Author of Alice in Wonderland was a known pedophile.
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (57)
sorted by:
It gets worse.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=00WCEbKM_SE
The part with the Walrus and the Carpenter is an example of how you can create your own local Protestant Church in order to take in people and abuse them.
You make sure you don't inform the Carpenter of your intentions, and then carefully "boil and eat" the oysters whenever he is away.
So, you find a Preacher, have him set up a Church at your instruction, and then use the Church as a front to take in the oysters and rape/abuse them.
Draw the conclusions out a bit more, and you can see the potential in taking in homeless or desperate "orphans" by drawing them in under the auspices of charity and then rape and kill them to get rid of the evidence. There's no one to wonder when an orphan disappears.
Boil them in water and toss their remains into the ocean.
https://qalerts.app/?n=2918
u/#q2918
Sun and moon freemason symbolism too.
Yup.
Sun = Masculine
Moon = Feminine
In the opening of the story you see a clear separation of Masculine and Feminine.
Father and Mother being estranged offer the greatest opportunity to abuse a child. Destroy the nuclear family and the children will follow you (the cult/false church) in their place.
If the Father and Mother are too busy quarreling amongst themselves, the child is left to wander, filled with confusion and anger, which you can then come in as a devious comforter and offer ways to "make them feel good."
The sun and moon don't always imply child abuse, mind you. They are symbols, which can be used to represent a greater concept.
Snakes are not inherently Evil, but they do lend well to the concept of Evil, with their "fiery tongue" and "slithering nature."
The Sun is masculine because it works so that things may grow (think antiquity and agriculture).
The Moon is feminine because of her menstrual cycles, as well as how the moon's position and state has astrologically been used to denote the personality of your progeny.
In Freemasonry, the Sun and Moon typically symbolize the Light (Sun), which is perfect, and the Mirror (Moon) which can sometimes bear the Light of Perfection and sometimes hide its face and be as Dark as the night sky.
The Sun and Moon, then, represent the Conscious and the Subconscious mind.
What I'm trying to say here, is that context matters, but the nature of the subject matter being used to express the analogy/metaphor stays the same. The Actions of Things is the Law of Nature, which is cold and immutable.
oh sleepy dude. I'm so disturbed now.
If that's bad, then you definitely don't wanna learn the stuff that's been keeping me up at night lately.
And I have narcolepsy. I can sleep during a parade.
Recommend you lend your talents to DecodingSymbol's telegram
Alice decode:
https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2021/02/08/alice-wonderland-rabbit-comms/
Jell-O decode:
https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2021/10/06/cosby-jell-o-office-king-of-the-hill/
This site belongs to a guy that thinks we faked all the NASA missions because no one had enough fuel to get to the moon.
Because they'd be constantly thrusting.
Because momentum does not exist.
Love out of touch comments like this, means Symbols is Over The Target. He never says all NASA missions are fake. But the Moon Landing?
"Every major technological accomplishment in history is always repeated over & over again with rapid improvements. Consider:
And yet 40 years after man walks on the moon? Not a single person or country has followed, nor even attempted to do so! Does that not seem strange and illogical?
In some places the perspective on what happened is quite different than here.
07/27/2018 Only 24 percent of Russians believe that American astronauts landed on the moon https://sputniknews.com/science/201807271066736384-russians-polled-on-moon-landings/
So which country is right?"
-https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2021/02/04/decoding-truth-from-historical-lies/
I don’t necessarily disagree with your assertion about the moon, but your reasoning in this instance isn’t that great. There are still benefits from going to America, flying across the Atlantic, and launching satellites. There don’t seem to be as many benefits of going to the moon.
If we never went to the moon then we would be less familiar with the lack of benefits of going to the moon, and we would be more enticed to go there for the first time to see for ourselves. The fact that people haven’t been interested in going to the moon in about 50 years might indicate that they really did go there and confirmed it’s not worth going.
I’d guess that humans have been on the moon, as telescopes can see man-made items on its surface (unless you’re one of those ‘the-night-sky-is-fake’ types). The footage from Apollo 11 is fishy. The people who have theorized about a possible background matte painting that limits the distance of the rover might have a point. Also the low-g movement of people and the flag is sometimes strange. So maybe they went to the moon in the early 1970s but not in 1969. Or maybe they did make it there in 69 but didn’t like the footage, so they used some fake footage. I’m not sure.
No value. There's nothing there. Nothing we didn't put there, anyway.
Criticism means you're "over the target?" Then you're never wrong.
If people agree, you're right. If people disagree, you're Over The Target.
It's unfalsifiable. "There's no monster under the bed--meaning it's HIDING, which is just further proof of its threat!"
Specifically Protestant?
In this case, yes.
Anglican England at the time wouldn't permit Catholic elements to take hold, so I can't say with any certainty the author was including them.
I'm not saying the Catholics aren't free of the same sins, only that the Walrus has different facets if he were Catholic which are absent from the analogy. Papal elements are notably missing. Besides, making it overtly Catholic in theme would have ended up a little too on-the-nose and could have been considered throwing shade at the Catholic Church, which would have drawn too much attention from the anti-Catholic sentiments of the English people at the time. He wrote it around 1890, after all.
This is a much fairer take than I expected. Thank you.
I've just run into a surprising number of people here who are all "fuck the Luther heresy" or some such bullshit.
We can argue theology later. Right now, we've got a world to awaken.
My stance is that the moment all the people with enough disgust at the Catholic Church decided to leave instead of weed out the corruption, the fate of both sects was sealed. Division tactics were at play from the Cabal.
Those with enough gumption were convinced to get up and leave because "I can do it better!"
I can see Satan saying the same thing about God's Kingdom...
Meanwhile, the corruption they were disgusted at was real, and was then able to take over the garden unabated now that the honest gardeners went off on their own instead of discovering that the reason the weeds kept coming back was because the Adversary was there sowing them all along.
https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew+13%3A24-43&version=GNV
When all the good people leave something because it is rotting away, don't be surprised when the rot spills over into your greener pastures.
Catholics are wrong because they permit the corruption, using the excuse "the corruption is fine as long as we do more good than ill!" Hypocrites. Remove the beam from your eyes, that you may remove the splinters from your neighbors...
Protestants are wrong because they would rather replace something with another whenever it breaks down instead of repair it. This is a wasteful impulse that feeds our current condition in accepting cheap tat from China and then replacing it when it breaks down in less than a year because the product of slave labor is always cheaper than the cost of repair...
To accept we are sinners is the meaning of being Christian. You cannot clean yourself in a bath until you are willing to recognize your own stench and dirt built up under your nails.
This is probably more than you were expecting, but when I get on a roll I can't control the letter count. Just know, neither faction is in the right, because they have formed separate factions. If Satan's Kingdom cannot stand divided amongst itself, why then do we assume God's Kingdom should stand when divided? Until we combat the division tactics, Satan will always be one step ahead of our attempts. Unity through Jesus showed the path forward, if only we take him seriously.