The Epoch Times DID in fact cover the Arizona audit
(m.theepochtimes.com)
Comments (44)
sorted by:
They are still in the dog house until further notice for me. Glad they did the right thing. Unless they make an official statement as to the delay I can’t say why it took an oddly long time to run this. Who knows but again, I haven’t kicked them to the curb but they won’t be sleeping by the fire tonight.
Uh... no. I do not care if Epoch Times reports intensively on this or not. They are trying to be an unbiased news source which means sometimes they aren't going to post what we want to hear. That is reality. The Q-Bal is not perfect nor is the plan. This is war and it's going to be messy. I fully expect them to stick with the truth and nothing more which means telling things as they are.
Yes, they are doing just that. The Epoch Times is the most responsible media source we have, and they have a proven track record.Not only that, no one know the CCP like they do, and they've been sounding the alarm for 18 years.
They are solid. Clean. How you want your media to be. That's why they are growing.
I easily rate Gateway Pundit above Epoch, but maybe that's just me
GP is political commentary. And that's okay to be biased, but that distinction must be iterated and recognized.
Epoch Times isn't going to tell us what we want to hear all the time and that's a good thing.
So solid and clean they were already spreading panic about people falling on the streets in China in january and february 2020. Jennifer Zeng and Falun Gong related. Maybe white hats working against CCP,maybe CIA puppets.
Stfu you stupid faggot.
Go back to Breitbart, Boomer
LOL
I’ll have to use that one mate.
I'm confused. It was published Sept 24 which is day of the audit report. And then updated later. Was there a delay?
Oh interesting. Says this at the bottom
Exactly. They bought the MSM bullshit without question.
It seems as though the white hats wanted the fake news to be reported.
The opposition is gleefully embracing the audit results, now. This is straight out of Trump's playbook.
I'm assuming that Jovian's forensics on the paper ballots are the main event of this audit, and that wasn't even covered by yesterday's report. So I'm presuming that stuff is yet to come and will pile on to the damming proof covered yesterday.
Okay, why did they wait until very late the next day to update this with yesterday's news? Someone in the other post says it takes time to report news. I can promise you, a good reporter, print or broadcast or online, always has a deadline. You can write a story in minutes or even off the top of your head (all broadcasters know how to dictate a story.)
Either they had no intention of updating this until they started getting emails or more than one somebody really fell down on the job.
BTW, if you're on an assignment, you don't close up and go home until the story is filed. Period.
Choosing to see the positive side of this, maybe it was because they got called out here on GAW and felt compelled to cover it solely due to that post?
Any who that's my working theory. We're the news now.
Too right. I saw a few compelling summaries right here on GAW just minutes after the event ended.
Correct.
I think you're right. You have the power of GAW to thank for this, I think. Other than that, or angry subscribers, it makes no sense to wait 24 hours + to write an update.
There was no follow up reporting needed (interviews for reaction quotes, for example) if you're merely reporting on what happened yesterday. Even if there was, that doesn't take long unless you have to have one particular person who you can't find for hours. I don't see that here.
It was published on the day of the audit. Not today.
Right. Took them > 24 hours. Every article since the audit report has reader comments about wheres the fuxk is the coverage. All they could come up with was to edit the false “Biden win confirmed” article?
I'm surprised how many things have names that I never knew about. Having a name kind of legitimizes things in a way right? Haha
Definitely, there’s all sorts of concepts that make way more sense once you put a name to them and start studying it.
Thanks op for keeping it real.
They may as well be viewed as controlled opposition until further proof is shown suggesting they aint.
Well, their headquarters is Hong Kong, correct? Not too hard to imagine that CCP is now strongly influencing them, if not outright controlling them.
I repeat my "claims" (I would need to look for some old copies somewere and it would take time - maybe I still have because I am quite hamster) that they were in fact spreading also panic about COW-ID in january and february 2020 - those videos about people falling in the streets etc. This was relation of Jennifer Zeng. By the way Epoch is linked to Falun Gong. Officially they are against CCP,but from another side - Falun is quite nationalist Chinese sect (suggesting "racial separatism" for example). What side they really are ? Interesting...
Moreover read "times" hebrew way - from right to left. What you would get ?
Maybe I am wrong about them and they could be somehow white hats,but I wouldn't bet on that.
Reading that certainly does not lead the reader to believe that they've come up with any damning evidence that Biden cheated, and that Trump won.
So yea, there are discrepancies, bit they didn't say that they were all in favor of Biden.
For all anyone knows from the information we have recived, the votes from people whooved out of state for example may have been for Trump and Biden, so how would you say that was Biden cheating.
Maybe I've missed something but it seems to me that this whole thing may turn up to amount to nothing but BS.
The main point of the audit is that the total number of ballots that should likely be discarded are much greater than the margin of victory. What wasn't reported was the numbers of votes for each candidate those ballots represented. But when you consider the issues associated with most of those ballots, it seems pretty obvious that they were an attempt to increase Biden's votes.
I think they were used to help Biden but unless I missed it I did not see that information.
Just google this:
Look at the title in google.
They were saying that audit confirms Biden's win.
They've renamed the article after a day but google still has the old version of the title.
I read this the day they published it...I had listened to almost all of the audit report, and i did think the Fann comment was not stated correctly. Other than that, I thought it was solid...
They ruined any chance of getting my money with this fuck up. They're no better than CNN with this type of bullshit.
They didn't fuck up. They published it that day?
No, they published the edited version way more than 24 hours later. Not just the next day but past 11 pm on the second day.
If you weren't subscribed to them by now, I don't think you would suddenly start. They have been solid for a while, ifk why they're getting singled out. They ran the story and many others that their competition fails to run.
Jumping in to the conversation as someone "who knows someone who knows someone who knows someone that works in the editorial department at the paper".
From what I heard, they need to go through a bunch of hoops fact checking from first sources before publishing an original article, which can sometimes take longer than other media with an agenda.
The way my friend explained this to me was that they try their best to be factually correct & balance, meaning if you take an article from the paper, strip away the paper's name, someone who's very left or right may think such article is in favour of the other side.
Not sure if anyone know this but from what I heard, they were sued by Dominion previously (regarding the election) so they're also walking on very thin ice atm.
But well, don't quote me on this. I'm just a nobody.
That's called matching a story and it actually takes less time. And in this instance, all they had to do was watch or read the audit report and then write it up. Nothing that any of you are describing to give excuses to Epoch Times has any relationship to what goes on in a real newsroom.
Thank you fir the followup
Pretty lame coverage. And hey, you have a copy of the September 24th version of that article?