If you do something to a pregnant woman that causes her to lose her baby in pregnancy then you can actually be charged for murder. My family was working on getting my cousin's loser ex charged for murdering the second baby because he beat her into the hospital.
What's the difference if the mom wants to kill the baby too?
You can't evict your dependent child from your house legally, you get charged for neglect. But mom can evict baby from it's purpose built growth environment that is part of every human life cycle?
It's illegal to sell human parts, but they can sell baby parts?
It's illegal to murder children, but they can c-section out babies, mature them outside the womb for 1 month or more then murder them for research parts because mom didn't want them?
Yeah that one, that last one, that's real. That's not an exaggeration.
Abortion is mostly done on black babies. Some might even say it’s black genocide. If you get an abortion you’re racist because you’re perpetuating black genocide.
Planned Parenthood was founded by Margaret Sanger, who advocated racial eugenics. It was indeed her idea to medically curtail the procreation of blacks.
They have always had it. It is called abstinence. But "better birth control" as a substitute for abortion---when abortion's goal was to prevent black births anyway? So, does this mean you are sympathetic to Margaret Sanger's objectives?
It is a well-known fact that once a society attains prosperity, the size of a family tends to grow smaller, as a proliferation of sons and daughters is no longer necessary to sustain it.
Third world people have lots in the hope that some may survive the dirty water starvation and look after them in their old age
No Sanger was a pos. But on the other hand to be force into having a baby you don't want ..possibly birth control method failed etc is against that person's free will and could potentially lead to abuse of an unwanted child .
It's usually men who state absolutes....they don't get to deal with the real problems...like men in frocks pronouncing upon this and that ....with absolutely no idea of reality
So...it is better to kill a child than to let it live under less than optimal conditions? This is a philosophy that would justify machine-gunning all the orphans. I am not sympathetic to this view, as something of the kind happened to my stepchildren.
Don't go lecturing about "reality" when all you can offer is death.
Don't be dramatic. It's not a child in the first month and you are a man. ..next lifetime you may be a woman...let's see how you feel when you already have ten underfed unhappy kids and learn another one is coming forced on you by an abusive husband ....reality...it happens
So, shoot all the orphans. Put them out of their misery. Your scenario is unrealistic. The large families in this country come from unwed mothers who pump them out so as to receive the Welfare stipends associated with them. There were large families in our past history, having nothing to do with poverty or abuse (sadly, prompted by the then high infant mortality).
At least you have shifted your argument from the welfare of the child to the personal convenience of the mother, which is all that it ever comes down to. In which case infanticide is just as legitimate---and is indeed being argued for in the curent discussion of the subject. By extension, any other murder might be legitimate if it is to the convenience of the murderer.
What also happens is that abusive husbands are sometimes put out of the woman's misery. I'm not sure if you think that is better than killing the child.
I decided a few months ago not to call it abortion any more, but to call it what it is... infanticide. It seems that the very term "abortion" is designed to hide the fact that it is a murder.
Im sure if planned parenthood calls the police (depending on how cucked the pd is) , they will tell the truck they have to leave (if not, arrest the driver [jan 6 style] and tow his truck to impound). Never works the other way around.
And every murderer including the parents who chose to do this and do not repent and come to Christ will receive their JUST rewards in HELL and JUSTICE on earth I pray.
These are souls, not unwanted "fetuses" or whatever evil terminology one uses to disguise this inconvenient fact.
Many libs I've come across believe in reincarnation ... so, what IF that was your own soul being "reborn" only to be exterminated? Thought libs hated violence? Yet, you wonder why most think of far leftism as a mental condition?
The constitution works for the freedom of speech to show those pics, but what about the pictured babies' freedom to live?
This WE MUST CONTINUE to BE a VOICE FOR
good. God Bless the parkers!1
If you do something to a pregnant woman that causes her to lose her baby in pregnancy then you can actually be charged for murder. My family was working on getting my cousin's loser ex charged for murdering the second baby because he beat her into the hospital.
What's the difference if the mom wants to kill the baby too?
You can't evict your dependent child from your house legally, you get charged for neglect. But mom can evict baby from it's purpose built growth environment that is part of every human life cycle?
It's illegal to sell human parts, but they can sell baby parts?
It's illegal to murder children, but they can c-section out babies, mature them outside the womb for 1 month or more then murder them for research parts because mom didn't want them?
Yeah that one, that last one, that's real. That's not an exaggeration.
Breaks my heart.
Abortion is mostly done on black babies. Some might even say it’s black genocide. If you get an abortion you’re racist because you’re perpetuating black genocide.
Planned Parenthood was founded by Margaret Sanger, who advocated racial eugenics. It was indeed her idea to medically curtail the procreation of blacks.
There has to b better birth control. I read it is easy to do...something to do with the navel. Women need reliable birth control
They have always had it. It is called abstinence. But "better birth control" as a substitute for abortion---when abortion's goal was to prevent black births anyway? So, does this mean you are sympathetic to Margaret Sanger's objectives?
It is a well-known fact that once a society attains prosperity, the size of a family tends to grow smaller, as a proliferation of sons and daughters is no longer necessary to sustain it.
Third world people have lots in the hope that some may survive the dirty water starvation and look after them in their old age
No Sanger was a pos. But on the other hand to be force into having a baby you don't want ..possibly birth control method failed etc is against that person's free will and could potentially lead to abuse of an unwanted child .
It's usually men who state absolutes....they don't get to deal with the real problems...like men in frocks pronouncing upon this and that ....with absolutely no idea of reality
So...it is better to kill a child than to let it live under less than optimal conditions? This is a philosophy that would justify machine-gunning all the orphans. I am not sympathetic to this view, as something of the kind happened to my stepchildren.
Don't go lecturing about "reality" when all you can offer is death.
Don't be dramatic. It's not a child in the first month and you are a man. ..next lifetime you may be a woman...let's see how you feel when you already have ten underfed unhappy kids and learn another one is coming forced on you by an abusive husband ....reality...it happens
So, shoot all the orphans. Put them out of their misery. Your scenario is unrealistic. The large families in this country come from unwed mothers who pump them out so as to receive the Welfare stipends associated with them. There were large families in our past history, having nothing to do with poverty or abuse (sadly, prompted by the then high infant mortality).
At least you have shifted your argument from the welfare of the child to the personal convenience of the mother, which is all that it ever comes down to. In which case infanticide is just as legitimate---and is indeed being argued for in the curent discussion of the subject. By extension, any other murder might be legitimate if it is to the convenience of the murderer.
What also happens is that abusive husbands are sometimes put out of the woman's misery. I'm not sure if you think that is better than killing the child.
based..
I’m crying seeing this. So unbelievably horrifying and heartbreaking!!! How can people not see this as murder?
I decided a few months ago not to call it abortion any more, but to call it what it is... infanticide. It seems that the very term "abortion" is designed to hide the fact that it is a murder.
Smart move. We should all call it what it is.
Im sure if planned parenthood calls the police (depending on how cucked the pd is) , they will tell the truck they have to leave (if not, arrest the driver [jan 6 style] and tow his truck to impound). Never works the other way around.
And every murderer including the parents who chose to do this and do not repent and come to Christ will receive their JUST rewards in HELL and JUSTICE on earth I pray.
There are no pro choicers. There is anti-life.
Wake TF up, "pro" choicers!
These are souls, not unwanted "fetuses" or whatever evil terminology one uses to disguise this inconvenient fact.
Many libs I've come across believe in reincarnation ... so, what IF that was your own soul being "reborn" only to be exterminated? Thought libs hated violence? Yet, you wonder why most think of far leftism as a mental condition?
Goddamn thats someone's child bro.
Someone's child? The mother herself hired someone to do that.
Liberals have convinced themselves it's just a "clump of cells".
Blood boils.
Looks P/S...... have you the link...?
WWG1WGA
No wonder they're angry. That is truly disturbing imagery.
I'm not sure why they would be angry when they say it's just a normal healthcare procedure, no different than getting a mole removed.
I pray this influences even just a few women to stop and think about the decision they are about to make.
That is one huge 3 dimensional 4 colour statement!
This looks poorly photoshopped, the billboard looks too bright clean perfect relative to the rest of the image