If the government must remain centralized, then I vote for Texas, Florida or one of the central Plains states. But, I doubt that it is necessary to have a single Federal Capital. Spread out the essential agencies and branches of a much-reduced-in-size government among conservative states where it makes the most sense. Stay away from large cities.
I'd say South Dakota because geographically it's in the middle of the country and the people have got to be among the nicest in the world, but I don't want to poison it either. So I don't know.
Maybe even the SD badlands where there isn’t much else going on, so the arbitrary economy and infrastructure of the politicians wouldn’t interfere with existing farming and mining.
It's a good question but I prefer Australia One leader Riccardo Bosi's plan to end the importance of a Capitol where the government breeds corruption and lies.
Bosi's plan is to decentralize the government back into the districts and build many smaller cities rather than singe centers in each state.
This is a good idea in this day and age of Internet connectivity. There should still be a symbolic capital where the legislature meets for a few weeks a year, but all government services should be scattered across the country. Hell, put some of them in our far off Pacific Island territories and Guam. It would help their local economies. Each state should get an agency HQ for a different agency each.
Centrally located in US making it easier for citizens to go to the Capitol when necessary. Trump said they also have enough land out there to have what would be needed for security. He also said it should be something built much more majestic and beautiful with the mountainous background. Pastel colored marble etc.
It was early days when the capital was put in DC when everybody lived nearby.
Florida is having the same issue with their capital in Tallahassee, all the way North of a long peninsula state. It was built when Jacksonville and St Augustine and Pensacola were the populated area.
The suggestion of Orlando keeps coming up as it is centrally located, so that citizens have access to their capital in Florida and don't have to drive from Miami to almost Georgia!
Gitmo.
LOL
u/#jail
No Capitol. Decentralize all of it so power can't ever concentrate again.
Right here, this one!
Detroit?
Perfect. Lots of vacant land, factories there. Make them sit in the ruins of industry that they themselves caused.
They are already in the freezing cold.
If the government must remain centralized, then I vote for Texas, Florida or one of the central Plains states. But, I doubt that it is necessary to have a single Federal Capital. Spread out the essential agencies and branches of a much-reduced-in-size government among conservative states where it makes the most sense. Stay away from large cities.
Central U.S.A.
Boring Nebraska
Missouri... somewhere the entire country can get to when they fuck up.
Oklahoma city. It's the central hub for America's highways. Making it a huge drug trafficking location.
Missouri or Kansas City would be best
Exactly my thoughts!
As long as the politician's are forced to move with the capitol, the Mariana Trench.
Lawn chairs --- in the middle of a big ass pasture on a gun range.
in a constitutional carry state.
Serve up some barbecue.
Cap Canaveral, so it’d be easier to throw corrupt politicians in orbit.
GTMO
KEK!
Hell.
I'd say South Dakota because geographically it's in the middle of the country and the people have got to be among the nicest in the world, but I don't want to poison it either. So I don't know.
Maybe even the SD badlands where there isn’t much else going on, so the arbitrary economy and infrastructure of the politicians wouldn’t interfere with existing farming and mining.
Oklahoma city.
Kansas City has my vote
Antarctica
As far away from my home as possible.
Somewhere in the swamps of the south. If they want tunnels, they will have to work hard to get them in the swamps.
Downtown Chicago.
Death Valley
Lincoln Nebraska
IOWA, or whatever state is right in the middle. Seems only fair.
davey jones locker....
It's a good question but I prefer Australia One leader Riccardo Bosi's plan to end the importance of a Capitol where the government breeds corruption and lies.
Bosi's plan is to decentralize the government back into the districts and build many smaller cities rather than singe centers in each state.
This is a good idea in this day and age of Internet connectivity. There should still be a symbolic capital where the legislature meets for a few weeks a year, but all government services should be scattered across the country. Hell, put some of them in our far off Pacific Island territories and Guam. It would help their local economies. Each state should get an agency HQ for a different agency each.
Colorado as Trump suggested.
Centrally located in US making it easier for citizens to go to the Capitol when necessary. Trump said they also have enough land out there to have what would be needed for security. He also said it should be something built much more majestic and beautiful with the mountainous background. Pastel colored marble etc.
It was early days when the capital was put in DC when everybody lived nearby.
Florida is having the same issue with their capital in Tallahassee, all the way North of a long peninsula state. It was built when Jacksonville and St Augustine and Pensacola were the populated area.
The suggestion of Orlando keeps coming up as it is centrally located, so that citizens have access to their capital in Florida and don't have to drive from Miami to almost Georgia!
Alcatraz is already condemned........
Prudhoe Bay Alaska
Somewhere not heavily populated.
Like Appalachia Kentucky/WV
Or maybe in the middle of farm town USA
Somewhere lobbyists won’t follow and set up headquarters
Lobbyists will always follow and set up headquarters. The entire system must be changed.
Pigs will go where the slop is!