Anyone remember this? "Pentagon ... hit by a missile, err, Plane"
(streamable.com)
Comments (50)
sorted by:
We all know it was a missle now. What exactly crashed in Penn that day because it wasnt an airplane?? We are being treated like children. Only bits of truth like bread crumbs
There’s video of Rumsfeld talking about “ shot down the plane in Pennsylvania”
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GtQfau-WeJE
Look at those heads spin in the background the moment he said it... "oh shit"
I like to know who gave the order and who pressed the button to launch the missile. Also where did they launch it from? Must have been right in front of that wall, given the angle of the attack. Perhaps a RPG of some kind? The fact that someone would follow this order without blowing whistle or raising alarms is very concerning.
Could have been the same rogue CIA sub that launched a missile at AF 1 that time. Maybe the sub was in the Potomac close by, in a deep area near the bay.
You can see that it’s a missile in the surveillance video that slows it down frame by frame. Not sure if that video is still somewhere on the internet, it’s been a few years since I’ve seen it.
Yeah I recently watched it, but then the comments claimed this was doctored. I know I had watched it years ago as well, I am pretty convinced it was a missile. If nothing else, the trajectory.
it was aired on tv when it happened, i remember that.
that video used to circulate every year, they really dont want it to be seen anymore. ive been trying to find it with no luck.
I saw the video and, no, you can't see that it is a missile. The image is so bad you can barely see anything. But what you see is far too long to be a missile, and certainly does not explain the airplane components found in the wreckage, including the voice and flight recorders.
You guys need to stop the magical thinking. People have seen jet airliners for over half a century. They recognize them for what they are. Hardly anyone has seen a missile, and they look nothing like an airliner. (I speak from working 40 years at the company that builds both the missiles and the airliners.)
Its amazing that on a post with 200 comments, we have people who know folks who actually saw the planes hit the Pentagon, and people who are experts in both missiles and airlines .... fascinating.
It's amazing, isn't it? You can talk all day long about Flat Earth, moon bases, reptillian shape shifting aliens, turning frogs gay, nothing... As soon as you bring up Pizzagate or 9/11, out of the woodworks they come.
9/11 > PizzaGate > Racine, Wisconsin.
All one in the same. Secret Societies that are nothing more than Satanic Cults at the upper levels. These Satanic Cults are the ones ruling our world. Satan is pulling the strings. This is why these 3 topics are the most attacked or censored. Expose Racine and their whole agenda unfolds.
https://greatawakening.win/p/12kFrvpf1u/plane-wreckage-on-the-pentagon-l/c/
It's not like they can't just fucking place it there for the photo op or anything. That'd probably be the tamest, most believable shit these people have done.
Plot twist: Dude secretly knew and was getting the truth out to the public
Like the BBC reporter on Building 7
Here's a video from AP, sorry for the youtube link https://youtu.be/0SL2PzzOiF8 Impact happens right away and on YT you can slow the speed.
Apparently, it's impossible to fly a plane in the way that this object flies. It's also not realistic to hit a building with a plane when traveling hundreds of miles an hour, apparently. I don't have any expertise on this subject, but from what I've heard from pilots is that even seasoned experts wouldn't be able to accomplish these flight paths. Droned aircraft (military) for the towers, missile for the pentagon?
Has anyone looked into the background of the “hijakers”...they couldn’t even fly a fucking Cessna 172 yet could fly jetliners with precision and use the instrumentation and flight electronics? Gtfo no way. I thought there was some kind of cockpit voice recording of flight 93 at one point, but don’t remember ever hearing any automated warning systems built into the plane chiming or going off.
You might find this interesting -
Article explaining theory it may have been a nuclear demolition written by a nuclear explosion expert:
https://sophias-correction.weebly.com/wtc-nuclear-demolition.html
Another perspective:
https://benthamopen.com/ABSTRACT/TOCPJ-2-7
https://benthamopen.com/DOWNLOAD-PDF/TOCPJ-2-7/
Example of what can happen to those who don't embrace the narrative and ask too many questions:
http://falsificationofhistory.co.uk/geopolitics/the-murder-of-beverly-eckert/
And one more -
https:/newspunch.com/cia-pilot-presents-evidence-that-no-planes-hit-towers-on-9-11/
"thinking about the number of people who died on the missile -- er-- "
okay, Spokesman Numbnuts-- try again. Lie lie lie
They don't care that some of us know they truth, when most of society would believe the lie that is being told over and over and over and over and etc...
If the truth actually ever comes out fully, I don't know if the people will feel more shocked, angered, or gullible. Probably a good mix, but I suspect many have an inkling things are not as they were presented.
ITT: People confusing the term missile for ballistic missile
Syntactic technicalities aside, how many times have you heard someone "Oh look, my missile just landed" ?
Super meaningless. An airplane can be a "missile" if so piloted, and that's exactly what happened. Do "missiles" have pilot seats, passengers, 757 nose wheels, and flight recorders? These were all recovered from the wreckage. Eyewitnesses on the ground saw the airplane pass over and collide.
Would love to see where you are getting this from. Remember, we are talking about Pentagon here.
I told you where I got it from. It can be cross-checked. The flight recorders were examined by another agency. We aren't talking about anything other than your paranoid fantasies. The truth is bad enough without making it into a delusion.
You told me nothing. You just made some comments and pretend like its a fact. Atleast we are being honest that we have no clue what exactly happened, so we keep our mind open for all possibilities.
Its amazing the amount of reddit-like shills this threat is attracting. Doesnt happen even during discussing the towers. Makes me think we are over the target.
In my case, you are nowhere. I just happen to have professional insight into matters aeronautical and have grown impatient with the kind of mentality that puts paranoid fantasy ahead of the facts. The Moon Hoax nonsense is similar. And you gotta realize how close you are in spirit to the Flat-Earthers.
Even more hocus pocus, outrage, high horse ... and Flat Earth BINGO !
But hey, do tell Moon Hoax, sounds yummy.
And here is an eye witness account I can actually point you to:
https://www.dailymotion.com/video/x6pcru
It's so totally meaningless that you had to comment everywhere stating just how meaningless you found it.
Us expert eyes have a different view. The problem with making something into a Rorschach blot is that what you see is what you want to see.
A friend of mine was a local fire fighter/emt. They responded and eventually entered the pentagon. They were on site for several days. According to them there was plenty of wreckage inside, such as rows of seats.
Lmfao. "Guys I totes know someone just drop it all its pointless"
If you think, in any context people would see a commercial airliner and refer to it as a "missile", then you dont live in the same reality I do.
So why'd the guy correct himself after saying missile? If it's correct there should be no issue. And if that's the term he's most comfortable with and used to using he most likely wouldn't have even thought to correct himself as he already believes himself to be correct.
And don't give me some dumb shit response like "he did it so idiots like you wouldn't get confused like you are now". There's no way he went through that entire thought process in the half a second it took him to correct himself.
"Oh I just said "missile", and while "missile" would be a correct term to use for this situation, some people might get confused. As such, I should correct myself to the more widely understood term that is "airplane". Nobody does this in half a second.
So it sounds to me like he knows what the narrative is supposed to be and fucked up big time and as a result, he corrected himself near-instantaneously.
A jetliner used as a missile. It's all a matter of purpose and functionality.
Look up Project Aphrodite for an example of airplanes used as missiles. Blew up the oldest Kennedy brother.
No-one refers to missile crashes.
Where did I say anything about Flight 77? Just because we believe a plane did not hit Pentagon does not mean we don't believe that people on that flight did not die.
If you have direct reports witnessing the crash, and you have clear recollection of exactly what they said they witnessed, and you want to share it, that would be amazing. To date, I have not heard any reliable eye witness account of what happened, so if you have raw witness details (not massaged by the authorities) then let us know.
The thing I am very curious to hear about is the flight path of the plane they saw hitting into Pentagon.
BTW, remember that there is another footage of a CNN reporter who reported from the scene saying he could not see any wreckage of the plane.
Thats a different question. Most probably hijacked by theCabal and unfortunately destroyed.
First I've heard this, but exactly! How did this happen when the "plane" evidently dematerialized. There is no way if it was actually a plane there would be nothing recognizable as aircraft debris left behind.
Hmm, sounds like a plant, like a miraculous passport found at Ground Zero from one of the hijackers on a plane that hit the towers.
No surprise, handshake account...
especially no tail of plane was left into wreckage, part that should been left outside instead of evaporating ...and planes engines, apparently iron did go from solid to gas in crash
add, and talking of passengers ...human bodies dont generally vanish...yet dna was there but nothing that could be called corpse or part of corpse ...no bones etc assuming flesh evaporated