New post from the @Q account on Truth who may or may not be Q decide for yourselves I’m just sharing for those who don’t have access to the app yet
(media.greatawakening.win)
🧐 Research Wanted 🤔
"Is this the real Q?"
The question you should instead be asking yourself is: Would a social media site built literally by Donald Motherfucking Trump, for the sharing of truths no less, featuring an IMPOSSIBLE-TO-GET single character username, that somehow just so happens to be the letter 'Q' (of all things), that then gets brought to people's attention NOT organically but by Devin Fucking Nunes (of all people), for an account that was created on a date -- the letters of which add up to 17 -- and that too PRIOR TO the creation of the account of the literal motherfucking owner of the said platform...
... do I even need to say anything more STILL???
How many "coincidences" before mathematically impossible?
This! 👆
The funny thing is, even if the (Truth Social version of) Q never confirms that this account is indeed them, [as they've already said "NO comms made outside this platform" (are to be considered legit) previously]...this STILL doesn't stop the owner of the account itself from redpilling and truth-bombing left, right, and center.
And if someone from the MSM openly calls out team Truth Social on giving the "dangerous QAnon" a platform, they can straight up call out their lie and link them to the comm made by Q which outright denies the legitimacy of any outside comms.
But alas, the MSM can't ask that question (and risk receiving that answer) because then, they would actually have to LINK PEOPLE to comms from their own biggest enemy, the notorious "QAnon."
Damned if you do. Damned if you don't. Plausible deniability 5D chess checkmate for the win.
Agreed! Read this ABOVE ALL doomers and shills! No outside comms in my opinion means that anyone claiming to have inside knowledge and communication with Q was FAKE. It’s perfectly understandable that Q WOULD be on TS.
It is, but Q also knows that we need proofs, and he knows how to deliver them.. we're waiting Q
this is the first thing this Q has written that actually sounds like old Q tho
Please format your posts even more
To be fair the format flair really helps the voice in my head emphasize the right syllables
Correct me if I'm wrong, and sometimes I can be, but didn't the Pepe memes START on 4 Chan or 8 kun or whatever? And Truth's hosting server is named "Pepe". Would that not indicate Truth's connection to that original board thus making it internal site COMMs?
Pepe is a transcendant-archetype meme, he is essentially an Internet everyman. The meme grew in 4chan but by now is much bigger.
It's not the strongest comm by itself, to me it seems like more of a cutesy in-joke.
Pepe was popularized on 4chan back in the day
Didn’t Trump post on that format only once as Pepe years ago?
Pepe started not only on the chans but also reddit before it was sold.
I sense mockery.
You must also consider the February 9th, 2022 creation date and the February 9th, 2019 delta on post 2677 with the comment -- "Its time to return publicly".
Too many coincidences not to take it very seriously. Confirmation is needed even so.
And the fact that this was well before Truth was opened to public access and the account was created BEFORE both Trump and Nunes
Also Q's reference in post 998:
The "Chair" serves the Master. Who is the Master? P = C. Q
This Truth Social Q account also invoked the "P".
https://qagg.news/?read=998
The dilemma for me is that whoever created the account would know all these things also.
I think I'll just continue to practice discernment until there's confirmation - ideally the original Q account will confirm using the official tripcode
Oh yea I am keeping an eye on it but a discerning eye. One thing I have learned over the last 7 years is to be skeptical about everything.
Any bets on how soon the MSM "proves" the account is "linked" to Ron Watkins or that idiot actor-shaman?
Also it is Feb 9 = 2 9 = 119 (911). 2022. There is a 11 11 11 11 in there. Taking back there symbolism.
29 does not equal 119
If it did, I could then also say 29 = 245 or 1145, or 254 or 1136, or almost any number I wanted to highlight as being meaningful
It's "2 convenient" :)
We can take numerology to any extreme and I'm not for that. But 29 does break down clearly to 1+1+9. If you want to flash 911 to people, 29 does the trick.
I'm way too much of a moron to have planned all this math out years ago 😂😂 glad there's smarter minds trying to rescue this country than me
u/#correct