GME gonna do a stock split! Good bye Hedgies.
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (75)
sorted by:
Buy, drs, hodl. Gmerica. MOASS.
I pledge allegiance to the United Apes of Gmerica
DRS my 12 shares, it ain’t much but it’s a honest days work…lol
Soon you’ll have more 😉
I have 5 locked up. Every little bit counts.
A split by itself doesn't change the intrinsic value of a stock. There are actually several reasons a company may decide to split...threat of delisting, an effort to make a low-priced stock appear more "worthy" of ownership, etc., etc.
-Stock splits always indicate confidence from the management, that the price will hold or go up in the future.
-Stock splits lower the price of one and therefore widen the range of potential buyers
-A lower stock price makes incentive programs for employees easier to implement (more granular stock options)
-A lower stock price considerably lowers the barrier of entry for options and therefore could lead to a more active option trading
Generally speaking, stock splits increase the value once the dust settles.
I think your statement would only be valid in a rising market perhaps. I can find examples of stocks that fell after splits. My only point was to clarify what some people misunderstand about stock splits. The split, in and of itself, does nothing to the actual intrinsic value. It's all about perception, and, in some cases, the company hopes by doing so that it will change the perception of the stock in a positive light.
Your statement would be more accurate to say, "...stock price generally increases FOLLOWING a split, once the dust settles." Semantics, but important...
It is NOT stock split. Read some superstonk threads jesus.
Why would I read a superstonk thread? I don't care about trading GME...
I have to ask. Then why are you here?
I am here because someone posted a potentially-inaccurate statement about stock splits, especially if it was read by a newbie. I was a professional futures trader, and I only offered a clarification about splits. Then, the rest of you started throwing rocks like you always do. I have a lot of helpful knowledge I could share about trading, but this is not the way to get it...
You are so ignorant you don't even know GME is part of the Q plan and with loopring foundation of the new decentralized financial markets.
I know quite a bit more than you realize.
Somehow you missed this important piece..
I wouldn't go lecturing people about what Q's plan is.
"Don't sell till the price looks like a phone number."
👍
If you think GME is 1.25x short, you're very naive. We've read the DD, we know how short it is. You'll find no purchase here. Nice try though.
If you own GME and AMC shares that are direct-registered via Computershare, and if you own several pounds of physical silver which you hold in your hands, it seems like you're well-removed from fiat.
I have encouraged many to do the same, as well as packing freezers and pantries, etc.
Get some seeds too, just in case.
I never though of it as pou do but now that I calculate my Oz to lbs, I have enough to bust a decent workout with hahahaha nice!
Does silver swing wild enough to make you a multi-millionaire in a few weeks? Because that's what happened to Viking Kitty / DeepFuckingValue - the guy named Keith Gill who testified before congress last year. Owns 100,000 shares, worth over $15 million dollars. We're looking for what's called fuck-you money.
I’ve tried explaining to people exactly why the GME stuff is bullshit.
I’ve pretty much stopped. It’s always “To the moon!” like that’s actually a thing.
They have no understanding how shorts work. No understanding of the actual math behind it. No understanding how options come in to play and worse, conflate options interests as actual shares vs interest in shares (or lack of depending on your side of the trade.)
A split literally changes nothing. It’s the same math distributed amongst whatever the split numbers is. 1 becomes 5, 1 becomes 7, at a cheaper price. Now even more retards can afford to “HODL” (spell the fuckin word right, have some respect for yourself) “STONKS” letting the shorts out slowly over time.
That’s the game when you get stuck in a short. The split makes the game easier.
Price increased on no news earlier in the week; price is down right now even with positive news. Tell me the entire thing is manipulated without actually saying so.
Hedgies didn't cover. Hedgies r fukt.
Yeah, you really made your case here.
It's okay, you can get a non-hedge fund job later on. You can stop spreading FUD now. Nobody believes it anymore.
Too the moon!
Don’t make a clown of yourself voluntarily.
This is the way.
So what does this mean for somebody that knows nothing about the jewish stock market?
Simply put, big, multi-billion dollar hedge funds have been doing shady shit to line their pockets. They identified a business that wasn't doing too well a few years ago (Gamestop), and started short selling it. That means selling shares of the company that they don't own. They "borrow" a share, sell it for $50, then when the price drops they say, "Aw, that's too bad," and buy it back for $20 and return the share to the rightful owner.
Some people notice this and said, "Hey, this is kind of evil. We should stop this." We go on buying up every share we can. We shop at the store to improve their sales. We vote in shareholder meetings, taking an active role in trying to turn the company around. Now, Gamestop has introduced a motion to release more shares as a dividend to current shareholders. So if you own shares, they just give you more. We still have to vote on it at the next meeting, but I know I'm voting yes.
You see, there's strong evidence that some of these firms have been naked shorting. That means selling borrowed shares without borrowing one first. Imagine selling a Camaro when you don't actually have one. Then you have to find one before the dude comes to pick it up. It's wildly illegal, but as long as you can find the car and never get caught, you're fine.
This dividend is going to expose who actually has shares of the company. If you own shares, you get the dividend. If somebody sold you the car, but didn't actually have the car to sell, you get squat. If they don't want to lose their entire business, they have to deliver those cars to the people they promised them to before the dividend drops. If it was a cash dividend, they could just pay it themselves to keep up the illusion, but this is a stock dividend. These are extra shares coming straight from the company. You can't fake that.
The demand for shares is going to skyrocket. The price will go up. If they can't make good on their promises, the government can start liquidating their assets to pay off the people they screwed.
This is the way.
Sounds good. Thanks.
This is the way.
When this company crashes - it's going to take down a lot of people.
I have nothing against GME, but their business model is as outdated as BlockBuster Video was. Games are bought, in mass, from places like Amazon, Walmart and through online distribution hubs such as Steam.
A store dedicated to selling new games, and buying used games at pennies on the dollar, is not a growth company. But, it's your money.
That's the old business model. Gamestop is growing and changing. They're expanding product lines with the goal of becoming a one stop shop for all things pertaining to geek culture. Video games, consumer electronics, trading cards, licensed apparel, novelty gifts; the list is endless. Like it or hate it, nerds will drop stupid amounts of money on things they love. BlockBuster failed to change with the times. Gamestop, under their new leadership, is not making the same mistake.
I understand your point, but every comic book store does exactly the same thing. They are seldom in business more than a decade.
Best of luck to you and GME. I just do not believe in their business plan
Blockbuster, Sears,.. was naked shorted to the ground by same people who tried do this to Gamestop. They got their people in these companies (hired consultant from certain company or even got their CEOs there) to erode them gradualy from within by making bad decisions. It's worse than you think. Check some DD on superstonk and you will be amazed how corrupt everything in financial markets really is.
And we found out about Boston Consulting too. Hedgies r fukt.
Think bigger. Just look at Gamestop's website. They're even selling kitchen appliances now, and since Ryan Cohen bought such a huge stake in Bed, Bath, & Beyond, there's speculation that they'll be expanding their offerings even more in the home goods area.
The prevailing theory is that Cohen is trying to rival Bezos. He wants to build an alternative Amazon that features brick and mortar stores in addition to e-commerce.
^^^. This is new information. It's presenting convincing data, it's showing that the GME method of doing business is revolutionizing itself.
Congratulations, this is how you win the hearts and minds; unlike others who used the "tried and true" liberal method of attacking anyone who dares question the narrative (while they bitch about this method used on them with COVID) - you saw an opportunity and rose to the occasion.
My compliments, you have presented something to think upon.
Someone has been paying 0 attention lol. Keep shoving cash under your mattress… because that’ll last forever
Best of luck to you. I will invest elsewhere.
Some people rush to where the puck is; I opt to go to where the puck is heading
If you’re okay with making suboptimal returns, go for it!
What happens if I don't DRS? I plan to but not sure all the pros or cons. I have xx in TD Ameritrade and 1 share at CS.
Your positions will be force-closed at broker's will, citing "your safety" or "unprecedented volatility" or some similar BS.
You have already signed your approval hidden in the fine print at the time of creation of your account, you just don't realize it.
This is not true. If that was the case, it would defeat the theory behind MOASS. If shorts can just “erase” their positions, what’s stopping them from not only force closing their synthetics but also force closing their short positions and failures to deliver?
While some brokers MIGHT force close and DRS IS the way, ALL shorts must cover at whatever price is deemed acceptable by the shareholder.
I'll sell my first share for $690,420.69. After that, I'm holding until they're phone numbers.
I’ve been in this bitch from the beginning, I’m not letting go… I might skip MOASS all together lol, I’ve become too attached to my shares
Not shorts, brokers. That is why I am 100% DRSed..
Sauce?
/r/superstonk
There is propaganda and then there are the laws of finance. Barring an outside force (congressional legislation saving them) you are about to witness the liquidation of hedgefunds into the hands of the GME shareholders who own DRS shares through computershare.com. I think for the most part all of us invested understand this risk and are willing to lose the investment vs bringing the entire, corrupt, diseased temple down upon them - it’s gonna be biblical.!
If shortfucks burn it will be good outcome. If we could use big wins to push schools from indoctrinating children or even create new schools (not indoctrinating facilities) that would be great.
r/GME and r/Superstonk are worth looking at. They've been putting out professional-level presentations for over a year now, ever since the January sneeze last year. It's the kind of research that takes teams weeks to put together.
r/silverbugs
Lol Silverbugs is whack. Every time I went there they were scoffing at the notion of squeezing the banks and were mostly simpletons admiring shiny trinkets and silver platters. Wallstreetsilver is where the based apes roam.
Was adding to the comment on propaganda. That whole sub is devoted to limited pours at 2X+ spot.
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/03/31/gamestop-shares-soar-10percent-as-company-plans-stock-split.html
But wouldn't the split weakens the shares and now that they're more shares wouldn't the banks have more shares to cover for the fake shares? IDK, their is a problem of people holding having even more shares. Can anyone explain?
No because every shareholder’s shares would have to multiply. So let’s say for simplicity’s sake that there are 1,000 investors all hodling 100 shares, but the true float is only 75K. If every single share was to be multiplied by say 7, there would be 700,000 floating around despite the true float of 525,000. But how can that be if there’s only 75K shares to split?? Synthetics are the only way, and if that’s the case hedgies would have to close their synthetics in order to get the “real” shareholders their 7/1 shares. And by real shareholders… there’s no way to tell because technically every shareholder is a real shareholder (outside of DRS). There’s no way to identify synthetics and thus why the float MUST be reduced to the original 75K.
But because they’re synthetic AND short, you get MOASS.
Thank you, I could not wrap my head around the issue. I was getting lost in the mechanics. Really thanks, it's not my wheelhouse and I just don't have the tool set to understand the mechanics of what was going on.
Absolutely fren!! It’s intentionally made difficult and entangled to keep us out. I was a smooth brain a year ago, and still am, but I’ve gained a wrinkle or two.
And then we all go to the moon.
Is the moass BEFORE the split? Or after? Theoretically
Who can say. Assuming the DD is proven correct, it could happen leading up to the split and after
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=98qw86DsdZ0
Yes, april money showers. Double meaning exists.
We used the capitalism to destroy the crony capitalism