268
posted ago by CaptainQirk ago by CaptainQirk +268 / -0

Johnson and Johnson created one of the "vaccines".

This was at a rally for a television doctor.

Trump said that he'd see the guests "later".

I feel like maybe that's important.

Thoughts?

Further research: At around the one hour mark, he talks about Woody Johnson of "Johnson and Johnson", mentions he has a shit ton of cash, then mentions his wife Suzanne, and notes that she's from Ukraine.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woody_Johnson

He has supported RINO Republicans like McCain and Jeb, but then switched to Trump.

He was ambassador to the UK under Trump.

He described Jan 6 as "a dark day".

Okay, I'm starting to think maybe there's some truth to the idea that Trump is just highlighting Deep Staters, or that maybe he just knows how to get along with incredibly rich political opportunists.

Comments (114)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
23
Everydaypast 23 points ago +23 / -0

Not sure how relevant this is but ain't J&J one of the jabs that aren't full-out mrna treatments?

At the time, I thought the MSM coverage of J&J side effects during early stage of the pandemic was a cabal initiative to push off any alternative jab that ain't mrna.

24
ThisIsHowItStarts 24 points ago +25 / -1

Yes this is true Johnson and Johnson is not an mRNA vaccine. That’s why they’re hitting them hard and trying to get them shut down. It doesn’t fit the narrative, it doesn’t fit their plan, so they want to get rid of them.

9
AussieSpectator 9 points ago +9 / -0

In Australia we had only the j&j available for the first few months then we had the national mainstream scandal where the mainstream said they were dangerous because of blot clotting so we need to get the Pfizer ones asap.

So now all the normies here beg to get pfizer over any others, also pfizer is only given to people under 50 all the old people get J&J/astrazenica.

Make of it what you will. I for one find it strange that the establishment would for the 1st time say vaccines are dangerous (after decades of "harmless, safe and effective) only to promote the mrna vaccines as the solution.

4
Everydaypast 4 points ago +4 / -0

Exactly what stood out to me.

It was shocking that the MSM would be the first to present the "dangerous" idea that a vaccine could not be "safe and effective".

Which lead me to believe mrna was an important milestone for this scamdemic.

Ofc this could be part of a cabal show of playing both sides but I lean more towards my initial assessment.

2
Phishhed44 2 points ago +2 / -0

Interestingly you’d THINK that if the EU wasn’t cabal controlled they’d have cooked-up their own vaccine? Just goes to show…

1
ThisIsHowItStarts 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agreed

13
HardWorkinPatriot 13 points ago +13 / -0

It's not MNRAS, but my son got it for his job and he did not want the MNRA. He got sick after he got it, and he got quite sick about 4-6 weeks later. They said it was covid. The J&J is just another version of the bullshit fake vaccine.

9
JessWithTheMess 9 points ago +9 / -0

Thank you, we got people accepting this jab as possibly non-dangerous just because the CEO was at the rally.

13
Qlue 13 points ago +13 / -0

Imagine how wishy-washy a person must be to flip on the vaccines just because someone showed up somewhere.

5
horseyPatriot 5 points ago +5 / -0

Friends with medical and biochemistry advanced degrees have been researching the vaccines and Covid since the beginning. J&J causes body to produce spike proteins.

4
WentFishing 4 points ago +4 / -0

The J&J is mRNA, it just introduces mRNA in a different form. All of these mod shots are just slightly different (experimental) versions of the same evil. I'm sorry about your son, hope he is well.

4
flopperdog 4 points ago +4 / -0

Not endorsing the J&J, but I got it early on (April, 2021) with no side-effects thus far.

2
GetsTheNogginJoggin 2 points ago +2 / -0

It definitely has the lower side effect profile of the current options.

1
Phishhed44 1 point ago +1 / -0

Glad you’re ok Fren?

2
Everydaypast 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh don't get me wrong I'm not endorsing the spike protein riddled J&J in even the slightest but it seems like pushing mrna is an important objective for the cabal.

7
Scorpion76 7 points ago +7 / -0

Correct J&J wasn't MRNA.

9
bubble_bursts 9 points ago +9 / -0

No, but it uses Adenovirus, and encodes Spike protein genetically. As ar as I am concerned, its the same shit.

6
PhDinNY 6 points ago +6 / -0

That has been my understanding all along, that the "front end" of the shots may be different, the end result is essentially the same. For this reason, I won't get any of the shots, ever (especially considering that they were designed for the first version of covid), and I'll be 65 this year. (and I had covid, which is one more reason not to get any of the shots :) )

3
WentFishing 3 points ago +3 / -0

It uses mRNA inside an adenovirus modified with "Sars Cov-2" to introduces instructions on creating spike proteins via the mRNA in the adenovirus.

It was a lie that J&J is not mRNA, they just use an indirect system ( instead of the direct nano-lipid injections of the others. Nano-lipid meaning a hydrogel containing graphene oxide and Luciferese enzyme.

2
WentFishing 2 points ago +2 / -0

It uses mRNA inside an adenovirus modified with "Sars Cov-2" to introduces instructions on creating spike proteins via the mRNA in the adenovirus.

It was a lie that J&J is not mRNA, they just use an indirect system ( instead of the direct nano-lipid injections of the others. Nano-lipid meaning a hydrogel containing graphene oxide and Luciferese enzyme.

2
bubble_bursts 2 points ago +2 / -0

I vaguely remembered it was something like this, thanks for clarifying

2
WentFishing 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wrong, it introduces mRNA in a dirrent form.

https://www.livemint.com/science/health/how-is-johnson-johnson-vaccine-different-from-other-coronavirus-vaccines-11614678596482.html

This is just one random article of many. It was lie, like every other. See my other comments.

3
WentFishing 3 points ago +3 / -0

No, they are not "direct mRNA injections, nut introduce mRNA within modified adenovirsus. See my comment above Do not be fooled that these slightly different poisons are "safe".