivermectin and HCQ get created against a virus that doesn't exist? Are those fake as well?
Yes, but current working theory is those are being injected, they are coming from the vax.
In addition I have a hypothesis on this which needs research. Are the spike protines ferrous in nature? If they are then the ferrous oxide that is also in the jab may be a time bomb of sorts.
If the spikes are magnetic, then the F.oxide may be holding them in place at the jab site in the shoulder. Multiple variables over time either shifts the F.oxide, weakens it, or otherwise makes it no linger effective at holding the spikes in place. The spikes then travel through the body/bloodstream reaking havoc on the victim.
You are thinking of graphene oxide, not ferrous oxide, which is an insoluble mineral. Just because something contains iron does not mean it is magnetic. Every molecule of hemoglobin is based on an iron atom at its center, and is not magnetic.
Don't know. But ivermectin and HCQ were not invented for Covid. They were invented for other things. If they also work for Covid, then that means the work for more than one thing.
If they work for more than one thing, then ... they work for more than one thing.
If Covid does not exist ("IF"), then those people are getting sick for OTHER reasons.
If that is the case, and if ("IF") those people are ALSO getting better from ivermectin/HCQ, then it necessarily means that ...
Ivermectin/HCQ work for ... MORE THAN ONE ILLNESS.
Don't know why you can't wrap your head around that concept, but that is the concept.
Are you purposefully misunderstanding what he's saying? He's saying IF covid exists, then HCQ and ivermecin can probably cure it as it does so many other things which is why it helps people from whatever it is (covid or otherwise) people are getting (flu, cold, pneumonia, whatever)
What they mean, is it’s COVID protocol killing, not covid, the ivermectin is curing the real problems being masked as covid, leaving them unable to push bad protocol
I've been saying this since last June. The numbers/charts mimicked the flu season for 2019 peak for peak. They then played on everyone's inner hypochondriac to tell them that if their nose itches, to get tested. They then took the massive amount of tests and retests and sculpted the data to suit their needs. They piled on real flu and cold cases mixed with false positive coof tests and bing bang boom, Scamdemic
Mag768720, how do you know hospitals/doctors are being paid to follow the NIH protocol(Remdesivir, vented, etc)? Have doctors/practitioners been threatened/fired because of going outside the protocol? I believe you, but how do you KNOW this information? My tbackground: I am an ICU nurse; I was on the frontline beginning last March with my hospital. At that time I saw a lot of patients that had co-morbidities(obesity, DM, uncontrolled HTN, etc). Now I am seeing 30-50 y/o that are "healthy" that are fighting this "disease". Some are hospitalized for 3 weeks or more because they are either vented or borderline in need of a vent(O2 sats drop to 70s with very little exertion). Yes, they are on Remdesivir, steroids, etc. To say I am disenchanted with the medical field is an under-statement. I am becoming angry and irate at the doctors that don't "practice medicine" anymore; I am angry at doctors for giving up their power to "big conglomerate medical corporations". I am angry that such corporations can dictate the relationship and the treatment that doctors can have/order with their patients! I am utterly effing disgusted!
Thx. I was wondering if there was a way to track hospitals receiving compensation for using NIH protocols while neglecting to try other treatments at the detriment to the patients. When I have asked our docs about other treatments like HCQ, ivermectin, I get the blank stare and the standard response: “we haven’t seen any studies that those work”. I am so disgusted with everything that I find is being done to “us” the people.
But they are getting sick at home, not in the hospital. Also, if Covid is fake then why is everyone taking Ivermectin? Covid can't be fake and Ivermectin a treatment for it at the same time.
I'm not suggesting that some of it isn't. Maybe even most of it. But why then the ventilators? And I've never heard of the Flu starving oxygen out of your vital organs leading to death. And I ask again, why are people taking Ivermectin? The Flu has been around forever and there has never been a run on Ivermectin to treat it? Something is definitely NOT normal.
Some flu and or sickness like pneumonia if untreated can put you on a ventilator. Ivermectin has broad spectrum ability to fight a variety of parasite born bacteria. I believe this why it is successful. I am not a doctor, but I have a very healthy horse . And, experienced the shit show first hand. My horse would have died, I know this...
Flu comes in many forms. Flu kills. Not all people have the same symptoms, but everyone gets a covid diagnosis. Even heart attack death is labeled covid why, would that be? I have seen this, and protocols are truly killing people...
For some people they are not able to overcome this virus/flu without treatment/help. My observations have been that in some patients(many healthy) the infection continues to the point where their lungs are not exchanging the gas...CO2 & O2. Their lung x-rays show a white-out...which is bad. Their arterial blood gas shows us that the gases(CO2 & O2) are not being properly exchanged. In some cases their scans have look of "crushed glass". Their bodies/lungs become so "air hungry" we have no choice, but to intubate and put them on a ventilator. Here's my issue: I believe that if the proper treatment was started early it would prevent the majority of these vented patients from ever needing a ventilator. The vent is NOT killing them; it's the uphill battle of the overwhelming infection in the body/lungs without proper treatment. Even if a patient overcomes the infection and off of the vent they are at risk for long-term lasting effects to their lungs from the virus/flu not the vent.
I'm not sure why everyone was put on the ventilators in the first place but ventilators are known for damaging lung tissue to the point of being the texture of "crushed glass"
Hospital puts patient on Remdesivir which causes rapid kidney failure, which causes fluid buildup in lungs, so they put patient on ventilator until death.
This is the protocol treatment plan. It’s not designed to cure people. The actual cures have been banned in this country.
Clinical trial studies of Remdesivir were horrendously bad. Also don’t confuse Regeneron, (which looks promising) with Remdesivir.
This is not a "bombshell", at least not as presented.
PCR doesn't just have to match on a primer. It has to match on two primers, and the number of nucleotides between those two primers has to be about the same between two different genomes to get a false positive PCR result.
The primers being a perfect match is much less important than two primers being a partial match among two approximately equal length sequences.
For example, if I have a sequence
ACTGAAAAAAAAAAAAACTG
and another sequence
GCTGCCCCCCCCCCCCACAG
you will notice the first four and last four of each are close to each other, and the length is close, but the actual sequence in between is completely different.
If I use the primers TGAC and CAGT it will perfectly match the first one, and partially match the second one. It will match the second one well enough that it will get built by the polymerase and will, with enough cycles, produce a signal close to the first one on a gel (how we determine sequence length) that it will be basically impossible to tell the difference.
In the case of the Nucleocapsid protein, which the CDC recommended primers look for, the sequence similarity may be similar enough to other viruses that the primers match. Having looked up the lengths of a couple RNA virus nucleocapsids here (page 4) and here (page 11), the length of the sequence is similar enough (about 1250 ish base pairs) that if the primers are close enough, its going to get a positive signal from many possible viruses.
I do not know if the sequences where the CDC recommended primers are is similar enough. I should do a comprehensive analysis at some point, but the protein size is close enough between viruses, and such nucleocapsid proteins are reasonably well conserved, so its entirely possible that the CDC test is producing false positives from nearly every similar RNA virus including maybe all the influenza variants. That is a supposition, not a statement.
Means the PCR is completely meaningless, and she called Covid a "Psyop."
Basically saying things we've been saying on here, but she also looked closely at the gene sequence, and she understands it (unlike most of us).
She mentioned that because it is the human genome, they can show positive PCR in anybody. She also mentioned that they are using different number of cycles in vaccinated vs. unvaccinated.
She says hospitals are getting legal indemnity from NIH (fed gov't) IF THEY USE NIH PROTOCOLS.
This, along with the money, explains why the hospital administrators are demanding NIH protocols, and the doctors are marching to their orders (without doing any research).
May these evil monsters burn in hell
This is completely out of my realm, so sorry in advance if I butcher this question. But are there other protocols for handling PCR testing or Covid cases, etc., besides the NIH protocol? Like, could hospitals be handing this whole plandemic using another set of medical protocols?
I believe the Doc. I really do. But what then, is killing all of these people on ventilators? The symptoms are real. I don't believe it's the flu. It's something if not Covid.
People are getting illnesses, just like every cold & flu season.
Some people die of flu every year. No more people died in 2020 than in previous years.
The NIH is the ONLY party that decided what the "Covid protocol" should be.
Hospitals are being legally indemnified against lawsuits if (and ONLY IF) they use the "NIH-approved protocol.
Hospitals are also being PAID BIG MONEY by the fed gov't if (and ONLY IF) they show they are treating patients "for Covid."
Therefore, hospital administrators are demanding that doctors say everybody is a Covid patient/death, or the doc gets fired.
Part of the NIH protocol is to use remdesivir and NO OTHER treatments.
Remdesivir has been PROVEN TO KILL patients. They had to end the remdesivir trial for ebola when 54% OF PATIENTS DIED.
Another part of the "NIH-approved protocol" is to put people on ventilators, almost no matter what.
Ventilators KILL people. Around 70%-80% of people who go onto ventilators (regardless of Covid) DIE.
What Dr. Merritt is saying is very similar to what I was theorizing in this thread:
https://greatawakening.win/p/12jwVfsauG/
Specifically, this:
Imagine if a genetic sequence was abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz. In other words, it was all 26 letters of the alphabet, in order. [Add: Dr. Merritt is saying that THIS sequence is part of the HUMAN GENOME, and NOT from any virus. I suspected this, but did not include it in the post.]
Once the genetic sequence is found and extracted, then the PCR is used to increase the sample of the genetic sequence, by using an arbitrary number of cycles.
After that, a false positive or false negative is issued, and you have the scamdemic.
P.S.: This is the EXACT same scam they have been running on AIDS, for which Fauci has been the head of that scam. AIDS patients were prescribed AZT to "help with symptoms," but AZT is extremely toxic and is what ACTUALLY killed the AIDS patients.
So which is it. Ivermectin treats Covid or Covid isn't real? If it's a normal amount of people dying from a variety of normal reasons why is everyone taking Ivermectin? Taking one specific medication for any number of random illnesses seems pretty stupid to me. How did a study that shows Ivermectin and HCQ get created against a virus that doesn't exist? Are those fake as well?
The gain of function spike proteins are real.
Yes, but current working theory is those are being injected, they are coming from the vax.
In addition I have a hypothesis on this which needs research. Are the spike protines ferrous in nature? If they are then the ferrous oxide that is also in the jab may be a time bomb of sorts.
If the spikes are magnetic, then the F.oxide may be holding them in place at the jab site in the shoulder. Multiple variables over time either shifts the F.oxide, weakens it, or otherwise makes it no linger effective at holding the spikes in place. The spikes then travel through the body/bloodstream reaking havoc on the victim.
You are thinking of graphene oxide, not ferrous oxide, which is an insoluble mineral. Just because something contains iron does not mean it is magnetic. Every molecule of hemoglobin is based on an iron atom at its center, and is not magnetic.
Don't know. But ivermectin and HCQ were not invented for Covid. They were invented for other things. If they also work for Covid, then that means the work for more than one thing.
If they work for more than one thing, then ... they work for more than one thing.
Logic.
How can it work for Covid if Covid isn't real? We can't have it both ways.
If Covid does not exist ("IF"), then those people are getting sick for OTHER reasons.
If that is the case, and if ("IF") those people are ALSO getting better from ivermectin/HCQ, then it necessarily means that ... Ivermectin/HCQ work for ... MORE THAN ONE ILLNESS.
Don't know why you can't wrap your head around that concept, but that is the concept.
Are you purposefully misunderstanding what he's saying? He's saying IF covid exists, then HCQ and ivermecin can probably cure it as it does so many other things which is why it helps people from whatever it is (covid or otherwise) people are getting (flu, cold, pneumonia, whatever)
What they mean, is it’s COVID protocol killing, not covid, the ivermectin is curing the real problems being masked as covid, leaving them unable to push bad protocol
Hcq has been around for 60+ years. They use it routinely in 3rd world countries for malaria prophylaxis. It's very safe and effective.
I've been saying this since last June. The numbers/charts mimicked the flu season for 2019 peak for peak. They then played on everyone's inner hypochondriac to tell them that if their nose itches, to get tested. They then took the massive amount of tests and retests and sculpted the data to suit their needs. They piled on real flu and cold cases mixed with false positive coof tests and bing bang boom, Scamdemic
Mag768720, how do you know hospitals/doctors are being paid to follow the NIH protocol(Remdesivir, vented, etc)? Have doctors/practitioners been threatened/fired because of going outside the protocol? I believe you, but how do you KNOW this information? My tbackground: I am an ICU nurse; I was on the frontline beginning last March with my hospital. At that time I saw a lot of patients that had co-morbidities(obesity, DM, uncontrolled HTN, etc). Now I am seeing 30-50 y/o that are "healthy" that are fighting this "disease". Some are hospitalized for 3 weeks or more because they are either vented or borderline in need of a vent(O2 sats drop to 70s with very little exertion). Yes, they are on Remdesivir, steroids, etc. To say I am disenchanted with the medical field is an under-statement. I am becoming angry and irate at the doctors that don't "practice medicine" anymore; I am angry at doctors for giving up their power to "big conglomerate medical corporations". I am angry that such corporations can dictate the relationship and the treatment that doctors can have/order with their patients! I am utterly effing disgusted!
That came from Dr. Merritt. I caught her interview when it was almost over, and this is something she stated. I don't know how she knows it.
Check out her various interviews and talks. She's been interviewed and has spoken a lot. I'm guessing it will come out and be talked about more.
I tend to believe it because it fits the facts as we know them, but I don't have absolute proof at this point.
Regarding NIH protocol of Remdesivir & ventilators, several people have stated this.
Thx. I was wondering if there was a way to track hospitals receiving compensation for using NIH protocols while neglecting to try other treatments at the detriment to the patients. When I have asked our docs about other treatments like HCQ, ivermectin, I get the blank stare and the standard response: “we haven’t seen any studies that those work”. I am so disgusted with everything that I find is being done to “us” the people.
Supposedly it’s the ventilators and the medication the prescribe which follow the protocol.
Ventilators + Remdesivir = DEATH
But ... this is the ONLY protocol "approved by NIH" and for which the hospitals have NO LIABILITY.
Understand the scam?
Got it. That’s what I was trying to say. Killing them with protocol that expedites death.
and more covid deaths means more relief cash from uncle sam... literally incentivizing hospitals to kill people.
But they are getting sick at home, not in the hospital. Also, if Covid is fake then why is everyone taking Ivermectin? Covid can't be fake and Ivermectin a treatment for it at the same time.
It’s the flu. Look at the stats. Suddenly flu has disappeared after how many years?
I'm not suggesting that some of it isn't. Maybe even most of it. But why then the ventilators? And I've never heard of the Flu starving oxygen out of your vital organs leading to death. And I ask again, why are people taking Ivermectin? The Flu has been around forever and there has never been a run on Ivermectin to treat it? Something is definitely NOT normal.
Some flu and or sickness like pneumonia if untreated can put you on a ventilator. Ivermectin has broad spectrum ability to fight a variety of parasite born bacteria. I believe this why it is successful. I am not a doctor, but I have a very healthy horse . And, experienced the shit show first hand. My horse would have died, I know this...
What flu causes people to lose their sense of taste?
Flu comes in many forms. Flu kills. Not all people have the same symptoms, but everyone gets a covid diagnosis. Even heart attack death is labeled covid why, would that be? I have seen this, and protocols are truly killing people...
For some people they are not able to overcome this virus/flu without treatment/help. My observations have been that in some patients(many healthy) the infection continues to the point where their lungs are not exchanging the gas...CO2 & O2. Their lung x-rays show a white-out...which is bad. Their arterial blood gas shows us that the gases(CO2 & O2) are not being properly exchanged. In some cases their scans have look of "crushed glass". Their bodies/lungs become so "air hungry" we have no choice, but to intubate and put them on a ventilator. Here's my issue: I believe that if the proper treatment was started early it would prevent the majority of these vented patients from ever needing a ventilator. The vent is NOT killing them; it's the uphill battle of the overwhelming infection in the body/lungs without proper treatment. Even if a patient overcomes the infection and off of the vent they are at risk for long-term lasting effects to their lungs from the virus/flu not the vent.
I'm not sure why everyone was put on the ventilators in the first place but ventilators are known for damaging lung tissue to the point of being the texture of "crushed glass"
Hospital puts patient on Remdesivir which causes rapid kidney failure, which causes fluid buildup in lungs, so they put patient on ventilator until death.
This is the protocol treatment plan. It’s not designed to cure people. The actual cures have been banned in this country.
Clinical trial studies of Remdesivir were horrendously bad. Also don’t confuse Regeneron, (which looks promising) with Remdesivir.
https://pieceofmindful.com/2020/04/06/bombshell-who-coronavirus-pcr-test-primer-sequence-is-found-in-all-human-dna/
Yes. Saw that before, and might just prove to be the key to understanding this whole thing.
This is not a "bombshell", at least not as presented.
PCR doesn't just have to match on a primer. It has to match on two primers, and the number of nucleotides between those two primers has to be about the same between two different genomes to get a false positive PCR result.
The primers being a perfect match is much less important than two primers being a partial match among two approximately equal length sequences.
For example, if I have a sequence
ACTGAAAAAAAAAAAAACTG
and another sequence
GCTGCCCCCCCCCCCCACAG
you will notice the first four and last four of each are close to each other, and the length is close, but the actual sequence in between is completely different.
If I use the primers TGAC and CAGT it will perfectly match the first one, and partially match the second one. It will match the second one well enough that it will get built by the polymerase and will, with enough cycles, produce a signal close to the first one on a gel (how we determine sequence length) that it will be basically impossible to tell the difference.
In the case of the Nucleocapsid protein, which the CDC recommended primers look for, the sequence similarity may be similar enough to other viruses that the primers match. Having looked up the lengths of a couple RNA virus nucleocapsids here (page 4) and here (page 11), the length of the sequence is similar enough (about 1250 ish base pairs) that if the primers are close enough, its going to get a positive signal from many possible viruses.
I do not know if the sequences where the CDC recommended primers are is similar enough. I should do a comprehensive analysis at some point, but the protein size is close enough between viruses, and such nucleocapsid proteins are reasonably well conserved, so its entirely possible that the CDC test is producing false positives from nearly every similar RNA virus including maybe all the influenza variants. That is a supposition, not a statement.
What does this mean? What about the cycles, etc?
Means the PCR is completely meaningless, and she called Covid a "Psyop."
Basically saying things we've been saying on here, but she also looked closely at the gene sequence, and she understands it (unlike most of us).
She mentioned that because it is the human genome, they can show positive PCR in anybody. She also mentioned that they are using different number of cycles in vaccinated vs. unvaccinated.
Thanks fren!
Question; Can I send a link to this thread to a non member and will they be able to read it?
What if this simply means the PCR tests are completely false and used as another instrument of control (power to tell people they are sick or not)?
What if SARS-CoV-2 is a real virus made in a lab according to all of the patents held by Fauci and the cdc?
What if the "owners" of the virus want to keep it super secret to prevent sequencing of it and identification of what they have built?
The guy who invented the PCR test said it is not being used as designed. I do not see how a faulty test = no new weaponized virus.
Then how did the Pineapple test positive?
Don't derail the thread.
Handshake. Trying to derail.
Fuck off.
Just deport and ignore.