Lmao I know right? OP is such a hypocrite for saying that. When I wandered in here and saw discussions on flat earth it was compelling to me to see such open minded conversations especially from people who did not fully believe in flat earth.
This is precisely the problem, beliefs. The motherfucking truth is out there and my interest in beliefs is the equivalent of absolute zero.
The whole problem with the world today is every cocksmoke walking around touting "their" truth. There is no rigor, no due diligence, no effort, just beliefs
Fuck all that shit.
One of the best things about the new world and the DECLASS will be all the dotards that can then shut the fuck up with their hair-brained shit because it will be conclusively disproven.
omg. hanks was quoting the guy he was playing with that line, it comes from real life. God bless Jim Lovall. he is getting old, and we wont have him for much longer, but I pray we do have him as long as he can stand it.
Hanks did not say it, It was a dude in mission control when the team constructed the fix for the CO2 problem.
"“Among the men in the Canaveral blockhouse and the Houston control room, there was no greater tribute a controller could be paid than to describe him, in the rough poetry of the rocket community, as a “steely-eyed missile man.” There weren’t many steely-eyed missile men in the NASA family. [Wernher] Von Braun was certainly one, [Chris] Kraft was certainly one, [Gene] Kranz was probably one too.”
It does not seem to originate with Lovall, but he talks about it in his memoir.
Edit:- I did not know it had real roots so thanks for that detail.
This is a thoughtful reply that I can get behind in the sense that the conceptual ability of the human mind is finite through the medium of thought.
"Trying to understand all of reality is like trying to measure the ocean with a tea spoon"
Absolute truth however, is a lofty ideal and not at all akin to determining whether the Earth is an oblate spheroid or flat as the queen's tits in 2022.
"I'm all for free speech, I really am. But when it comes to medical disinformation leading to the deaths of many civilians, I just won't stand for it".
I agree it makes us look retarded. But we don't just ban people for their opinions here; the only exception being if their opinion is that Q is a larp, we are a Q forum after all
Yeah. Have to say, if you are old enough to remember what normal skies looked like and what normal jet trails looked like, the existence of abnormal sky spraying should not be in dispute. Having done my share of sky gazing in my youth--including 7 years living near an international airport--the first time I looked up around 2002 and saw an extremely abnormal perfect grid sprayed across the entire visible sky, I knew at once something deliberately harmful was going on. I was told my mind and memory were lying to me--grids across the sky are supposedly entirely normal jet traffic. Such people do not even notice the trails gradually fan out to form artificial clouds. Photography now often contains chem trails, helping to promote them as "normal." I hate being lied to--and more and more the tissue of lies is being revealed. This apocalypse (revealing of things previously hidden) is the work of God, whose existence is proven by Creation and Scripture. Sorry, but life did not begin with a big bang. You did not evolve from apes. The universe isn't random. That is all conspiracy theory.
unlike the human trafficking and other criminal rackets we are trying to expose, weather modification is an open 'secret'. follow the money. here's a small sample of funded projects collated by the Harvard, Solar Radiation Research Program: from 2008-2018.
you're right, the term "chem trails" is designed to make it look sketchy -- similar to the C_A's propagation of the label "conspiracy theorist" on those questioning the establishment-approved JFK narrative.
the real third rail topic is how do we 'explain away' the fact that it was Trump who signed the first 'official' direct Fed funding, MIT Technology Review reported:
The $1.4 trillion spending bills that Congress passed this week included a little-noticed provision setting aside at least $4 million for NOAA to conduct stratospheric monitoring and research efforts. The program includes assessments of "solar climate interventions," including "proposals to inject material [into the stratosphere] to affect climate."*
We are apart of a group called GreatAwakening. Most will be awakened to things they could hardly ever imagine. Some are already awakened to things they thought unimaginable. Maybe you’re not there yet with this part of awakening. Honestly, most aren’t because they let their ego get in the way, leading them to tell others they are wrong causing them to narrow their thinking resulting in stagnant growth.
How can you be so certain that centuries of everything you mentioned is trustworthy when we are living through an authoritarian hell, led by satin worshipers, that have been doing this for centuries? They have infiltrated all aspects of life as we know it.
I don't know, I don't care about the subject so I just ignore it. If you want to debate t take it up with the ones talking about it. If it wasn't for your thread I wouldn't have clicked on catsfives thread either.
While I would normally agree with you, I would have to say, 1/....if you have a cogent, well thought out argument, I will listen (at least). 2/..Official."Science" has lost ALL credibility these last 2 years.
Q's teachings largely focus on the notion that mostly everyone in authority is not only lying to you, but doing so in a coordinated fashion to shape a false reality in a very drastic way.
However, Q was pretty light on applying those principles to any specific situations. Q followers will take Q's philosophy and try to apply it far beyond what Q ever did.
For instance, Q never really mentioned vaccines, at least not in such a way as to indicate how enormous COVID and the vaccination situation would become. He never directed you to believe that COVID and the vaccination was some sort of Deep State plan, or that Trump's position was somehow a 5D chess move designed to thwart said plan. Q never mentioned anything about vaccines or a virus when describing the Plan.
So all those vaccine and COVID theories that make up the bulk of the posts here?
That was almost all you guys. That was you applying the "trust nobody in authority, all information is compromised, there is a secret war and we have a convoluted 5D plan to win it" philosophy to a situation that Q never really talked about. You took a lesson and applied it to a novel situation.
Doesn't it make sense that different people would try to apply those principles to different established facts from different authorities? That perhaps some people will reject different evidence than you reject in following Q's teaching?
Many times when I talk here, the evidence I provide is dismissed as compromised or part of some black hat disinformation campaign. The information came from the authorities, so it's obviously a lie.
Flat Earthers think the same thing about the concept of photographs "proving" the roundness of the Earth.
Believers in the adrenochrome theories think the same thing about any chemical analysis of real adrenochrome.
Chemtrail believers think the same thing about any chemical examination or natural explanation of contrails.
9/11 truthers think the same thing about any mainstream analysis of the wreckage.
And so on and so forth. Some of you reject some evidence, and others reject other evidence.
Which is why I suspect there are so many different variations of Q followers out there. GAW is definitely the biggest I'm aware of (at least that's organized, unlike 8kun), but in groups isolated from here, you see different sorts of evidence accepted and rejected (such as the JFK crowd in Texas). Every Q group that believes wildly different things is still justifying it by saying that everyone is lying, and there are almost no established facts that you can trust.
So I suppose the question would be this: Does this board enforce Q's philosophy, or does this board believe that Q endorses a certain set of facts that lead to only a few different alternate theories of reality?
I'm sorry you feel that way. I personally have a hard time trusting any research conclusions I've come to without engaging with perspectives that disagree with me. Research has always required conflict between different interpretations of evidence.
Again, I'm sorry you feel that way, and feel that attitude is going to cause you far more problems with creating a welcoming environment for normies than any posts about flat earth will.
Not really a moral high ground, no. People here just have a tendency to assume that if I don't wilt in the face of the evidence once I see it, and am not convinced by your interpretation of that evidence, then I must be a troll.
Which I think is what many people here think a Great Awakening actually is. That the only difference between you and me is that you've seen the evidence, and that I haven't. That all it'll take is for people to watch the videos you did and read the articles you did, and that 94-96% of the population will be converted.
Which is a bad assumption to make of me, or of any newcomer to this site.
You won't find a single post from me being disrespectful, calling you crazy, or anything of the sort. I have always participated here in good faith and on friendly terms.
If this is still considered "troll" behavior to you and worthy of being ignored or attacked on that basis, then consider that perhaps Flat Earth isn't what's causing issues in interacting with normies.
So you want to censor speech? I think we should start swinging the ban hammer on values that don’t align with our movement. One of those being unnecessary censorship of speech. As any other off topic posts, they should be moved to the correct .win, not censored or banned. Mistakes can be forgiven.
which is weird considering Q outright said the earth is not flat, and we are on a Q forum. seems thats the ONLY q post that you are allowed to disagree with here
I don't care if the earth is round, flat, a rhombus, a taurus, on a sea-turtle's back flying through space, a 3D hologram in a computer, under a dome or anything else, there are far more pressing situations that we can address so I agree that flat earth talk belongs on conspiracy.win or reddit or myspace or somewhere else than here.
They always flood in here when we're over the target on something and then vanish again after a few days so I assume that most are Fedboi accounts. I'm only met one actual flat Earther ever and I had to stop talking to them for a while as it was just moving the goalposts type crazy not a single logical argument.
So It's not just me. Although the ones I notice have some ideas about something Q actually mentioned, and have taken them to a degree that makes the flat earth seem reasonable: and they can't be argued with because "Q said."
This is what ZerroDeFex and I are feeling above. The alternate science posters and thread hijackers are a type of troll. Things looking tense in Khazakhstan? Quick, find a volcano going off and argue that it is a false flag.
There's a great example. Research related to HAARP has gone on for many years. Anyone can search patents and fill up a hard drive with info. Can it be proven that it influenced the weather in any particular instance? No. You can hardly even prove the weather did some of the things it did, unbelievable storms have been happening for years. But it brings out a conversation of sorts and it ties up more peoples' time if they choose to step in it.
I hate to tell you, but "ignoring centuries of actual science, physics, math etc is simply anti-reality" is exactly right.
We HAVE been living in a masonic "anti-reality" for at the very least a few hundred years. We are like infants waking up from a long nightmare concerning our distorted understanding of history, health, science, time, and space.
I don't know the exact shape of our realm, but questions like these and questioning established "science" is absolutely needed.
Ask yourself a simple question, what could you do to a mind if you warped reality from birth? Could you then easily hide everything else? Open your mind. The things you make fun of the most and dispel are the very things THEY don't want you to look at. I have a simple rule, if its censored or ridiculed, it's probably true.
CHEMTRAILS ARE REAL, FLAT EARTH IS NOT. SHIT-TONS OF PROOF ABOUT CHEMTRAILS, EVEN BRENNAN ADMITTED IT IN THE PRIVATE SECTOR. Flat earth has no proof, just camera tricks and misplace conclusions. curvature of the earth, it was a variable to overcome for the drone program... sending a signal around the globe by bouncing from satellite to satellite to overcome the curvature of the earth. In a vacuum, water forms a sphere... track the path of the sun across the earth, then try to claim the earth is flat.
Lmao I know right? OP is such a hypocrite for saying that. When I wandered in here and saw discussions on flat earth it was compelling to me to see such open minded conversations especially from people who did not fully believe in flat earth.
I find that quality to be quite attractive.
Doomers should be fired out of a canon into the sun.
Agreed. Living in our own echo chamber is not helping anyone.
This is precisely the problem, beliefs. The motherfucking truth is out there and my interest in beliefs is the equivalent of absolute zero.
The whole problem with the world today is every cocksmoke walking around touting "their" truth. There is no rigor, no due diligence, no effort, just beliefs
Fuck all that shit.
One of the best things about the new world and the DECLASS will be all the dotards that can then shut the fuck up with their hair-brained shit because it will be conclusively disproven.
It will be a paradise.
You and I could become friends. Everything you just typed is 100% spot on.
....and you sir are a steely eyed missile man!
Ha! Just watched The Martian last night. Excellent movie quote.
Maybe showing your age there bro? (as in youngish (lucky you))
It's from apollo 13 and was repeated on the Martian. Both were great movies although I don't think I can watch Tom Hanks now.
Salute! Fren.
omg. hanks was quoting the guy he was playing with that line, it comes from real life. God bless Jim Lovall. he is getting old, and we wont have him for much longer, but I pray we do have him as long as he can stand it.
Hanks did not say it, It was a dude in mission control when the team constructed the fix for the CO2 problem.
"“Among the men in the Canaveral blockhouse and the Houston control room, there was no greater tribute a controller could be paid than to describe him, in the rough poetry of the rocket community, as a “steely-eyed missile man.” There weren’t many steely-eyed missile men in the NASA family. [Wernher] Von Braun was certainly one, [Chris] Kraft was certainly one, [Gene] Kranz was probably one too.”
It does not seem to originate with Lovall, but he talks about it in his memoir.
Edit:- I did not know it had real roots so thanks for that detail.
This is a thoughtful reply that I can get behind in the sense that the conceptual ability of the human mind is finite through the medium of thought.
"Trying to understand all of reality is like trying to measure the ocean with a tea spoon"
Absolute truth however, is a lofty ideal and not at all akin to determining whether the Earth is an oblate spheroid or flat as the queen's tits in 2022.
I am laughing at the construction of that (sentence?)
Name does not check out.
He’s saying just put in in the appropriate conspiracy board and leave the Q research board to do Q stuff.
"I'm all for free speech, I really am. But when it comes to medical disinformation leading to the deaths of many civilians, I just won't stand for it".
--Neil Young
We just read what they typed. We don’t need an interpreter.
Reading means nothing without comprehension.
My goodness you’re logical😊 Crazy daze in the whirled🙃
I laugh everytime someone posts a thread telling other people not to post threads.
I used to laugh.
Kind of tired of the self righteousness
Me too😂 We are livin in seriously crazy daze
I agree it makes us look retarded. But we don't just ban people for their opinions here; the only exception being if their opinion is that Q is a larp, we are a Q forum after all
Yeah, but the internet is a shit hole. Just roll with it.
Dispute Chem-Trails? Literally look up ^
Its so real it even has a newer name: Aerosol Injection
http://www.dezonengods.com/chemtrails-of-death/
Yeah. Have to say, if you are old enough to remember what normal skies looked like and what normal jet trails looked like, the existence of abnormal sky spraying should not be in dispute. Having done my share of sky gazing in my youth--including 7 years living near an international airport--the first time I looked up around 2002 and saw an extremely abnormal perfect grid sprayed across the entire visible sky, I knew at once something deliberately harmful was going on. I was told my mind and memory were lying to me--grids across the sky are supposedly entirely normal jet traffic. Such people do not even notice the trails gradually fan out to form artificial clouds. Photography now often contains chem trails, helping to promote them as "normal." I hate being lied to--and more and more the tissue of lies is being revealed. This apocalypse (revealing of things previously hidden) is the work of God, whose existence is proven by Creation and Scripture. Sorry, but life did not begin with a big bang. You did not evolve from apes. The universe isn't random. That is all conspiracy theory.
Yeah, and I remember flying in a 787 when I was a kid, too
Fact is people fly 12x as much, farther, and the aircraft stay at cruising altitudes more
Not that any of this sways you
you do know the government has produced decades of legislation for weather modification, yes?
1973-74 Weather Modification Regulation Act 93rd Congress
National Weather Modification Policy of 1976 94th Congress
H.R.2995 - Weather Modification Research and Technology Transfer Authorization Act of 2005 109th Congress
unlike the human trafficking and other criminal rackets we are trying to expose, weather modification is an open 'secret'. follow the money. here's a small sample of funded projects collated by the Harvard, Solar Radiation Research Program: from 2008-2018.
what would happen if people were aware of these stratospheric aerosol injection, solar radiation management, and Bill Gates dimming the sun "research" programs happening right over their heads in real time?
you're right, the term "chem trails" is designed to make it look sketchy -- similar to the C_A's propagation of the label "conspiracy theorist" on those questioning the establishment-approved JFK narrative.
the real third rail topic is how do we 'explain away' the fact that it was Trump who signed the first 'official' direct Fed funding, MIT Technology Review reported:
these have been sampled at altitude, analyzed, and shown to be nucleating nanoparticles, the same formulas identified in geoengineering patents.
Shouldn't you be discussing your views on a conspiracy site?
The AirForce literally wrote a paper on it..
http://www.dickatlee.com/issues/environment/climate/mod/pdfs/USAF_weather_force_multiplier.pdf
The concept of dew point temperature and adiabatic cooling is like writing on the side on an alien spaceship to these peeps.
You think chem trails aren't real. Dude, you are very close to getting deported. You might want to catch up there buddy.
Deportation for thinking..........Orwellian!
You sure you are on the right board?
Hmmm. Does sound like you are shutting down discussion with a number of preconceptions.
how about we not censor anyone on here? were not the left.
Psy-op meant to divide the truther community. Is it working?
Only on retards.
Here John brennan talking about it https://youtu.be/tk5u5OPlaEo
We are apart of a group called GreatAwakening. Most will be awakened to things they could hardly ever imagine. Some are already awakened to things they thought unimaginable. Maybe you’re not there yet with this part of awakening. Honestly, most aren’t because they let their ego get in the way, leading them to tell others they are wrong causing them to narrow their thinking resulting in stagnant growth.
How can you be so certain that centuries of everything you mentioned is trustworthy when we are living through an authoritarian hell, led by satin worshipers, that have been doing this for centuries? They have infiltrated all aspects of life as we know it.
"Unless we're just in the matrix imagining this discussion is even happening, I suppose."
youre getting warmer 👍
"the truth would put 99% of people in the hospital"
youve got a long way to go bud
seems like... you dont belong here 🤔
I used to think chemtrails were nonsense but it's looking more and more true. https://youtu.be/rAxXyMAmBMs
The flat earthers seems to have led to the mudflood/Tartaria truthers, which is pretty cool, imho.
have they been posting here? All I ever see are covid posts, and we can never have enough of those...
Well the thread is literally bait, did you think they would not post there?
I rarely see it in the comments on other threads, but I don't usually read the comments in a lot of threads.
I don't know, I don't care about the subject so I just ignore it. If you want to debate t take it up with the ones talking about it. If it wasn't for your thread I wouldn't have clicked on catsfives thread either.
While I would normally agree with you, I would have to say, 1/....if you have a cogent, well thought out argument, I will listen (at least). 2/..Official."Science" has lost ALL credibility these last 2 years.
Yes - MORE CENSORSHIP! Look at possibly go wrong with that!
😂
Just for an outside perspective...
Q's teachings largely focus on the notion that mostly everyone in authority is not only lying to you, but doing so in a coordinated fashion to shape a false reality in a very drastic way.
However, Q was pretty light on applying those principles to any specific situations. Q followers will take Q's philosophy and try to apply it far beyond what Q ever did.
For instance, Q never really mentioned vaccines, at least not in such a way as to indicate how enormous COVID and the vaccination situation would become. He never directed you to believe that COVID and the vaccination was some sort of Deep State plan, or that Trump's position was somehow a 5D chess move designed to thwart said plan. Q never mentioned anything about vaccines or a virus when describing the Plan.
So all those vaccine and COVID theories that make up the bulk of the posts here?
That was almost all you guys. That was you applying the "trust nobody in authority, all information is compromised, there is a secret war and we have a convoluted 5D plan to win it" philosophy to a situation that Q never really talked about. You took a lesson and applied it to a novel situation.
Doesn't it make sense that different people would try to apply those principles to different established facts from different authorities? That perhaps some people will reject different evidence than you reject in following Q's teaching?
Many times when I talk here, the evidence I provide is dismissed as compromised or part of some black hat disinformation campaign. The information came from the authorities, so it's obviously a lie.
Flat Earthers think the same thing about the concept of photographs "proving" the roundness of the Earth.
Believers in the adrenochrome theories think the same thing about any chemical analysis of real adrenochrome.
Chemtrail believers think the same thing about any chemical examination or natural explanation of contrails.
9/11 truthers think the same thing about any mainstream analysis of the wreckage.
And so on and so forth. Some of you reject some evidence, and others reject other evidence.
Which is why I suspect there are so many different variations of Q followers out there. GAW is definitely the biggest I'm aware of (at least that's organized, unlike 8kun), but in groups isolated from here, you see different sorts of evidence accepted and rejected (such as the JFK crowd in Texas). Every Q group that believes wildly different things is still justifying it by saying that everyone is lying, and there are almost no established facts that you can trust.
So I suppose the question would be this: Does this board enforce Q's philosophy, or does this board believe that Q endorses a certain set of facts that lead to only a few different alternate theories of reality?
That was great insight
I agree, great insight. We we’re all awakened by something different.
Why would he mention vaccines? THE SHOT HEARD ROUND THE WORLD.
Q didn't have 'teachings,' he directed teams of autists where to dig
This board enforces a few things but staying rubber side down is #1
I'm sorry you feel that way. I personally have a hard time trusting any research conclusions I've come to without engaging with perspectives that disagree with me. Research has always required conflict between different interpretations of evidence.
Again, I'm sorry you feel that way, and feel that attitude is going to cause you far more problems with creating a welcoming environment for normies than any posts about flat earth will.
Not really a moral high ground, no. People here just have a tendency to assume that if I don't wilt in the face of the evidence once I see it, and am not convinced by your interpretation of that evidence, then I must be a troll.
Which I think is what many people here think a Great Awakening actually is. That the only difference between you and me is that you've seen the evidence, and that I haven't. That all it'll take is for people to watch the videos you did and read the articles you did, and that 94-96% of the population will be converted.
Which is a bad assumption to make of me, or of any newcomer to this site.
You won't find a single post from me being disrespectful, calling you crazy, or anything of the sort. I have always participated here in good faith and on friendly terms.
If this is still considered "troll" behavior to you and worthy of being ignored or attacked on that basis, then consider that perhaps Flat Earth isn't what's causing issues in interacting with normies.
So you want to censor speech? I think we should start swinging the ban hammer on values that don’t align with our movement. One of those being unnecessary censorship of speech. As any other off topic posts, they should be moved to the correct .win, not censored or banned. Mistakes can be forgiven.
which is weird considering Q outright said the earth is not flat, and we are on a Q forum. seems thats the ONLY q post that you are allowed to disagree with here
go back to reddit! we dont want your kind here
https://archive.org/details/ElanaFreelandUnderAnIonizedSkyFromChemtrailsToSpaceFenceLockdown2018Pdf/page/n7/mode/2up
I don't care if the earth is round, flat, a rhombus, a taurus, on a sea-turtle's back flying through space, a 3D hologram in a computer, under a dome or anything else, there are far more pressing situations that we can address so I agree that flat earth talk belongs on conspiracy.win or reddit or myspace or somewhere else than here.
What about if the Earth was shaped like a giant fallus? I would want to know !
You are still correct. More pressing matters are at hand.
They always flood in here when we're over the target on something and then vanish again after a few days so I assume that most are Fedboi accounts. I'm only met one actual flat Earther ever and I had to stop talking to them for a while as it was just moving the goalposts type crazy not a single logical argument.
So It's not just me. Although the ones I notice have some ideas about something Q actually mentioned, and have taken them to a degree that makes the flat earth seem reasonable: and they can't be argued with because "Q said."
I just tell them; travel to the ice wall, or explain to me how timezones function on a flat earth.
Do one of these and prove it (they cant, and wont)
This is what ZerroDeFex and I are feeling above. The alternate science posters and thread hijackers are a type of troll. Things looking tense in Khazakhstan? Quick, find a volcano going off and argue that it is a false flag.
There's a great example. Research related to HAARP has gone on for many years. Anyone can search patents and fill up a hard drive with info. Can it be proven that it influenced the weather in any particular instance? No. You can hardly even prove the weather did some of the things it did, unbelievable storms have been happening for years. But it brings out a conversation of sorts and it ties up more peoples' time if they choose to step in it.
fuck heads always resort to censorship.
I hate to tell you, but "ignoring centuries of actual science, physics, math etc is simply anti-reality" is exactly right.
We HAVE been living in a masonic "anti-reality" for at the very least a few hundred years. We are like infants waking up from a long nightmare concerning our distorted understanding of history, health, science, time, and space.
I don't know the exact shape of our realm, but questions like these and questioning established "science" is absolutely needed.
Sorry OP. Don't agree with the censorship. Ignore them. They'll go away.
If the Earth was flat, cats would've knocked everything off of it by now.
Hey you noticed the GIANT FORUM SLIDE that’s been going on!
I want to help but got banned for deporting too many people.
Chemtrails are real ask your buddy Bill gates
And questioning authority is one thing but ignoring centuries of actual science, physics, math etc is simply anti-reality - absolutely ridiculous.
Lol, you're in for a rude awakening over the next few years. Buckle up bud
Just a reminder: 2 years ago you thought politicians and doctors were legit ;)
Ah damn, I just came back to change that...but you caught me. I'm picking fights and I'm not sure why, lol.
For the record, I'm not a flat earther and actually mostly agree with your post when taken in full. That title tho, lol
The earth is relatively spherical but chem trails are real. Much being researched and paid for by Billy Gates.
Flat earthers and chem-trailers are not really causing a problem, are they?
Flat-earth is ridiculous
Chem-trails seems extremely unlikely to me, but I don't think we need to ban them at this time.
Where is the "dislike" button when you need it. Tyrants of any sort are not welcome here.
Ask yourself a simple question, what could you do to a mind if you warped reality from birth? Could you then easily hide everything else? Open your mind. The things you make fun of the most and dispel are the very things THEY don't want you to look at. I have a simple rule, if its censored or ridiculed, it's probably true.
CHEMTRAILS ARE REAL, FLAT EARTH IS NOT. SHIT-TONS OF PROOF ABOUT CHEMTRAILS, EVEN BRENNAN ADMITTED IT IN THE PRIVATE SECTOR. Flat earth has no proof, just camera tricks and misplace conclusions. curvature of the earth, it was a variable to overcome for the drone program... sending a signal around the globe by bouncing from satellite to satellite to overcome the curvature of the earth. In a vacuum, water forms a sphere... track the path of the sun across the earth, then try to claim the earth is flat.
People who want to ban flat earth make me think it is a thing.
To be honest I kind of lean towards just mocking the living piss out of them.
This may come in handy on your travails:-
(https://media.communities.win/post/QnMqTgLLVoio.jpeg)
It's like shooting fish in a barrel.
Who says what shape the earth is except that it’s a circle?