She sounds like she's reading a script she didn't prepare, stumbling over words and reading the last word on a line like it's the end of a sentence and then realizing the sentence continues on the next line.
Also, real whistleblowers get attacked or ignored while she gets immediate national attention and a senate hearing.
you scratch your head when you see democrats getting all pumped and start agreeing with the whistleblower. You see the dollars signs in their eyes as the prospect of more government control gets them aroused.
Came here to say this.. her 60 minutes interviewer didnt talk over her, asked her reasonable questions, didnt try to inject his side in to her statements..
"We are not doing enough to censor Conspiracy Theorists." ~Modern MSM Endorsed & Democrat Championed Whistleblowing
hahaha how obvious does this need to be.
In her testimony, Haugen said, "Yesterday, we saw Facebook get taken off the internet. I don't know why it went down, but I know that for more than 5 hours Facebook wasn't used to deepen divides, destabilize democracies, and make young girls and women feel bad about their bodies."
the statement, tweeted by spokesperson Andy Stone, read. "We don't agree with her characterization of the many issues she testified about. Despite all this, we agree on one thing; it's time to begin to create standard rules for the internet."
THERE IT IS FOLKS
PSYOP GOAL
it's time to begin to create standard rules for the internet.
She might REALLY be such a severe leftist that she believed all the crap she spouted, but IMO that large-jawed "woman" was a paid DS propagandist. She hit nearly every single talking point of the Deep State, including, as you said, clamping down on all speech the DS disapproves of, and controlling ALL narratives through censorship online. And then we have the media pushing and promoting her like she's a big hero. That all adds up to just more poisonous lies to control people.
Not a damn thing she is saying that is beneficial for any of us or this country.
When the company you are "whistlblowing" against says "damn she is right!" that should sort of be suspect even for those suffering from double-think newspeak. Unfortunately I don't think they have any clue anymore. They've been reduced to walking biological android automatons
There are so many great whistle-blowers out there right now and many are highly positioned and respected...it is more than suspicious that this lady was plucked out of thin air, placed in a mockingbird interview and immediately hustled in front of a senate hearing headed by a known criminal and then televised.
Can't be real. But the slam dunk that it is an op is when NPR jumps in to cover. This can only lead to extremely detrimental legislation or worse.
Is this hearing in response to the 60 minutes interview? If so, why can't we get a senate hearing for the proven fraud? Love how bullshit gets fast tracked.
Unfortunately, they have Section 230 protection from lawsuits because they are considered a platform, but are clearly acting as publishers with their censorship and "fact-checking" teams (paid for in large part by Big Pharma to label anything that exposes them as false)
Basically, the dems want to revise Section 230 for more censorship and conservatives for less.
Yeah. It was rhetorical though, as in, why wasnt that woman all over 60 minutes the next day...clearly leftist "whistleblowers" are part of the machine.
My dad asked me last night what a "finsta" was after hearing Blumenthal ask the Facebook lady to work towards "ending finsta" as if it's another company when it's just girls making slutty private instagrams.
She sounds like she's reading a script she didn't prepare, stumbling over words and reading the last word on a line like it's the end of a sentence and then realizing the sentence continues on the next line.
Also, real whistleblowers get attacked or ignored while she gets immediate national attention and a senate hearing.
you scratch your head when you see democrats getting all pumped and start agreeing with the whistleblower. You see the dollars signs in their eyes as the prospect of more government control gets them aroused.
Came here to say this.. her 60 minutes interviewer didnt talk over her, asked her reasonable questions, didnt try to inject his side in to her statements..
Total fake whistleblower..
"We are not doing enough to censor Conspiracy Theorists." ~Modern MSM Endorsed & Democrat Championed Whistleblowing
hahaha how obvious does this need to be.
THERE IT IS FOLKS
PSYOP GOAL
it's time to begin to create standard rules for the internet.
OMGWTFBBQ ITS TIME TO CENSOR THE WEB!!!!!
https://archive.ph/wD04T
FACEBOOK HELPED CHINA MAKE ITS CENSORSHIP TOOL
How re-damn-dic-ulous-ly obvious does all this shit need to be?!?!?
THE DEEP STATE ? NEW WORLD ORDER ? GREAT RESET CROWD IS TRYING TO PURGE OPPOSITION EVERYWHERE
She might REALLY be such a severe leftist that she believed all the crap she spouted, but IMO that large-jawed "woman" was a paid DS propagandist. She hit nearly every single talking point of the Deep State, including, as you said, clamping down on all speech the DS disapproves of, and controlling ALL narratives through censorship online. And then we have the media pushing and promoting her like she's a big hero. That all adds up to just more poisonous lies to control people.
ring a ding ding.
Not a damn thing she is saying that is beneficial for any of us or this country.
When the company you are "whistlblowing" against says "damn she is right!" that should sort of be suspect even for those suffering from double-think newspeak. Unfortunately I don't think they have any clue anymore. They've been reduced to walking biological android automatons
And don't forget how quickly she came on the scene.
Yep. Gets on MSM instead of Project Veritas. Almost immediately goes before the Senate. Is asking for more censorship.
And decides THIS ADMINISTRATION can be helpful?
Depends on what kind of "help" one is looking for. In this case she wants "misinformation" to be censored so it is the ideal administration for that!
True
Yep! They are trying to use this "whistleblower" to justify MORE censorship on social media, with government regulating it to provide cover.
Yup. Here come juicy & camelto's anti lynching law....
Exactly. Amy Klobuchar just asked her that exact question. "What can we do to censor vaccine misinformation?" Unbelievable.
Haven't been following this bullshit at all, but when I heard that CNN was talking about it, I knew it had to be establishment propaganda.
Same...when I heard NPR talking about it
Fake hearing is what I was thinking ... :) The committee head - blumenthal 🤮.
He's going to use the same Sandyhook "committee" bullshit.
and how did that slimy reptilian get to b committee head ?
Doesn't Pelosi pick all of them?
Yeah That makes sense.
NCSWIC
Wow Klobuchar bringing up Jan 6. This is a clown show...
Fakebook's Fake whistleblower..
LOL…. You know once it gets traction in the Senate… this shit is fake as fuck
Why is this stickied? The “whistleblower” is just an employee who stated her opinion that Facebook needs to censor more free speech
There are so many great whistle-blowers out there right now and many are highly positioned and respected...it is more than suspicious that this lady was plucked out of thin air, placed in a mockingbird interview and immediately hustled in front of a senate hearing headed by a known criminal and then televised.
Can't be real. But the slam dunk that it is an op is when NPR jumps in to cover. This can only lead to extremely detrimental legislation or worse.
Exactly
Is this hearing in response to the 60 minutes interview? If so, why can't we get a senate hearing for the proven fraud? Love how bullshit gets fast tracked.
Naw, her hair is clean.
If the media supports it believe the opposite
I can't watch any longer.... too much bullshit
fuck fakebook and all others just like it
cleanse yourselves of social media bullshit and ppl/companies like this become OBSOLETE!!!
FUCK FACEBOOK
With all these algorithms and entire departments devoted to choose what is promoted?
How on earth is Facebook NOT a publisher?!
Unfortunately, they have Section 230 protection from lawsuits because they are considered a platform, but are clearly acting as publishers with their censorship and "fact-checking" teams (paid for in large part by Big Pharma to label anything that exposes them as false)
Basically, the dems want to revise Section 230 for more censorship and conservatives for less.
Yes. But they used hide the stuff that makes them a publisher.. now they just talk openly about it and still they have 230 protections.
I agree, there is no question at this point, but the dems don't like it either, but want to revise it as a tool for more censorship.
Yup, they're teeing up Kamala & Smolett's newly revised anti-lynching bill.
Oh puke, she has changed her LI profile to say 'Civic Integrity'.
I am not following her testimony, but she has only been at FB since 6/2019. How much can you learn?
shawn speagal - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GlTWIAFyjd4
I didn't really look into this one but from my short read it sounded like her "whistleblowing" was that FB should censor conservatives more.
Where's the whistleblower from the first Veritas video two weeks ago? The lady who filmed everyone saying wtf is going onwith these heart attacks etc?
https://youtu.be/obdI7tgKLtA
This one?
Yeah. It was rhetorical though, as in, why wasnt that woman all over 60 minutes the next day...clearly leftist "whistleblowers" are part of the machine.
Oh sorry. Lol. 😂
I struggle with finding shit... and I knew where that was. :)
Thought that counts, fren!
OH, so convenient to distract from PV/JW and other white hat lawfare combatants.
Or writing checks to pay fines for misrepresenting himself as a War Veteran.
A dirt nap.
My dad asked me last night what a "finsta" was after hearing Blumenthal ask the Facebook lady to work towards "ending finsta" as if it's another company when it's just girls making slutty private instagrams.
I'd like her to come out with stuff like I have seen you you and you on there soliciting children. ....
I missed a word... added one. Does that help you?