🧐
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (39)
sorted by:
Not only that but achieved that altitude after crossing a road and mainatining that for hindreds of feet.
Not possible.
Yeah. And they found seats and personal paperwork from passengers.
But no engines.
6000 lb aircraft engines 'burned up' in the fire. Engines make from high-temperature alloys?
Complete horseshit.
I work on Navy jet engines for a living. It's total bullshit that they wouldn't be able to find them. The most plausible thing is the engines weren't there in the first place. I believe in the disguised weapon as a plane theory, myself.
Have you seen the aerial video of the plane hit? (It's pretty obscure, will try to look for it) Anyway. it strongly appears as though it was a missile with how it accelerates in the final moments.
Side note on OP: That's with the engines roughly scraping the grass, not the wheels down height.
I haven't seen the aerial video, just the ones from the ground and the chopped up, missing frame video from the security shack.
This footage aired once after 9/11 - it's obvious why -
https://t.me/WeTheMedia/11096
I never saw this Thank you ! 911 was the day I truly woke up , I was a Bush Republican , met them , went to conventions , dinners etc , after watching him at that school and the other news for about 30 minutes I walked into my office, in my house, took down the framed signed photo of him , broke the glass ripped up his photo and threw in trash outside , I just knew !
YT link for easier downloading:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bbR5CzvdRkw
Never saw that video. Thanks!
At the time I got into many conversations about 911 and was considered a tinfoil hat by most conservative friends.
And, my local Walmart has like 100 cameras looking at the parking lot.... yet zero cameras caught a massive plane flying into one of the most secure places in the USA.
One bad gas station video is all the PENTAGON had? I don't think so.
They (FBI I guess) went to all the gas stations nearby and gathered all their security footage so none of it would leak out.
What happened to the actual plane, and more important, to the passengers who boarded the plane?
That has always been one of the more horrifying thoughts about 9/11 for me.
The planes were flown to Westover Airforce Base in MA … the passengers were selected to make the texts/phone calls at the right times, then they were all executed…
I really do believe this theory!
There was a flight attendant who figured it out. With her experience, she knew that the whole story was fishy. There was a phone interview with her on YT. She was able to track down where the planes landed, even. I watched it long ago, but I am sure it's long gone.
I did too, so I know you are correct! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7md2QzNsAe4
Yes, that's the video! Thanks!
There are a bunch of her podcasts/videos at:
https://www.spreaker.com/show/rebekah-roth-shows-show
The primary series is a 10-part (5 separate podcasts, 2 segments each) entitled, "(A) Flight Attendant Speaks on 9/11". VERY interesting.
Thanks for sharing!
911 was an inside job https://www.ae911truth.org/news/840-uk-filmmaker-alan-golding-on-making-the-unspeakable
...so far little has been done to disprove their opinion of "our" I.Q....
...hopefully that is going to change soon....
The truth ….
https://youtu.be/sZWSwssxUkY
Well apparently they think we are that stupid. I remember seeing the first pictures of it and knew, without being an aeronautical engineer, that it could not have come in at ground level, you know because of physics and stuff. However, aside from myself and husband, no one I know even questioned it, or exactly how it made such a nice neat hole with no airplane debris scattered around.
I think about it from an aerodynamics perspective. Think about the effect the plane would have on the air just above the ground. You have a plane coming down that would pancake that air, which would actually push the plane upward (if the pilot were truly trying to keep flat as opposed to diving). It creates an oscillating effect on the plane and would make it very hard to control.
You can even replicate this with your hand if you have a source of very fast moving air like a compressor hose pointed along a wall. If you semi-quickly approach your hand to the wall, but don't try to actually hit the wall, like the pilot not trying to hit the ground, you'll actually feel your hand press against the air and then your hand will lift off the wall for a moment.
Parking in rear
Did the plane hit the Pentagon horizontally like the picture? I assumed it would just hit diagonally from above. Can someone tell me what I am missing here?
The only video of the impact shows an object hitting the Pentagon low with a trajectory parallel to the ground, NOT a diagonal dive that crashes into the building like you would expect from a plane.
Logic destroys their narrative
We know it was a targeted missile!
https://www.defense.gov/News/Feature-Stories/story/Article/1939053/a-911-reflection-the-pentagon-in-photos/
Jet fuel = code for nano thermite 😉
Wtf is nano thermite?
Aluminum is pyrophoric at patricle size <10 micron.
Military-only material, found at the site -
"Germany's gulli.com Interviews Dr. Niels Harrit on Nanothermite at the WTC"
https://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2009/05/24/18597630.php
"High-Temperature Thermitic Reactions | Twin Towers"
https://www.ae911truth.org/evidence/high-temperature-thermitic-reactions
https://benthamopen.com/contents/pdf/TOCPJ/TOCPJ-2-7.pdf
Wild shit.
They vaporize the aluminum in an argon chamber.
Although I have to say that seems overkill. Regular thermite will burn through just about any building that exists today
If jet fuel can burn steel beams why don't aluminum airplanes melt when flown...
I don’t know about any of you but seeing the truth on 911 did nothing but set me back in life amongst the Normies :(