Happening today: Mike Lindell will present his election fraud case to the Supreme Court
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (166)
sorted by:
If you read Devolution Addendum Part 3, it might be designed to fail. That would mean we tried all three branches of govt and all failed, which would trigger certain actions.
I for 1 have never been lazy. I am very industrious, & Never took that damn Test, wear No mask, NEVER take the genocide shot, & many other things like being raised in a communist country. I know countless many things like How to grow own food, etc etc. -- Just because a person does not know Everything (like Devolution) does not mean we are "lazy".
oh, & Happy Thanksgiving tomorrow, & every day of your life with JESUS...
Agreed, I think this will fail and trigger the next level of the "rule of law" (the law of war)
How so?
All branches must fail. The House, Senate, Exective and Judiciary. If the States also continue to fail to act then this demonstrates the system has fallen and knowingly has given te country over to the Chinese. The military can then act. Let the hangings begin.
Yes but we already failed in the courts? Trump did, so have others.
Read Patriot Patel. He thinks that Lindell has some of the State AGs onboard, which would give his case standing (the others were all dismissed for lack of standing). If it has standing and is dismissed, then all 3 branches have fallen and we have a constitutional crisis a brewin'.
Because Q says military is the only way and this is how military gets deployed?
It depends entirely on the situation. A situation in which failure would be the overall better outcome would be when that failure opens up more doors that lead to a more definite victory. It would also be benificial to fail because you learn more from a failure than you do a success. Failure also keeps people pushing. If you have a massive victory, sure youll have some people that are motivated to keep working but a large portion of people might see that victory as a stopping point. Im sure youll say "but if you fail wont that make people give up too?", and youd be right but thats just because theyre discouraged. Its far easier to convince someone to fight who is simply discouraged than it is to convince someone who feels theyve already won.
Start here, there are like 10 parts https://www.bitchute.com/video/Uo2gcVUzcNWb/
Then read this also many parts, this is part one. https://patelpatriot.substack.com/p/devolution
Decodingsymbols.wordpress.com also believes Mike's purpose is to put the issue to sleep. Hence the pillows.
Hes saying it was designed to fail so it triggers more devolution actions.
I don't think that is what he said. The case is not designed to fail. It was designed to succeed.
The courts will most likely reject it anyway. Proving that the 3rd and final branch of the government is also completely corrupt
If it was designed to fail and the courts rejected it, it would prove nothing.
True
Wtf, thats not how reality works.
If the case is set up shitty so they fail by design aka lose on purpose with a sucky case it will not trigger anything.