When I first saw this drop I went down so many rabbit holes...so much sauce in this post alone....😉
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (199)
sorted by:
Do you all know what really happened to the Hindenburg?
When I was a child I was told by a credible source (scientist) that it was purposely destroyed in the most visually scary way possible. A true PSYOP to make everyone fear hydrogen, the most abundant gas in the universe, also one that burns clean (water vapor from exhaust pipes). He said oil tycoons had a hand in it and with reporters on the flight and on the ground witnessing women, children, etc being burned up in a bright fiery ball would be enough to scare humanity away from developing hydrogen based vehicles for at least a hundred years.
He said airships are slow but perfect for shipping of all kinds of goods and materials across land and water, no need for roads. With way less tractor trailers clogging up traffic, (spewing pollutants) it would have given way to better hydrogen(clean) based cars and better roads and traffic management. This would also cost MUCH less money, money Big Oil wanted.
He said it was not just Big Oil involved in the PSYOP. The electric companies needed hydrogen stopped too. He showed me OLD technology, a hydrogen producer. A chemical formula that can produce hydrogen at 40lbs constant pressure, when the valve is open. When the valve is shut the containment chamber stabilizes at 40lbs and the chemical reaction stops in the mixing chamber. There is NO PRESSURE BUILD UP, zero chance of explosion. He said even if we were to purposely put this hydrogen producer in a fire to blow it up, the explosion would be very small, like an M80 fire cracker. The gas chamber is very small and the hydrogen is only created when the valve is opened.
Why did the electricity company want hydrogen fear in the minds of men? He told me how he got the electric company and government goons to swarm his house. He took an old water turbine from a mill and connected it to the crankshaft of a tractor trailer engine that he converted to run off the hydrogen producer. When he fired it up he pumped out enough juice to power the entire town he lived in as well as many of the surrounding towns. The government, police and electric company swarmed his place and forced him to disconnect it. Some say that if you put power back into the grid the electric company pays you, this is only true if it is meaningless pennies. If it is enough electricity to power a city... they shut you down. We could all be producing localized electricity with this method, either for a town or just in our own homes. No grid. No electric lines stretched across the land. Using cheap (most abundant element in the universe) hydrogen producers hooked into a hydrogen combustion engine spinning a turbine. No more Electric Company.... Government loses taxes... They don't want it to happen.
Wow, what a good read. When I read stuff like this, it gives me hope for the New World where greed won't be what guides people.
Was reading it thinking the same. And wanting the blueprints. :)
In another thread I found an old first-take analysis reading "Prescott Bush and Allen Dulles owned shares in Union Bank, which owned Holland-America. Holland-America managed the Hindenburg. The man in charge of Holland-America in the US, John Pannes, died in the Hindenburg."
I can see from our frenemies at Fresh Air that Prescott Bush worked for George Walker of W. A. Harriman & Co., and "Harriman and Walker took a participation in the Hamburg-America Lines." (Not Holland-America.) Bush was also a director of Union Banking Corporation (not Union Bank), which had its assets seized in 1942 under the Trading With the Enemy Act due to Thyssen Steel holdings that were held to be Nazi (NSDAP) related. Hamburg-America, now Hapag Lloyd, did manage the Hindenburg and did lose their local manager John Pannes in the 1937 wreck. So the basic links are confirmed and the suspicion can be placed. However it's hard to tell what's more important to the wreck narrative, the death of Pannes or the death of the airship industry. The connection to brainwashing, psyops, and sheep suggests that this was brought in partly for the change in industry focus, but one death (or more) being significant also suggests that there may have been opposition to the change; but Pannes doesn't seem like a big enough player for that purpose. Yet Q thinks we can figure this one out too, so it may be simpler than that.
Interestingly, Hamburg-America owned the SS Amerika, the first ship to warn the Titanic about icebergs.
A+ post, Patriot. Just opened my eyes and reminded me everything is tied back to electricity.
I was more impressed with how many things are tied to centralization
Even more broadly it's tied to energy, not simply electricity. Thanks for your comment it also made me just remember the underlying motivations of almost all their schemes as well
Wow I'm gonna have to dig on that!! Doesn't surprise me at all tbh.... Thanks for the post fren!
Just type HHO in YT, and you'll get lots of Videos on the technology...
Even Trucks running on it.....
That's badass!!
Nope this is not HHO. No electrical power is applied at all. This is not electrolysis . This is not using direct electric current to drive an otherwise non-spontaneous chemical reaction. Pretty sure it is a spontaneous chemical reaction since I just add the 3 ingredients, and never apply power to it.
I got the jist of that....
Still wondering what three chems and in what quantity each....
It takes energy to extract hydrogen from some source. "Burning" hydrogen as fuel (oxidation to create water e.g.) will only produce power proportional to the energy released in the oxidation process (forming of chemical bonds). That energy (in the form of heat) will not be 100% efficient in the creation of electrical or mechanical energy; i.e. some will be lost to heat exchange with the surroundings. Even in a perfect system the energy you require to get the hydrogen by itself in the first place will not net you much of an increase in energy, if any at all.
For example:
The total hydrogen bond energy for methane (CH4) is 397kcal/mol. This is the minimum amount of energy required to extract 2 H2 from one CH4.
The amount of hydrogen bond energy in a water molecule is 232kcal/mol, thus two H2 from water requires (or releases) 464kcal/mol.
Its not as simple as all that, because we have to form the H2 molecules, and we have to do something with the O and C left over, which means more bond energies. The ambient temperature, the pressure, the state of matter all make a fair bit of difference, but for simplicity lets just look at these numbers.
So it takes 397kcal/mol to create the 2 H2, and then we get 464kical/mol out of it when we oxidize it netting us 67kcal/mol. Not a whole lot, and we've had to get the methane in the first place, and we had to put energy into the system to extract it, but we did net some energy through this chemical process. Then we have the inefficiencies in the system, the energy lost to heat, etc.
But what if we start with water and then end with water?
Then its a net of 0kcal/mol, and its actually less than that for reasons I've already stated, costing us more energy in than out.
Now we can get that energy from natural sources, like the sun, or geothermal. We are then really getting the energy from the sun or earth, and storing it in a chemical battery. Which btw is exactly what solar energy and battery storage is, but instead of storing the energy in hydrogen gas, which is not very energy dense, we are storing it in lithium batteries (aka chemical storage).
So the question I have for you is, if someone produced a super wonderful hydrogen chemical energy extraction engine, where did they get the hydrogen from? What was the initial energy source?
Now don't get me wrong, there are potential other uses of hydrogen other than chemical energy that can extract TONS of energy from a small amount of hydrogen, making the creation of H2 from other stores of hydrogen (like methane or water) well worth it (fusion e.g.), but in a purely chemical process, hydrogen is at best a weak battery (aka storage of chemical energy requiring input from an external source to create).
Unless your suggesting mining H2 from the sun, or maybe the clouds of Jupiter, in which case, knock yourself out.
This does NOT use electricity to split the hydrogen. I never said it did.
am not a chemist, nor do I play one on the internet...
this is the mixture (use caution)
When Aluminum metal reacts with diluted. sulfuric acid, it gives Hydrogen gas and Aluminum sulfate.
Reaction follows: Al + H2SO4 → Al2(SO4)3 + H2
(see more in posts above)
I appreciate you making this point. It drives me mad when the government (UK) start talking about "hydrogen boilers" or "hydrogen cars" because, as you say, it is really only a storage media for energy, there is no vast reservoir of hydrogen waiting to be tapped.
Best case scenario is producing it alongside a nuclear power plant, but if its intended for domestic heating you might as well just have resistive panel heaters because there is no advantage to piping hydrogen all over the place, that you made using electricity.
This does NOT use electricity to split the hydrogen. I never said it did. The "storage media for energy" would be in the form of aluminum/acid mixture. We are not storing hydrogen with the method I have described.
am not a chemist, nor do I play one on the internet...
this is the mixture (use caution)
When Aluminum metal reacts with diluted. sulfuric acid, it gives Hydrogen gas and Aluminum sulfate.
Reaction follows: Al + H2SO4 → Al2(SO4)3 + H2
(see more in posts above)
I take your point, but the aluminium is made with electricity so actually this energy cycle is worse than I thought. I suppose you could recycle used aluminium like this thought.
I am not a chemist, nor do I play one on the internet...
this is the mixture
When Aluminum metal reacts with diluted. sulfuric acid, it gives Hydrogen gas and Aluminum sulfate.
Reaction follows: Al + H2SO4 → Al2(SO4)3 + H2
I explained more to someone above. This only produces the hydrogen, what he hook it into after was a converted diesel engine. He said he keep melting parts and needed better components. This was in the early 1980s btw.
And where does one get sulfuric acid and pure aluminum? I mean, they aren't that hard to get, but they take energy to create those things. Again, any chemical engine is just another form of battery. That doesn't mean you can't get more energy out than you put in, but if you go back in time, you will find the energy came from somewhere else, and was just stored in the chemicals for later use.
I am not suggesting there is no merits to such a system. I am not saying hydrogen is useless. But to suggest it is somehow better than hydrocarbons (i.e. more chemically efficient, more reliable mining or extraction source, etc.) just isn't in line with chemistry. If there was a huge pile of pure Al and a gigantic bottle of H2SO4 sitting around and you had no better use for it, creating an engine to create electricity from H2 is probably a pretty good idea. But there is nothing there that is better than a gasoline engine for the same purpose (chemically speaking).
What IS better is using H2 (or rather D2) for fusion. Cold fusion has tons of evidential support (at some point I will do a proper write up for that). That is a real suppressed technology. Then we aren't talking about chemical energy storage but nuclear energy storage. That's a whole other ball of waxy atomic particles.
I do understand what you are getting at, kinda. But this is not a chemical engine. It is a hydrogen extraction method which the gas is then used to run a converted gas/diesel engine with. Clean burning. Also we are using scraps here, my first run of it I used a bunch of crushed cans. Pure aluminum is not required and sulfuric acid is cheap, get it from restaurant supply for cleaning drains. The system he had (mine is smaller) held about 5 gallons, and when he ran his 1935 ford truck off it, he only had to fill it every 8 months or so. The main issue was the conversion in the engine in the truck where the heat of the hydrogen was burning out parts. Back then we did not have the composite materials we have today that can withstand such heat.
Who died during the 'accident'? Pick one of the 36 names.
Why is this relevant? Tie the name to another of the subjects here. Big Oil in America means Rockefellers, but they are not one of the subjects here directly unless you prove they are family 'y'. Saud is already excluded from Y because it remains alongside Soros in this storyline. Who do you think is intended? This is the greatest ARG of all time and we have much ground yet to cover.
Who died??
The last three opponents to the FED Res....
Y is the Rockefellers. Don't remember everything about post 142 but I do remember this in the discussion.
Was just looking through the old "Storm is Here" catalog - we were given so many crumbs by Q! I remember being on my laptop for hours and hours and hours every day doing research. Seems like forever ago.
Thank you for confirming. How did Soros replace family 'y'? Hmm, on Black Wednesday 1992 Soros made $1 billion by having shorted the pound, in much the same way Nathan Rothschild made a fortune on advance knowledge of Wellington's victory (described in Griffin's Jekyll Island and fictionalized in Russo's Trading Places). Did the Rockefellers get cut out of the innermost circle, get fed misinfo, and lose big on that transaction? Or did their decline happen later? If it's true that they were neutralized before 2017, that might explain why David was so eager to speak publicly, because he was trying to get back in. Do you have any research on those points?
I think when David Rockefeller died Mar. 20, 2017 at 101 yrs. GS step into his place and took control of N. America.
Rockefeller’s, really? I assumed Rothschilds (due to the “Y” antler-headed mask worn by one or a number of them at that masquerade party circa 70s, which pictures circulate).
So how does Y signify Rockefeller?
My latest on it appears below. Posts 133, 142, 189, 275, and 299 suggest that Q means Soros replaced "Rock (past)" and thus Rockefeller is family Y even though Rothschild also illustrates Y. So it appears Q links them even if he doesn't show the symbolism that makes "Y family" uniquely Rockefeller, because that may well be old news. In Q's narrative Soros did not "replace" Rothschild due to 133.
The link to which I replied suggests that Y means the horned Baphomet, and Owl represents the dualist opposite Sofia, thus these are taken as dual Satanic symbols. Baphomet goes back to the Templars, and early central banking might also.
I pointed out that the Biblical symbol of a head dividing in two appears in Ezek. 21:18-23 and includes divination, pagan sacrifice, the Y as a fork in the road and a freewill choice of destinies, and God's control over all these. This is useful background to the Y as horns of power and dualism.
+++= Saud
++ = Rothschild family is still in the game