Judge unseals 400 pages - clearing way for Pfizer whistleblowers!!! Is this the start of the MOAB?
(www.opensourcetruth.com)
⚠️ Vax-TYRANNY ☠️
Comments (34)
sorted by:
Interestingly enough someone posted yesterday a lady's tweet (I'll see if I can find it) that stated the CDC was either going to come clean with something on 3/10 or risk whistleblowers from the CDC coming forth 3/11. At the very least it's curious timing.
That post (I think it is still stickied) is what got my eyebrows raised about this article.
Trying to find those docs now. Curious if it will be a race to come clean before someone gets caught.
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/78003/000087666122000258/xslF25X02/primary_doc.xml
Or https://www.sec.gov/edgar/browse/?CIK=78003&owner=exclude
So is Pfizer requesting to be delisted from the NYSE?
Dated March 7, 2022
What would that entail? Basically buying back all of their shares? People should fucking HODL if that's the case. Make them buy them back at 5 and 6 digits. Save Gamestop for phone number-prices and above.
Yea right buy back. They’ll just transfer assets and then file for banksruptcy. This ain’t their first rodeo.
If anything shorting Pfizer would be the way to go. I have never shorted anything so I don’t know how it works.
My limited understanding is that shorting only works if you don’t own the stock… basically you pay a fee to someone with the stock to borrow thier shares for, let’s say 30 days. You then sell for less the value betting the value will fall even more than that, so you profit when you buy back the shares to return to the original owner at the end of the 30 days.
You need a brokerage account with options enabled. I had mine turned off so I don't get tempted and wind up with a 5-figure margin call.
That’s what I don’t want to either. And that’s why I don’t play but from my limited previous research options are different from margins. But either way. Don’t want to risk it.
Public protection? I worked for a small publicly traded company and nothing was sacred there. I’d assume this is them trying to find ways to avoid exposure
No. There is a bond that matured in 2022, and is fully paid off. So it can't be traded anymore. Lol at the line on the form "description of security." If it said class a stock, this would be a big deal. But it lists a bond that's already paid off, so no biggie.
Don’t kid yourself. The FDA, CDC, NIH, DARPA, BIG PHARMA, etc. all knew the records were false. They didn’t care, but only cared about their NWO agenda.
That’s why it takes Awakening to remove them. They will still deny after their last breath from hanging.
Ironic name.
Hopefully I want to see the leftist orcs meltdown.
“I may have gotten Myocarditis, facial paralysis, blood clots, hives, VAIDS, but at least I didn’t die!!!”
"Myocarditis is a potential side-effect of the vaccine, here's why that's a good thing."
“ oh yeah and I still got covid … twice”
Yet.
I do think the meme where the vaxxed is gone and the unvaxxed has a Santa hat on is still valid, probably this year or the next year.
I love that meme.
Remind me what happened on April 13th?
Ohhh. Thanks.
Think I found exhibits, not the actual complaint.
The United States is suing Pfizer and Ventavia with her?
Am I reading that right? What does ex rel mean?
According to the linked sauce from opensourcetruth.com, the DoJ declined intervention. So Jackson is on her own. After her lawyers quit in October, Barnes Law has picked up the case.
Does anybody actually read the source info anymore?
I normally don’t because the last few times I’ve tried it’s been sketchy sites with massive amounts of clickbait ads. Should’ve read this one.
Interesting that the DOJ reserved the right to intervene later.
https://www.qwant.com/?q=legal+term+ex+rel&t=web
So I did Google that correctly.
The UNITED STATES is suing Ventavia?? Because Jackson gave them info about shenanigans??
And Psaki et. al are still hawking vaccines??
Dude what the fuck the U.S. is suing Pfizer for misrepresenting the safety of their vaxx. They’re saying it’s not safe at the same time they’re pushing it
My head feels like it’s become jelly
I need a lawyer to explain what this actually means. Because the US declined to intervene in the civil suit, but it says the suit is the US suing Ventavia off of info from Jackson?
Original Article: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/judge-evidence-pfizer-whistleblower-lawsuit/
Exhibits: https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/21207246/exhibits-in-jackson-v-ventavia.pdf
Awesome you found the exhibits. I think these may be worthy of their own thread.