Uh Oh: Democrats Didn’t Realize This Was Embedded in Maricopa County Ballots
(www.americanlibertyemail.com)
Comments (92)
sorted by:
We knew about this TWO YEARS AGO!
We did see what looked like black lights being used on the ballots, but I believe most thought they were looking for a watermark. Then we had Jovan post something about every printer printing a unique code on every page, one that's not visible to the human eye because it's a small number of colored pixels. This is the first time I'm hearing about a radioisotope. Not sure of the validity of the article referenced in this post.
The isotope could be what became a "watermark" in the rumors. It serves the same purpose. This validates those theories
I'm also questioning the validity of the article. But machine identification codes exist https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine_Identification_Code
Yes we did. A friendly reminder
Please convict and EXECUTE all Traitors.
I hope the recent GITMO upgrades placed the gallows right outside the courtroom windows, so the person on trial can see the traitor from the trial immediately before them as they take the short drop.
I thought Runbeck was the authorized (and compromised) ballot printer in AZ?
In my quick search, there are many older articles (prior to the election) that all state Runbeck prints for Maricopa County. That goes against what the article linked in the OP states, so I'm curious if it's valid information that Rolland Papers is exclusive for the entire state.
Edit: I'm wondering if Rolland Paper makes the ballot paper stock but is not the sole printer of ballots using that paper. Thinking maybe the article has errors in how they identified Rolland Paper. Can anyone confirm?
JovanHuttonPulitzer.locals.com He hasn't let on that this was the case, but he made it clear that he had information under his hat that could not be revealed. He is totally the only one that knows about this. The rumors have been flying but now it seems he's either been outed or someone has let the cat out of the bag.
As far as I know, Runbeck was the printer for AZ, GA, and several other 'swing' states. I'm also pretty sure Runbeck was in on the steal.
What I don't know is who supplies the paper. It seems very likely that the paper would be provided by another vendor which could be Rolland Paper. This is the first I've ever heard of Rolland Paper though.
First I've heard of Rolland Paper as well and I've been tracking this story for a bit: https://searchvoat.co/v/GreatAwakening/4101272
And Georgia too. Maybe AZ audit and wrangling had to happen to get Georgia.
A little about Runbeck: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/09/maricopa-county-relegated-election-processes-printer-didnt-provide-accurate-counts-ballots-received-election-day-chain-custody-details/
Many had thought there was digital encoding like a watermark that was built into the ballots to identify frauds, but hearing this is hopeful. I just don't know what takes so long to go through and identify the frauds, make the case and decertify. We're more than a year past the election and still talking about election 2024. Not dooming, but rather wondering if these failsafes exist, why are they not moved more quickly since they were known in advance by those who matter.
Yes. This entire thing moves at the slowest pace of the slowest investigation. A perfect storm is when everything happens at once. I believe this is what we are waiting for. Which investigation/operation is taking so long, who knows. There was an obvious delay. I firmly believe they were shooting for December according to a couple markers I watch. But who knows. It still could be years.
It'll be amazing to watch it all play out if it happens quickly and effectively.
The proof needed to convince you is a bit different than the proof needed to get convictions in a court. RICO convictions took Rudy years to put together. I know thats not something any of us want to hear but it is the truth.
Good point. And it sucks that it's true.
No, that’s good because it explains the reason why “nothing” often “seems” to be happening. I don’t know about anyone else, but it has me excited that there is a REASON why things are taking “so long.”
I use quotations on all of these words because, of course, when you were rounding up what you need for a case it’s going to take what seems like a very long time and it’s going to move at a glacier’s pace.
But taking forever to round up nothing is meaningless, take forever to round up a very very very very big something, is everything. No I’m extremely encouraged by how long this is taking when I see things like THIS.
Some of us are more skeptical than others (for which we are constantly shouted at and hated in places like this) and stories like this are extremely encouraging.
We are more skeptical, so stuff like this is really good for those of us who are struggling to wrap our minds around it. Because this makes sense: this, we can understand.
Send this article to every Normie you know that thinks there is no proof of Election Fraud.
Yes, but I know their response will be questioning the validity of this source. (If they can even break through their programming long enough to read and understand it.)
I would love to see a more official source confirm the presence of this radioisotope, and of the large numbers of counterfeit ballots.
A more official source than the only legally permitted manufacturer of the ballots?
I think you need to pesonally dig deeper, if that is what you're concluding.
The source of this is americanlibertyemail.com claiming that the ballot manufacturer said this. Do we have direct word from the ballot manufacturer that is not passed through a third party?
I saw the entire interview of the CEO of the ballot manufacturing company.
Why haven't you?
I missed that one! Can you share a link?
I'm not digging for a link for you.
do it yourself
Can you give me anything to go off of? How recent was this interview? Who was the interviewer? What was the name of the ballot manufacturer? What video site do you recall watching it on? I am searching for it myself but not seeing it and need a few more details to go off of please.
OK, that’s great, but that’s not included in the article. Again, do you not understand the priority of sourcing if you’re trying to convince somebody of something? Nothing in the article states that you watched that video. There are no sources for any of the claims made in this article. Claims, by the way, that I believe are true! But you’re not gonna convince someone with a very poorly or completely unsourced article just because you watched a video that they may or may not have seen.
You are wasting your time. He is a self righteous prick that would rather call people concern trolls than be even a little helpful. They can’t find it, can’t remember any actual details to help others find it, or just plain made it up to support his earlier comment and not seem like a complete idiot spreading unsubstantiated “facts”.
Nobody has seen it for months, if it was this one. There was a Rumble video "Bob Hughes Maricopa County Ballot Printer Talks About AZ Audit," but It's been removed from this link: https://wethepundit.com/maricopa-county-arizona-ballot-printer-talks-facts/
and this one
https://skagitrepublicans.com/BobHughesMaricopaBallotPrinterTalksAboutArizonaAuditTheDeepRigQA
and also YT:
https://www.buymeacoffee.com/SuzanneMaresca/maricopa-ballot-printer-talks-about-arizona-audit
(has anyone ever heard of these blogs before?)
which you can see were published in June 2021, before the audit was over, so he couldn't have been spilling the beans then. He might have been the one who was describing how many kinds of ballots each election requires, though. That was a good interview if someone can find it. I do feel there must have been a print version, since I seldom watch videos. In just this one county there may be over 600 variations, as each school and judicial and tax district will have a unique set of candidates and proposals, so it is a huge coordination problem.
Found a print report finally.
https://uniteamericafirst.com/maricopa-county-auditor-bob-hughes-shares-how-they-use-high-tech-equipment-to-verify-validity-of-ballots/
So if he was on the audit team, he was talking out of turn on July 26 to be revealing this.
And this was the source of that, and has the lost video link. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/06/dems-must-terrified-maricopa-county-auditor-bob-hughes-shares-using-high-tech-forensic-digital-cameras-ocr-validate-ballots/
He means he wants CNN and MSNBC to report it so all those who STILL think these are legitimate news outlets will believe it.
That is not what I mean at all, but thanks for trying.
If CNN or MSNBC reported it, I would know with certainty it was fake.
I gave something of an exaggeration. I had the feeling you knew those were beyond help, but I don't know what you might think is a better source. The people who really need to read and hear this stuff don't pay attention to any of these alternative media sources. They are either getting MSM feeds via Yahoo, Google, or MSN, or playing video games using weird apha-numeric screen names.
The faggots who bitch about sources on KNOWN INFORMATION are hilarious.
They don't know what is going on, will not seek to confirm information, but assume they are some kind of authority.
It really is a joke.
It is clearly not known information. This article is the first time many in this thread are hearing about this confirmation of a radioisotope in the ballots. Stop complaining and give me something to go off of in finding that source.
fuck off
So you are a useless lying troll, got it.
And just because you know it doesn’t mean some Normie we’re going to try to show this to already knows it. I’m struggling as to why you’re simply refusing to grasp that. You’re a smart guy. You know sources are important. You’re just pretending not to get it. Don’t be so defensive. Everyone around here is so damned defensive all the time.
You just don’t like that someone pointed out that the article is poorly sourced. You just don’t like it. So you’re lashing out. It’s childish. Stop.
Yes. Though I actually get their concern. They want those still with their fingers in their ears screaming "there was no fraud" over and over to finally be convinced of the truth that even a casual glance would reveal about election fraud. When measures are taken to correct and mitigate this fraud, these people are going to go dangerously bonkers. The concerned want as few of these people left as possible when this happens.
Except that legally permitted printer of ballots didn’t write the article, did they? Someone wrote this article, and I believe the contents of the article are true, but I don’t know the guy. He can be lying.
He technically could be flat out making up everything in the article. That’s why you need receipts. Again, I believe the guy, I really do, but no one should just take his word for it and Normies won’t.
I sense some confusion here. Runbeck is an official printer of ballots: are they the official printer? Because there were apparently printing machines at some locations, according to a blurb from the County Recorders office. Furthermore, there is this Bob Hughes guy. He was in a video that was all over the place but is now mostly memory holed except for all the links I already posted in this thread, and several times was described as "Maricopa ballot printer." Not sure if he's a CEO of anything. Who are you talking about?
Or don't because it's fake.
Please realize, you are just as worthless as the left, if you are passing on fake news.
Don't be a faggot, do some research.
Well maybe not necessary this article, but one that actually sources its information more clearly. If you’re trying to send this to a Normie who already doesn’t feel the election was stolen, this isn’t going to convince them. I actually do believe the election was stolen, very strongly, and even I’m reading this article wondering where the hell the sources are. Do you think a Normie wouldn’t?
Firing squads, all of them. On live TV. Let's even stream it into the classrooms, this is historic and our children need to see how to deal with traitors.
Easy there handshake.
Election fraud should be sedition. That should be punishable by a minimum sentence of 20 years, up to life. Oh, and the other penalty, too.
Someone who steals business ideas and follows up by cheating his partner will always return to form. Zuckerburg is toast, literally and figuratively. Kind of reminds me of his predecessor, Bill Gates.
Damning—> One of the most serious election crimes uncovered by the auditors last year was that there were many counterfeit ballots discovered in Maricopa County. How many? More than 27,000, compared to Joe Biden’s alleged 10,000-vote victory in Arizona.
Rolland Papers?? Damn, I thought you said print the fake ballots on rollin papers!!
Dr. Steve Pieczenik was right from the beginning. He said this right after the 2020 election on Infowars. What he didn't know was how long this investigation was going to take. The tide is turning.
Really good details in this article that can be verified. Thanks for sharing!
A quick bit of internetting, and Rolland paper is a paper mill in Quebec, Canada. Part of the Sustana Group. Sustana Group is owned by an investment firm H.I.G Capital. In December of 2021, H.I.G sold Sustana group to none other than Blackstone Investment.
Good news for our side.
https://rollandinc-production.s3.ca-central-1.amazonaws.com/app/uploads/2019/07/31120725/d2883_rol_brochure_security_papers_ang_web.pdf
Just recounting, the count was essentially the same. That was the first sentence. Then theres 30 pages of "but this happened." The important part is they found tens of thousands of ballots that are fraudulent or untrustworthy. Their conclusion was the "election should not be certified."
I believe that's just counting all the ballots, including the fraudulent ones. You don't actually believe Biden won the election, do you?
You are right. Just recounting, the count was essentially the same. That was the first sentence. Then theres 30 pages of "but this happened." The important part is they found tens of thousands of ballots that are fraudulent or untrustworthy. Their conclusion was the "election should not be certified."
Cyber Ninjas found out that when recounting all the votes (including the illegitimate votes), that Biden won Maricopa county. This was obviously going to happen, and shows little irregularities on behalf of the people counting the votes in November 2020.
What irregularities Cyber Ninjas did find for example was in descending order:
255,326 ballots included in the “final voted file” (the “VM55” file) as having voted early that were not included in the “early voting returns file” (the “EV33” file), when the EV33 file should have an entry for each early vote cast (whether by mail or in person) with the details as to when and how that vote was cast;
23,344 mail-in ballots cast when the registered voter had moved and where no one with the same surname remained at the address;
5,295 instances of multiple ballots from the same person;
3,432 more votes in the official results than in the final-voted (“VM55”) file;
2,592 more duplicate ballots than ballots sent for duplication;
1,528 voters who had moved to another state;
The difference in votes between Trump and Biden is 10,457. Add all the numbers above up and the total should be 291,517, a number that is much larger than the difference in votes, indicating irregularities.
And how many were invalidated by marking with a sharpie?
Another point as to why the Arizona election should be decertified.
I don't believe the Maricopa audit covered this. I am getting my numbers from this file: https://cdn.michaeljlindell.com/downloads/fix2020first/states-v-us-and-states-compl-2021-11-23.pdf (page 33-34/82 of the .pdf file). I could not find anything related to sharpies in the specific Cyber Ninja part of this document.
Curious how that got lost in this pile of malfeasance.
I wonder if during the original November 2020 counting, the vote counters were instructed to throw away all ballots marked with sharpies, instead of having the sharpie-ballots being stored separately but marked as ineligible. This could explain why they weren't taken into account as a factor of the Cyber Ninja audit
I haven't really looked into the sharpie aspect of the Arizona election particularly.
Really, how exactly have they all been debunked, and by whom exactly? No need to keep details from me, I want to see why you think so.
I wasn't aware those had been debunked. Who debunked them? Was there another audit? Or did someone just say they have been debunked and you believed them? That's embarrassing that you are so gullible.
You have to read beyond page 1. The 'more votes' part was comparing the votes counted to the votes counted again. The rest of the report subtracts BS votes (all of which were Biden's) by evidence of differing methods of fraud until it shows a massive Trump victory. Have an attention span.